#Problem Processing Request w/ graphql subscription on public api

34 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

idle martenBOT
#

Project ID: 5601a4f4-da8e-4978-9e2f-ac476d3cb851

patent osprey
#

5601a4f4-da8e-4978-9e2f-ac476d3cb851

limber dragon
#

i must ask, what is the usecase, im intrigued

patent osprey
#

making my own railway client!

limber dragon
#

do tell more

patent osprey
#

ok ok I will spoil the fun - I was looking through the careers page and you all mention the async project, where candidates build an app to spin containers up and down. I thought it sounded neat and wanted to build this myself. I want to add a few bells and whistles, so I thought I'd take a stab at graphql subscriptions.

also, I understand you probably have more pressing things to focus on so don't worry about the above if you don't have time. I just thought it was odd and could possibly be a bug so I wanted to reach out

patent osprey
#

nvm, got it 🙂

limber dragon
#

😦 and i was preparing code for you

patent osprey
#

aww man!!

#

well, your kindness has not gone un-noticed Brody!

limber dragon
#

thank you!

I wish you the best of luck!

#

!s

patent osprey
limber dragon
#

thats very nice, well done! now let me publicly view your logs kekw

subtle spade
#

I just redeployed your service

#

No need to thank me.

patent osprey
#

hehehe

subtle spade
#

cool project btw

patent osprey
#

didn't get to logs @limber dragon work has been crazy :/

#

ty!

subtle spade
#

did u have any graphql knowledge prior to this?

limber dragon
#

the reverse proxy is very interesting

subtle spade
#

I might do something similar

subtle spade
limber dragon
#

their site calls a reverse proxy that adds auth to the gql requests

#

and avoids cors

patent osprey
#

yea I'm not interacting with the public API on the client, yet on my backend

#

I'm using my account token for auth and I didn't want to leak that on the client 🙂

patent osprey
limber dragon
#

so could i make any request to the proxy and have it auth it for me?

patent osprey
#

yes 🫣 - I thought about adding another layer of auth between the client and server but didn't for the sake of time. the project requirements dictated a frontend and backend, and more-so made the backend to meet requirements

#

anyways I emailed Ian so hopefully I hear back prayge