#PHILOSOPHY CHANNEL
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
All of us deserve punishment because all of us are sinners beliving ing God and what he did for you saves you from punishment
One thing I like to think about
Does an infant or stillborn go to hell
They never had a chance to belive in god
nah, kids who don’t really have an inner thought or like “control” go to heaven
cause they never did anything bad if they can’t even really control their body
But all sinners go to hell and we’re born sinners
if yk what i mean
Moreover what about someone who hasn’t had the chance to understand the concept of religion
yes, however, it’s different for kids because they dont really have the capacity to understand anything
he’s not even real
It’s the concept
yeah, that’s why God tells us to preach so we can spread the good news
Ppl who have never been introduced to the idea
so we miss no one
So is it based on intent with knowlege or simply intent?
Like feral children have no concept of god
well.. you can’t really know God if you can’t even understand the concept of God
of religion
Because the stillborn is absolved because they don’t have the privilege of choice tet
pretty much
yes
pretty much
The point in kinda pushing is how much agency is involved in the choice
Even if you know god exists but you’re raped by a priest is it your fault for not believing?
yes because God shouldn’t be defined by the community or the people
God should be defined as he is
But then the church is an exercise in futulity
Because it’s god defined as community and people
Also then pagans
Or any religion
Can be god defined as he is
Wait no I guess the bible stops that
Religion is weird because there’s a justification for anything really
For me there’s too many holes to accept
Maybe there’s a divine creator but I doubt the bible is his word
Too vauge contradicory and obtuse
well it seems contradictory but it’s not if you look at context of the two texts
it seems vague but there’s a lot written, you just have to remember it’s translated and was written a looooong time ago
idk wdym by obtuse
If the point of the divine word of god is to convert non believers why would you make it so difficult to understand?
14 year old me could parse problems with the text and it takes a whole lotta justification to make it make sense
One hole I can get, I can chalk it up to god’s plan or whatever
But when there’s dozens of holes?
I can’t patch that
because what God wants us to understand isn’t really easy to understand or comprehend in the first place
there’s also a lot of false preachers/teachers
so it makes a little more complicated
Quite a few of em.
indeed
It’s easy to justify hard to solve. Maybe I’ll be a believer if things change but right now I have no incentive to convert again.
understandable
Imo there aren't really any contradictions in the Bible (I haven't researched this specific subject enough so maybe I'm wrong) but the contradictions mainly are with the people who supposedly believe in the Bible.
i mean the Bible also uses a lot of metaphors and a lot of contradictions are either cause one of them is a metaphor and the other means literally
and also context cause some contradictions looks like it’s contradictory until you read the context and it’s talking about something else than what the other text is talking about
But when literally everyone you know who say they're following the Bible are doing horrible things it kinda makes you not wanna follow the Bible.
One thing is the rules set in the bible just aren’t applicable to the modern day. With so many false preachers and misrepresentations how is one to know when the “right” example manifests?
are they really devout Christians if they’re doing horrible things :/
No and yes. The Bible as far as I'm aware allows for quite a few horrible things to take place. Stoning people and whatnot.
HUH?
i’ve been reading the Bible for the past 2 yrs and i never heard such thing
You've never heard of stoning people? What?
it’s possible it was of the old covenant
no
well
i could also just have terrible memory
💀
(i do have terrible memory)
im pretty sure thats only if someone commits a crime
Yes. Because if you've read the Bible at all, especially with Jesus specifically, you've heard of stoning people.
probably yes
And who gets to decide what's a crime in that case?
oh wait
in Islam if a married man/woman has intimacy with another man/women he/she have to get stoned
that’s the old testament
the old covenant and the new covenant are different
god
So were those people not devout Christians? Genuine question.
i mean the old testament is before Jesus came to earth to save us from our sins. the people were devout Christians because they had to do the works in order to be relieved of their sins unlike today, where you can just have faith in God and believe faithfully. you actually had to work for it in the old covenant
covenant = law
btw
I must say i have a doubt i belive in predestination which is that God chosses who to lead out of alp ofnus infected with sin. Its like that because we rebelled against God (Adam and Eve eating fruit in the garden). But God basically just said dont eat from it you will die (basically get infected with sin) but he didint mention about hell and how he will choose who to savw because no one can save themselves if we rebell
Ngl I've always been uncomfortable with the garden of Eden. Why put the tree there? Why let the serpent in? If they were truly free of sin and haven't faced a single consequence how on earth were they supposed to know what would happen? How long could they have been there before they ate the fruit?
Adam and Eve was tricked by the devil into eating the fruit
they were not rebelling
Honestly yeah, devil did rebell against God but God should have had power to not let him in why if we are his favorite creation made in his image.
Is a similar thing with the first murder as well. He was a vegan typa person, he had no experience with death. He could've legitimately not understood what would happen when he wacked his brother with a rock.
Yeah but i mean God told tp not do it and they did it so yeah they rebelled, were tricked into rebelling
yea
Fro this i mean u kinda always can kbow you are going twoards a bad oath if u feel like angry twoards someone, so idk abt this
Who was there to teach them not to? The equally as ignorant Adam and Eve?
God obviously had the power. It was a test
I mean existence would be better wirhout it imo
I havw a lot of doubts like this
this world is a test. If the devil didnt exist then who would give us temptation to do evil all the time?
Wait are you talking about those 2 brothers and how one killed the other? I dont really remember that story well imo
Yes.
well then it wouldn’t be free will
Yeah i struggle to understand whs God let devil do stuff what makes it better why didint he just destroy him right away
Ah
Here's another philosophical question, is all the suffering truly worth it for free will?
i mean we would be robots then
Cause I feel like I hear that all the time and it just feels like a lack luster argument.
the devil is the absence of God just how dark is the absence of light
And what would be wrong with that?
uhh no emotions lol
no train of thought*
I would be fine without emotions ngl, they don't have a good track record.
We did have free wil to choose. And i kbow about argument that we would be bunch of robots that would just listen and do right thing because we wouldnt have free will. While that sounds robotif and dry it definetly sounds better than eternal suffering that u could experience
i mean there’s positive emotions and negative emotions
obviously we can’t ask why we’re humans so it’s not really something i can answer tbh
I would gladly give up my free will to if it meant I wouldn't go to hell.
Same
then life would be too easy. as i said this world is a test. after we die we will go to heaven/hell depending on the results. there wont be no devil in heaven
What's wrong with the world being easy?
well can’t say why God doesn’t
or does
But think about if we never ate from fruit we would be perfectly free of sin, bad stuff
if there was no devil everyone would end up in heaven
the point of the world is to find out the people that had proper belief in God despite the temptations and evils of the world
It sounds logical that if there is no bad it wohld be very panful to live but if we are talking about state of no sin then that obivously has to be good and perfect state
Why though?
because God wants to reward the faithful people with heaven and punish the bad people with hell
So he wants to inflict suffering for the temptation that he himself caused?
Also that women are meant to submit to men, wth
Cant wait to be called sexist and what not but through whole history males were leaders and we see in what stupidity society has become now with secular culture
Are males not still leaders in secular culture?
^
That’s a terrible take - males are physiologically predisposed to being leaders in tribal times, as they are physically stronger. It’s easy for those things to persist over many ages. Secondly, the world is better now than it was 50, 100, or 1000 years ago, so your second point is mute.
i personally don’t want to lead a relationship 💀
Well most in politics but now there are this weird mindsets where male is at home and female a business man im not saying a female should stay at home but fact that male stays is so weird and wrong.
God allows the presence of temptation through Satan, this does not mean that God is punishing people for something He directly caused. Rather, He has given humans free will to choose between right and wrong, and the temptation is part of the test of life. Humans are judged based on their own choices, not because of the temptations they face.
Why though? Men can take care of kids and clean just as well as women and there are plenty of fields of work women are great at.
Yes they should lead because they are stronger, and a lot of us feel miserable tho life has never been easier and we are in this society that promotes a ton of this sexual stuff and what not its awful
Physical strength doesn’t equate to ability to lead, terrible point
But males are stronger and tougber they should do harder stuff and if u are better at doing this dangerous stuff u should be leader
men aren’t stronger, they’re just better at dealing with intense stress
Since males do tougher stuff tjey will be of tougber mindset too atleast it should be like that so they should lead
Why is that at all obvious
I disagree
Thats a litreally strenght, a mental one😂
true lol
There's plenty of hard work to be done at home too and just because you're staying home doesn't mean you aren't a leader.
In these society where most of us males are weak morons its honestly not evem a suprise that so many people in secular areas disagree
Cringe response
Not addressing my point at all
Not as much as beaing a firefighter or something thats a literal fact lol
i think y’all have a different definitions for leadership
Sadly true
Do u ask why i find my point obivous or?
My dad goes to work as a teacher. He ain't doing hard work like a firefighter.
I gave an example
I ask you to provide sound reasoning that physical strength equates to mental strength
Male was always a strpnger gender and was treated more harshly and it should stay like it
Yes, but I also gave a real world example of a not hard working job which kinda invalidates the idea that men are required to do hard working jobs.
Males usally do harder physcixal stuff because they simply can and it can get tought and they can keep goibg more than woman usually so yeah
They dont need to all of them but what 99% are man that do for a reason lol
Stronger individual should be a leader, dont ur instinct agree with somethibg like that?
But you do you realize that even if what you said is true that there are plenty of jobs that do not require hard labor that a woman can do instead of a man? Thus making it to where the man can stay at home raising the kids?
my dad doesn’t like to do physical work lol
nothing wrong with a man staying home and the woman working
Not really. Intelligence is more important for being a leader in this day and age. Sure before someone who was strong would be able to hunt and thus bring more food making them more valuable but now for food I would say intelligence is far more important.
We don't vote for bodybuilders for president do we?
Dude who through history and now goes to wars man, and thats a tough place to be in, why they go there, because they are stronger meaning they can go longer they have more endurance so they wont give up as eawy as most females would
Imo we should just put all the candidates in a ring with a bear and whoever is the last man standing should be president (I want the bear to be president)
i mean, women got mental strength for sure. they probably have the same mental strength as men do. it’s just how men can handle intense stress better so it’s harder for a woman to go through intense stress but she is capable to do anything she puts her mind to
Im not conparing bodybuilder to female but average male to avergae female. Man are also in wars, man were hunti g before killing huge aninals so it makes sense to say we are better at tactical thinking
LOL
that’ll be so funny
Well sure because of physcicall attributes it is. And also males are usually more attracted to intense stuff like strenght training and that while woman like peacful stuff so its also simply our biology
no. men are just single taskers so it’s easier to accomplish at things. you notice the greatest chess player or the richest person is a man because he’s single minded. women are typically better at multitasking so they tend to do multiple things :p
You sure are good at oversimplifying incredible complex topics
I think males are better at tactical thinking which is requierd because males go to war through whole history its in our blood
eh, preferences
How much biology have you studied to make that claim?
Even if everything you're saying is true you do realize that women can still work right? And if they make enough money it allows for the man to stay home, right?
I like to keep stuff simple
The world ain’t simple so that falls apart
just to clarify, all the things i said are from Islam since im a muslim so i dont know if it is relevant with other religions
Sure yeah i agree woman are better at multitasking. But how often do u see a male doing intense training and how often woman.
Yeah prefrences because of different attributes
mostly cause it’s not so hard for men as is it for women
indeed
Behaviou of males through history shows everything. Now it got different because life is easier
Bruh, just because fewer women do resistance training doesn’t mean they are mentally weak
That’s not anything, that is 0 credibility
hmm muslims apply most of the old covenant (in addition to the new covenant) while Christians don’t apply the old covenant
I never said woman cant work. Look im no good male but i would be vers very very dissapointed in myself if i would stay at home, i think its a shame
by covenant you mean testament?
covenant = law
It simply feels wrong and embarassing
oh
yesyes
Why is it a shame?
well we just follow the Quran and Hadith
yes, the quran is the first 5 books of the Bible if i recall correctly
idk about the hadith
but yeah there are lots of similarities between Christianity and Islam
yes
i have to look into that
alright
let me know what you find when you get to it
sure
Males are more attracted to chalanging themsleves intensley is what this shows. Who through history is daying in wars? Not that they wanted to but who should go other than them who are stronger and tougher. Therefore u wanna make thek not leaders?
You should learn how to write mathematical proofs, the logic is jumping all over the place there
Btw if you say it's a preference or biological imma be annoyed cause personal preference doesn't really matter here and it sure ain't a inherently biological thing all men have.
^
I dont see a female training intensly to their limits. Boys are the one doing stupidity, doing hard challanges in schools, not girls
Yes, men fought in wars, but wars literally require physical strength so men are going to be selected
That has nothing to do with mental strength
LOL cause girls are smart enough to not be stupid. boys also typically have more energy so they have more chance of doing stupid stuff cause of them being active lol
What is there left to do than try to simply navigate and come to conclusions, what should i do say for everything that im not sure or follow all that id considered right or simply explaining stuff to myself so i navigate in this place?
that was torah which was revealed to musa or moses in english
girls are doing hard challenges in school tho
Try to reach real conclusions that are logically sound, even if they aren’t simple
not just guys
Also a lot of the differences are taught not necessarily biological.
OH
well that makes more sense
^^^
wdym by differences?
Between boys and girls, like what they prefer to do and whatnot.
ohhhh, that’s true
i mean energy wise, men are more energetic overall since they live on a 24 hr cycle like women live on a 28 days cycle
Huh
What
so men are more likely to be out and doing stuff while women still do but probably not as much :p
Especially in regards to color I would say. Pink is a manly color and it always will be.
Okay, does that really mean women are less energetic in day to day life?
I just think those are unrelated
Are u a male or female? What less tough female should be stressing on a job with her stupid boss for example being a jerk and its not shameful for men to avoid that. As i said if woman wnat to worl let it be jobs that woman can do but for men to avkid job is crazy. Males are ones that provide. Males would hunt and bring food it should be like that males should definetly bring income to family
lol pink and blue were set as girl and blue for gender reveals because of the greek gods or something like that
yes
it affects the mood and energy of the woman
Where am i contradicting myself. Im talking to 2 of u at the samw time i cant really do my best here lol
No contradictions, you made 2 unrelated statements and then said therefore another statement
While you are on your period sure, but I’m skeptical that it reaches weeks past that
Maybe I’m wrong
Since men are ones that would go through more pain for the most part they developed more mental strenght. What everyday in war fearing to not die in war and not come to ur family ever again doesent make u mentally strong??
Also, in that case, is there no difference between kids
I'm male, and I do not have a biological need to do that. Also staying at home and raising kids, working on the house, cleaning, and cooking is still providing.
Most men don’t do that. Your ancestors fighting wars doesn’t give you any right to claim that men are mentally stronger than women
Yes and males have more of a need to prove themselves, they are much more competitive
What are girls doing lol maybe there are wilder ones lol but thats rare
^
Oh im logical to myself if u disagree cool
lol there’s 4 stages in a 28 days cycle: menstrual, follicular, ovulation, and luteal
menstrual is our weakest point, follicular is our strongest point
we get mood swings more often in the luteal and we get more freaky during ovulation
buh
Oki doki
To be or not to be
indeed
So true.
hmm well they’re doing AP classes
and stuff
idek
i’m homeschooled atm :p
so like buff after the bleeding stops?
Ive done so much gun stuff that AP means armor piercing to me
pretty much lol
advanced placement lol
Buff: Rivers Of Blood acquired
LOL
dang
Brother people that live around me fought in a very dark war lol. Males are built for bad stuff to go through thek better than females whifh requiers more mental strenght. And its fact that we have more drive for challanging stuff
But to attribute to philosophy
In this day and age i feel that people have too big of a need to react to everything
no
Rather than let other people do their stuff and rather observe
Yes it is providinf but in history male would go outside and provide from there thats my point. Ajd i do jot understand u at all
And the constant need to get somehow offended and then tell another person that they are wrong just to feel somehow a better person or something
I also feel like you can't really see the not vocal party and thus can't tell how many stay silent.
Whats that
Yea, its more that we only see the barking dogs
advanced classes basically
But the truth in the society is very different
It appears we are at a stand still once again.
Because the people who live their life not arguing online live very differently and dont feel that they are in such a bad society as social media lets us understand
For me it's more about trying to understand the others perspective.
yeah
Oh i was more thinking about physcical stuff thatvis aslo mentally challanging like pain tolerance, we do a wild stuff xd
real
ohhhh
i mean women do typically have a higher pain tolerance than men :p
I didn't know what AP meant until a couple months ago
I like to understand perspectives but often people choose to butt heads rather than have a real conversation
yeah i think that's a real shame
in the context of schooling
But most of the stuff going on i dont really understand but if its not harmful i co exist
with women i usually have very pleasant conversations
Then why are there not male vs female combat sport matches😂
I welcome people of all kinds when they dont aim to shoot me down
I love hearing the tea.
.. cause women would be absolutely dominated LOL
because males have some physical advantages
I might not understand them but i co exist if i can vibe with them most of the time
There is instance when it happened dude that was tran broke females skull males are.more damage resistant
Smh I want that to happen to me instead.
Such as pain/damage resistance
W
lol well you’re biologically stronger :p
Yea my body fat buff gives me - 10% physical damage
females have a higher pain tolerance
With +20 mental damage debuff
Hit them in the balls and ask then

yeah men’s bodies are more durable when it comes to defense i’d say
some women have balls
Are we sure women are even real? I haven't seen one.
But yea, often just being heavier results in you not getting as much damage
huh? are they even a woman then?
you've never seen women in your family?
real
that's kinda sad ngl
trans women yes
ohh
i mean we’re referring to females when we say women
How no way female would survive more equal punches as man would from another man
Thats what im talking about
female sounds so bleh
pain tolerance is mental
strength is physical
I was a single child thrown into the sea and raised by the ocean wolves (cuttlefishes)
lol females are iron man
cute 🥰
Its both, ans i think males are usually mentalls stronger because they are built that way because the do harder stuff usually and have more drive for them
it's also dumb that female has male in it
i think
i mean technically female is a male 
Well woman also has man in it.
Well thats propably because all old stuff propably used the male as the definition or point zero
i personally think they're capable of equal things but you're allowed to have your opinion ofcourse
exaaactly
As far as I'm aware it's actually the opposite.
Well im no expert
“Some Renaissance linguists believed the word woman to be derived from "womb man" (man meaning “human” or “person” in Old English). The word is actually derived from the Old English compound "wyf man", with "wyf" used in Old English for both married and unmarried women.”
LOL
I just feel that society revolved alot more around men back in the day
As womens positions were mostly weaker
i want a wife
yeah women used to be supressed
idk y
A lot of stuff still revolved around women though cause ya know, they give birth to people.
ooo i’m already a wife
Yes ofc
good for you :D
But just that society was more male positive
males are so weak in these days
thank you :]
we need to work more
physically or mentally?
both, and they dont have skills
Im gona write my point here again since i was going all over the place talking to 3 people at the same time at one point. Through history males go hunt, go in wars and that they do ugly stuff generally and therefore should be leaders. They have better tactical thinking because its in our blood. Have you ever seen a female army general? We arw stronger becazse we are built for tougher stuff its biology. Our mindset is different we are more wild and strive for challanges, i will admit strive for stupid stuff lol. I think im talking perfectly normal stuff both genders are needed ofc a nd both are better at certian stuff and cant function without each other.
i disagree
Handstand isnt the golden standard skill of society pend
ok , i started to like working
A male wnat to prove himself more, want to be brave more than woman frim my life experience
hmm depends honestly
i’ve seen weak men and strong men
but if we’re talking about the majority, there’s definitely more weak men than there are strong men, and it’s opposite for the ladies somehow
that is purely societal
But yea i think people need to have some more mechanical skills and so on
So u are on side of completely changing purpose of male lol ignoring how it was in history
i mean skills that can give u over average salary and good knowledge how to invest them
None of that excludes a man being a stay at home dad though.
i'm on the side of the right equality for everyone
china has a female army tho
I would say people need more basic survival skills and stuff of every day life too
Like changing a light bum
Bulb
Making a fire
Living without electricity
women better , i will try to get over average
Most people are starting to lack these basic skills
you should
it’s hard to find traditional men nowadays
i do , but sometimes i cheat with some benzine 😅
People dont even prepare for any sort of situations. Like if you are out of water or cant go to the store
yeah i saw that
Most people dont survive that
Yes our mindest depends on our place u live in. I live in balkans so i have much diffwrent mindste than all of u here. Im just having values somewhat same as it was before because its much more better to me than what types of males we have now. Ajd its not like im some alpha male nowehre near that in fact prob more screwed than all of u but i strive for beaing better thid way that is right to me
alright, that helps me understand you better,
you be you
i just learned to swim few months ago , but i dont like to water much so
Im talking about general, ans that army is definetls not as effective as male.
I think there are alot but most just cant say much in this society of today without someone being offended for no reason
Well just because it's right to you doesn't mean it's right for everyone.
we can agree to disagree
im feel bad bc of that :/
Ok i wanted to express myself better
bro who dont know that ?
Well some people dont know how to change a tire either
@dusty oasis And it certainly doesn't mean that every man has a biological need for that.
Etc
buh
These basic skills are left to "professionals" these days
if u will say to make an electical instalation then sure idk , and i will study from internet for weeks before to start
Im not saying you have to know everything
But you should now some basics of things you use in daily life
Like lights, water, your transportation vehicle etc
yes i agree
I forgot abt that imo. Dude u say u dont feel shamw abt rhat i simoly do because it was never like that. When i look at strong men in histors i get inspired those who would go out of their homes. Females mostly take care of kids and shouls be like that women are better at that, at giving love to a child. Thats how it always was even in our eaely stages and what are we really doing is swapping roles messing up how stuff should be done.
And if you cant get water or food or electricity or heating for 3 or more days people should be prepared @dense bane
eh , i prefer to use train and metro over to drive (i do very rare so im not a decent driver)
But in the age of 24/7 stores people go to the store for a few items every day
Yea but even repairing your bicycle if you use one should be something you can do
bro is easy to find water
But water that wont give you the shits
for food i will go to work :))
like i need to buy some things , i cant grow all
But if you live in a big city you can be far from drinkable water
Yeah i cant deny that. Most do tho, and in my opinon all should
bro im not in forest , probably u need just some sand
Yeah ofc, it all really depends on what u were told and learned to think, im just on side society has been thrkugh history until recently when we aslo got a bucnh of sick stuff
i drink from parks
:))
when i run
But most people lack these skills to cuz they are used to getting water from the tap
I even saw some people bamboozled that you can eat a fruit straight off a tree
Like if this sort of basic knowledge is gone
We are ruined as a society

im not even close to that situation , ok compared with my dad idk many things (like elwctrical instalations and water instalation)
also few more things
Btw am leaving this conversation. I feel like there may have been a couple good points but we are at a standstill and I have to get on with my day.
im sure we can survive
but i want to be better than just that
why men so weak these days ?
why im so weak
ik
bc im lazy
Im on side of both genders doing what they are special at. Males to lead because they are tactical. And females to take care of kids because they are better at it. So teaditional view.
yes , that makes concurence
motivation for me
bc im lazy
long conversation today lol
i didnt read
And bible saying women should submit to men simply says that woemb should be helper to men that shoild be leaders
are you a christian
Since i think males are more tactical they should make decisions and women should trust them but ofc im not sayint that they should shut up and accept everything without giving any tought its not like us males just spit the truth and if male is requiering something unreasonable ofc dont submit
Yes, not a good one
ok
As far as I'm aware the line in the Bible with Eve that says she was made as a helper was heavily altered to be like that when it was being translated. Pretty sure the original says that God took literally half of Adam and not just a rib as well to make Eve.
i prefer women to be free and equal in rights
Really? I think its just takinf a rib, but what does that even have to do with this or anything contorversial lol
idk that , i need to search if is true
You were saying that the Bible said that women are supposed to be helpers, it has to do with this conversation cause translation stuff means that that isn't really true.
If she is unhally bwcause her husband is requiering worng stuff she should definetly not submit. Its that if a male is normal good person that she should comfratavly put her trust in him
study bit and see
not all what ppl say is true
i dk
Ye, definitely fact check me. I'm very stupid and very likely to be wrong.
How? God said that its not good for male to be alone so he made a helper to Adam
ok then
And as far as I'm aware the original translation has different wording and how it says it it talks about them being more like equals.
Im bad ar fully expressibg myself alos i was talkig to 3 people at the same times so i get that this was so controversial, but i truly dont think im controversial or anything or have harmful mindset or anything
What in like hebrew?
bc are equals
Oh, i mean look im no person to go and check translations i really just have to trust what i have. Im sure there would be a lot of controvery and reactions of ppl if it was dedinetly proven it was changed. I dont see why would thaz be the case since that mindset was not controversial at all back then. However exploring if translations changed actual text and that is interesting i might explore that there is a lot of stuff to explore. Its quite overwhelming lol
Anyways i dont have nothing to say anymore
Definitely need to look at a buncha different translations of the Bible. How it words things is very important. At least in the circles I'm in it's very known that the different translations have different meanings otherwise you wouldn't have all the different versions of Christianity that we have today.
Yeah thats true
וַיִּבְרָ֨א אֱלֹהִ֤ים ׀ אֶת־הָֽאָדָם֙ בְּצַלְמו בְּצֶ֥לֶם אֱלֹהִ֖ים בָּרָ֣א אֹת֑וֹ זָכָ֥ר ונקבָה בָּרָ֥א אֹתָֽם׃
And God created man in his image, in the image of God he created him, male and female He created them
This is the word for word translation
equal in value. different in roles
there’s word for word translations and thought for thought translations. you just search that up and you can find graphs of word for word and thought for thought translations
fellow believers in God what are your biggest reasons you belive he exists and for atheists what are biggest reasons you don't belive
exactly
The sheer amount of hate I see from Christians I know irl puts me off. That and the fact that the supposed joy I was constantly told about that I could find in God never showed up.
real
i don’t blame you. there’s a lot of Christians who are really hateful and don’t even do the 2nd commandment which is weird (love your neighbor like yourself). i’ve met a lot of Christians like that and it’s really disappointing to see how they express their so-called “love”
the second statement you said, i can definitely relate to. i still believe in God and believe the things he does for people but he haven’t really done much for me (mentally) so
i believe in God because it’s literally impossible for him to not exist. a creation needs a Creator. God is the beginning and the end so he simply already existed because he came along with the “beginning”. it’s inevitable - it would be impossible for me to not believe God to exist when he created nature and miracles and love
badum
you ever think that's just your human way of thinking
we are evolved to think A -> B
every action action precedes a reaction
we could just be insignificant
like it makes sense that we would just start existing due to the laws of the universe
atoms, molecules, ect
a self replicating molecule has a higher chance of existing than one that doesn't
so after a few billion years
you end up with beings which are good at replicating
No offence Kat but I think some of your thinking is limited by ignorance
if you took some time and learned the how and why of science I think you'd have more faith in the idea of evolution ect
the scientific process is the closest thing to infallibal we can get
science has dropped mortality rates from ~50% to 4.3%
Science provides us with models and ideas that have allowed us to fly, get to the moon, eradicate smallpox, feed millions, and create or destroy
the one thing it asks for us to do is question everything, and admit when we're wrong
💀
bruh
you say no offense and say that 😭
Was I too blunt?
yes
I meant it constructively
😭
Sorry
Still I should be more aware
i dont think so
Paenarthrobacter ureafaciens KI72 proves that evolution is real, the bacterial strand didn't even exist before nylon was invented in 1935
well after a god would've created the Earth
and we tracked its development
evolution is real duh
but human evolution is a different topic
buh
anyway i should be sleeping, not typing 💀
goodnight
humans have evolved in small ways over time
so ur telling me we went from a clumped mass to all the things we have today
species evolution slows when it's not necessary to evolve
humans currently don't have anything we need to evolve for in any dramatic fashion, so any evolutionary process happening to our species would be going quite slowly
Ok this is gonna sound more mean but I don’t mean it that way, it’s just typical of humans and awareness helps us combat it. It’s easy to feel entitled to understanding of the universe, and when a topic or idea is too complex it can’t be true but we need to understand that not everything we feel is reality
what if the universe doesn't have to have a logical explanation
or what if that explanation for its existence is perfectly logical, but we simply cannot comprehend it
these are too complex for me aaaaah
Even then we’re evolving slow but noticeable changes probably. Bill nye talked about how we’re indirectly selecting for women who can reproduce at an older age because women are doing careers and settling down later
You can googlr
Kertgerzaught
I can’t spell that shit
CGP grey
Varatasium
for example, us humans evolved to live in a 3-dimensional world. Along with the vast majority of other living organisms that we're aware of. We cannot comprehend a higher dimension because our brains didn't evolve to understand it or live in it
Kurzgesagt I think
oh the yt channel
Veritasium

lol
Science buddy
never thought about that, but it makes perfect sense
Also I feel like ppl are getting taller and more mature
yes
But that might just be me
people have been getting taller faster
more mature is subjective
so we can't really measure that with any set metric
Well more self aware
you can kind of just feel when someone is mature
Yeah
there's no algorithm for it
yall know people were taller before
does acting smart make you smart?
acting a certain way doesn't make you that thing
and the more we evolve the more shorter we get
I’d argue that there is some traits
Humility, self awareness
im talking about Adam

buh
I was gonna say, according to available research, the average human height during the time of "cavemen" (early Homo sapiens) was significantly shorter than today, with estimates placing the average male height at around 5 feet (152cm). So I was hella confused when you said we were taller before.
Cause at no point in human evolution have we gotten shorter
Holy shit adam was 27 mtrs tall
I'd love to see him play basketball xd
Lol
You can’t prove adam existed
he can dunk from the height of his kneecaps fr
religion:
Religion is not proof it’s a fabricated history
religion didn't exist before humans, so if we invented it then like
It’s human interpretation of gods word if anything
wha
Thats a big if too
for all we know the whole thing could've started with some guy who ate some funky mushrooms and was just writing a cool story
damn
nathan are u an atheist?
I'm not gonna lie the stories in the bible are cool as hell sometimes
No I believe if a creator exists we’re outside of it’s scope of understanding
like a guy just splitting a whole sea in half so a bunch of people can get across it quickly
Real shit
I'm glad in a way that religion existed, because it gave humans before us a way to explain the world around them. It gave them reassurance and explained a lot of things that we couldn't find out ourselves at the time.
If god exists it’s not our interpretation of god
It’s arrogant to think god would conform the the ideals and morals we prescribe to it
God would probably be amoral
It's weird in my mind to call ancient Greek, Nordic, Roman, and many others "mythology" when it's no different from Christianity
cause if you call Christianity mythology someone is gonna shoot you probably
Real
it's just declaring their whole religion is fake
and yours is the real one
when neither side can prove any of it
Thats why I’m wavering towards anti-theist
it's like two kids arguing about whose super hero won when playing a pretend game
In terms of traditional constructions of religion
Exactly
And ppl die bc of it
yeah that is kinda 
Religion is another excuse for humans to fight each other instead of working for mutual benefit
because of religion related war humanity lost an estimated maximum of 900 years of technological development
The dark ages
yeah 😔
I'm not trying to shit on religion cause people can think whatever they want
but everything about it goes against all logic in my mind
The thing is religion has to be really good at makkng people belive
Otherwise it wouldn’t exist
I don't even think everything started in just one really small infinitely dense space, cause that doesn't make a whole lot of sense either
It’s quite literally thought evolution
I'm not sure how it started or why we're here
I choose to believe that the explanation for our existence is simply one we cannot comprehend
The beginning and the end are concepts humans will always struggle to comprehend
it's too far fetched for any mind or computer to understand or calculate
It’s against our nature
yes
because we can't accept that there can be a beginning or an end to everything
we love to imagine that something had to come before
and something must always come after
We’re not built to see the world as it is we’re built to see it in the way that will make us survive the longest
it hurts my brain to imagine time before things existed, hell even a time before time existed
like
would it even be black?
blackness is just the absence of light
but light didn't exist yet
so like
what would it have been like
what is nothing??
we literally cannot comprehend that
😵💫
so I choose to believe that there is no explanation
we're here because of something we cannot understand
I choose to belive there is no explanation I will understand
a god we can understand, an infinitely dense and small area we can understand
Same
Funny idea but the anti life equation in DC
what's that?
Uhh
Like
Zombie virus
It’s based on the idea that seeing a pattern activeates it
Like
Just in general the idea of a concept that if you understand it will push you to suicide
Some things are better left unexplored
Idk it’s some DC nerd stuff you can look into it
sounds interesting
Religion it’s just human nature really
honestly every time that my mind gets close to imagining what true nothingness would be like, my entire head feels a sharp widespread pain then goes numb and I completely lose it
every single time it happens
it's like my brain literally crashes
yup :p
Try alt-f4
lol
But yeah back to what haseeb said I don’t belive that our ideas on religion and god are correct if a god exists
i do
Why would god reflect our morality or any ideas
because the Quran contains miracles, prophecies, and scientific knowledge the no individual could possess 1400 years ago
I haven’t read the quran so I wouldn’t know
According to current knowledge, the earliest known star observation site is considered to be the stone circle at Nabta Playa in Egypt, dating back around 6,500 - 6,000 years ago, making it the oldest astronomical observatory in the world. There are also many others all around the world. We had the constellations and were tracking other astronomical objects and features before most cultures existed.
it's not too unbelievable to think that people 1400 years ago knew a LOT more than we thought they did
Just philosophically how can god exist and conform to our ideas of morality and thinking patterns
lots of people think about humans 3000 years ago and imagine them using stone tools
bronze was made over 5000 years ago
we could already melt, refine, and shape metals back then
hell, we figured out how to make alcohol before we invented wheels
our progression makes no damn sense
but that's how it happened
Yeah
Like it isn’t hard to find contradictions and false claims in religious texts
They’re products of humanity just like us
God to me is the perfect omnipotent being
Perfect would mean removed from our way of thinkjng and ideals
Or they’re not perfect and subject to all the flaws we are
Nothing should be worshipped as dogma
wait ill give yall a list im a bit busy rn
Lol
You see how religious establishments use these as tactics to maintain control? They bog you down with specifics which are easily disproven but take time to do so
Even if we start conceptually it doesn’t track
Religion at the heart of it makes us feel good
It creates a sense of belonging and control in life
It’s so easy to accept because it’s already intuitive
That doesn’t mean it’s right
We are flawed beings that see things with bias
Religion is an exercise in arrogance because it centers around the idea that something created US. At the center of religion is always humanity
It’s never about why god exists or what purpose it serves but what our purpose is and how do we relate to god
it's all good, I'm not trying to shit on what you believe in either btw. I think it's great you have enough trust and faith in something to take it as your truth
If it makes you feel good I guess do as you wish
This is a good video that kind of relates
CGP Grey on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cgpgrey
"What Makes Online Content Viral?" By Jonah A. Berger & Katherine L. Milkman http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1528077
Special Thank You to My Bonnie Bees:
Tyler Morris, Marvin Sponaugle, Rolf Røsand, PervertedThomas, rictic, Ian, Saki Comandao, Edward DeLany, Jake Stolha...
After watching consider religion as a “thought germ”
Over millions of years it’s evolved to be the best possible way to get people to fight and think about it
I go brd no gn
yes its all fine dw
then laws of universe will be my god :))
i cant tell if is real
what animals evolve fast ?
sure we need to study it
smaller organisms
such as bacteria
new strands of the flu and coronavirus for example come up all the time
sometimes multiple times a year
because of how quickly such a small organism can change
thats right
still i dont beleive in darwinism
sure exist evolution
but not in that way
no is not arrogance
i just admit that i cannot be saved through my own strength
so nothing to be proud by myself
we Muslims dont follow any "tactics" of our establishments.
also wdym by tactics of religious establishments
there is no such thing like that in Islam
tactics like music , thats right
i dont realy enjoy religious music
music is totally forbidden in Islam
intersting
i think music is fine
as time is not too much
some specific music frequencies mess with our brains
also kind of leads to addiction, but this topic is not talked about much. Because you will see people saying "i cannot live without music"
for example if you listen to music with depressing lyrics then you will feel more depressing
yes can be an adddiction
like u cant work well without music
can happen , i like sad ones with hope
lyrics are important for me
Yeqh its dissapointing, hopefully God leads you one day
I also currently feel like he is distant from me but that is my fault so yeh
sad many christians dont understand love and become hypocrites (can happen to me too)
That is one of the strongest arguements but i never really explored it much. I heard arguement from alex o connor if u know him that we really just create stuff from materials that were always on earth so ig u could say that this all got created from stuff, materials, molecules whatever it is idk much abt science from stuff that was always there. So we really just dont create something we just make different shapes of it. We take metal and make it into a car for example. We just discover stuff and reshape them. Whs do we then belive everything needs a creator if we just simply reshape stuff, not create something unique. But then again idea of everything accidentally becoming is ridicilous to me i need to explore this more. On earth we see that we dint create stuff but reshape, why does it make sense so much that there even is creator if we really havent seen one. But then again who gave all of this, it simply randomly apperaed
random laws ? no way
Well I feel like that argument is a little lack luster. Because you're saying that for us to exist someone would have to have created us but if that was true then wouldn't something have to have also created God? Why can the world not exist without a true beginning but God can?
I mean u cant just say that there is no evidence, there is historical evidence (bible)
bc is over laws of universe
and the Quran
Yeh forgot abt that lol
u can belive even without evidence but u cant force others to belive without 100% evidence
(i dont say u forced someone to belive)
I mean since we like create stuff, tho we dont we really just reshape. There has to be also a creator a supreme one that started eversthing, whk is not limited by weaknesses like time and that so he was there frkm the start and always will be. No one is better thsn him so he cant have a creator
He is that grand creator
Thats true
But that doesn't explain how he exists in the first place. How did he come into being? And if he simply always existed then what's to say the world couldn't have also just always have existed too?
Wdym, if u mean how its weird thaz all thos molecules whatever merged together and created all of this randomly then yeah. Even tho we dont create bht reshale stuff its still weird to just think it all got randomls here it dkesent make sense to me
how exist laws of universe ?
World cant because we are his creation we are limited we have weaknesses while he does not. He is creator of everything time and all that so he is not affected by it. He is complex perfevt beinf much more comolex than us so we cant fully understand it because on earth its different
Btw for this all of that wqs always there that creates everything than its tehnically our god, but then our god would be simply some molecules that got destroyed from massive explosion in that process lol. And they are not complex molecules cant think right, atleast i think so i mean, they all just randomly kerged together. While idea of God show a mind that created everything
I feel like that doesn't answer my questions.
he said he cant bc is impossible
God know
something like that
How?
Im saying that it makes sense for creator of everything, so big stuff to be complex being thatvis not limited like us
I cant understand truly how someone has no beginning, what is infinite but it makes sense
Because if he woild have he would need to be created right?
If he doesn't have to have a beginning than why does the world inherently have to have a beginning?
Because he decided so, his rules
Btw if there is no end to something u cant really start new stuff, earth would be much different and because he has no end he is always like he is so his nature is always the same
same in the case of science so
we dont know
like that
Yeah, we don't actually know for sure in either case what the "beginning" looked like. I'm just saying that imo it isn't a good argument for saying that a god must be involved.
isnt a good argument
sure
i still belive in God bc some things cant be created without laws
Cause if we're saying that something cannot come out of nothing and therefore that means a creator exists then that would mean that that creator would have also have come from something and so forth which I feel doesn't really work because that would mean that God isn't all powerful because there would have to be something above him to create him.
And if we're saying that he simply has always existed then that argument can also apply to the world itself as the world could have just always have existed without a creator.
yes , but same for laws of universe (these sure exist:))
yes , u have 2 options with same problem
But God is infinited alwqys been there there was nothing before him, and everythinf that got created was after him
If u fully accept theors that God is infinite than there is no problem with that theory
So why couldn't we also argue that the world is infinite without a creator?
Do u mean specifically earth?
If something can exist without a creator then that means that the world could exist without a creator.
Our universe, the earth, the stars, and whatnot.
Then that would bean that it got randomly here, who reshaled metal into a car? It got randomly there? No humans, a mind created it. So it makes sense that a mind something that is aware created stuff
If eversthing needs a creator than there is no grand creator which would mean this chain got randomly started..
Brb
I mean kinda.
I dunno how it started but saying that God is self evident in that fashion doesn't really explain it any better.
Btw I'm not trying to argue against god here I'm just saying that this specific argument is not infallible because it relies on concepts that are literally unknowable.
for me now these things dont matter much , bc is to only solution i found for my problem
Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.
^thats for me
yes
i can agree
some things we need to believe
Alr, i just wanna explore all of this ajd come to my conclusions
But it shows that we dont know so much, and it all point twoards submitting to grand supreme creator, God.
Will
Because we can litreally logically point twoards him
Atleast thats my opinion
I mean maybe but that isn't really what this discussion was about.
Maybe but not via this specific argument.
Im trying to point twoards that we are talking abt what was the cause of universe and to me it is fascinating that we can logically provebit yet we know so little
Btw did u hear abt math arguement for God?
And i belive we can since we are basically discussing idwa of gran creator
I've heard about it but I've never heard the actual argument.
Mainly have just heard it in passing.
Ah i recommend exploring it. I dont really remember it well so im a bjt scared to mess it up but basically since math is infinite amd it describes thid worl and we didint invent it but discovered it it point that since itnis infinite its stored in infinite mind God. I hope i told it right lol
I also have to go. Is time for sleep.
GN
bye
i have spent quite some time making this. Please read it in your free time @cloud flint @stone osprey
I’ve read through most of these but most of them are extremely vague and the other half are obvious
Water being a cornerstone of biology is obvious you can cut open any living thing and find watee
The heavens being gaseous is so vague and unless you have a very specific understanding could be anything
The idea of sperm and the egg is nothing new
Hell, look at roman philosopher Nostradamus
He’s said to predicted most of the worlds major events
it was nothing new in the 7th century?
All he said was stuff like “there will be war” and “a plague is coming”
The concept of seed in men and egg in women is not new
Even in historical times
17th century philosophers had specific details on the anatomy of the human sperm and egg so it isn’t hard to belive that before that humans knew a ton already
yeah thats 10 centuries after the Quran
thats my point right there
You can infer a lot from “seed go in, child come out” and “no seed go in no child come out”
same with the big bang theory
Oh come on they say the heaven and earth was “opened up” by god how are you supposed to interpret that
people in the 7th century definitely did not even imagine that
If it said “cosmic background radiation tells us the universe is constantly expanding” then I would agree
People have been shagging since the beginning of time
Is it hard to belive they would speculate on how it works?
no offence but ur acting like im talking about like 100 or 200 years ago
what about here ?
Also statistically when you have a big enough text your bound to say some stuff which is true, and some stuff which is wrong. Unless your claiming that the Quran hasn’t changed since it’s conception, you can see how correct interpretations would be maintained while falsified statements would be omitted
i dont even understand whats the question ?
modern biology and genetics was not a thing during the 7th century
yeah it has not changed a single letter
not a single letter at all
intersting
Idk man they didn’t have science back then but they could still observe the world.
Like
as a matter of fact, million of people have memorized it throughout their lives
the entire Quran
maybe not average
Half of these are observations on the human condition
I can know these with no inference
no technology wasnt so good at that time
Life needs water
sure
You can tell, if you ejactulate inside a female you can concieve a child, and if you don’t you don’t get a child
look, they way you are thinking now, you cannot compare it with a thought of a person from the 7th century
lol
Off of that you can get the idea of “seed” and “egg”
yeah everybody knows that but they didnt know about sperm cells and the egg
first is more funny
They never specifically state sperm and egg. It’s purposely vague and left up to interpretation
not some kids
how do you know that do you understand Arabic????
No but they don’t know anythingn they shouldn’t be able to know
Your asusming everyone back them was stupidly ignorant
Humans are really fucking smart dude, and we can infer a ton from our environment without understanding
nah , they was like us
Unless they get into the four stages of reproduction and interphase
“We sent down iron” doesn’t become “the earth is made of iron” unless you know astrophysics and geology
^ i like that more
:))
who said the earth is made of iron
iron is not a material from earth do you researches
iron cross 
according to science iron came from stars
With that logic all materials other than hydrogen and whatever are from supernovae
how?
Everything above iron should also have been sent down
i realy dont care about that
Everything heavier than iron is created through nuclear fission in stars
like density ?
Atomic mass
g/m³
More electrons n stuff
ah oki :))
so ur telling me gases are heavier than iron?
more neutrons and protons bc electrons are ~0
u mentioned hydrogen before
nope
Yes. Xenon is heavier than iron. It’s less densly packed than iron though so it floats
U need to have more of all three otherwise you get an ionized partical but yeah ik what you mean
oh wait i forgot bruh the text file i gave has scientific meanings in it
he Quran refers to iron as being "sent down," which some interpret as a reference to the fact that iron is believed to have originated from supernovae explosions in space and was delivered to Earth through meteors and asteroid impacts. This aligns with the modern scientific understanding that most of the iron on Earth originated from outer space.
didnt u read this
sure u need more electrons
anyway i dont know what is about here
Why then is everything other than iron not considered “sent down”?
I did btw
That sentence on it’s own is completely obtuse
why that even matter ?
It’s proof of the quaran being a divine text
Sent by god
ah ok
during the time, iron was considered to be a very strong material and was commonly used for making tools, weapons.Iron is also significant because it is one of the elements that can withstand immense pressure and is vital for physical strength, making it a metaphor for strength.
None of these claims stand on their own. They all rely on modern knowledge and inference to make sense. Without them they are just more religious metaphors for things in everyday life
false
you are ignorant
Exactly the metaphor without inferring just refers to iron’s strength and how it’s a gift from god
how are you saying they rely on modern knowledge when im saying for like the 10th time now that it was revealed in the 7th century
idk even the text
We choose to interpret it as supernovae creating heavy elements
what im trying to prove here is that scientists only knew that iron came from supernovas after the 20th century
In order to justify that it’s stuff that people wouldn’t know in the 7th century your prescribing your own inferences onto their writings
Haseeb here is an example
you talk like u have lived in the 7th century
we should to keep things clear to get a conclusion
If I say “water is a gift that runs through all life” that has many interpretations but once we discover that all life is based on water I can change my interpretations to “woah look I predicted the nature of the universe!”
As a primitive human I can know water is a gift and we all need it to survive
hey thats not that wow , trees , animals need water so
no water no plants
no plants no animals
Exactly
Conceptually religion is never about god it’s about what he said to us or what he gave to us
you are completely ignoring the point im trying to prove by saying irrelevant things. My point here is to prove that the Quran has said scientific statements that are being discovered up until now. The big bang theory is mentioned was discovered during the early 20th century. The protective layer of earth is mentioned which has been discovered in the 20th century. And the role of mountains to stabilize the earth. this has been discovered after the plate tectonic theory so its post-1960s
also the seperation of salt water and freshwater
the entirety of the text was to prove this point yet you are here talking about interpretations and why other elements did not "come down"
this is what i meant when i said u are ignorant
you clearly didnt read the text properly
this
also
no the point your trying to prove is that people 1400 years ago knew things they should be able to know without science
no im not
but the thing is none of this stuff is explitly true and uses extremely vague claims and idea's to claim that this is stuff people knew without sicence
if the point is even religious establishments did science your not wrong
I know that
science is just a process
nothing divine about it
not false, but blatantly vague
it ignores nuance and relys on human intuition to get the point you want accross
without my understanding on the nature of the universe it tells me nothing I can't infer from my surroundings
"iron is a gift from the heavens" hell yeah medival me probably has one iron hoe that allows me to farm and survive
ofc iron would seem like a gift from god
and I guess it is if you consider that god is something we can't understand
the point I'm trying to say is nothing about this is false. It's blatantly vague to where anyone can infer whatever meaning they want from it
Like I can choose to infer from the iron thing that god came down and actually handed it to us personally
we still on this topic 😭
yeah religion is a big topic
we should give it the proper respect of being thourough if we want to talk about it
indeed
my main problem with it is it has killed so many
the website you gave is just false
its an anti-islam site
i could tell after reading like 2 minutes into it
I did five minutes of googling mb
never ends , i think i can demostarte why we will cant have a good concluion
yeah its fine dw
maybe bc of terorists
no its just wants to defame Islam
like the articles on there was only about the bad side of the religion and most of it is false
also whenever you see a website or anything that has ☪️ this moon and star logo it is most likely incorrect cause the logo was never a part of Islam. It was more of a cultural innovation created by the ottoman empire
ooo nice
I feel like most of those are pretty easy to figure out, and others are too unclear and could be interpreted in a lot of ways
religion is both good and bad. At it's best it brings people together and helps create positive change and morals, at its worst it pushes us to our worst tendencies
Yeah
Wsg kep
Hru
chocolate milk
I feel ded
😋
Like physically or emotionally or what
physically
Ngl I dislike the moral argument for religion cause that would imply that if you're following said religion that means you're moral when that has been proven to be wrong time and time again by all the horrible people in religion. It doesn't necessarily mean the religion itself is bad but it certainly doesn't do it any favors.
I feel like morality is decided by the people within a group and not the rules for the group.
Bad people will do bad things no matter what morals they're supposedly following.
yes
idk that , i prefer what Jesus said