#PHILOSOPHY CHANNEL
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
I have a bachelor's degree in physics, won't argue on most physics topics cus it's not enough but no one is allowed to break the 1st law of thermodynamics and get away with it
chuck norris could ngl
dang, physics.. i can imagine you struggled a bit with it lol
At least you took accountability for your actions. I think thats what’s important, and the problem is we need to take accountability for things that aren’t even our responsibility. It’s not my fault that I had no sense empathy and my mental illness was neglected by my parents, I was mentally ill but I took responsibility for that. I couldn’t function in social settings until like just before covid. People need to be held accountable for more than their able to control because ultimately there’s more things to take responsibility for than there are people.
my physics teacher was telling me about all this so idk man
and everything I'm seeing seems to support it
Look up the first law of thermodynamics
Wasn’t so bad in all honesty, found out I prefer math along the way though which made the end of my degree kinda boring
yeah, energy cannot be created or destroyed
well, it can
and it has been
I bed
multiple times
Gn
Lol alright
reading it yourself would make this less painful
the fusion reactor test results have been repeated
oh I didn't believe it either lol
Have you actually read the results? Because I just did
I thought my teacher was bullshitting
it's the first law of thermodynamics so logically it'd be quite an unbreakable rule
but the titanic was also thought to be unsinkable
granted the first law of thermodynamics is a lot more solid than the titanic was
Yep just went through it, those headlines are a giga scam
It took an order of 10^3 MJ of energy to make a laser of 2 MJ, and then we got 3 MJ using the 2 MJ laser
indeed. i mean you can always talk to him about it - in a nice manner. it can only go so far. people have choices, we can call him em out but what he does about it is his choice. we can't force anyone to do or believe anything and we shouldn't. his life isn't my life. yes, i agree that people should take responsbility for their actions and live up to be better tomorrow than he is today. however, it can only go so far. some people don't take responsibility but yeah
However, lasers don’t just exist in nature, it costs energy to make them, and it will always cost more energy to make the laser than any output energy of a system using that laser
@stone osprey I don’t blame you for getting mixed up by it, pretty often science headlines are scams
I think you read it backwards
I do that too sometimes haha :>
Did you read what I said?
lol, ig you're just quick to pick up patterns then
that is true but over time that energy can be made back from the reactions
How? In what way?
Lol I lowkey just abused math to avoid learning physics if I’m being honest
it's still a net energy gain within the system and I read that the efficiency of the system would need to be improved to be practical
obviously
Within the system of the laser and the reactor, yes. Within the system of the earth, or the universe, no, and it never can be
cause hundreds of MJ to power the laser is still a loss there
then why would we be investing billions into making these reactors
That’s a great question
if we'd be guaranteed to lose energy every time
Because we already lose energy every time
it seems possible to just make the lasers way more efficient
with a lot of engineering
We are trying to improve Q, the conversion ratio, and fusion has the potential to increase Q
Currently, our conversion rates of potential energy to useable energy are absolute garbage
yes
This could potentially be a 100fold increase in Q, but it would still use more energy than it produces in the system of the universe
but if it can't be created or destroyed, the universe wouldn't lose or gain anything
By converting matter into energy, we lose total energy but gain useable energy, like burning coal to power a steam engine
Correct, it doesn’t, it just gets converted until heat energy is all that remains
also atomic decay theory works, where in a few octillion years the universe would run out of energy entirely and become a vast wasteland where it's forever to be 0°K, so why wouldn't it be able to work the other way around where the universe could gain energy?
LOL
real
you practically already know college physics lol
nah I wouldn't say so
maybe some of it
but not all of it
Ah, but this is slightly incorrect
Energy is not lost, it is simply converted into an unusable form
o.O
Which is different from being lost
heat energy, my friend
I've always had problems with it, but it's another fundamental truth
gravity might still work even if the universe was in a heat death but I'm not too sure
I will say, there is 1 thing which is a potential hole in this theory, but it's such bs and so weird it's hard to say
depends, if there is no mass left than gravity loses meaning, all that's left is energy, but spacetime might still be distorted
although gravity also propagates at the exact speed of light so we know that gravity must be bending some invisible fabric of space. But we've known that for a while.
yep, general relativity is very fun
that happens a lot unfortunately
wish I got to do that more
haha
no, you don't realize how BS this one thing is
there is some potential that matter spontaneously pops into existence occasionally, and is immediately deleted by corresponding antimatter which popped into existence at the same moment
but there is not much to go off of with this
well mass doesn't fade or disappear at 0°K as far as I know. But we haven't gotten there and we probably never will. So spacetime should still be distorted
motion stops but I don't think gravity is motion
What made you change?
gravity isn't really a thing, it's more of a construct that is useful
this reminds me of whitehole theory a bit
GR seems to be much better than gravity
yea pretty much exactly that
there is potentially something there, but who tf knows
I wrote about whiteholes for a presentation in 5th grade
and from then on I was called a nerd
🔥
you interested in physics and math?
yes
you planning on studying physics in college?
lol real
it's all good, you'll figure it out
i took a weird path, but found math is the right place for me
this has definitely been one of the best conversations I've had here
ye glad I could provide some info
I feel as if I was slightly disrespectful early on but you seem cool
usually don't go into details but felt I could here
time lol. idk how i lost the ability to feel sympathy and empathy but as time went by, i realized how i was rotting and that was affecting my parents because they were taking care of my physical health and i wasn't even doing the basics (hygiene) and my parents were worried. i tried to take more care of myself because i didn't want them to waste money on me so i just did something about it lol. it didn't really help me with my mental health but ig it somewhat did
all good, I think I came off a bit disrespectful too tbh, question marks are passive aggressive ig
you'd be really good at it
true lol
rip, life is rough and I can relate fs
A lot of people say I'd be good at a lot of things, but there is too much I want to do while also never being enough to do
what other potential paths are you considering? will affect my suggestion
or the right thing to do
:/
just do something, better than nothing
airforce/spaceforce (cringe ik) pretty much any other branch of science, or something else entirely idk
Olympic cyclist could work
so many different paths
yeah go study physics
can train while schooling, don't commit to something like that til ur elite
but make sure to get into math now, like get exceptionally good at math early
I already average slightly higher than most Olympic cyclists on bike trails
don't be like all the other physicists and wait until it's too late
well shit, that's something
well you would be, at least if it's logical. you're quick to pick up patterns and you're curious. i get how you feel tho, there's a lot of fun things to do lol
still, do something academic til supporting yourself as an athlete alone is possible, don't commit too early
there's no such thing as right or wrong when it comes to choosing a career lol
math isn't really my thing I'd rather be doing crazy experiments and testing than a whole lot of calculations
that would be so cool
I'm good at math but I find it boring usually
you still need to be good at math before getting into experimental physics
yeah I know :/
also, ill say that at least my experience with experimental physics was pretty shit
maybe engineering is more fun
but experimental physics was mostly waiting for something to happen and I couldn't stand it
I need myself to do something positively meaningful
become a father
if it does something good it's fine, no need to maximize without considering your happiness
with who though? o-o
ig
what if she's to far away to do that rn
guess I gotta wait
😔
you're 17.. idk if you'd want to be a father at 17 💀
hear me out
lol
parents were 16 and 17 when I was born, wouldn't suggest it
oh shit
that's wild
had a good life, but it's been real tough on my mom and she coulda had shit go way easier
so def would suggest against it
yeah
my friends mom gave birth to him at 18 and his older sister at 16
she's so sweet but damn her life has been rough
yea this, my mom's experience too
welp, guess I'd better get grindin
dad speedrun
🔥
and drivin
I'd have to drive a bit
Ahh okay so it's still a journey. Was there a turning point where it became easier?
Or it changed as soon as you decided?
yeeah, when my boyfriend came into play lol. idk how but my love for him felt different than what i've felt towards my exbfs and he's unintentionally helping me
lol
Ahh that's great. I'm glad that it's helping. It's really nice when our loved ones help us improve
I will just add a side note to be careful with that if it's an online relationship though. People are especially sensitive to age gaps now (perhaps understandably so) and can call things predatory even if you don't feel like they are. Just be careful where it goes and what you share, you know?
of course. thanks for the heads up. it actually is an online relationship. i never really expected it nor did i exactly support online relationships because of how wacky it usually is. edating is just.. eh but i’m here so lol
i told my family about him and they know about him. we’re also planning to meet up in the summer (about 6 months) so it won’t always going to be an online relationship but a long distance relationship
wear a glove with plutonium and bump into someone
[ingame]
<@&1305977291695718462> can sociopaths and people who don’t have emotions and empathy in general be ethical?
yes
yes
yes
I think they can act ethically, but I'm not sure about be ethical
I have one friend who is like this and it's truly disturbing when I argue with him, he will argue for sytems while never considering those who must live in that system
yes
Yes
Yes
We have a bunch of yes men here 😮💨
I don't think so
Sure while sociopaths or those without empathy might follow ethical rules for practical reasons, true ethics really goes beyond that
It’s about genuinely caring for others and understanding how our actions affect them. Without empathy, they might struggle to fully grasp or prioritize the well being of others, which is at the epitome of ethical behavior
So
Ethics is about caring how your actions affect others. People without empathy, like sociopaths, might follow rules to avoid trouble or get what they want, but it’s not because they genuinely care. For example, a sociopath might donate to charity to look good, not because they want to help people. True ethics comes from caring, and not just acting
lol indeed
What if a sociopath acted ethically because he understood it to be right, i.e. had chosen to follow a moral compass as correct? If he (I am using this pronoun in the historical and all-encompassing sense) knew that he could not feel care for any man, but still chose to act with it because he believed the action of caring to be right?
You say that true ethics comes from caring. I do generally agree with this, but often character shines most brightly when someone does something because it is right, not because they care for the person in question.
For instance, a man may very well be attracted to a stranger he sees walking down the street late at night. He can at that point choose to act either in accordance with his emotions and desires (which in some cases brings great violence), or to act respectfully. A child or teen can desire a piece of candy at the store, and while there is no caring relationship with the store owner he can do the right thing for conscience sake.
Someone with a lack of emotion can still behave contrary to their emotional numbness. They can still believe something is right, simply because it is.
Because of this, I believe it is possible for a sociopath to be truly ethical, if his moral compass is correct. But it would look (and of course feel) very different. 🤔
(I had the thought yesterday but was very busy 😅
Hmmmmm
I’m in agreement. They can act ethically, but they cannot be ethical
Ethics isn’t just about doing the right thing—it’s about why you do it. A sociopath might act ethically out of logic, like saving a drowning person because it’s “the right thing,” but it’s not driven by care or connection. True ethics comes from valuing others’ well-being, not just following rules or principles. Without empathy, their actions may seem right, but they lack the depth that makes morality meaningful
Yeah that's my point exactly
Ah, I guess I've been using a different definition of ethics. If you define ethics as requiring the emotion of care then of course they can't.
[Did a quick check and Mirriam-Webster online does not mention emotion, simply a set of moral principles, with ethical = conforming to accepted standards of conduct. Though personally, ethics as conformation seems a shallow definition. I'll need to do a dive into some of my older dictionaries at home!]
I know a sociopath who, for the most part, acts ethically, but he genuinely only does ethical things because he’s worried he’ll be rejected from society if he doesn’t
Websters New International Dictionary, Second Edition, Unabridged:
Ethical:
- Of or relating to moral action, motive, or character; as, ethical emotion; also, treating of moral feelings, duties, or conduct; containing precepts of morality; moral
- Professionally right or befitting; conforming to professional standards
Will try to find another later, but this does seem to bear you out a bit more, being the same as moral. (Which begs the question, what is the definition of being moral).
But he genuinely had trouble rejecting all the knowledge of math if it came at the cost of his little sister
What would you call him if his motive was that it was the right thing to do?
Well, what is the right thing to do? It’s defined by your moral compass, which he does not have
I think in all cases, a sociopath acting ethically is not doing so because they want to do the right thing, as they have no definition of right and wrong
Like, to keep it in a world I know, what if he had decided logically that Christianity was real, and thus chose the Bible as a moral compass. (thus learning that fairness, treating others well, etc. was the correct way to live, and desired of him).
Would he be ethical? Or just "happening to follow kindness because the religion he believed in requires it"?
Actually, I do see a bit more of your point now. Are you saying that being innately ethical would require you to have an inborn care/understanding of why ethics are important?
Where behaving ethical without that internal compass isn't the same?
And you're asking if sociopaths can be innately ethical?
It’s still acting ethically, but it’s not being ethical
Yep, that’s what I’m arguing
Ahh, ok! That is a really interesting question... and would perhaps delve into whether it is possible to have a conscience without emotions 🤔
I think you can have a conscience, but it only works in relation to you. What I mean is - you have homework that’s due, but you don’t want to do it so you play video games to procrastinate. While you play the video game, you feel bad about what you are doing. AFAIK he experiences this, he’s talked about it w me, but it’s only because it’s in relation to him
He can only view something as a wrong choice if it’s wrong to him
Bruce in Finding Nemo says that "Fish are friends, not food." Is he right? If he is, how do we reconcile that with his attempting to eat Nemo in the next scene? <@&1305977291695718462>
Fish are fish
and I eat fish
therefore they are food
although they can also be friends
so it kinda depends
Valid answer
I dunno man he's crazy
he wuz lying
his plan was to strike once nemo was lured in to a false sense if security
no - i refuse to elaborate
you can eat your friends (ingame)
I mean I suffer from weaker emotions including empathy in general
I just rationalize most things as exchanges and transactions
I see emotions and feeling as valid currencies in a relationship even though I don’t feel them particularly deeply
Can you consider that “empathy”?
I see, that's really interesting. So sort of "I know this will hurt me later" or "my conscience feels bad because this is wrong," but he changes because it feels better for him to do the right things, not because it is better for others?
Yea precisely, he only has a conscience when he is doing an action that hurts him later. He genuinely doesn't understand what's wrong with slavery, since it resulted in society progressing fast and cheap, other than that he wouldn't like to be a slave.
It's kind of scary but I've had tons of interesting conversations with him and helped him develop a bit more of an understanding of society, which is something at least
<@&1305977291695718462> If you had a dollar for every time you didn't have a dollar, how many dollars would you have?
more than a million
this is more of a math question than a philosophy question
hi
I love fish, I want pet eel
But if you had a dollar every time you didn't have a dollar, then you wouldn't have any times where you don't have a dollar
nah cause I put it away every time
and then I don't have a dollar
Do you lose the dollars every time you gain a dollar?
And do you mean every time you had no dollars at all, or every time thre was a dollar you didn't have?
I guess that's a pretty philosophical question too
-topic
What goal do you think humanity is not focused enough on achieving?
<@&1305977291695718462>
teaching
He is incorrect. Fish are friends and friends can be eaten so are therefore food so stating that he is a friend but not food is incorrect.
Friends can be eaten?
Getting enough sleep each night?
At least that is me the past two days
I would have infinite yet also none
Schrodinger cat fr
-topic
What do you fear is hiding in the dark?
demons
i watched horror movies

took me years for me to get over the fact that there’s something lurking in the dark waiting to snatch you and torture you
even worst that i watched the conjurings 😭
Is darkness just the absence of light?
Is cold the absence of warmth?
is clean the absence of dirt
money thats not being made
What inconsequential super power would you like to have?
-topic
What songs hit you with a wave of nostalgia every time you hear them?
Those no copyright songs
The one that gets used in tutorials and things
I LOVE THOSE
YOOOOOOO I USED TO WATCH THOSE
Yeee exactly
Me too
i like reading but in the car or when there is no alternatives
if im studying then I can read
but in my house its kind of hard for me to read
(unless its studying)
any suggestions?
Philosophy is about widening up your perspective rather than narrowing it down with the existing facts that you have already consumed.
Widening up a deeper perspective just by ask yourself more about a certain thing and think more about how that certain thing could possibly do and if your idea is validate by others then a new fact has arise
ok
but i kinda need help
cause when I try to read i think of the alternatives and I don't
ok
What are the alternatives you think of?
youtube
Indeed it is my good fellow
Huh
Frrr it was GOATED
lol
What 😭
bro fumbled
there's still a chance
na i dont think so
specially with that gif bro
u gotta level up ur game
she's hiding her feelings
my level is perfectly fine
she def isnt
lollll
i dont think so
u looking like a boomer with that gif dawg
true
see even the girl agreed
but thats a cat tho
its still a female
based on kat's bio role, Kat is a male
na dont look at roles
yeah
😭
about what?
the thing u just did
reverse manipulative rizz
LOL
what is love?
my dad
how so?
thats cool
i cant say for sure , but to give attention is part of the love
love is someone who cares and genuinely wants the best for you, even when he makes mistakes and have done some things. he tries his best and always improves because he wants the best for his family. my dad sacrificed a lot for me and my siblings to be standing here today and he has proven that even in the midst of the chaos in which we didn't have the best relationship.
and also my bf
yea , fun fact u can see that more when u dont live with ur parents
i've had a bf 😭
i mean you live with your parents in your childhood and teenage years
after that, it's really a choice if you want to keep that relationship with your parents when you move out
i do now too but less time and our relations are better
also they teach me more or maybe im just more open than before
idk
that's true
hmmmmm i think worth to keep good relations whith ur parents
feels good
just imagine how happy they are
indeed
honestly it depends
some parents are manipulative and it's just sad to see
my parents are worth keeping a relationship with cause they're really great to hangout with
my mom was bit but now she dont try and we have better relations
yeah exactly
i think many of them are (idk sure) (i wish that)
that's understandable. my relationship with my mom is a little complicated. it's not the worst but it's not the best. it's just how it is. i don't hate her but eh lol
most parents raise children using manipulation
it sucks to see
make sense , i can understand
yes :))
thats i dont blame
was realy good compared with others
😦
it’s more common than you realize, it’s just not very obvious
Some parents are like this and their kids grow up messed up thinking it was their fault
But is it the seed or is it it's surroundings?
sometimes it's one, sometimes it's the other, and sometimes it's both. but honestly, if you had good parents, you'd know who to watch out for.
my dad is the type of person who would be skeptical of everything and i'm really grateful for him for that because he looked at things at an objective way. it didn't really help that my parents left me alone with a phone at the age of 13 during covid tho.
sometimes the seed can prevent the surrounding from corrupting the child.
I do wonder, though, how much of it is the seed’s nature versus the surroundings. Even a strong seed can struggle to thrive if the environment is too harsh or toxic, but sometimes, as you said, the seed can resist and grow despite it. I guess it’s always a mix, and it depends on the unique combination of both
Also ps I was referencing the quote - "if a seed fails to bloom into a flower do you blame the seed or do you blame the environment" smth like that lol
We can't hate people for who they are because 80% of it depends on their upbringing
And no human can be truly evil
Kat typing the longest message in Discord history fr
i mean, well. when you first have a child: who takes the most care of the child? who does the child look up the most? who does the child cry to the most? who does the child trust the most? some of the answers will be the mother or the father and sometimes it be the babysitter if she is babysitting a lot more than the parents.
however you can control who the child interacts with. it sounds like being a helicopter parent but it's just the same as letting your child not interact with some random stranger on the street. you can always meet the parents and see if you like the parents because the parents' personality typically has an impact onto the child since they're usually the models for the child (while there are some cases where the child's models aren't the parents).
of course, you can only go so far in protecting the child in his environment but if you can have the child trust you to know that you won't judge or punish, you have a much higher rate and hope that the child will be safe because of the fact that the child can lean on the parent for advice or comfort or guidance.
it is a combination of both the seed and the environment but ultimately, the child is in the hands of the parents because of how much the parents do impact the child - it's no small number (while there are some cases that the parents don't impact the child if the child has a different parental model). at least from newborn to teenage years.
but then again, even after teenage years, the life of the child is still in the hands of the parents but well.. adulting is not easy lol and that's what we have parents for.
badum
anyway
lol you wish
that is a very long message I'm not gonna lie
Hmmm parents absolutely have a huge influence, especially in the early years, but they’re not the only factor. You can’t control every aspect of a child’s environmentfriends, school and even random experiences play a role. The idea of trying to manage every interaction is unreslistic and, frankly, doesn’t prepare the child for real life.
Yes, trust between a parent and child is critical, but it’s not a guarantee. Even the best parents can’t always prevent outside influence or a child’s own choices from shaping who they become. At some point, it’s about equipping the child to navigate the world, not trying to shield them from it entirely
implying that it is for bad purposes
a lot of children are scared of the dark, going to buy "monster spray" is manipulation, but not bad
hmm i respond tomorrow
<@&1305977291695718462> Are cell phones more good or bad?
both
Plim plom plim
That's not how more works
Plom plom
Plom plim?
depends how you use it
Bing bong
I think that they offer more good than bad
yeye
ching chong
Explain
and they cannot be inherently bad because they are tools designed to help us, but how we use them can be harmful
RACISM
cellphones themselves can't really be bad, but the way we use them can be
indeed
It depends on perspective
Personally I think they’re more good than bad
But you could argue peoples happiness has gone down because of phones
IF THE WORLD WAS EENDIGN ID WANNA BE NEXT
TO YOUUUUUUUUUU OOOOOHHH
Huh
It’s 10:30
I got school tmrw, maybe in the afternoon tomorrow?
Aww okay
i mean it's hard to do that if the child isn't in your sight 24/7 obviously then the child would be influence by his environment. it would be different if the child is homeschooled tho, in which the child still in clubs, sports, and interactions all the while in being in the eyes of the mother or father. they wouldn't be stepping in or interferring anything. maybe they wouldn't always keep constant attention to the child because then that would just be helicopter parenting. but to know the general people your child interacts with will give the parent the idea of who is influencing the child.
this doesn't mean you go and manage every interaction because that's just frankly unrealistic (like you said) and it's honestly isn't healthy for the child. but the least you can do is to warn the child of the type of people to look out for. the traits you should look for in a friend, and etc.
oh whoops
^
amazing
Plom plim plim
screenzen
Plim plom plom
plom plom plom Plim
Why is language
bro forgot the question halfway
Hmmmmmm
I'll respond in a sec
Because.
It has indeed been longer than a sec
lol take your time
So I watched the last video in my watch laters, and I am really considering a zibaldone journal for 2025. It's thought to have meant "salad journal" in Italian because it was all the rage when notebooks were invented in Florence, and books were expensive, so people would pass them around and copy their favorite parts and share their journals like we share Instagram reels. How fun is that???
Tru
it is
but I am
I am not
Am i?
Hmm
😱
Am I truly free in the choices I make? <@&1305977291695718462>
Nah
If free will exists it’s proactive not reactive
You have the ability to change your future not your present
yeah kinda
are we just the sum of our actions, or are we something greater?
But you can change the present no?
Like if I'm eating or smth I can go do something else
That's changing the present
Hah both
We are shaped by our actions, but our potential and intentions make us more than what we do
indeed
You specifically, no
Everyone else yes
What does that even mean 😭
sum of actions + thoughts, next
Well, I’m not sure it’s so simple
How is the sun weighted? Surely one who only thinks good things but does genuinely nothing with their life isn’t a good person
In the same way someone who does many good deeds with purely selfish motives isn’t a good person either
weighted 50/50
so if you think only good things, but don't do anything, you get 50%(C)
however I'd slide everything so that
S -100
A+ 90-100
A- 80-90
B- 60-80
C-50-60
D -40-60
F - <40
that's a slippery slope
it is
does feeling bad about doing a negative action work as a justification for said action?
because based on this, it does
true
its like a best fit line
its not perfect but for most people it will work
Why
why what
CHAT
<@&1305977291695718462> If a person has an accident and is no longer able to contribute to society, has their value as a person decreased, increased, or stayed the same?
It stays the same, I don't think the 'contribution' to society really dictates someone's worth or value. Horrible millionaires are often considered more 'valuable' than the average joe
I disagree because contribution often shapes how value is perceived in society. While horrible millionaires might not be morally admirable, their influence or resources can create tangible impacts, like jobs or innovation. On the other hand, someone who doesn’t contribute might still have personal worth but is less impactful in a broader sense. Society, whether fair or not, often ties value to what someone provides or influencess
Does societal value outweigh inherent human worth when determining a person's significance?
<@&1305977291695718462>
I disagree with that, since majorly those millionaires aren't even in it for society, they're in it for themselves, typically like most people. The level of scale and influence is different, but at the end of the day, you and I need to care about society and the impacts of the things around us, while those millionaires don't, which is why they can so easily do what they do without much thought
And just because someone can't work due to some disability, does not mean whatever they have to offer won't be valued or impactful for anyone. Society, community, small group, 1 to 1, a small impact is still a impact nonetheless, and I think many people undermine themselves a lot in that way
I see the value in small, individual actions—supporting someone, inspiring change in a small circle, or building community connections can have profound personal impacts which is essential for relationships and local change
However, societal influence depends HEAVILY on scale. Millionaires, even if they do be acting selfishly, often create widespread ripple effects—funding industries, creating jobs, or driving innovations that shape society far more broadly than individual efforts. Their impact, whether intentional or not, reaches thousands or even millions.
I totally understand your point about individuality. This doesn’t diminish the importance of small contributions, which are invaluable in personal context, b ut the scale of influence is different, and society often values contributions based on their broader reach and tangible outcomes. Both levels matter, but they do play distinct roles in shaping the world
Lmao
Which also begs this question
depends on how you define value:
if you define it as the net worth or monetary equilivant, then it decreases
I think
its time for me to comment a philosophical value
this time
oh actually
nevermind
my philosophical thought just vanish
but i recommend reading this book
which i am currently reading
i dont need a book for this
Lmaooo
Life without a form of struggle is also a form of suffering without purpose in life
In life, we deal with hardships and struggles in order to fulfill for our needs and if our life provides us everything that we have need and dreamed of, then... What is the purpose of our existence? Why do we exist? If we don't experience a thing called Suffering?
are we really human if we don't suffer? as humans, we make mistakes and when mistakes are made, we pay for the consequences. the consequences thus being the suffering in a sense
buh
Life doesn’t need suffering to have purpose. Without struggles, we could focus on enjoying life, helping others, and exploring new things. Our purpose could come from love, happiness, and creating a better world, not just from overcoming hardships
Pshhhh
Some people are so ignorant sometimes
(not talking about you orange lmao)
Gladly
ahem
ooo i have an idea
what is considered a meaningful life to you? <@&1305977291695718462>
buh
well, i think we can assume that large impact on the world is a meaningful life
so that's a start
I assume you mean a large positive impact which only applies to some people. Not everyone wants to have a big impact on the world and some that do want a big impact want a negative impact
It all comes down to how we individually define meaningfulness
lmk if u ever find out 😔
one where I achieve what I set out to acheive
Do we all see the same colours?
Does it matter?
Pretty much impossible to tell. Ain't no way to figure out what the soggy bacon in your skull is doing with all that color information.
Following God, having big purposes to strive for, reasons to get out of bed in the morning. Being help and good to others and not burden to them. Living busy but ofc not too much. Simply doing benefical stuff
Yes it does, with no bad there cant be good. With no uncomfratable stuff there cant be enjoyable stuff. Without suffering you cant have flaws, without flaws you cant strive to something. You cant create better world if it isint broken
Is conscience real or is it all just survival insticts <@&1305977291695718462>
Did Jesus have flaws? Isn't he still good?
He didint, he is perfect. Am talking for humans, he is God
God doesn't have flaws too, he's still good though isn't he?
As i said we sre humans he is God its different, we are made in his image but he is still above us, better than us
Also in heaven will there be any bad? But there will still be good won't there?
Heaven is a different place than earth, this is a broken world and broken stuff builds us up as we endure. I dont know how it is in heaven im talking about earth, which is different than heaven
Yes but you're saying that bad is inherently connected to good. If something can be completely good without bad then how does that work?
Conscience is real but there's different forms of it that aren't just for human understanding
Earth is not heaven as simple as that. I personally cant see how u can be halpy if everything is good but i still trust that somehow heaven is like that and works like that
But then you're saying that you can be happy without suffering in heaven? Therefore suffering is not inherently connected to experiencing something good.
If I was to assume anything, I'd think heaven wouldn't cater much to human or heartily desires. Similar to how our minds can't process the thought of aliens from across the universe with completely different ways of living that us. Just a theory behind the thought
As a Christian i should belive in conscience but i cant help but see how it being instics makes sense to me. Like if u heart someone close to u u will feel bad because ur relationship with someone close to you is damaged, i can see it as just tactical and survival insticts. And those insitcs arent only self related but about others aswell
Yes, on earth it is, not everywhere tho.
I didint even think of heaven or anything like that when typing, after all i can only really speak about what i experience here
Instincts and consciousness don't have to be separate
Mothers generally have the instinct to care for young if it benefits them, and survival. But there's also the consciousness to form bonds
Yes, however i can see us just making conscience a separet thing from instocst tho they are simply just instincts
I'll admit that in the life we live suffering often leads to betterment but it is not because of the suffering that we get better and improve. We get better because of the side effects of suffering, not the suffering itself. When you exercise it can be almost painful, but do you get stronger because of the pain? No, no you do not. You get stronger because of the healing from the pain and whatnot but if you didn't feel said pain it would not detract from the muscle growth.
I mean dont we form bondy because we are social creatures. Mother will form bond with child, well obivpusly to raise a child. Ppl will make bonds witj each other because they are social creatures and they are getting possoble support and help for future
U get stronger mentally when suffering
Some mothers don't form bonds or the desire to care for their kids. Something through various reasons
Because you're healing from it. It is not the pain that causes the growth though. And it's not just suffering that makes you get stronger. It's specific types of suffering that cause specific side effects.
And suffering and pain is also inherently bad because ya know, you can just be in pain and not grow from it. Because once again it is not the pain that causes improvement, it is the healing from pain.
Breaking bones is suffering isn't it? How can you improve yourself from breaking a bone?
How does being in a car crash that leaves you disabled result in something good?
How does literally 90% of the types of pain you can experience result in something good?
True, that could be because of health related stuff, or bwcause they are genuinely evil and that stuff.
Something good can happen despite the pain and suffering, you can make something good out of suffering, but it is almost never a direct result of the pain and suffering.
Becausw u go throught somethinf hard and other stuff becomes less hard. And u get humbeld and more grateful
How can you be humbled and grateful for your spouse dying in a car crash? That's suffering isn't it? But it doesn't cause anything good.
If u dont fight it its gona swallow you yeah, exepct times when u rlly cant do anythinf abt it
Also how does depression fit into all of this? That's essentially perpetual suffering with no gain.
You will be more grateful for others around u, more grateful for memories u ahve with your spouse. And humbeld to not let pride make u argue with yoir close one over stuff that dont need arguing because you could lose them any second you never know
This is gona sound goffy but if u get out of it u make a great story of ur life.
U take a look bacl and see how far u come, when u fix some big probelm in ur life thats the best fwlling ever, when u come from nothing to something better. I remember times when i coildnt do a single push up now i can do 40 in a row and its good looking back
But you don't get out of depression? It's a mental problem.
Yes you can by changing ur life
My dad has had it all of his life and has made attempts on his life several times.
He's a great man despite it, but it's not the depression that has caused him to be this way.
Its a terrible thing but theres alwqys a wqy with no hope in this life ur done
What is it?
I think you can heal from depression, it's not impossible. At the very least you can go through good periods or times where life feels nicer
He's a man of a god.
Ah, that is the main source, but i still belive suffering=good
Not really. You can work through it and not feel like you wanna die every second of the day but it's a constant struggle that you can't really get over. If you slip for a second you go back to feeling like garbage.
Question then, do you seek out suffering? If suffering=good then wouldn't you want to suffer?
Im not in a good mental state. Better than befire amd thats because im trying, doing somewhat benefical stuff. I dont live a good life, not super awful ig, i have big flaws and because of them i feel bad mentally, u gotta fix ur flaws to feel better, someone is not depressed for no reason. U dont get cancer for no reason, stuff happens in ur body am no docotr but yeah thats simply how it goes. Amd without those flaws stuff to work on life is torture. I dont rlly have a purpose like i used to have which makes me suffer. Lets just say i was increnebly lucky to get that opportunity, unlucky to lose it and increnebly unlucky to get used to joy strivi.g for it gave. But i belive that all this suffering is gona benefit me, that it will build me up
I mean i used to be much more disciplined, going very tierd to bed every night because i had more of a purpose in life and man was it awesome when every day has soms tensions ofc this is nothing like having family problem ajd that ofc i wont strive for that but if somwthing like that cathes someone it is benefical if person doesent let it swallow them
This is more of a side note but people do in fact have depression for no reason, or at least no reason on the part of the person. Mental health problems exist and people can have lifelong depression literally because their brains are made wrong.
It's very likely that it will build you up. But you could've also built yourself up without suffering.
I cant see that
How?
By practice and being a good person?
How can i be good without there being evil
How can i help someone if there are no burdens other have and me
How can i be himble if u have no flaw and problems
idk as human im evil
By not being a horrible person. I know great people who have had wonderful lives.
Well we are actually all evil but yeah
my name say what i belive
I belive in depravity too
Why can't you see that? Could you elaborate on why you can't understand having mental illnesses that cause depression?
There had to be problems to be great everypne has them, and for a reason
til now i didnt find a philosophy who can save us
Wdym
The reason is because their brains physically are not producing enough dopamine and other chemicals.
just how i feel about myself , im a very bad human with insane thoughts sometimes
sometimes i dont want to be creative
Well i prob cant because i prob dont have something like that if ur right that its possible. But how sadddining is that thought its basically means ur forever ill from it, how can u then have hope how can u exepct to get rid of it, what is a human without hope
Yeah, it's suffering without hope, and therefore nothing can be gained from it.
We are all wicked in Gods eyes but ur prob not very bad i genuinely doubt it if u litreally have remorse and accept it and u belive an dstrive for light(God)
very sad. However lets be honest now im not much of a hsitory guy but ppl before were living much worse than we today and we are less happy. We are to comfratable.
yes God want to save us (im the one who needs)
All of us need God
but sometimes we cant see that
Imma come in few mins
True
People before also had a much bigger stigma surrounding mental illness. My family has had a history of depression but due to the fact that you would essentially be beaten down for even suggesting you were sad you wouldn't talk about it. Due to the fact that we have more ways to express ourselves nowadays it is easier to see the amount of suffering that is happening everyday when before it all happened behind closed doors.
Well u would expect then ppl back then to eventially break and end it all. But thats happening today much more. Everyome now has depression because theres no that stigma i do think it was too extreme back then but we need to be more tough
thats why i think 80% of ppl with depresion dont have a goal and dont work for it
they are not sick
Absolutely
That the whole reason ppl get depressed because they dont have a purpose
Life is to easy
are some exceptions
yea , it is
i say if life isnt easy then im weak
Ah well life gotta be hard fpr u to not be weak
i think the hard thing most of the times is just in my mind
things i like to do even if are 10 times harder feels ez
so
i just like to say life is easy
@celest bridge im curious, are there literal studies and stuff that prove that science can track if brain doesent release enough dopamine. I domt meam talking and seeing if ppl have sings of deppresion but litrealy machines or something that tracks chemicals in brain
Ohh true, absolutely
I make drama of stuff that i can do but i just gotta be consistent
Alr
til now my life was easy , and now i dont belive ppl who say how hard is something ...
i will see , and i will try
Lol when i uave push day imma be dying to do it even when i domt feel at best. But when i gotta do legs or stretch im like ahhh lol
yea lol :)) similar
Well life today is definetly easier than before, some ppl uave it bad i def domt and i gotta be grateful that also blessing and curse at the same time tho but its all my fault if its curse because i have resources and time to do good stuff
for me is just bc i cant find a long term goal for legs
bc i dont have that much weights
maybe 30reps BSS with 20kg is a good goal for now
Ah, wel currently i do high rep stuff so goal for me is just to get numbers up on exercises
good
Yeh
I currently do high rep push ups, pull exercises and squats and practice handstands
thats cool
I would love to be able to do other skills tho would have to change training style, will do in future prob
yes
I don't know of any specific ones but yes. There are quite a few I believe.
What dp i google to find it lol
I was actually gonna try and link a study but I also didn't know what to google to find em.
Ah alr, imma try to find it later, btw i enjoyed debating
Ye.
i involuntary contradict and complement people
some are fine with that some dont like that
i mean God is good and the opposite of God is the devil sooo
idk if is the opposite
bc isnt even close as ''strong''
ok he asked something harder
i cant imagine
ngl
Yeah but does God suffer for that good? If no then suffering is not inherently required for good.
oh true
Oh, so we need suffering for happiness to exist? That’s such a tired argument. Why does good only have value if there’s bad? That’s such a narrow view of human potential. We can appreciate joy, love, and fulfillment on their own merits, without having to endure pain first. If anything, clinging to the idea that suffering is necessary just perpetuates it.
And striving for something doesn’t require flaws or brokenness, it truly requires vision, curiosity, and creativity. Do you think an artist paints only to fix a blank canvas? No, they create for the sake of creating. Why can’t we pursue a better world simply because we can because we want to leave it better than we found it, not because it’s some dystopian mess we’re forced to repair? Your mindset assumes we’re incapable of evolving past suffering, which says more about your limits than life’s potential
I actually was reminded of something in regards to this topic. If someone turns out better and does good because they want to stop the cycle of abuse they were raised in does that mean that the abuse was good? Was the abuse beneficial to their childhood? The answer is no obviously. They did good despite the abuse and it was the healing that made them better. Abuse typically simply creates more abusers. If one does not heal from suffering then there is no benefit and thus suffering does not equal good. It is the healing that is good not the suffering that caused it.
no im dum
Sufferimg gives ability to heal tho, u cant heal if theres no suffering
To me its very simple good cant exist without bad, bad cant exist without good, how can it? Ppl were happier before tho they were in worse cicrumstances. For artist i get you but not everyone wants to do art and everyone needs some flaws some problems to function properly. If u were to get rid of suffering here we would all go insane. Our species is suffering since the begging and as much as we evolve and get rid of it we become more and more broken and thats the fact people are more sad, sensitive and stupid than ever before
Wdym
Also i want to add artist has tp go through sufferimg to create art
There are definetly a ton of trials in creating art so yeah
U need suffering everywhere
no lol 😭
have you never seen art made out of love, kindness, happiness, contentment?
I mean wouldnt painting be complicated atleast in some cases unless ur da vinci level??
lol
i mean yeah
but not all
Even da vinci prob had to struggle atleast few times i mean hes human like us
Also beliving that suffering gives good is not a bad mindest its a powerful thing which if u belive in will always give you hope
Because then suffering isint just some torment to you, you see it as a test
Were we suffering since the beginning? If we're talking religious perspective then weren't Adam and Eve having a pretty good time before they left the garden of Eden?
Yes but that doesn't mean that the suffering itself was good because you do not improve from suffering. It requires an extra action and I feel like that's a really important factor. Even if we are going by the logic of you can't have good without bad that still doesn't mean that the suffering itself is good.
if they say something and is cot complet i complement their point
suffering = love
my opinion
Some of my best art is based on love and it's not like practicing art is suffering. Struggling to make a new art piece doesn't mean I'm suffering through it, it just means it isn't easy.
if is not easy is some suffering
No?
now i dont like art just if have sense
u need to suffer if u want to be elite in any thing
art sport work etc
I have not suffered through art. Certainly it is not easy but essentially every moment of it I have enjoyed.
u should to enjoy the final thing sure
we have both
sometimes we enjoy somethimes is so sad
when things dont looks how should
Yes but unless your mindset is wack that isn't suffering. If something doesn't look right you can just try again and work harder.
I meant more from evolution side of things
Yes it is good because it give ability to do an action that improves you, healing, but even in process of siffering u lesrn a lot u could be groing throught a long trial of pain in life and everydays be learning lessons slowly getting out of it
True
uhh is it really love if you're suffering in the relationship?
It is tehnically suffering but yeah not on level of losing a loved one ofc
"suffering" as a word is extreme
I think he means more like parents suffering for child whwn taking care of it because they love it
Okay now I'm confused. What on earth do we even mean by suffering then? Cause difficulty does not equal suffering.
Personally ot all varies from person to person i get most joy out of something if it was very hard ans i did it
they don't love the child because they love the suffering? they just love a child that they're willing to lose a bit
Ok i was being extreme yeah i was looking at every single trial like a suffering lol
Yeah but i think he means it in a way that love is suffering for someone if needed
oh yeah of course. it wouldn't be love if you weren't willing to sacrifice something
Yeah cause that is simply not the case. You can struggle and even experience pain without inherently suffering.
Well it could be sligbt suffer8ng if u dont keep getting better for a long time and keep doing it, or if u somehow lose art u worked on hard and still keep going
depends the situation
I agree, i agree that in some cases you can get joy without suffering but in a lot of cases with suffering to therefore suffering isint bad
^
Yeah
I was not speaking of art from the perspective of everyone I was speaking from my own perspective. And the fact that I am not suffering through it means that it is not a requirement for art.
Of i read this right, u complement them before they complete their point?
er- i would leave the relationship if it's causing me to suffer ;-;
there will be times of sadness in relationships cause of mistakes and such but nothing that would (or should) mess the relationship up in a long run
Also of course in everything there is suffering, we are human, but that still doesn't make the suffering good.
it wouldn't exactly be a hobby of yours if you didn't enjoy art lol
Alr, but suffering through art can be good in certian situations, as i said like not getting better for a long time, it tests your patience and willingness to continue
Ye. I absolutely love art. One of my best coping mechanisms.
yess I love art as well. i love looking at what artists have created. it's just really beautiful how we can translate a bunch of scribbles into these masterpieces
Just cause suffering can lead to good experiences doesn't mean that the suffering itself was good.
I genuinely dont understand how if it can cause good, suffering gives u a ton of potebtional in future because of lessons u learn. Its the thibg that gives a lot of wisdom. Like if ur in a war on a batelfield i bet those ppl learn a lot everydays, wisdom wise
If a cat is stuck in a tree and someone gets it down that is a good action, correct? So are cats being stuck in trees a good thing?
no after
No, i have to admit, whole time im talking abt human experience tho. However this is kinda goffy but cat could learn a lesson to be more careful in future lol
Whats wrong with that?
if they are sick ?
nothing realy
Lol
some just dont like
yes. except if you're in war, you're going to have PTSD from seeing hundreds of people dying on battlefields. the results of the suffering can be good but there's a downside to it 99% of the time
I mean then try to not i recommend not thinking abt not trying to do because than ur prob do it more cuz ur thinling abt it lol
suffering for good
uhh mentally? yeahh ig?
dont be stupid
no , u need to take care of others
Yes, true abt PTSD i did not think abt that, i do be making myself wrong here to myself lol
war is never good
and sometimes is some suffering
yes , i said to suffer for good things not bad ones
But in less extreme situatuons than war its good
how ?
depends. some relationships requires you to take a step back instead of a step forward - especially if your mental health is also being affected by them
For example while maybe living with fimancial problems u will leaen how to use money better and become more thankful for stuff
And humble
I feel like the most important factor here is suffering can cause a good thing. Suffering often doesn't though and if it was good inherently then I feel like that's a contradiction.
here depends , we need specificity
in that case
Its not good always but definetly can be thats my whole point
i see
And it can create great potential
yes
Ppl that went through hell on earth are ones that are most inspirational
let's say someone is suicidal and she's suicidal 24/7 and talking about suicide all the time. she can have the affect on you. this is what happened to me when i was 14 and i first had disord
im just to weak so suffering is good for me
We all are
"lets be chill , thats not a solution"
what i will say
and why to suicide ?
Can cause. It can be good. That doesn't mean it's good though. You can make it good despite how bad it is but that doesn't mean that it was good in the first place. The biggest blessing you can have is not going through it to begin with.
how extreme was ur life :/
enough to make me numb every morning when i wake up and have a hard time crying even when i want to most of the time lol
People who fight criminals are seen as heroes, but that doesn't mean that the criminals are good are they?
sad
I mean if u dont go turough bad ur gona suffer here, its gona be very boring. Suffering always has ability to give you good, but its not if it swallows you yeah. And if its huge suffering that messed u up like war than its bad i would say
I struggle to cry lol
Tho i want to sometimes
So suffering isn't inherently good? And it's the healing afterwards that's good?
Thats not at all what im displaying. Im talking abt personal struggles
I'm just using it as an example.
And i agree with that example
suffering is good if u know how to mannage it
That crimibals are not good
my opinion
PFT, that's like saying depression is good if you know how to manage it 💀
Yeah, however some is too kuch so it will break u atleats somewhat like war if u seen bad stuff in it ofc
we cant avoid suffering so yes
sure is important to do all u can to avoid it
if u can
but we cant control much
Suffering can always give good if u go throught it. Every single one will give u wisdom, however extreme ones more bad than good in most cases. Thats what i belive. While suffering u can get postige stuff, wisdom so it is good
uhh not everyone will get depression but i see what you mean
war is 😭
i understand what u say , dont stay in a bad relationship (if thats realy bad)
we can avoid some stuff
you can also get wisdom without going through suffering lol
yes and no
Doesent mean everyone in war sees bad stuff, my father from what he told didint see super awful stuff if amy awful so yeah hes good mentally
not like we go through war to learn the stuff about the book from Art of War
we need some suffering
is a must
at all is not
If u suffered u appreciated wisdom much more. Theres reason why little kids arent talking abt wisdom lol
war is shit
Okay I feel like we've reached a stalemate here. I'm gonna be off.
i mean yeah, it's inevitable. i'm sure we all cried from not getting something we wanted when our mom said no lol
Bye Cuttlefish
lol , now life is ur mom :))
lol real
Nah, i mean with awful like seeing someone get killed in front of u, im heard he hear a lot of gunshots, bombs and stuff ofc thats bad thats suffeeing to go through a forrest and hear gunshots around u
just our opinions , i dont want to be annoying
Yes, i never said we need to go to war, thats a last option
last = the worst
Yeah lol
Yes
i see , but some do
What some do, im lost a bit lol
war is bad even if u dont see awful things
some see them
war is never good honestly
Yes ot can bring good tho, wisdom and that
never ever
you don't need to go to war to have that kind of wisdom
just strenght to keep doing even in hell
you just need to know what it's like to see someone die in front of you
but
In conclusion extreme suffering is overall bad, and other is overall good
suffering is never good lol
is good , teach us
Really, those ppl are the bravest ones those understand stuff more than any of us softies imo
However its not worth it
Because of bad stuff
No suffering would cause huge suffering
hmm ig so
when i was 17 yo i suffered bc my life was without purpose so i learned how to live better and i got more wisdom (im still stupid)
Yep
is nice to suffer for a purpose that worth in ur eyes
is less suffering
than without one
indeed
Yes when i was tierd striving twoards achiving one of my goals that i sadly lost those were some of my best times, i mean it gve a lot of joy, that was my prime happines wise lol
Bad friend groups suck. I always thought I just hated people growing up before I realized that no, I just mostly surrounded myself with people I don't like and there are actually people who I enjoy the company of.
:)) yes
We all are, thats a literal fact whoever disagress is lying to himslef
indeed
that's understandable
i used to be like that as well
Attention seekers i mean
oh
Also I kinda sucked as a person as well. I'm still learning how to not be a garbage human being.
i agree , but these school kids teach u to have a reasonable self esteem
they are not better
yeah of course. we all desire to have some attention
honestly just a matter if your intention of talking to a particular person is specifically because you're doing it for attention or because you genuinely want to talk to them
honestly same
environmental change (friends , media , goals) makes a big diff
indeed
who you surround yourself with really have a huge impact
yes
i see that in my life
and works
Yes, i must say now that i am sadder than before i havs the most desire for attention than before so from personal experience im happiest when i focus the least on attention so thats whaz i should strive for its prob same for most i mean it makes sense. I mean those rude ppl are like it because they want to get reaction out of u so they feel better
However i also kinda want more respect cuz of my low self esteem
However there are obivous reason im like this, i got stuff to fix
yes me with HSPUs pull-ups etc
just imagine someone looks a u and what to become like u
Absolutely if someone gets under ur skin thats very bad, sadly happening to me, truly shouldnt
Lol i litreally daydream abt being able to planche and do those skills so i get attention and respect
:))
mine is more to get strong
sure a PL will dont be a good goal
Ah
but for me PL is just good to have
O its awesome it looks so cool
(u know ppl ask about it too much)
:))
understandable lol
also i show my work :))
me who intentionally finds people who gets under my skin to learn how to deal with people like them an increase my patience tolerance:
i just did today
Im gona try to strive for it becazse of attention gain asl least as possible cuz imma be happier then
I mean you do you ig if u find it helping u lol gl
lol i mean kids can be annoying so i gotta learn how to be patient so i can learn to tolerant them when they need me as a mother
just preparing myself for motherhood
Smart
patient but some things should be taxed
is conscience a real thing <@&1305977291695718462>
oh yeah of course, i'm careful with it haha
yes
for a lot of scenarios i can think that its simply just instincts, both self and others related but then again sometimes i feel bad for something tho it is not related to me or others of my species (animals) so it cant be tactical thinking, instincts
u can think that lying is simply wrong because it ruins trust, tactically speaking u could lose close ppl that are help to u, same u can say for killing, stealing ect. U could say that if u hurt someone u will feel bad because ur simply hurting someone important to u, possibly ruining relationship, because of it feelling both bad for yourself and them. But then why do we find hurting animals if we dont need to wrong, i thought we feel bad beacuse we are wasting time for nothing, just causing pain, but then again if u accidentally hurt an animal ur not like oh no i lost time, u actually feel bad for it tho from survival point of view you shouldn't because it is not your species. and everywhere on earth torturing animals for no reason is found wrong
i'm not in the mood to debate atm lol
alr lol
“Real” as defined by science or perception
Conscience is immeasurable as far as I know so scientifically no, but I feel like I have conscience so yes from my perception
<@&1305977291695718462> Is deja vu?
there is no such thing is Perfect
I feel like this is wrong. Sure on the bigger scale perfection is almost impossible to achieve but if you look smaller perfection is easier and very much plausible. Also depends on what you mean by perfect.
both
intersting , but we still can make decisions
There is a difference between being unproven by science, and real. Science itself, and theories of how we came to be don't even prove that our senses are reliable - We infer it by our experiences, and science relies on that for us to even use the scientific method. So in the conversation of whether conscience is "real," I think it's important to remember that science is one mode of studying the world and finding truth, not the only one.
(For instance, science might say that my room is warm because [insert very long explanation of a heating system], where its quite as true to say the house is warm because we set the thermostat where we are comfortable.)
Isn’t free will the ability to make decisions?
It depends on what you consider real, if perception is reality perhaps
But science is about measuring and finding correlations and relationships so we can take advantage of them, like how we gleaned that penicillin kills bacteria therefore can be used to cure ailments in the body
If you can’t measure or act on something consistently, it’s almost as it doesn’t exist.
According to science
Which is why I don’t think conscience exists
I feel like I have it, but I don’t know if others feel it or how it works, and how I can manipulate it
Therefore it’s inconsequential to my existence
I cannot test, theorize, or act on it
I see! How do you think about things like friendship and such, then?
I can measure friendship
i dont understand
If I’m nice to someone, usually their nice to me, ect
i think is more than that
Sociology is a branch of science
no , some things exist and we dont know
and we cant measure them
You can measure and act on what social queues and tells
how u measure ?
How did this person react to my actions?
In a scientific setting you could measure levels of horomones
If you can’t act on something and get consistent results than it’s inconsequential
depends
depends what he have in head
For example, I know if I let go of an object it will fall without support
It’s actionable and measurable
I can also act on the fact people like praise
I can measure reactions
something like dark matter
And figure out how to best create relationships
thats basic
Thats why it’s theoretical
Complex things are the sum of many simple ones. Planes work due to multiple simple principles
i 100% agree
but some things cant get good results
too many variables
Chaos theory fr
But we know there is a relationship, just not the specifics
Like with dark matter again we can hypothesize on it’s properties by how it interacts with gravity
Though we have no proof
yes
Something which is intangible, dark matter is somehow still measurable and can further our understanding of physics
Crazy
yep
the world itself (all life) aint perfect since it always changing if it was, the world stays the same not always shifting/changing
Perfect is just a term of remark
not the thing itself
it only exist by remark
I've seen a couple religious people in this chat and I was curious about something. Would you say I deserve eternal torture?
i do
is not my problem to judge others
Can you elaborate on that?
God know others
So you're just saying it's not up to you to say if I deserve eternal punishment?
yes
Okay, lemme reword my statement then.
I'm a non-believer. According to your god, non-believers deserve eternal torture, correct? Do you agree with your god that I deserve eternal torture?
God does what he wants , cant be wrong
i deserve eternal torture
we all does
I dont think so
from my human perspective, people only deserve divine punishment, when they committed a sin that it is too evil
that can affect the life of any living things
negatively
or if they commit a sin by disrespecting someone's religion harshly
Depends what you did
If you called someone on speakerphone in a crowded elevator, yes
some would say yes. some would say no. honestly depends who you ask tbh
Doesn’t the honestly imply tbh? Are both necessary?
Lol
shhh
i just tend to add unnecessary words for some reason lol
same girl
all good, thought it was funny
This was more intended as a personal question not a just in general question.
at the end, there's no valid answers - just opinions
the only way to find out is to experience the end point of life and meet the Death Point
Yes
Man god is such a goofer for being so obtuse
if you were an angle, you'd be acute 🥰
