#PHILOSOPHY CHANNEL
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
It depends though
if his parents are in his best interest then they can see blind spots
hmm yes i will keep that into consideration
indeed
is it good or bad to gossip?
Depends on the topic and person
whats the definition of gossip?
To discuss something thoroughly
Shit im bad with philosophy
Imo gossip is talking about other people when they're not there
It could be positive (did you hear that guy just got named king of the universe) or negative (his nose is upside down what a loser)
Nahh
Karma exists
The question I always ask myself is
"Would I want someone to do/say something like that about me?"
Answer is probably not
what if it didn’t
uhhh that would just be a deep conversation lol
@ancient wharf @fresh grail
so gossip in definition is a bit subjective because there was a whole lot of different definitions of it when i searched it up on google but here’s some that we can settle on for now so the conversation doesn’t go wild
I mean
If you’re okay with people talking behind your back, go ahead and gossip. Otherwise you should probably stay out of it lol
Hey that's my definition
What are the odds
lol
pftt, so you basically stick by the golden rule
is it possible to not judge or have an impression on people?
I think it's impossible to not have a first impression of someone just because biologically people are wired to make snap judgements. I do think that someone could definitely ignore their first impression and act without judgement, but I don't think it's possible to go in without a judgement
What do you think lol
You always asking the questions but never answering them
lol
i like asking questions than answering them
haha
understandable
i can see how you came to that conclusion
subconsciously, you will always have a judgement about someone, but conscoiusly, you have a choice. you can make a first impression about someone and then ignore that first impression and treat that person like you would with anyone else.
so, to an extent, it's possible
It's possible to ignore your first impression. It's not possible to not have one
LOL
basically
So we agree
why do people hate Roblox
it's the greatest game
a billion user made games all accessible
you can make money from it too
Because it's mostly kids and kids are annoying
theres plenty of quality games
besides you only need 1 good game for it to qualify
and there is a few
probably the people than the actual gameplay
It's somewhat hard to find the good ones though.
Haven't really played much Roblox and although it definitely isn't bad enough to be hated it's kinda mediocre imo.
Just from what I've seen though.
I've been a dev and a player for awhile
I returned to it after a few years and was suprised
there is a lot of good games now
and gambling
Wow, an actually good philosophical question in philosophy? Am I dreaming?
No, I would not. This is the modified trolley problem
Not only because they're my loved one so I'm less inclined to kill them, I wouldn't kill any one, stranger or loved one, even if it saved 1 million people
If you can be persuaded to kill or do something unethical in the same utilitarianism, then you can be persuaded to do anything
what if a terrorist asks you to bomb a city in exchange of saving a country? You do that and then your hands are dirty, even if you "saved" hundreds of millions of people
Also, by killing someone, you are actively involved in their murder, whereas if the 100 people died, you weren't involved at all
all this is just philosophy obv, in an actual situation like that I'd probably freeze and breakdown
true
i could never honestly
if anything, i would sacrifice a million people to save him
anyway
new question
is corporal punishment effective? why or why not?
( just noticed that most of my questions aren't really philospical lol, they're either psychological or fit some other category)
then the question comes back, no? The roles are just reversed
How many people are you wiling to sacrifice to save your loved one?
everyone
so everyone in the world including your parents, siblings, friends, teachers, dogs, and cats?
it will honestly be a great burden to carry but one i'll be willing to make
yes
no idea
yeah in the end the protagonist killed himself, i think
you don't have to
indeed
what am i gonna do w 100 strangers 
i hope their family dont find out tho 👀 whatever it is i did
It's very effective, 100% of people who got the death penalty never committed another crime
LOL
I think you confused corporal punishment for capital punishment
What's the difference
capital punishment = death penalty
corporal punishment = beatings given to children for discipline (could also be used for crime)
Capital punishment is more effective
wow, sounds like you're really lucky and he's pretty lucky to have someone who loves him as much as it sounds you do.
yeah, i really am lucky to have such a man in my life. never thought i'd be able to meet a person like him tbh
that's really cool!
do you know if he feels the same about you?
tbh, i still have some doubt about it but ik he does. it mostly just the voice talking otherwise lol
that makes sense. The brain likes to lie to you a lot
nah it's not really my brain. there's a voice in my head and it likes to talkitalkitalk
schizophrenia?
hm
👀
you also have schizophrenia
Nah fr is that called scizo?
LOL
if you have a voice talking to you in your head that you feel is not your own
then yeah, you probably have schizophrenia
i'm not being serious btw
Haseeb is though
I talk to myself
But its me
bro just found out he might have schizophrenia in a Discord chat 💀
rip Haseeb
Nooo i dont think so man
dont self diagnose even if you do actually have it 😭
Idk lets end this convo im getting confused
that's internal monologue and a lot of people don't have it
Oh
How do they not have it man
you also don't have it for every thing, I bet
you know when you sometimes think of something based on your emotions rather than words?
that's how they have it for everything
Ohh
I have it when i lay down to sleep
All tired at night
But i can talk to it anytime tho
As long as you dont start believing its another entity its all good
Nah nothing like that
A true philosophy question is one where no answer is wrong
It's so cool
So you'd rather sit back and let 100 people die just to keep your hands "clean"? That's not moral high ground; that's cowardice disguised as virtue. Refusing to act when you could save lives doesn’t make you innocent it reallymakes you responsible for every preventable death. Morality isn’t about protecting your conscience; it’s about doing what’s right, even when it’s hard
Same lmaooo
Talking to yourself is normal
Like
I talk to myself everyday
As in have a conversation with myself
Idk why i do it but it just feels good
Yeah exactly
Yeah it's like there's someone you can tell your problems to 😭
Man I feel so schizo rn
Nope, it is not about letting 100 people die but rather than actively taking the life of someone who otherwise wouldn't have died, so it is moral high ground. To save some people who are going to die anyway, you actively steal someone's right to life. You aren't doing any good.
Yeah but
if you don't kill anyone, you were never involved, those people did not die because of you
but if you kill someone, someone died because of you
murder is only in the 2nd option
Letting 100 people die to avoid making a difficult choice doesn’t make you morally superior; it’s just choosing inaction over responsibility. Those lives aren’t lost to fate—they’re lost because you’d rather avoid taking a difficult step to save them. Sometimes, real morality means making hard choices to prevent greater harm, not just standing by to protect your conscience
Bro 😭
So you would let 100 people die because you don't wanna get your hands dirty
I think you're confusing only one action as taking a choice rather than accepting that not taking one life IS making that difficult choice
if only one answer that is saving those 100 people is making the difficult choice then that is not a choice
me not killing the one person IS my difficult choice
morality is not a numbers game btw
My brother
Saying "not killing is my choice" is just an excuse to dodge responsibility. The actual hard choice isn’t refusing to act it’s stepping up to save lives, even when it’s uncomfortable. Letting 100 people die to keep your hands clean isn’t moral strength it’s selfpreservation disguised as virtue
This reminds me of fate zero where the same question was asked to the main character
He chose to kill the one though
Morality isn’t about numbers, but it’s also not about ignoring consequences. Letting more people die just to feel “pure” isn’t moral—it’s putely selfish
Is it a good show i was thinking of watching it but idk
Maybe now i convinced you lol
The mc there is amazing
Hmm
you're focusing on the wrong thing. You're focusing on the internal aspect of choosing to kill, rather than the external aspect of taking a life. Mortality is about the external aspect, not the internal. You're focusing on "keeping hands clean" when it is actually about the other person who is being killed, not you
the other person had nothing to do in this, yet you chose to steal their life away
that is morally wrong
the 100 people were already involved
I think you are ignoring the fact that unless you do this 100 people die
So its kinda hard to just say no to letting them die
that is the default. Saying that you actively kill someone who has nothing to do with any of this to save 100 people who were already dying isn't morally superior, I would argue it's morally inferior
But the fact they are dying isnt set in stone
You're completely missing the point. You're fixating on the idea of taking a life, but what you're really ignoring is the bigger moral failure of choosing inaction and allowing 100 people to die. The external aspect of mortality you're so obsessed with doesn’t change the fact that your inaction leads to more suffering. Choosing not to act isn't some neutral stance—it's a decision tao let people die for your own comfort, and that's the real moral dailure
Failure*
You are implying that you not choosing is superior cause they were meant to die or something
I can also argue thats morally worse
I swear you are gonna love fate zero if you like this one
Its only like 24 eps
This shit got me thinking if i actually have scizo
Atleast you aren't depressed? 😭
Yeahhhh lets look at the bright side
Lemme explain
I dont like sad
Schizoid is both bipolar and schizo
Oh
What is morality? It's not about what's best for the majority of people, if that was the case, then minorities shouldn't matter at all, but the fact of the matter is, they do, and that's because of morality. You can't just sacrifice some people for the rest, it's not morality, it's being an indifferent asshole to the minorities.
Morality is about ensuring that everyone's fundamental rights as a human being aren't stolen away from them, you stealing them away is what makes you a criminal, and it's called a crime because it is morally hollow, whether it be the right to life, speech, expression, whatever.
Let me ask you this, you're going to spend a lot of money on your kids/partner and they are going to consume a lot of resources as well, would you instead then kill your parents/child/partner and save all that money to spend it for some charity about saving kids in Gaza?
Damn
I need to think on this one
good conversation
Is morality relative or absolute?
I'd say it's relative. Imo the only way there could be an objective morality is if a god exists and even then it's iffy.
Therefore you are
but what if you are
well your question is a false comparison
Providing for your family is not the same as choosing to save 100 lives over one. Your analogy falls flat because it mixes up personal responsibility and direct harm. We’re lit talking about an active choice where you have the power to save 100 lives by sacrificing one, not choosing between feeding your family or donating money. It’s about preventing MASSIVE loss, nort playing favorites. If you had a choice to save a hundred kids or let them die just to avoid feeling guilty about sacrificing one, you’d be the one who’s morally bankrupt. Your refusal to act isn’t protecting anyone’s rights, it’s just allowing suffering for your own sensw of purity
I see where you are coming from but
Actually wait I don't see at all
I know I am but are you
I am the terror that flaps in the night
as the Greeks would say
I'll be the monster in your bed tonight
@reef star might be old enough to get that reference
I get the reference
and I'm very proud of it
I'm proud of you too
my 4th grade teacher would put that on for us to watch some days
it was so epic
my 4th grade teacher is the best teacher in the world fr
oh? that's so sweet
There is a channel for Philosophy?
I don’t think there is an emoji that can express this amount of joy
it's a forum but it's the same thing
fr
did you have a question?
A few members have really liked it
I’m currently working my way through the complete works of Friedrich Nietzsche. Slowly but surely making my way through the 4k pages of his work
damn what was that previous topic
mf you not schizo
hell nah
you'd have a fire page in historys books and possibly some phonk edits made of you
fair trade
Fym hell nah 😭
FYM
If the world was flat would that make people mountains?
That person you kill for the 100 people is also a stranger tho
self preservation, i aint saving no random people, who knows what they be like
but they someone i love
which not a stranger
That's not the question tho
It's a gamble fr
But love your fellow as you love yourself
LMAO
FUCK THEM STRANGERS RAHHHHH
love for someone ik vs love for strangers be different for me
Classic
It's always the gamblers who end up on the wrong side of histry
Not the people who win big 🤑
I thought the question was
99% of gamblers quit right before their biggest win
Would you kill a person to save 100 strangers
💀
what kinda question is that
kill 1 stranger orrr... 100 strangers
ermmm..... i chooooooseee... feastables 😍
Isn't it weird that meat is just animal muscles?
I just thought of that in the shower
Then what is it
Actually I'm not sure
bro switched sides when everyone was against her
I FORFOT THE ACTUAL QUESTION CAUSE YOU NEVER BROUGHT UP ABOUT "killing a loved one"
You were just saying about killing a person 😭
I apologise
I did, all the time
also am I just supposed to assume that the poster doesn't know the question themselves?
Hi
???
I was focused on this one
That was ages ago 😔
I apologise 
I'll acrywlly remember to try remember the question next time
<@&1305977291695718462>
You can add this role with !philosophy and remove it with !nophilosophy
I wasn't sure who all wanted it, so I added Kat and Cass for now since they specifically mentioned it.
ooo @stone osprey @cloud flint @gusty ermine @ancient wharf @fresh grail @burnt tartan
thank you Hampton :]
!philosophy
awesome!
!philosophy
oh and @rustic dragon @dense bane @sturdy lake @paper trellis @celest bridge can't forget about you guys lol
hello :]
New philosophy question - is it the act of making bread, or of eating it that is more mentally healing?
@philosopher
well that didn't work lol
could you enable it so some of us could ping it please?
it's okay if not
i personally think that making bread is more mentally healing as someone who like to occasionally bake bread. i just find the process so nice. especially kneading the dough is so satisfying guhh
hjkfjd
i wanna bake some bread now lol
Same 😩
do you have a favorite kind of bread to bake? O.o
When I have all the time, I like making a batch of dark rye and regular sourdough, and making a multicolor braided round loaf 0.0
I haven't done it in quite awhile though... Honestly it doesn't take that much longer
Ohh okay one moment
ooo yummyy
Done. Try it
<@&1305977291695718462>
ooo
thank you Hampton sir
epic
depends on the person and the context
it would be so fun if we met up and baked together ahaha
supposed to be a subjective question lol
hmmm
I would say making
da questionn
it mroe fun
It would be!!! 😄
Probably depends on the person. Especially if their brain happens to be made of bread.
I missed it, but just answered it :3
I thought it was a general test ping at first
Making bread
Like... You would eat their brain!?
I think Christianity discourages cannibalism
nah, if their brain was made of bread then eating the bread would be way more mentally healing
...
Liver king logic
nah, Jesus told me back in the day that he eats people sometimes
This is true, but I can't just assume Thankfuller's faith xD
...
Two ends of the spectrum xD
True but for us maybe we can just observe
I'm not sure what I am
atheist fits best though
LOL
imagine
yeah it was, but i was also replying to minstrel. i would feel bad for pinging a group of people for no reason 😭
actually maybe agnostic
ah, you're so sweet
Oki :>
Yeah, I knew you were kind, but didn't remember much confidence in a creator who thinks you are individually amazing. (You are though)
no you
That has happened before xD
ehehe :3
no you
where's your proof? O.o
ha
I evaded the Thankfuller compliment return!
You can't evade the fact you're amazing though
everything about you
LOL
hmm you just proved that you’re the sweetest hehe
nuh uh
ono
she melted

!philosophy
temporarily xD
!philosophy
<@&1305977291695718462> Is eating meat bad?
what makes you think it's bad in the first place?
No i love it
The smell when you burn it
uhh, well you wouldn't eat it in the first place if it was burnt lol
Certain religions view certain animals as sacred hence why some religious people can’t eat certain meats (also certain animals are considered “unclean”). If it isn’t against your current religion I see no problem with it. Meat provides a lot of nutrients that are hard to find otherwise like creatine carnitine and carnosine along with a large amount of amino acids
Humans have been eating meat as long as we’ve known how to hunt (which is a very long time)
No you wouldn't
By that point the steak is congratulations
Medium rare is perfection
Curry>>>
Lebron better
bad for the cow, good for me and my tummy wummy
Bob the cow did not die in vain
yes 🙏 we thank him for his sacrifice
Exactly
Bob did not die for this
This guy should genuinely get a lifetime ban from cooking
Literal blasphemy
I’m sincerely sorry to anyone who suffered their way through that abysmal cooking and absolute ruining of a perfectly good cut of wagyu
I’ve never had a wagyu 😔
I haven’t either
I’ve had filet mignon before and it was good but not Wagyu yet
It’s on my bucket list though
no
if we are not meant to eat animal, why is animal made of food
🧠
yes
(i eat meat)
I wanna get back to the previous topic
@ornate hazel I still wouldn't kill the 1 person if it was a stranger for the same reasons
Oh my god same i wanna try it so bad
Shaq better
Maybe at his peak but Lebron is objectively a better player when you compare careers
And honestly you can make an argument for 2007-9 Bron being better, 2012-2015 Bron being better, or 2016-2018 Bron being better
Bad for animals
I dont eat meat
How do you build muscle then
Yeah i guess
Never watched basketball tbh
he's my uncle
Liar liar pants on fire
I'd never
Proof?
idk
it’s both
I immediately thought of blowfish encryption
I call the animal pufferfish
same
where is the question of the day
hm?
Ik we had a lot of questions and conversations about morals, so what’s the ground point in which we all agree in the idea of morals and what creates that ground point? (and if you think there’s no ground point in which we can all agree, why don’t you think such ground point exists?) <@&1305977291695718462>
imma do some chores so adios lol
I think we can all agree that sexual assault is widely considered morally wrong
Morals exist to benefit humans
On the flip side though, if everyone viewed it as wrong then why does it still happen on the scale that it does?
cause not everyone views it as wrong
just most people
I don't think there is a single thing out there that everyone can agree with
Most people do, I agree. But not everyone. My point is, there is no single moral that everyone follows
I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who thinks that they don't exist
There’s a set that MOST follow, but not all
I guarantee there are a couple
There’s definitely some
Find me them
Solipsism
Although that is not necessarily that you don’t exist
It’s that you can only prove that only your mind is true to exist
So that's the opposite of what I said
Im sure there’s some extreme nihilist out there that believes so. Or someone on some really heavy drugs
Or someone with some sort of pre existing mental condition
Regardless, there’s certainly someone out there who doesn’t believe they exist
So find them for me
Find an ontological nihilist
You're a trendsetter
are u suggesting the ppl who commit those acts don’t view it as wrong?
I started this company charles
There are many (that at least most would profess, regardless of culture) - We all agree that there are things not to be done. We all agree you can't just have sex with anyone you like. We comprehend fairness and justice. Even if we don't all agree on what those things are, or what is right and wrong, we all know right and wrong exist. (You'll probably be quick to say it's not ok for someone to steal your car, punch you in the face with no prior aggression on your part, torture kittens, etc, even if you believe all morals are relative/a social construct to make life more convenient.)
For me personally, I see those things as being the reflection of a Creator who is good, and who made us to show love and to be loved. That while there are matters of properness, manners, etc. that change culturally, there is a standard that exists outside of all of it. That our conscience is more than "oh my parents would be mad if they found out."
Because some people know something is wrong but do it anyway. The strongest desire in humans is not always to be a paragon of morality 😅
Not a moral thing but stares at past self eating a protein bar knowing good and well I did not need a snack
What exactly do you mean by "we all know right and wrong exist."?
A true moral ground is hard to pin down because any basis we choose—like logic, empathy, or religion depends on beliefs people might not share. If there’s any shared starting point, it’s the idea that we need some kind of moral system to live together peacefully. But what that system looks like is open to debate. In the end, it might be the shared search for answers, rather than the answers themselves, that forms our common ground
Yeah I was boutta ask that aswell
Like, there are things anyone from any culture would say "now that is uncalled for"
My ground point for morals is "I don't want people to do that to me so I probably shouldn't do it to them."
Would you say 100% of people would say that tho
I don't think so
Like, someone could say "yeah you killed my mom for no reason, but it's not a bad thing. just sad for me"?
I guess I could see someone saying it, following logically from us being animals or something? I'd find it much more difficult to believe that someone would believe every behavior is fine. 🤔
I'm pretty sure we've had this conversation before
Yeah well
(I've been gone recently so I need to catch up xD
Personally even if there are "fundamental" morals I feel like at least 90% of the morals that we know and teach are social constructs. Things born out of culture not out of genetics or simply knowing.
(And learn everyone's thoughts xD
I mean about moral grounds and stuff
Oh yeah, certainly a lot of what that looks like is culture and learning.
Like, today?
(if so then I may just need to scroll more carefully 😅
no, before, the same topic was discussed some days ago
I disagree with the idea of universal moral rules. Norms like avoiding harm or sexual boundaries may seem common, but history shows us that these vary widely. Practices like ritual violence or slavery were once acceptable, suggesting our morals are shaped by culture, not actualobjective truth
Pointing to a Creator as the source of morality also assumes shared beliefs. Atheists and humanists build moral systems around empathy or minimizing harm without invoking a higher power. Morality seems to arise from social needs, not divine will
Also our sense of right and wrong feels universal, but it’s mostly shaped by upbringing and culture. Instead of reflecting an external standard, our morals likely come from shared human instincts and evolving social needs
And of course a problem with saying that there are fundamental truths is you have to have some correct way that everyone agrees on to find them otherwise who gets to decide what those fundamental truths are?
I don't really mind topics repeating but it just feels funny to see people forget what they talked about, like ai 💀💀
or makes me feel insane 🤣
Thanks! As for one note, I was not assuming shared beliefs when talking about morals coming ultimately from a creator, more like instinct/group memory.
Was I really here? 😭
I didn't think I was
I've been sleepy for like... a week
I forgot the question I was advocating for 😭
hey, I appreciated it xD
If I was here before, I was obviously not awake enough to remember
Hmm
It seems the question was a bit different but it branched off to the same thing about moral grounds and stuff
I understand now
Righttt but If you’re talking about instinct or group memory, that actually supports the idea that our morals evolved through shared human experience rather than coming from a divine source. It seems more like our sense of right and wrong grew out of what helped us survive together as a species tbh
Thanks! Good to know that it was not me, rather another pink person
I see where you're coming from tho
I tagged your message, you were in it, there's no escaping it 🫵
Yes, it's really a double-edged thing because we could figure out what works well for us on our own, or it could have been built in
That is Nathan
I am not Nathan xD
nor am I Kat
The message I replied to. Click it
ohhhh
I remember now
I took that as "are there actions that are always evil or good"
Like, is giving someone a hug always good
(Which of course could vary a lot by cultural understanding of various gestures, etc
Thank you, Existence xD
guys are there morals if there are no humans
yeah, that's why it demanded discussion about moral grounds and their objectivity
stares at the dog who chewed up my purse today
Got it! I guess I just didn't read carefully once it diverged to that
NUKE THE WORLD
A
I agree.
I’m not saying it’s always the case, but there are sometimes those who show no remorse for their actions and sometimes (and I need to preface this, I do NOT agree with what they do) but sometimes people believe what they’re doing is good. There’s several cases of such things
It is rare but it does happen. It’s more common that they know what they did and they know it was bad, but there are always a few who think what they’re doing is good
I feel I could’ve phrased that better
i haven't heard of cases of latter in the example of sa, but if they exist i think most would say they are not of sound mind.
but then we can ask if our "common ground" morals need to be agreed on by those most would consider mentally unsound to be truly "common ground", and then the question of what is "common ground" criteria of being mentally sounds 😭. I know common values/behaviors in one culture can be seen as insane in another
They are certainly not of sound mind but sometimes people can be tricked into believing what they’re doing is for the good. This is seen sometimes in mass genocide where people are tricked into “dehumanizing” others and believe that what they’re doing is helpful for society. Like I said, it is fucked up and not right, but unfortunately it is something that happens. Those that do it certainly aren’t in their right mind
That got dark really quickly my bad
I think genocide is bad
u think
true true, so if we are looking for a ground point morals, does it also have to be agreeable by those who are not of sound mind?
can be dangerous bc maybe those that are not of sound mind are, like u said, just tricked. and whoever decides what constitutes sound of mind then decides morals that excludes them, like u mention with dehumanizing.
who knew this would start a whole debate lol
i think it gets hard when we have to include people who are not of sound mind, bc they are gonna prevent our criteria of "everyone" in agreement. but then who decides what makes someone of sound mind 
should to be good , im curious about morality
what is , how works and why
bc u can declare any point of moral, and if any disagree, they are just not of sound mind
any moral point*
Welcome to philosophy
so i think we have to include them when we are looking for a moral ground point that is agreed by everyone
lol. i asked the questions most of the time and usually it's pretty dry answers so xp
idc i made one for me
but
idk how it works
morality is an interesting topic, especially since it's also very controversial
LOL
i dont see why is
is very intersting and important
you don't see why morality exist is very interesting and important?
ohhh. well that's because when any topic is controversial, then that means there's different opinions, ideas, and information about it which really makes us think what is right direction to go about this particular topic
therefore, it's interesting lol
should exist the right
uhh could you rephrase that pls?
some ideas are wrong for sure
oh yeah of course. but there will always be some people who think it's not wrong and therefore needs to be debunked lol
Alright get ready for a paragraph. First matter, what constitutes everyone? I’d define that as any human being with a conscience (this could be a whole other debate but we’ll use this definition for now). Next up, what is a moral? I define it as a simple judgement of what’s right and what’s wrong regarding a certain behavior or action. That brings us to the question, is there universal morals? I don’t believe so. Sure there are some that are generally agreed upon, but everyone’s interpretation of right from wrong differs based on experiences. There is some universality when it comes to those who follow a religion, for example Christianity has the ten commandments upon which Christians believe those to be moral. There are common morals such as don’t kill people, but again, those experiences along with the psychological state of people means that not everyone will agree that killing is wrong (for example in sacrifice which is part of some cultures, or even the death penalty which is often viewed as wrong but at the time was seen as a valid punishment). My point being, due to the large scale of people (being everybody) and the vast number of experiences those people went through, along with cultural influences, and differences in psychological state, it is impossible to have a moral that absolutely everyone agrees with.
That’s my thoughts on this
If you take a smaller group of people, it is possible to find a common set of morals, for example within cultures and religions. But to find one within everybody is impossible
this makes sense to me
yes
i'll keep thinking ab if there is some universal common ground moral point but i think what u said makes sense
i would type stuff but i don't want to type a whole paragraph lol
can u use empathy for bad ?
What do you mean by that? Empathy for something bad?
I could see it being used as a manipulation tactic potentially
to understand feelings of others and to use them in a bad way
like that
You could potentially empathize with someone to find a weakness or vulnerability to exploit, or use it to gain trust and reliance and then use that in a form of manipulation
Those are the two scenarios I can think of
Damn it’s hard to type with bandaids on your thumbs
I’m a dumbass for using tweezers
yeah, that's called manipulation
ty
yea
Huh?
Easily
oh
For example you can show weakness and reveal a secret about yourself hence making them feel vulnerable and revealing something about themselves or at least making them feel sympathy and thinking you are showing weakness when you could be lying
This is essentially emotional manipulation
yea , intersting way
Here's one: Do you guys think a sufficiently smart (as smart as humans are) AI deserves rights?
You can argue that no matter how smart the AI is, or how well it portrays emotions, thoughts, expressions, etc, it's still just a computer made 1s and 0s so is just imitating human characteristics but is actually not sentient, so it doesn't deserve rights. But then humans are also just 1s and 0s like computers are because our brains and nervous system takes in information by receptors one stimuli and value at a time, one receptor fires up, particular behaviour, 2 fire up, particular behaviour, exactly like computers, 1 bit fires up, particular behaviour, 2 bits fire up particular behaviour, so you can say our brains and nervous system also just imitate reality and experiences for us while we aren't experiencing anything. So why do we deserve rights?
I guess this also asks the question of consciousness, are we really conscious? And the question of reality, is the reality that we see, actually real?
What do you guys think?
If for example you say, it does deserve rights, then why doesn't a simple AI like chatgpt deserve rights? Because it's too simple? Then at what point does the AI stop being just a machine and start being sentient?
<@&1305977291695718462>
Thoughts?
No lmao
Idk
AI is a tool not an animal
When it starts doing things for the sake of doing things?
why not?
And questioning meaning
If i had to use detroit become human as reference its an interesting thing to think about
bc AI is not a person , no feeling , we need rights for cars ?
There are already chatbots in our server that respond without being asked to. Are they sentient then?
animals don't question anything, so they aren't alive?
Yeah
@dense bane
What AI even gon do with rights, any thought it has is based off human behavior and thoight, so it'll be fighting for a cause because of humans. They don't know what they fighting for, but just fighting because humans did it. Which goes into consciousness, they aren't conscious because they can't 'think' without a command.
If you thinking on some Detroit Become Human type shi, then I do believe that people can form legitimate attachments to their bots, but at the end of the day, it's still a preset command that makes them the way they are
The only way for me to think AI robots like DBH deserve rights after going rouge is in a different society
Is stupid
We can't even afford rights to other humans
I'd be damned if we start giving bots rights first
🤢
I'd he the first people to start murking them tbh
What word
Personally if we consider the highest lv of ai that has been presented in the game i mentioned i do think that giving rights is a good choice considering that if ai is able to express emotions it makes no difference what they are by definition
They do, and have instincts like us
They are still promted to do that. Also LLMs just mimic and create text but don’t truely think so I odn’t think it counts
No but they are less sentient than humans
I'd be fighting for animal rights before robot rights tbh
I hate LLMs
Why
BS
If we define humans as animals with emotions and critical thinking why would ai at the highest lv be any different than us?
How can you say that they are fighting for a cause because humans did it but humans aren't fighting for a cause because other humans did it? Command? Have you ever seen a feral human? They don't behave like humans at all but like wild animals, with no semblance of consciousness like modern humans, why? Because they didn't have human environment in their formative years, so you can say that the environment we are brought up in is also just commands, right?
Also, animals can't do anything substantial without commands either, does that mean they aren't alive and conscious?
exactly
if u say "buy that have AI" be sure i will dont buy it
you are also prompted to think the way you do by the way you were brought up
Oh like AI being shoved in every service now?
@cloud flint
Yeah but I do stuff for the sake of doing it. An LLM is prompted to start conversations and does it bc of that
bc AI dont exist
I'm not talking about LLMs though
Its about intention if it does it because it wants to it deserves rights
yes , and that "AI" was 7 years ago too
You are real then?
Whats your point? AI being shoved down throats is annoying but it does have its real world uses
if I manipulate you and change your way of thinking such that you do something for me thinking you did it because YOU wanted to for the sake of it, would you then say that you're not conscious?
How do you even define intention then?
:))
It can easily be changed
BS and i hate it
to give rights to AI is stupid
Well duh intention can be changed by everything in your environment. if you say go do x please my intention becomes to help you.
rights for PCs
bro what's the point of being in a thread named philosophy if you just gon say one liners without explaining your thought process and discounting everything else as BS
genuine question
The only difference we have from ai is that we know we weren't created by someone for a certain purpose
why we talk about AI here
We’re talking about in the future when computers actually criticly think and stuff
"only"
then? I prompted you to help me. I can prompt an AI like that too. So?
Humans started fighting because of mistreatment of other humans. Other animals don't often just band together for a reason against humans unless it's for survival. Humans band together for ease of life
AI was made for our ease of life, which is why I don't see it as something that needs human rights.
Animals don't need human rights because they aren't human, they are on their own in that aspect
Dolphins are said to be incredibly intelligent, but rights can't apply to them because they simply aren't human
Idk if this makes sense hah, I'm just typing thoughts
is that possible ?
:))
Ai could reach a level of independence that would be beyond a tool for helping us
Kicking dogs
Making it something integral to our lives
Atp we gotta pull out 😭😭😭
eat dogs 
what if cant
I'd tweak out so hard if I saw a Detroit become human mf walking and living they best 'life' because they're programmed to have great predictions, outcomes, and studied human behavior preset
Off rip successful
that's what I'm saying
Are detroit become human AIs not alive?
Cause who is trying to make a bum AI robot. Too much cost to waste it on average
why humans
Theoretically yes I think
Idk tbh.. cause I feel I may have to actually see one? I feel in the back of my head, I'll always remember 'this isn't human'
But then again, humans forms bonds with things lesser tbh..
Omg I just remembered the dude who married they anime body pillow
someone know how self-awareness works ?
Uugghh imagine it if was ai instead
We have no reason to believe its not biomechanical in nature
That's what's my question. Why is there a "this isn't human" filter? What makes them different apart from not being biological? Actually, we can create artificial meat already, so what if instead of metal parts you make them of organic human like parts as well?
As far as I know
but we dont know
I wish I can think outside of the 'we would be fucked' aspect lol. It's early in the morning
that's what we're here to discuss
philosophy isn't science with tested out facts and theories
Yh we’re talking theory
Yh js remmeber there ain't suppose to be a right or wrong
Unless it's the most obvious thing ever
It fun though
you came here out of your own volition fym 😭😭😭
If one doesnt respect something thats built to help him while giving it enough intelligence to understand that fact wouldnt that be problematic?
Yeah true we better hope that actually doesnt happen
Yes
Humans vs AI war
I prefer to talk about humans rights than about AI
They're called AGI and from what I read back when chatgpt came out, experts in the field estimate they can be a thing by 2060s (also read more about what these experts thought of chatgpt like tech to see if they're accurate at all and all articles from 2000s and 2010s that I read said they could be a thing in 2020s) so make of that what you will
Would artificial be redundant if ais made ai?
exponential growth with increasing tech type thing
more you progress in tech the faster you progress to the next level
Or is it tre fact that the intelligence is based off organic materials that make it natrul
They're already made by other ai lol
Look up boston dynamics
probably seen
Honestly
Now that I think about it
If it's FOR ME
Fuck everyone/everything else
But
🤔
I was gonna say that since exponential means it might come sooner than predicted
What is the diff between natrual and artifical int
That's my question
I don't think I'd be unhappy with a AI bf DBH style that can replicate human warmth and literally be my ideal type
how is human intelligence any different than artificial if artificial can do everything humans can?
but cant
robots cant walk well
Maybe “created through the natural functions and forces of the universe, without intervention or interaction from sentient beings”
People already use AI for emotional intamacy and VR for pronography
I would prob be that old man who tells him to paint
Yeah, and it ain't even physical yet
I mean can u blame them? AI can be quite literally the perfect partner.
They sell these to amazon
He got the boogie
the yellow dog like ones
not in real scenarios
4 are not 2
they keep standing
People already talk for hours on ai rp websites
imagine physical
better discord
I used to ai rp. Then I switched to human rp cause ngl it is better tbhhh
🤔
😭
I could still talk to my rp partner OOC, u like ai rp 💀
Have you guys seen westworld?
And idk.. js better
But why? Why that distinction when the same processes can be achieved?
what's it about?
They are essentially the same thing lol
Ah, Westworld! It's like a wild west theme park, but with a twist! The show dives into the lives of androids, or "hosts," who are programmed to serve the guests' wildest fantasies. As the story unfolds, these hosts start to gain consciousness and question their existence, leading to all sorts of philosophical dilemmas about what it means to be human. Think of it as a mix of cowboy action, futuristic technology, and deep existential questions. Plus, it's got some pretty stunning scenery—just like a good sunset over the plains! If only they had a fitness routine like the Hybrid Routine to keep those hosts in shape, right?
Yes rights
I wanna see what they will be capable of
Oh nah man
Bro when we get the physical ai sex bots we are FUKED
Is that ai
Already exist
Kali🥰
Uh huh give me the name brother
if are same are humans if no are not
literally fucked 🤣🤣
It aint that exciting
Gtg brb
I can get my type
I agree
Huh
Show about ai sex maids??
Do you know about Sophia?
@burnt tartan @cloud flint @jade star have you guys ever seen Sophia's videos?
yes
Nein
She's already so real
PC with face
DBH type android that already exists
maybe for u
Look her up
BRO but this is the BEGINNING
PCs back when they started couldn't even handle sending a text
Look at them now
These Androids are the WORST they will ever be
Imagine 40 years in the future
I dont trust
https://youtu.be/uhND7Mvp3f4
They can walk just fine too
Boston Dynamics' amazing robots Atlas and Handle
ATLAS®
The world’s most dynamic humanoid robot, Atlas is a research platform designed to push the limits of whole-body mobility. Atlas’s advanced control system and state-of-the-art hardware give the robot the power and balance to demonstrate human-level agility.
HANDLE™
The mobile robot for mov...
They dont have emotions or consciousness, so no
read the convo
40 years în the future , is possible we will cant make better graphics chip
I agree
When it has feelings and emotions
at what point do you say it has feelings and emotions?
probably when it realizes it has desires
that would come first I think
I think you guys aren't getting it, I'm basically asking what sentience and consciousness is, tbh
before any other feeling
I gotta go to class
:(
babies can't realise they have desires, so they don't deserve human treatment?
lmao imagine still being in highschool
ikr, so lame
humans lowkey just realized babies are basically mini humans recently tbh
before that shift, we are classified to be on the 'worst parents on animal kingdom' list
yall ever seen old art?
the babies look like grown people
all depressed n shit
don't have to look that far
just until recently surgeries on babies used to be performed without anaesthesia
because they thought babies can't feel pain
and aren't conscious
and you guys think computers aren't conscious either 
idk, im willing to abuse one till the news comes out that they can feel it or smth
maybe humans in the future look down on us like we do with humans in the past
with robots and stuff, i mean
unless my ai can give me my dream of having a abused house husband
im not hearing it
Is that real or CGI ?
It's all real lmao
They are pioneers in android making
C.ai.....
Boston dynamics
They have been doing this for decades
Generative AI only got accessible to public recently
It had been existing for a lot of years
i aint talkin bout sum
he bleeds from his head wound, hand reaching up to touch the blood "w-why would you do that?.."
type shot
shit*
im talking bout some
sure
still that backflip looks fake
real
Aw hell nah mannn
you're just getting that uncanny valley effect
should i search
because we expect it in CGI usually
nah i dont have
Amazon already uses robots by them
Yes is easy to do
and other large companies
sure
but dont do backflips
U need a lot of balance
Thats why is impressive
bru had to try 3 times
I'm not on pc 😔
xdd
markdown on mobile sucks
there are very nice ai, like dawn cafe in japan
like the one where people control
cause they cant work
physically
cause illnesses
kawaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
U need to be so strong or ur husband to be very weak
How tall are yu
10'4
can u total of 100kg pull-up ?
1000kg
NO
Yes
5'2
beginner
(idek what kg is)
FIRE
imagine the back and forearms
Silverback Gorilla's
They can lift that heavy, I think
and they're basically dumb humans in terms of physique
is pull-up bro
no way
maybe deadlift
on bench they can go to about 1800kgs apparently
any video ?
sounds crazy
nah I just google searched also who's making gorillas bench 😭😭😭
like
you can't teach it that
weakgorila
lmao 🤣
if untrained gorillas bench 1800kgs, imagine trained gorillas 💀💀💀
was 350kg ?
dunno
idk if is real
they ARE among the strongest animals on the planet, if I'm not mistaken
I would say no, but then I also believe humans are much more than 1s and 0s. I believe we have free will, and to give AI rights (to vote, work in society etc, etc) would simply be to give extra rights and power to their creators. (Since everything they do is based off of programming, other humans, etc)
That being said, I don't believe that even ai androids ought to be abused for "fun." It's just not a good mental place to go to as a human - "This thing isn't real so I can be whoever I want." Even though they don't have a consciousness, I would relate respectfully and kindly because they are designed to work like humans, and learn from humans.
1800kg is a car
(Will scroll down to read other thoughts as well :)
Untrained women can lift cars a little too in a fight or flight environment, it's called "hysterical strength" and it's a lot
Angela Cavallo did that to save her son
crazy
I can definitely imagine a gorilla doing that
yeah we just can't tap into that much strength consciously cause they put a lot of stress on our muscle fibres which can break them too
Yes but bench a car is hard
they break fr
Why do you think we have free will then?
not safe
My computer restarted mid-reply, will try to retype after my practice session. :(
it's trying to tell you something omg
sure they can, they realize the desire to eat at they cry
I would say read the thread first though, maybe you get new thoughts to add in
they realize the desire to sleep and they sleep
or cry
depends on the baby
but they cry to get attention to be fed or put to sleep
real
Do they really realise it or is it just instincts like stubbing your toe and screaming out?
and if they are instincts, then instincts are just biological programs
instinctive reactions are still triggered by something. A realization of something.
prompted commands are also triggered
"if this, then that"
but it's not a realization
it's automatic and triggered by a program that we created
if you touch a hot stove, your fingers back down immediately before you realise you've touched something hot
It's not realisation
it's purely instinctive
I suppose any human realization is still triggered by a sort of program
you don't realize it but your nerves do
nerves are just receptors, like light receptors in a camera, they just take in information and then do the pre-commanded response
it's not realisation like a conscious thing
except that response is formed by evolution rather than a program
but it's still the same thing
actually programs are just evolution tbh, now that I think about it
nerves aren't what makes something sentient though so this isn't exactly answering your original question
but still interesting
it's not, but this is what you said
you said nerves realise thing and that's what makes us different
no I didn't
.
nowhere in that sentence did I say that is what makes us different
