#Nord Stream Pipeline
1 messages · Page 13 of 1
and half the copies floating around are doctored so it's not even a reliable source anyway
<@&941484701632307232>
Yes.... no leak stuff please.
Thank you folks.
Isn't this whole thing about a big leak though? 
Norwegians 🇳🇴 now dropping double the amount of sonobuoys into the Baltic to explode more stuff faster 😏
https://twitter.com/leifnixon/status/1647039706079678466
Is it OK to take Seymour Hersh reporting seriously although it is based on leaks?
It's based on his imagination, so it's probably fine.
Though I wouldn't say it's okay to take Seymour Hersh's reporting serious at all.
P8's have been super busy south of Gotland/off Kaliningrad this week - I think @stark palm mentioned on Twitter that there's some kind of Russian naval exercise taking place.
Given that Seymour hersh sem to have a long going estranged relationship with the truth I would not take what he say the weather is serious
https://archive.is/oFPYg
Russias MoD publish alot short news articles, pretty good source.
Maybe they are mocking us?! /sarcasm
https://function.mil.ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12463929@egNews
Ok, this is actually interesting. Dunno if Alexander has written about it.
https://function.mil.ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12463204@egNews
wait ... this was published April 6th ..... so definitely after Oliver Alexander's March 25th report with T-Online ...
they seem to want to explain after the fact what their ships were doing in the area of the explosions
@sand delta do you have that link handy for the country by country 12 nautical mile/EEZ zones files?
Marineregions
With all the P8 activity over the Baltic in recent days, I was wondering if I could see anything interesting on SentinelHub - looks like some possible aircraft activity: https://sentinelshare.page.link/dXrp
Thanking you
np
It is strange, because they have never announced this kind of exercise with the SS-750 before
The only Russian military press releases about the SS-750 that have come out since 2021 are that one
And then these 2
On the 6th September 2022 it supposedly assisted on a test dive to 100m for the "Ufa" and "Kronstadt" in the sea ranges of the Baltic Fleet
and on 5th October 2022 it supposedly assisted on a test dive to 190m for the "Ufa"
Neither of those two situations should bring it anywhere near Bornholm
If you wanted to be conspiratorial, you could suggest that those test dives were working up to the operation, but on the flip side, 80 metres isn’t deep at all for a submarine, it’s a pretty standard operating depth.
Although if they were just out of a refit, it would make sense of course.
There is no water 100m deep in the Baltic west of Gdansk, so that can't have been excuse to go near Bornholm
Even more strangely the April 6th exercise mentions the AS-30 rescue submersible. All previous press releases involving the SS-750's work with rescue submersibles mentions the AS-26.
Prior to this press release the AS-30 has always been stated as being part of the Pacific fleet.
@junior moat
@elfin cradle @sand delta
Oh interesting
Why the hell are they using the AS-30 for that exercise
Quite a way from Vladivostok
yeaahhhhh
Has there been recent news in the field of Russian submarine rescue?
https://function.mil.ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12462504@egNews
"The crew of the submarine "Ufa" worked out "laying on the ground" in the marine training ground of the Baltic Fleet"
As part of the delivery of the course task L-2, the crew of the submarine "Ufa" worked out the element "laying on the ground" in the sea combat training ground of the Baltic Fleet.
I wonder where that area are they are laying the sub on the bottom...
Perhaps a new boat was ordered?
UFA is the newest one, and if its one of it first testdives, kinda make sense to have a submarine rescue near. But It should have done all testing
Yeah, Ufa became a part of the navy after seaworthiness test last October/November. So they should not be worried that something should go wrong.
My guess right here off the coast of Kaliningrad
Even stranger if the AS-26 is still in the Baltic
I wish I had a map over Germanys 7 submarine diving areas east of Bornholm..
@sand delta Sara, do you know what the blob areas north of Gdynia is? Holding area for tankers?
The red dots you mean?
Yes.
Oliver might have a chart handy
But my understanding that that area has a tonne of wind farms?
Very suspect.
Is this just after the reporting by t-online?
And you of course.
oil rigs
Same day, but in the evening
I think I sumbled over some Russian naval forum last month. That had pretty good and obscure info. Will try to find it tomorrow.
Close enough 😛
On the 23rd they mention the Ufa's L-2 test but no mention of any support vessels
So far I don't see any mention of support vessels on any other L-2 tests for other subs
Except for the random on the 25th
Where they decide to basically rerelease the 23rd press release with the addition of "oh by the way, the SS-750 is helping"
I´ve only looked thoru the russian naval news very fast, but I cant find any article about Ufas sister-ship that is based in Kronstadt-
Unless the SS-750's crew were unhappy with being left out 🥺
"The immersion of the submarine was provided by warships and the SS-750 rescue ship of the Baltic Fleet."
Warships and the SS-750
hahaha
Does the SS-750 have a moonpool?
It launches the submarine using a davit so it might not necessarily
Nvm, it was just a wierd shadow on a photo.
Not exactly a sign of great fate in your submarines when you have to bring out a submarine rescue ship to every test.
Then again the Kusnetzov seemed to always be escorted by a tug
If you look for at press releases published by the Russian MoD for other submarines' "L-2" test, there is never more than a single one during the course of the test and none make specific mention of support vessels.
The Ufa has had 4, 2 of which specifically mention the SS-750.
Just because it is easier than retyping
I can find 4 Kilo class in the Baltic in August 2022. Ok, one are in a drydock, and there is also a nuclerar attack sub visiting Kronstadt.
Need to go and sleep, I have bearly slept at all the last 3 nights. But I will look into Russian navy forums and see if I can find something about the minisubs.
Huh, I was not aware that RU has 2 more mini-subs. Project 18270 (AS-36 North Fleet) & 18271 (AS-40, Pacific Fleet) (trying to figure out the motherships). That free up AS-34 & AS-30 for other stuff..
Have we seen anything about a yacht Copernicus? oh no, he is starting the yacht thing again
This may be a long-shot to a dead theory, but it was already posted the 27th Sept. Maybe here they started the sailboat disinfo campain
"According to AIS and satellites on the navigation portals, the Copernicus yacht left the Polish port of Hel in the Gulf of Gdansk at noon on September 22 and arrived at the port of Nexo on the island of Bornholm on the evening of September 23.
Following the 9-seater ship went to a nearby small island in the Kristiansö archipelago to the east. And on September 25 at 17.00 she headed for the Polish port of Vladislavovka in the Gulf of Gdansk.
It is noteworthy that at 22.43 Copernicus was 40 kilometers from the point of the future leak on Nord Stream 2 and about 25 kilometers from the point of damage on Nord Stream. After that, the ship's position signal disappeared. And it appeared, judging by the data of navigation portals, already at 14.34 on September 26, when the ship was approaching the port of Vladislavovka."
Must go to my nephew´s birthday, so I cant research this until this evening, but mayby one of you can try to see the ships movement, if they are sus or nåt.
Copernicus is an old boat designed to compete in a round the world race. That means fast and light, not comfortable. The original interior, which looks ro be intact, is designed to provide the bare minimum of necessities for survival by a young and hardy crew.
At first glance she seems to be in her original configuration, minimal upgrades.
It would seem to be even less suited to dive operation than Andromeda. No easy water access, small battery bank.
Hard to see what role she would play.
BUT...who knows.
Unerbittlich geht Hersh mit den Regierenden ins Gericht. Wenn er den Irak-Krieg von George W. Bush schon äußerst unklug fand, dann könnte Bidens Nord-Stream-Anschlag noch eine Stufe höher stehen. Nach Hersh war es Bidens verzweifelter Versuch, die westeuropäischen Verbündeten bei der Stange zu halten – und sie in einen langen Krieg zu zwingen.
Shortly after your story was published, video appeared online from a Florida Air Force veteran who, through freely available flight data, was able to say that there were indeed tracks from a P8 aircraft over Bornholm. There is also a P8 machine in your article: it therefore threw off the sonar buoy and thus triggered the explosions. The aviation expert Monkey Werx says that it was not a Norwegian, but an American machine, which was also refueled via Poland by a service plane coming from Germany. Could this be a missing piece of the puzzle in your story?
[...]
Whether that was a Norwegian or a US machine is actually quite unimportant. Two years ago, Boeing delivered the first P8 machines to Norway with great fanfare, and US forces trained the Norwegians on the P8. In addition, American P8s fly extensive patrols in Norway. This plane must have come from Oslo. It is most likely that an American flew the plane. Because you tend not to rely on outsiders in such matters. But which plane was flying there - whether a Norwegian or an American one - is unimportant and trivial.
Oh god, Tichy 🤮
In what world are the Americans going "yoohoo, can I borrow a plane please and thank you" to the Norwegians.
Two more steps to the right and he can blend perfectly into the AFD
Just a casual 200 million dollar aircraft being loaned, no questions asked.
He's also a was once a journalist
lol
He's already their favourite.
lol
and the sonar pings from those bouys arent standardiced so any irregularity would been noted
especially after the explosions
🤣 not a Norwegian, but an American machine, which was also refueled via Poland by a service plane coming from Germany.
let me get this right, we have a American miltiary plane taking of from norway being refuled by a polish plane taking of from germany....
(also you really don't need to refule on those small distances
And they needed to make the pilot American to keep it all under wraps.
Because apparently a Norwegian pilot won't respect OPSEC.
more likely the norwegan pilots will be anoyed about not being allowe to fly it 😄
lol
and why would they need to keep quiet about the plane going for a flight
an other intresting thing
the Norwegan King is involved aproving top secret norwegan operations
Its interesting to see that the current Russian narrative had already started in 2020. Its like the Nordstream sabotage is taken straight from it and are built on the same wrong assumptions that lead to war.
It basically says that NS is essential for keeping EU (and Russia) as an independent geopolitical powers. And if they were destroyed US would be energy dominant over EU and they just become a vassal
The 21 Dec 2019 sanctions package because NS2 is “inconsistency with the economic interests of the US”, showed that legal and legislative norms in the field of world energy trade are no longer applied, being replaced by open arbitrariness."
"Sabotage of the pipelines is available to countries with moderate scientific and technical potential, such as Poland and Ukraine.
Underwater sabotage is also possible on the part of organizations and groups independent and relatively independent of any state, such as Ukrainian nationalist organizations, radical Islamists, etc. Terrorist influence in this case can be carried out by rather primitive methods.The Baltic Sea is shallow and the location of the pipeline is not a problem even with a minimal, relatively inexpensive and legally available set of equipment. The actual terrorist attack can be carried out by lowering a demolition charge on a cable."
"1. Terrorist impact on Russian underwater gas pipelines is almost inevitable. With a high degree of probability, the United States will act as the main initiator.
2. Attacks on Russian underwater gas pipelines will result in a large-scale crisis in the European Union. The result of the latter, with a high degree of probability, will not be alarmist rallying and state-public mobilization, but complex disorientation and disintegration.
3. As a result, EU will be liquidated as an independent geopolitical actor, and US take comprehensive control, with the aim to becoming The world's economic and political hegemon.
Sorry for long text but that article is like the whole Nordstream scenario we have today. Just that he assumes that EU dosnt have any own agency (which the Russians have seen EU today, only as a vasall to US/NATO). And US would become energy dominant to EU, and the gas hit us harder than it did.
Google translate writes this article pretty wierd sometimes tho.
lol
The actual terrorist attack can be carried out by lowering a demolition charge on a cable."
I would love to see the error margin on that, and if it is any better than just chucking it overboard
you should mark quoted secitions with ether >>> `text`
or
text
block
Its the same mindset, the same rational that lead to the invasion. It must be rooted really really deep down in them, that the "Anglo-Saxons" control the rest of the EU/NATO, countries lacks own agency.
Didnt know you could do that.
suspected that
three right arrows and a space create
this
etc
Ty, but I must go to bed now. Up in 5h..
the single ` is mostly usefull for single line or short sections while three of them are usefull for long blocks of thext
this is always the fun part when there is stories to construct that has a lot of moving parts that is convenient to implicate, just sprinkle a bit of everything - carpet bomb - and when things get shot down go with whatever hasnt been overly disproved 😛
Am I correct in assuming nothing related to NorStream was was exposed in the recent leaks? Or is that question itself problematic?
Ask Aric? He has seen more of the documents than the few that were published on 4chan.
It is problematic. No talk about the contents.
Thanks for clarification.
The Danish patrol vessel P524 Nymfen took 112 photos of Russian vessels on 22nd September 2022 while it was in the vicinity of the Nord Stream blast sites.
The Danish military confirms taking them, but will not share them due to their intelligence value.
@elfin cradle @sand delta @junior moat
interestingly when asked the same questions about photos US vessels in the area, they stated that they had none
👀
We've the track of the Nymfen right?
Give it a 5nm buffer on both sides for "reasonable visibility for pictures"
They have you on alert, Alexander
Isnt 5nm aprox how far you can see from 10m ASL?
these are the complete Nymfe tracks from the Danish AIS data
Yea, the Russian ships were definitely there.
Have you asked the Swedish navy, for more info about Visby or shall I write them a mail?
The interesting question about thes photos is whether they show the AS-26 (or AS-30) mini-sub on board the SS-750 or whether it is absent in some or all of the photos.
"they have a range of 21 nautical miles (39 km), at a top speed of 3.3 knots (6 km/h)."
If SS-750 were withing that range of the explosion sites or closer in a period of 6,5h or shorter, that is gonna make things more interesting.
👀
the diana is 611 px's long and 43m long so 14px per metre, and in this pic it's bridge is 92px high
which gives the bridge an air draft/height above the water of approximately 6 metres
4.7nm then
to your own horizon
but you can see over the horizon if the other ship is sticking its head over it
so you've to add the reverse to get the absolute maximum possible distance
not getting a terribly good picture at say 9.4 nm though
but it's the absolute maximum assuming two 6m high things
wouldn't it be simpler to use drones?
I did not follow the previous discussion in detail, but how much do we know about potential candidates for the Russian vessels?
Naval warships aren't going to be deploying DJIs, it's not something any NATO navy I am aware of has onboard.
Vessels on the list supplied to T-Online included SS-750 — a rescue ship — and two rescue tugboats, the Aleksandr Frolov and SB-123. These three had on-board equipment that could potentially have been useful for planting explosives. The two tugs have lifting equipment while the larger SS-750 rescue ship carries AS-26, a Priz-class mini-submarine with manipulator arms that can reportedly lift up to 50kg.
Thank you for the summary!
@sand delta is there a steerable electro optical sensor on top of the Nymfen's bridge?
Coughs uncomfortably in non-NATO Irish
Maybe ask of they have "images of any spectrum". lol
@strange bane, just in case you missed the ping during your account problems.
One sec
I'm not seeing anything.
That looks like a camera.
And my database of military systems is saying it doesn't.
The systems on the top of the deckhouse on both sides are most likely search lights.
Oh it's a recent thing.
The sensors will equip a range of platforms across the Danish military, but primarily land vehicles and naval vessels. Those outlined in the DALO notice include the Polaris MRZR, Supacat Intruder, Mowag Piranha 5, Naval Special Warfare Rigid Inflatable Boat, Iver Huitfeldt-class frigate, Absalon-class frigate, Thetis-class inspection ship, Knud Rasmussen-class inspection vessel, and Diana-class patrol vessel.
I realized that I know someone who has been a Captain on the Diana-class
You can see it here.
🚨🚨NEWS ITEM IN DANISH: The 🇩🇰defense took 112 photos of 🇷🇺 vessels near the #NordStreampipeline before the explosion
1/Four days before the Nord Stream gas pipes burst, a Danish patrol boat named P524 Nymfen took 112 photos of 🇷🇺 vessels
2/in the area around the explosions.
This is written by Information, which has sought access to documents from the Defense Command.
Here, Information asked for access to "the photos and video footage of Russian vessels taken on September 22, 2022, on board the P524 Nymfen ".
3/To the request, the Defense Command has replied that it has identified 112 photos and no video recordings.
The pictures were taken from the boat during a patrol which, based on the sailing pattern, focused on the area where an explosion occurred around Nord Stream a few days
4/However, the file access request was rejected , as they "are part of the intelligence work, which is why they are exempt from file access ," the Defense Command said.-END-
It does seem that the Diana-class were on escort duty for any Russian transits of the Sound.
Vanochtend werden de Russische landingsschepen de Oostzee uit begeleid door Deens patrouilleschip Diana. Inmiddels lijkt die taak te zijn overgenomen door de Nymfen (P524), en tuffen de Russen met ~10 knopen richting Noordzee. https://t.co/2pyBaFPiIx
Which makes sense in relation to what their stated duties are. I wonder could you ask your friend is there a Danish naval protocol for Russian naval transits of the Sound? @stark palm
Does Denmark get a notice that a transit is going to occur, or is it a case that the Russians show up without notice?
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Yea, the FLIR has been there for a couple years.
- Eskadre is the Danish Navy's sovereignty and surveillance related tasks unit.
(Just replacing the picture I posted with one that has the faces blurred, out of respect for the sailors privacy)
Alternative pictures of the Diana spectating the Tour de France in 2022.
It's midnight, so it's timelapse time again. First one is a zoomed out view showing P524 - Nymfen approaching the area and some other military traffic.
The second shows an approximate view range for P524 - this is back of the envelope stuff, 5NM = 9.26KM. I had to do some clunky workarounds, so if it's wildly inaccurate; my apologies.
Of note, P524 gets close to a Swedish vessel - I wonder if the Swedish crew were taking photos at the same time? 🤷
Thanks to @velvet rain for helping out with improving these and of course @stark palm for bringing this new info to light.
Nice job.
Those pictures have to be of the ships in the vicinity.
As there was a nice Sentinel 1 pass @ 16:45 UTC on 22 Sep, I thought we might see the Russian vessels over the site - but they had gone by then 😦
Quite possibly visible elsewhere in the same S1 pass, but will require some work to figure out where.
IIRC the protocol is "follow it closely alternative have Danish personal on the bridge" and get annoyed when they insist on hitting each waypoint at their sepcificed time instead of just making sure that the overall time is correct
I think that was form article that interveiwed a danish captain about the precedure on russian ships.
lets say they are really "by the book"
even if the book is bullshit
Non paywalled:
https://archive.ph/z0aGw
I assure you this is a photo taken on the day by a single highly trustworthy source, who I cannot name. 
Outline of the Russian ships story here ... https://medium.com/@brian-whit/photos-show-russian-ships-were-close-to-nord-stream-sabotage-site-four-days-before-explosions-f5a4524be1a7
cough - #1072947857654554624 message
Think there might be some new info in the 3 part documentary made by together by the public service networks of Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland. First part is coming tomorrow
https://digitalt.tv/premierekalender/skyggekrigen/
The series is the largest overall journalistic coverage of the Russian hybrid war in the Nordics ever. The coverage has been done with the support of Nordvision, which is a fund set up with the aim of strengthening public service productions in the Nordic countries.
On 19 April, the result of the extensive Nordic cooperation will be published. A three-hour long documentary series in three episodes entitled 'The Shadow War', which is broadcast simultaneously in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. On DR1, the first episode can be seen on Wednesday at 21:25, and the series can also be seen on DRTV, where the first episode premieres already at 6:00 on 19 April.
In continuation of the series 'Shadow War', DR publishes a podcast series in six episodes - also with the title 'Shadow War'. It can be heard for the first time on April 26 on DR Lyd.
Will it be available worldwide?
No idea
I have set my alarm to 6AM so I can watch it right away
Perfect thing to eat breakfest to.
I'm up, does it have subtitles?
not sure if any of them per default sub in english
can you access the nrk version? from my experience they are good with having things open as long as they are not limited by some rights stuff
There isn't, but it's worth to torn in the norsk2, some words and som spoken English makes it watchable. Also if you speak German.
vlad making an apperance
@pure finch Looks a bit more intentional than MJ.
Its in Dannish so use a translator:
"When the TV crew from DR met "Admiral Vladimirsky" between Sweden and Denmark, they saw masked men with automatic weapons."
Nothing major NS related in the first episode
but it does seem like the next ones may focus more on it
while very interesting, the first episode did seem a but messy editing-wise.
Jumping between spying at Volvo, Svalbad, fishing vessels and NS
yeah its more of a setting the context episode than narrowed down on a more narrow storyline
but its interesting with the cable cut, it seems similar - perhaps its worth looking at if there is some correlation between the ships suspected to be involved there and the nord stream - even if its different gis wise there might be similarities in the owner structures or other related information
The cable cutting was a much easier operation in many regards as it could be done by just dragging an anchor.
They very much stepped it up for Nord Stream
but the approach does seem similar, and would make sense if the governments end up in a similar position that they cant prove it even if almost all the pieces fit
but everything here does point even more towards Russia and GUGI as I have long suspected
yeah definitely - the NRK guy seems also to have uncovered a lot of general activity in the gis data that is suspicious in a wider spectrum pointing to being very deliberate and organized
so a relative short jump in correlations when you see very unnatural movements at nord stream area, even if as you say this is a more complex area, more montiored and that cables are easier to oopsie than gas pipes
https://twitter.com/PutinIsAVirus/status/1628745062845669376
And here is the IMO/MMSI if anyone wants to dig deeper:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SFvSUkFdgdS__BdxSu98cDxC4623GXAvwOcEhTR5wbQ/edit?usp=sharing
Blad1
IMO,MMSI
AKADEMIK ALEKSANDR KARPINSKY,8227238,273457410
AKAD.M.A. LAVRENTYEV,8211162,273430900
AKADEMIK B.PETROV,8211150,273454710
AKADEMIK FERSMAN,8313958,273455310
AKADEMIK GOLITSYN,8119003,273451600
AKADEMIK LAZAREV,8408985,273450600
AKADEMIK MSTISLAV KELDYSH,7811018,273411400
AKADEMIK ...
can’t wait for Hersh’s new piece where somehow this is proof that the US did it
Does anyone happen to have a chart handy that shows the territorial water limits in Danish waters. Specifically in regards to the line of “international waters” that exists through the Danish straight
.@forsvaretdk har uddannet kenyanske dykkere, der nu kan dykke ned til 60 meters dybde. Baggrunden er en tragisk dødsulykke fra 2019, der fik Kenya til at spørge Forsvaret om hjælp.
#dkforsvar #værdatkæmpefor
Se 8. min. video på Forsvarets Youtube: https://t.co/CZtw2vNuWb
The true culprit is revealed! 👀
Lol. At the end it was a rubberboat crew. All is possible.
everything, you say? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_marine_mammal
A military marine mammal is a cetacean or pinniped that has been trained for military uses. Examples include bottlenose dolphins, seals, sea lions, and beluga whales. The United States and Soviet militaries have trained and employed oceanic dolphins for various uses. Military marine mammals have been trained to rescue lost naval swimmers, guard ...
great stuff, just fyi: its possible to auto-translate the subtitles to english with google chrome. (thanks SnapFasterly for the hint)
This is a rush job on my break, I'm tied up with work this afternoon - but let me know if something like this is helpful
From researching it, my understanding is that nowadays the straits (with the extension of the territorial waters to 12nm) is that Denmark views the treaty as providing a non-suspendable right to innocent passage through its Strait waters, rather than cleaving a channel of no-Danish control whatsoever through Danish waters.
Passage of Warships
The 1857 treaties are not applicable to warships (or other government ships operated for non-commercial purposes). In their regulations concerning the passage of warships and other government ships operated for non-commercial purposes, Denmark and Sweden have made special provision for passage through the Danish Straits. Until 1994, Sweden required prior notification of passage of foreign warships through its territorial sea. Such notification was not required for passage through the Swedish territorial sea in the Sound. Although this is not explicitly indicated, the provisions of the relevant ordinance indicate that the regime of passage is that of innocent passage. Danish regulations accord foreign warships a right of innocent passage within the meaning of international law through the Danish territorial sea. Submarines are required to navigate on the surface in the Danish territorial sea. The right of innocent passage also exists in the Danish Straits. Simultaneous passage of the Great Belt or the Sound of more than three warships of the same nationality is subject to prior notification through diplomatic channels. There have been incidents with more than three ships passing at the same time through the Great Belt, but usually the flag state complies with the applicable Danish rules. The passage of warships of the Hollaenderdyb and Drogden, parts of the Sound comprised within Danish internal waters forming part of the roadstead of Copenhagen and the Little Belt, which also forms part of Danish internal waters, is subject to advance notification.
The positions of Denmark and Sweden concerning passage of warships is not shared by all other states. The view of the United States is that warships have either the customary right of transit passage or the conventional right of "free and unencumbered navigation", since transit passage is more restrictive than freedom of navigation guaranteed under the 1857 treaties. As was noted above, it is doubtful that the 1857 treaties also apply to warships. Whether the generally existing customary law regime of passage of warships through straits has been altered by state practice in respect of the Danish Straits would require a more detailed analysis.
Yeah
the orignal treaty about the sund and the straits specify "treaty text on free passage for all friendly ships"
Traité pour l'abolition des droits du Sund et des Belts
Haven't found the real text or it translated but from what I can find it only applies for innocent passage
For what it's worth, it is a ship of the Russian Navy, so not surprising it has armed men onboard.
the Commitment to: 1. not to collect any Customs, Cargo Fees, Lighthouse and Lighthouse Fees, Barrel Fees, or any other Shipping or Loading Fee of the ships, who pass the Belts or the Sound to go from the North Sea to the Baltic Sea, or vice versa, whether they are unable to sail through Danish waters or are forced to drop anchor there or seek a port, be it due to accidents at sea or because of commercial operations. No ship shall for the future, under any pretext whatever, dare to be detained or subject to any arrest on its voyage through the strait and the belts; but His Majesty the King of Denmark expressly reserves the right to, by separate agreements, which do not require any visitation or arrest, to arrange the prosecution and customs treatment of the ships of those Powers which have not taken part in the present Treaty
Now the question is: "do that apply to ships that aren't trade vessels"
2. neither of the registered ships that enter or leave Danish ports with cargo or ballast, whether those who have carried on commercial operations or not, or demand from their cargoes any tax whatsoever, to which these ships or their cargoes, by reason of the passage through the straits or belts, would have been subjected, and the abolition of which has been stipulated in the preceding passage; and is it to be understood that the costs abolished in this way, which consequently must neither be collected in the Sound and the Belts nor in the Danish ports, nor can they be restored indirectly either by increasing the existing port and customs duties for that purpose, or with the same aim of introducing new shipping or customs duties, or in any other way. Nature.
```2. His Majesty the King of Denmark still commits himself directly to the above-mentioned high contracting parties to: 1. to preserve and maintain all the past at the inlets and approaches to His harbours, moors, rivers or canals or existing lighthouses and lighthouses along His coasts, as well as the buoys, barrels and pilotage marks that now exist and serve to facilitate navigation in the Kattegat, the Sound and the Belts ; 2. for the future, as heretofore, in the general interest of shipping, to take into serious consideration whether it would be useful and convenient to change the location and shape of these lighthouses, lighthouses, buoys, barrels and pilot marks, or to increase their number, without anything imposed as a burden for the foreign shipping; 3. for the future, as heretofore, to supervise the pilotage service, the use of which in the Kattegatte, The sound and the belts at all times are left to the captains and shipmasters' own well-being. It is understood that the pilotage fees should be moderate, that one and the same rate should apply to Danish and foreign ships, and the reported fee will only be able to be charged to those ships that have voluntarily used pilots; 4. without any intrusion whatsoever, to allow all, both Danish and foreign, Private Contractors, at their own pleasure and under the same conditions, without regard to their nationality, in the Sound and the Belts, to lay down and station vessels, exclusively intended for the towing of the ships , who wish to make use thereof````
It's just standard innocent passage, it seems.
I hope the next episode is more Nord Stream related
There is a big debate over who blew up the Nord Stream pipeline. Instead of allowing the debate, Facebook has decided to take a side. It is censoring Pulitzer-winning journalist Seymour Hersh. And instead of explaining, Facebook sends readers to an article in Norwegian. Watch
19462
5743
Elon and Shellenberger is fighting to keep Hersh stupidity relevant
by attacking another publicly funded media outlet
Can someone check if there's interesting footage in the Baltic sea with the new Google pro images. It's possible there isn't and it's only in Ukraine. (See Geolocation Ukraine H/t @foggy mirage )
Where am I supposed to be looking?
Ah gotcha
I got pointed out that Russia basically have bombed its own pipelines before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Russia–Georgia_energy_crisis
puts on a tin-foil hat There are some similar parallels. Both occurred when the electrical net were pressured by bad weather, both occurred in a country where it had been a color revolution, additional bombing occurred to press the net even more, both occurred just after 00:00 UTC. taking off my conspiratorial tin-foil hat
Russian officials earlier described the attacks as deliberate acts by pro-Chechen criminals and said an investigation was under way.
Hours later, a third explosion -- in Karachaevo-Cherkessia, another southern Russian republic -- ripped through a power line, temporarily cutting off a portion of Georgia's electricity supplies.
Relations between Georgia and Russia have been tense since Mr Saakashvili was swept to power by the so-called "Rose Revolution" in 2003, pledging to lead his nation on a pro-Western course.
Two explosions occurred on the main branch and a reserve branch of the Mozdok-Tbilisi gas pipeline in North Ossetia at about 0300 local time (2400 GMT) on Sunday.```
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4638566.stm
Now we just need to find some russian timing fuse that allow you to say the day it will go off easy, but it is anoyingly complecated to set the specific time and it default to 00:00 UTC
russian spec ops the type of dudes to have their VCR blinking 12:00
Old soviet fuses for underwater could have time settings for days and some could be paired with a fuse (VPZ-1) that is activated by a shockwave propagating in the water.
````30 minutes to 6 days```
http://www.dogswar.ru/boepripasy/miny/8808-vzryvatel-zamedlenno.html
Взрыватель замедленного действия ВЗД-144ч (СССР)
Anyone know who funded what percentage of Nordstream?
If looking at Nord Stream AG:
"Gazprom International Projects LLC, a subsidiary of Gazprom – 51%
Wintershall Dea AG – 15.5%
PEG Infrastruktur AG, a subsidiary of E.ON Beteiligungen – 15.5%
N.V. Nederlandse Gasunie – 9%
Engie – 9%
"
For example, I’ve read in a couple places that it was mostly Western European funded, but I’m struggling to find anything reliable. If it’s a high percentage European funded thing, the incredulity of “why would Russia blow up its own pipeline” is a bit hollow
And it becomes more a “Russia destroys X billion euros worth of European investment”
31 percent German, 9 percent Dutch, 9 percent French.
And 51 percent Russian.
plus the lost gas revenue
NS2 cos 9.5 billion euros apparently, the offshore portion of NS1 cost 9 billion euros.
Rounding everything off, and halving the cost of NS2 cos it’s half broken, that’s destroying 7.5 billion euros worth of European property.
Admittedly it’s doing equal damage to Russian property, but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to what Russia had already lost access to at that point.
Wasnt NS2 was fully owned / funded by Gazprom?
NS2 was the only shareholder was Gazprom (sounds weird if others also financed it but did not get any shares).
```Gazprom paid half the cost of building Nord Stream 2, with the remainder of the $11 billion pipeline project financed by British oil and gas major Shell (S.HELL), Austria's OMV (OMVV.VI), France's Engie and Germany's Uniper (UN01.DE) and Wintershall DEA (WINT.UL).````
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/exclusive-nord-stream-2-owner-considers-insolvency-after-pipeline-halt-sanctions-2022-03-01/
yeah
but none of the secundary explosions match the shockwave activated exploisions
No. Therefore its most likley it was just a timed one.
Somewhere I read the cost to repair, if done reasonably quickly, was like $500 million Euros.
It is like you are in an accident with your car, you only loose the cost of repair. And Russia may have expected to get some profit for the repair?
The loss of gas is another matter, I don't know that value.
So it depends upon how Rissia expected Europe to react to the loss of gas. If Putin assumed Europe would freak out, and pay him to repair the facility, he was looking at a far smaller hit. If he expected it to cause NATO to cease supporting Ukraine, the those savings would offset the pipeline loss.
Of course I do not know, I am just pointing to a possible alternative financial analysis. And obviously, if that was his plan, then it backfired.
I don't know of any reason that it would be difficult to fabricate a simple timer fuse or detonator. I have timers on my boat, 12VDC, that can be set to open or close contacts any day of the week.
So you set the timers Sunday to go off Saturday. That gives you nearly 7 days to set the charges.
Now I have the tin foil hat. The explosive materials, think 20 kilo blocks if explosive could be pre positioned. You want 200kg of explosive you place 10 "bricks". This could be done at anytime, months in advance.
When sure you want to do the demolition come back and place the detonator in the pile of explosive bricks. That detonator is a small waterproof box with the timer, a battery, the fuse, and a small amount of explosive, enough to set off the pile of "bricks".
All of this could (easily??) be handled by the rescue sub.
And there is no special anything except the explosives, all freely available on Amazon.
Insurance cover of the pipelines has been renewed, which would cover the cost of repairs, and Gazprom have initiated engineering studies to determine how the pipelines can be sealed and preserved for future repair. The cost of repair is difficult to assess without knowing the full extent of the damage caused and the requirements of the regulatory authority that would need to be satisfied before the pipelines can deliver gas. The damage requiring repair is not limited to the areas of obvious destruction but could include significantly longer lengths where seawater ingress has resulted in significant internal deterioration of the steel; caused by SRB (sulphate reducing bacteria) rather than 'normal' chloride corrosion. The oxygen content at the seabed at the site of the NS1 destruction is anoxic (<2% oxygen) and there is H2S (hydrogen sulphide) present which indicates SRB. SRB 'corrosion' can be particularly rapid, although it is more usually a problem in warmer water, whilst the chloride corrosion is a slower process.
The extent of seawater intrusion depends upon whether the pipeline valves at the landfall locations have been opened to allow the controlled release of gas. If they have not been opened, the pressure of the gas inside the pipeline will be about 7 or 8 bar - the external hydrostatic pressure at the rupture. The profile shows the extent of seawater intrusion for the NS1 pipeline profile (green line shows 8 bar) and it shows that seawater intrusion could be very localised to the rupture sites. Alternatively, if the gas has been released at the landfall locations then the seawater intrusion could be for a much longer length depending upon the residual pressure in the pipeline. If the pressure is reduced to atmospheric pressure, or slightly above, then the pipeline will be filled with seawater but there will still be gas in the pipeline at discrete locations along the entire length - at the high points in the pipeline as it lies on the undulating seabed profile. This of course presents another set of problems that needs to be addressed regardless of whether the pipelines are to be repaired and reused.
Where is the profile from - a previous post in the thread?
The seabed profile is from project documentation for Nordstream 1. I just added the green line when I was looking at this from a pipeline engineering perspective.
Cool, do you have a link I can pin for the channel? That sounds like a good resource.
The Nordstream Library https://www.nord-stream.com/press-info/library/
Nord Stream is a natural gas pipeline through the Baltic Sea. The pipeline is a key factor in securing energy security in Europe.
Its less than a week until the geologist pappers regarding the explosions at NS is presented at EGU23.
where to find the seabed profile amongst the library documentation 👇
Boeing WC-135R Constant Phoenix low over the water off coast of Kaliningrad....consistent with sniffing out a gas leak
it need to work at 100m depth
and I can bet that your 12v timer can't do that 😄
are their even any pipelines in that area?
arent submarine hunting more likely?
As can be seen from the programme, each presentation will be only 10 minutes. Ben Dando, one of the authors of the third paper, tells me the full papers will not be automatically available. He's checking with his co-authors to see if I can have a copy. The situation is a bit complicated because the three groups of seismologists are now planning to combine all their work into a single paper which may not be available until some time in the summer.
Do we ever get any good news?...
Its doing baseline sampling. Nothing out of the ordinary. This individual plane is a new one and is out on a sampling mission to establish baseline-values for its sensors.
What is to stop it? Put it in a sealed box, sufficient to hold the pressure. Would need to do that to keep water out.
What exactly is the problem
the problem is making the box
You make the very few pressure sensitive events small, and the "pot" them, sealed in epoxy.
One of the individuals in contact with Russian officials was Ralph Niemeyer, Wagenknecht’s ex-husband. He told The Post that he was still in near-daily communication with Wagenknecht and that during recent meetings with top-level Kremlin officials in Moscow it was clear to him that “there are certain people in Russia who have [an] interest” in a union between Wagenknecht and the far right.
“I know from private talks with these people that they are aware of the potential that this would have,” said Niemeyer, whose house was raided in late March as part of a criminal investigation over his alleged involvement in a plot by the ultra-right Reichsbürger movement to overthrow the German government — allegations that Niemeyer denies.AfD members and Niemeyer have continued to travel to Russia since the war began. When Niemeyer traveled to Vladivostok, a Russian city in the Far East, in September, he posted images on social media of his meetings at an economic forum with Peskov, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Alexei Miller, chief executive of Gazprom, the Russian state gas giant.
Niemeyer said at the time he was there to negotiate a new gas supply contract through Nord Stream 2 with Moscow, on behalf of what he called “a German government in exile.”
Niemeyer said he returned to Moscow following the Baltic Sea explosions that damaged the Nord Stream pipelines in September and was told by a top Kremlin official, Yury Ushakov, that supplies could still be delivered through Nord Stream 2, where one branch was undamaged in the explosions. During these meetings, he said, he was given a special encrypted telephone for communicating securely with Peskov, who, he said, is also interested in the effort to unite Wagenknecht and the AfD. Peskov did not respond to a request for comment about whether he gave an encrypted phone to Niemeyer.
https://archive.is/uJYGM (WaPo: Kremlin tries to build antiwar coalition in Germany, documents show)
Yes there are pipelines there and the WC-135R is not a sub hunter, it is for colecting samples of airborne particles and gases, usually tasked with picking up radioactive particles
to detect if a nuclear test has happened but it can be re-tasked to sample pretty much any airborne particle or gas
Alex
80 meters is about 8 BAR. About 120 PSI. 4" schedule 40 pipe, electrical conduit has a working pressure of 1,400PSI and a burst pressure of 6,300 PSI.
The "box" is a piece of pipe.
You know this how?, why would it try to establish baseline samples in that area?
Don't forget this descended to 5500'
In the area
its the first time for the airframe in europe, its normal procedure to do baseline sampling. did the same north of norway and around the kola peninsula in the last days. its basic knowledge for aviation researcher.
Because its the same new plane that have done baseline testing elsewhere. You need to do baseline testing for every location so you know what the background is.
However I´ve seen increased radiation in Finland, but it seems to be normal changes during the year, no artificial nuclides. But that is kinda why you need to do diffrent baslinesamples at diffrent time of the year.
Interesting
positive or negative?
best I can find is this
Schedule 80 PVC pipe 6-inch showed no deformation at temperatures to 170°F and 27 inches of mercury vacuum. The 6" pipe specimens showed slight deformation at 165°F and 20 inches of mercury vacuum.
Not saying that it is impossible
more that you would have to build something
and likely seal it before throwing it overboard.
(yes you could fill it with mineral oil and with a bit extra work get around the implosion problem
What makes you sure of the Aircraft's mission?, why dip to 5500ft in the area of previous Gas release? perhaps if you have information confirming your assertion you could show the source otherwise its a knowledgeable guess.
The South American flight has no bearing on this
I dont see a connection that is Finland ground statiopn monitoring
Yes, you asked for source.
I asked for a source that confirmed your theory, that doesnt but never mind this is getting to be a distraction
It has not fly anywhere near the explosion sites.
It passed downwind of them
I am only theorising, Its ok to put forward theories of course but you presented as fact hence my questioning
I thought you might have inside knowledge oof the flight
Not downwind, winds are mostly going from North east to South West. Kinda why its good location for wind turbines.
Sadly because the Iridium I-4 F1 satellite is experience outage the whole ACARS net is reduced in capability. Sometimes you can get the plane's mission from them. Especially if it has a special mission outside the ordinary flight plan as they must be sent to EUROCONTROL.
https://acars.adsbexchange.com/#!/2?socketid=sZylANw0IiWUXNpoBI2w
a lengthy article from Bloomberg; no new information but a reasonable round-up and an interesting photo of the NS1 receiving plant at the German landfall. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-04-20/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-still-a-mystery-months-later?leadSource=uverify wall
what is the expected/estimated max distance the core of a nuke could be detected from?
(we are if anything too good at detecting radiation than too bad)
an unexploded nuke is pretty hard to detect
they don't put out a whole lot of radiation
It detect fallout and nuclides that is released when you are changing fuel in a reactor or reprocessing stuff, so it cant detect a nuke unless it has gone off.
yeah
I was thinking about unexploded detection in general
also that's a different type of radiation than the particulates this thing is probably instrumented for
you'd just need a regular geiger counter
but you'd have to be within...I dunno, 30-40 feet of it?
yeah
and a gamma spectrometer to figuer out what you are looking at
r squared and all that
Bearly that, the Plutonium and Uranium in nuclear weapons are mainly Alpha particles, and then the core is surrounded in heavy metal tampers like wolfram or depleted uranium. You basically need to have a gamma spectrometer next to it.
but yeah a nuclear weapon core is like, you can carry it around in a suitcase, it's fine
it's not like the planes carrying nuclear bombs gave their pilots cancer :p
But once a nuke has exploded and spread radioactive fallout it dosnt require much for it to be detected as it stand so much out from the background radiation. Like the Ru106 release in 2017 or the Nyonoksa accident in 2019 were detected in very small amount.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airborne_radioactivity_increase_in_Europe_in_autumn_2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyonoksa_radiation_accident
Airborne radioactivity was detected in Europe during autumn 2017, starting from the last days of September. The source is widely suspected to be in Russia; the Russian government, however, denies that any nuclear mishaps occurred that could have caused the radiation spike. The radioactive isotope detected was ruthenium-106; across Europe, it wa...
The Nyonoksa radiation accident, Arkhangelsk explosion or Nyonoksa explosion (Russian: Инцидент в Нёноксе, romanized: Intsident v Nyonokse) occurred on 8 August 2019 near Nyonoksa, a village under the administrative jurisdiction of Severodvinsk, Arkhangelsk Oblast, Russian Federation. Five military and civilian specialists were killed and three ...
a bit hevy and unweildy thouhg 😄
oooooooh you'd be surprised
this isn't even close to the smallest one
and that's a fully assembled weapon, not just the core
or how we detected Chernobyl
precedied to call up the soviet ambasador and basically tell them "we know one of your NPPs exploded a few days ago, which one, and what can we do to help"
The ambassador had offcorse not been told anything yet
did something nuclear come up in the nord stream pipeline investigation or is this a case for #1096714680845738076?
you posted the tweet about the airplane
(but yeah we should stop now 😄 )
yeah, the tweet says its collecting a baseline and was an answer to the question why the nuke sniffer was in the baltic. dont know how it went from that to this
but i dont follow that closely here, so could be that i missed something.
without paywall
https://archive.is/fBpcN
we were speculating about "what is it sniffing for though"
but yeah I don't think anyone is about to suitcase nuke the pipeline so probably off topic
````"He talks about a Russian warship that last June violated Danish territorial waters close to Bornholm, when the island was hosting a gathering to celebrate Denmark’s democracy."```
Any contenders on which?
Do we have anyone from Denmark here?
Alexander is probably already on it.
feels like the kind of thing that should be easy to find in Danish papers but hard outside
Is this compleatly new info?
Such work can require long periods in dark waters breathing air from tanks filled with heliox, a mixture of helium and oxygen—and no nitrogen, due to its potentially narcotic effects. Over beers in a Copenhagen bar, one of Denmark’s most experienced navy divers says finding the pipelines without precise coordinates or tracking technology, then transporting and placing the explosives, would’ve challenged diver-saboteurs. The charges, which likely weighed hundreds of pounds, had been placed against the underside of the pipes, with the velocity of the explosions helping avoid a fireball that might have ripped along the pipelines in both directions. The diver estimates the operation, including a safe ascent, would’ve taken an individual diver several hours. He surmises that whoever carried out the attack had access to a fast-moving autonomous submersible vehicle, like the ones employed by sophisticated naval forces. A surface vessel remaining relatively static for hours as it waited for a dive team, he says, would’ve attracted unwanted attention in the moment or been flagged by investigators after the fact.
The Danish navy says the hypothesis is sound, as it would’ve been difficult for divers to spend the time required [...]
also the fireball idea sounds unlikely?
yeah that's not possible at all, pure natural gas is not flammable
needs oxidizer
the rest of the info seems solid though
yeah my thoughts too
weird that a diver wouldn't know about gas properties though
that's kind of life or death knowledge in that line of work
the guy is a UXO diver not a pipeline welder
lol
And those skills have been beefed up over the past two decades as Russian submarines have increasingly probed the country’s waters.
(it have actually decreased since the mid 90s but have recently started up gain)
I still wonder if the large section of missing pipe is caused by the explosives (which would had been placed along the section of the pipeline) or that the expanding gas lifted the whole section up.
I would guess that would be differnt in how the damage looked
I thought Sweden or Denmark cut out their respective parts of the pipeline to investigate it?
IIRC the Expressen or was it aftonbladet 🤷 article talked about "sectons might have been cut"
Ah
some of the video taken for expressen and for tv1 shows that the pipeline had moved on the seabed during the immediate gas release (that's the lengths of pipeline that are still on the seabed). The seabed where the 270 metre long section that's missing used to be is very 'disturbed' but it's difficult to tell if that's because of the explosion(s) or the interventions carried out after the gas discharge had finished (and before the rov surveys were performed).
I think the idea that the pipeline was cut is the result of limited views on the rov survey that was published which seem to show a shiny smooth steel surface where the rupture occurred (mostly because of the reflected light). On closer and more careful inspection it can be seen that the surface is not as smooth as it first appears and that the steel wall is in fact torn not cut. It's also a curved tear and not a straight cut as it appears on some of the vision/photos/
the oddest thing with that is that it is expressen that made that investegation
They are not a paper anyone that serious
This has a Guardian overlay...I'm having trouble following the source if we were talking about aftonbladet or expressen. Is this just another article about the same thing?
Posting links would really help keep things transparent!
it's taken from the blueye survey that was conducted for expressen and reported in The Guardian. (When I was looking at the available video i took screenshots of some of the more 'interesting' views but also copied photos when it was easier.)
the initial reports after the inspection was conducted reported that objects had been recovered. The Expressen vision publicly available is for NS1-A only and only for one end of the destroyed line (the end coming from Russia) which doesn't look as though it was cut. It may be that the other end (going towards Germany) was cut but there is no vision of that section of the destroyed NS1-A. The vision of NS2-A south of Bornholm is only side on so the end of the pipeline can't be seen.
That's cool! Just throw in the URL of the video when you post your screenshots. I think that's a good solution.
I dident rember which evening tabloid did the original investegation
but yes it was expressen
SÖDRA ÖSTERSJÖN. Här inträffade explosionerna som har eskalerat den geopolitiska konflikten mellan Ryssland och västvärlden. På botten, 80 meter under Östersjöns yta, filmar Expressen de söndersprängda gasledningarna i Nord Stream 1. Vår undervattenskamera dokumenterar långa revor i havsbotten innan den når det betongarmerade stålröret som sliti...
That's okay. I just want to make sure we are sourcing properly - thanks so much!
honestly expressen doing this kind of reporting is more odd than buzzfeed doing serious reportin (in the past?)
their usial reporting is (at best) about shit like this
A school in Washington, USA, is facing criticism after a video of a game between teachers and students was shared on social media. In the game, students and teachers compete to lick up marshmallow cream on either side of a plexiglass.
The ROV survey was done by Blueye for Expressen and later for BBC. The survey done for TV1 used a Blueye ROV but wasn't conducted by the company.
Positive
Negative would likely be higher. Compression on a circle.
But if that isn't enough go to schedule 80. Much thicker wall and still commercially available.
usially don't work that way
pressure to implode and pressure to expolde are usially differnce
the 80 pipe stood up to 20 inches of mercury vacuum (what the hell that even means in real numbers)
and from what I can find it dident look like that much
but I don't know how to convert distance of liquid metal to pressure
20 inches of mercury is only about 10 PSI, seems a very low figure
Yeah it feels too low
But it's not actually a impossible figure.
Something cane easy have a really high max pressure but an almost none exist any vaccum tolerance
Surely -10PSI on the inside of a pipe the same as +10 PSI on the outside, so still quite a low pressure differential
( do understand how a pipe has different tolerance to - and + due its shape)
sure
in the end my point is just "don't assume that something can take a vacuum because it can take high pressure" as that is rarely the case.
IIRC some space travle SF thing had their space ship end up under water for some reason and the captain asked the enginere "what hull pressure is this ship rated for" the enginere answered "eehhh, It is a space ship so I would guess -1"
If you assume something can take a vaccum in error you can easy end up with this:
I imagine we all know this from experience with plastic drinks bottle
Yeah, but the average Joe would not expect that from inches thick metal
So back to the matter in hand, are we saying that the gas mains can only take a -10 PSI (10 PSI external) pressure differential? what is the pressure at the depth they are laid and are they reliant on positive internal pressure to avoid collapse (I find the last point unlikely but have no knowledge)
At 100 metre depth pressure = 10 Bar (145 PSI) relative to atmosphere = 11 Bar absolute ,so I begin to think the 10 PSI figure was a mistake
Nordstream pipe laid at 80 - 110 metres depth
the pipe is laid unpressurized, ergo it can stand to be unpressurized again
the "20 inches of vaccuum pressure" probably applied to a pvc pipe or some similar material, not to a steel pipe. Gas pipelines are installed in much deeper water than in the Baltic Sea and external hydrostatic pressure is seldom a controlling factor on wall thickness in such shallow water depths; it's usually internal pressure. To illustrate the point, prior to installing Nordstream 2, one of the pipelay vessels, the Pioneering Spirit, had installed a 32" diameter line (wall thickness 39mm) into 2,200 metres of water depth in the Black Sea. https://allseas.com/project/turkstream/ At 2,200 metres the external hydrostatic pressure will certainly have been a consideration in determining the wall thickness required; but for Nordstream there wouldn't have been the same concern although tighter requirements were specified on the ovality of the manufactured pipe.
yeah, that part about 20'' of vaccum is about PVC tube and a continuation about how to build a timing detonator that work at depth
I would take PVC over metal any day for something that will be under negative pressure
it really does not want to be crushed
you do you 🤷
all the homemade ROV designs use it :p
but yeah for a bigger pipe at pressures high enough to push gas long distances it makes sense that the limiting factor would be overpressure not underpressure
they arent going to be useing PVC pipes becouse they are better, they are going to use them becosue they are cheeper
I believe they're also lighter for the amount of strength you get (at least in small diameters like for holding electronics)
making it light is not an advantage if you are going to toss it overboard and want it to sink 😛
oh right yeah I guess the ROVs are meant to be neutrally boyant
I would suspect that they build them with a slight posetive bias so they return to the surface if everything fails
in my experience you haul em up by the tether hahaha
but anyway, this is related to if the charges were planted separately from the detonators?
I think that's kinda unlikely
making extra trips is expensive, risky, and more likely to get you caught
do TNT or other high explosives sink or float?
C4 explosive sinks - a relative density of about 1.7
hm
rdx is about the same as that iirc
did this get sorted out? I took a look now with my professional license and I can's see Visby in 2022. Can't reproduce your tracks above, but I could earlier in March this year.
No, they never replied after the initial inquiry
So according to them they have never had data for the Visby prior to 2023
That's obviously bullshit. I remember clearly reproducing those tracks in early March, but noted they were almost the only Swedish military tracks for the entire season before the blast. In my contacts with Marine Traffic support, they have denied ever touching the database, but maybe they don't keep their own archive, and there is another way for the military to scrub the open source database. Have you tried downloading the raw data?
I mean Oliver also has a screenshot of the track iirc
So it's not really disputed as to whether it was there before
Its still in the Danish AIS data.
So there is really no valid excuse for MarineTraffic? They claim they don't tamper with data, but that's a hollow statement if they don't keep their own protected version of the data they display.
Nope. I wonder if the data is still up att vesselfinder or if they have got a note too to delete records.
So there is someone that have asked Marinetraffic to remove the data, the question is who and why. Doubtful it would be the Swedish millitary as they know there are other parties that saves that data. Dont think they are that stupid.
Btw, here are the Dannish AIS data archive, and we can see that they have not modified the files since last year:
http://web.ais.dk/aisdata/
I also had a theory that marinetraffic may go back through historical data and remove stuff that looks suspect
they have a bunch of different receivers feeding into it and if some of them are disagreeing with each other they might just wipe out the data
Doubt that is the case here. The data matched up with the official Danish AIS data
and it just so happened to disappear a day after the article was released after having been here for 9 months
yeah, that would be really unlikely for the Swedish military, if anything they would publish stuff of the type that no one else would ever publish
just run us through how you think gas pipe lines are constructed
iirc in this case it was s-layed in 3 sections, joined on the sea floor, and then filled with water for pressure testing
but from your tone I'm going to guess you have some news for me? :p
no i was just curious if you knew more about nord stream specifically
sorry if it came off that way
this is the basic info https://www.nord-stream.com/the-project/construction/
Nord Stream is a natural gas pipeline through the Baltic Sea. The pipeline is a key factor in securing energy security in Europe.
but they went into the s-lay stuff somewhere else that I cannot currently find
seva mentioned it here
thanks, i'll give it a read
I pinned a post with a library of docs about Nord Stream too, @daring flume
If that's helpful:)
Good article on Russian underwater capabilities.
Looking into some new NS info. Will give a small update tomorrow if it leads anywhere
If anyone wants to help with one of my leads, I am looking for a "ghost ship (AIS off)" hanging out near Danish waters / Bornholm during BALTOPS22. I am fairly certain one of the Russian SIGINT ships was keeping an eye on the exercise not too far away.
Oh interesting, I'll take a look.
I'm checking if any Russian ships communicated with Danish radar in June 2022.
If we can find evidence of that, we can at least finally put Hersh to bed
As it would mean that the Russian's were looking right at the US while they were "placing the explosives"
And still somehow have no evidence
Couple interesting ships.
(For recreation, just ask it to give you all DSC in the last 365 between MID 219 (Denmark) coast stations and MID 273 (Russia) ship stations.)
It would be the RFS Syzran
It's MMSI is 273363010.
Sadly nothing on Yaddnet.
Or maybe that's not it's MMSI.
MM is for merchant.
Think I may have possibly found the culprit behind NS, but need a bit of time to confirm the data.
If this pans out, then it explains that the Russia did it, the West knows they did it but can't 100% prove it. Which would make sense looking at other acts of Russian sabotage, like Svalbard. Russia wants the west to know that they did it, but still keep some plausible deniability.
#typical russia
Waiting on some sat images
If I may ask, when did your suspect ship do sus stuff?
I wanna try to see if I can find something independently of you.
They were involved I think, but not the culprit themselves
There is apparently a Russian threat to the future of Europe's energy infrastructure. A team of Nordic journalists has spent the past year following dozens of Russian vessels in the North Sea. Many times the ships are registered as fishing trawlers. But reporters says the crews on board are looking for more than just seafood. DW's Teri Schultz ...
(I assume they are also trawling for fish...might as well be eating fresh seafood in between doing hot ukrainian diver shit)
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/04/21/why-is-facebook-censoring-sy-hershs-nordstream-report/
Big if true
Yet the fact-check...leans heavily on open source intelligence whose reliability has itself been recently challenged
Next episode of The Shadow war was released this morning. This link should be watchable in the whole world, but no English subtitles afaik.
Från ett parkeringshus görs framsteg i spaningsarbetet efter spionerna. Putins utsända har lyckats gömma sig bakom en lögn - fram tills nu. När reportrarna kartlägger ryskflaggade skepp på nordiskt vatten gör de hisnande upptäckter. Fisketrålare visar sig ha en dold agenda och rör sig misstänkt kring kritiska platser. Del 2 av 3.
this version works well with the subtitle translation feature of google chrome: https://tv.nrk.no/serie/brennpunkt-skyggekrigen/sesong/1/episode/2/avspiller
Good to know.
Accompanying article in English:
https://www.svt.se/special/putins-spies/
think I saw Sweden kicked out another 5 yesterday
this is the Norwegian article in case they are differently angled or have differing information
They've checked previous adresses for people connected to the consulate and embassy and identified those who have lived at the GRU conservatory.
This might be of interest to some of you Nordstreamers....new podcast series dropped today with two episodes.....obviously relevant to recent links above. 
Nothing really interesting related to NS
Didn't the satellite pictures bring something new?
Oh, I meant in the new episode of the documentary
26 of the 112 photos the P-524 Nymfen took on the 22nd September were of the SS-750
mm
things seems awfully like they align with some patterns
Russian ships just seems to have magnets towards being in certain areas and having transponders off
I have some more information that I am publishing in the next hour or two
Good job!
I wonder if we will soon see a new red herring or a bunch of articles that is again trying to put the blame on the Americans/NATO/phantoms. If that occurs, that means that the Russians are getting nervous.
sy is gonna have a whole new set of theories in time for the evening shows
its 3 main problems if its Russia like it seems like patternwise fits well
lack of undeniable proof
lack of will to want to have it escalate in the current situation
and Russia willing to take more risks because they count on the two prior, thinking that it will cause slower democracies more trouble anyway to act upon it should they be unable to do it "undetected"
Oliver
Thanks for your work.
To be fair Hersh's idea about how the pipeline was blown up is basically the "aliens did it" of journalism
https://twitter.com/CovertShores/status/1651860434251575298
https://twitter.com/CovertShores/status/1651860444724748288
UPDATE
Thread
Slowly information is coming out about the #Russian Navy ships operating around #NordStream before the attacks. E.g. https://t.co/p7QxtkQ6Lj
The presence of SS-750 with a DSRV submersible is highly suspicious
1/8
231
yeah expected that, it seems its has been built up for looking more at nord stream in the last one
bah
peaple on twitter complane that Nordic investigatiors dident care about if the NYT published crap
?
I mean, you can quite quickly glance at that account and find out its not worth spending a calorie on
good fait to try, but success rate of getting anywhere is pretty much 0
The podcast Cold Front is made by the same people with the same content. And it's in English. You're welcome:
https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/cold-front/id1683166185
This is gonna be fun to track:
"Russia’s Baltic Fleet to hold over 30 drills in summer training period
In total, the Russian Baltic Fleet will prepare and improve over 300 facilities for firearms and gunnery training, combat vehicle driving, tactical and special training"
Looks like our old pal Minerva Julie may be in dry dock.
Satellite photo is prior to 1 May, so is a different vessel.
Lat: 40.733 Lng:29.503
Might have something interesting
I have been looking into all the subs that Russia operate in the Baltic and been tracking their movements using sat photos and other methods
Initially I wanted to see if any were unaccounted for during September 22nd, but it seems like all of them are accounted for that day.
Then I remembered something. While the Ufa did its 190m test on October 5th alone, it did the 100m test on September 6th with the Kronstahdt according to Russian MoD press releases
It seems like the Latvian navy kept an eye on the September test.
I was thinking. What if the Ufa took a detour and went to the NS pipes. This is the exact same time as the Minerva Julie started circling above the NS site. Doing the test with 2 subs on the 6th September would give one of them some cover if it dissappeared.
On the 22nd, Russia could have gone to the NS site again with the SS-750 and other vessels, which are known to support sub operations as a way to "indirectly show it was them". If they stayed far enough away as to not be directly over the site, and having all subs accounted for, it wouldn't be possible to 100% prove it was them.
The Swedish Warship that went to investigate on the 22nd also went to look at the 190m Ufa test on the 5th October
yeah sounds like a possibility
Gonna get a more detailed post out tomorrow with all the info
Guestimate, it would only take 8 hours to reach the area submerged. So a mission could been done within a day.
Minerva Julie arrived to the north site the 6th sept (but that is when press release said the test dives were finished). But if the subs were out for a few days more..
the Kronstahdt returned to Kronstsdt the 8th while the Ufa returned to St Peterburg the 17th
Here is our NS investigation: https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/moerklagt/militaer-radiokommunikation-afsloerer-russiske-flaadeskibe-var-paa
Intercepted radio communication reveals how 3 Russian Navy vessels were operating near later Nord Stream explosion sites in June and September last year. They were operating with AIS turned off.
More details in our english spoken podcast Cold Front: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/cold-front/id1683166185
Article in BBC here: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65461401
The unknown Russian ship is likely the Syzran. She was at sea keeping an eye on BALTOPS22
Yes.
Two options according to our research:
Project 862 Yug Class - Hydrographic Survey Vessel
Or
Project 503R Alpinist-class
Do we have any estimated length of the ship from SAR?
If Yug class its Nikolai Matusevich, if Alpinist its Zhigulevsk or Syzran (most likley).
Where was Dmitrov?
Drydock until the 15th and then no indiciation it left Kronstadt prior to the blasts
Ty.
Did Oliver post a navigation chart website here recently
Looking for it and can't find it
Thank you 🙂
FWIW
OpenCPN is a free chart VIEWER that is arguably the best available. It runs on Ubuntu and can be loaded on a PC or Android. OCPN is really a full on chart plotter and will monitor NEMA data streams to display various data points including AIS.
The CHARTS are available through this link
https://www.o-charts.org/?lng=en-US
Denmark is €25
Sweeden is €48
@shut aspen quick question: will there be a international/non-nordic release or english subtitled/dubbed version of the tv-series?
Consequences of Nord Stream sabotage ... https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/poland-boost-military-protection-baltic-energy-infrastructure-2023-05-04/
The Polish government has approved draft legislation that would allow the military to sink an enemy ship targeting a key gas pipeline from Norway via the Baltic Sea following NATO's warning that Russia might sabotage undersea energy infrastructure.
Ukraine and Poland did it. That's the suggestion in this article for The Nation by James Bamford. Can't say I'm persuaded. https://www.thenation.com/article/world/nord-stream-pipeline-explosions/
Apart from anything else, that story seems like it might need an editor, "then it is revealing", "Washington's defining silence".
So many of the stories seem to take one or two points and run with them, based on the given author's bias, instead of exploring the whole confusing mess.
The first rupture point was on Nord Stream 2 just off Bornholm Island—on the exact segment of the pipeline built by Russia’s Fortuna: the same area repeatedly targeted by the Polish air and sea vessels
I mean, great - so what about the main cluster of explosions further north?
I am told the NY Times has finally picked up on the Russian sub support ship story. A week late but ....
it would be very interesting to hear about the decision making process they went through
it would assist the authors of various published articles if the basic facts on which they build their argument were correct. In this instance, one such example is that the vessel that installed the Nordstream 2-A pipeline in the vicinity of the rupture was not the 'Fortuna', it was the Akademik Cherskyi. The Akademik is a dynamically positioned DP3 vessel, not an anchored vessel. The Fortuna (which is a custom built but anchored pipelay vessel) commenced installation of the NS2-A pipeline about 17 kilometres to the west of the rupture location after the Akademik was removed from the work. Whilst there were complaints about the Fortuna being 'harassed' I haven't seen any reports about actual interference with anchoring. Just one example.
There's a link at the end of Bamford's article where readers can request corrections https://www.thenation.com/corrections?title=The+Nord+Stream+Explosions%3A+New+Revelations+About+Motive%2C+Means%2C+and+Opportunity&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thenation.com%2Farticle%2Fworld%2Fnord-stream-pipeline-explosions%2F
Corrections The form below enables readers to submit corrections. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. If you need customer service click here or
Maybe BBC or other channels will buy. Until then we have the English version podcast https://podcasts.apple.com/dk/podcast/cold-front/id1683166185
Russia has come up with a bizarre response to the revelation that several of its warships were active last September in an area of the…
there's still no explanation for the Minerva Julie weirdness right? I remember speculation about whether vessels typically wander around an area like that and the conclusion was something like "either ridiculously bad seamanship or suspicious"... still no reasonable excuse identified right?
having it for hydrophone cover seems super likely with that ~9 hour difference Oliver is estimating between the sub leaving and the ship leaving
especially since that area is generally deserted when it comes to noisy shipping traffic
(judging by the heat maps some folks made a few weeks ago)
it is the closest I have come to an explination for what it is doing other than terrible seamanship.
yeah...that was all I could think of, like if I had a hydrophone network trying to track subs the last thing I would want is a giant tanker making tanker sounds up top
especially if it's randomly going around the area so you can never get a good fix on how it echoes
Everyone I have talked to has told me that you would never drift like that for a week. Maybe 24 hours, but not a week. The only way you would do that would be if the crew kept getting updates like “we will have a new destination for you tomorrow morining/few hours”
when they get held up it's usually waiting for a berth near their destination port right?
so they have like standard waiting areas where they can anchor and stuff
which is the complete opposite of hanging out in deep water above a bunch of pipes
It would be pretty easy to put it in a situatuon like that with minimal Minerva involvment.
Just have the refinery cancel as it entered the strait, that location would be the first one where they could hold.
Then just have the refinery keep stringing them along until it was done.
that's the last piece of the picture for me tbh...the crew clearly wasn't in on it or someone would have said something
I would love to have been able to get information on what the Minerva Julie’s destination was when it left Rotterdam and if it was the same refinery as it ended up going to in St petersburg
does avoiding the EEZ around bornholm fit in with that though? like if they had to hold would they have a reason to drift way offshore instead of just coming closer and anchoring near the island?
yeah it could be that it was used as a pawn, but the holding pattern itself makes no sense unless you have a purpose to being there. But I am sure most boat captains can be convinced for a few days if they are mislead to do some ultra stupid shit - as long as they are getting paid anyway
looking at the timelapse it's really clear that they were allergic to the EEZ, any time they got close they were like NOPE
because the two previous trips the Minerva Julie went to a different refinery than it did on this trip
there's a phrase "not my monkey not my circus" that could apply here I think
a little bit more polite than calling the crew useful idiots hahaha
I can't imagine the folks working on board were happy to hang out in that stretch of sea at that time of year though
it had to have raised some questions right?
but if you're getting paid by the day and you get told to spend more days getting somewhere...yeah, I guess nobody would really complain
@strange bane mentioned Danish pilotage requirements as a potential reason to avoid the 12 nautical mile zone around Bornholm.
I just checked the Danish AIS data again. Minerva Julie broadcast RUULU as destination for multiple days before and during the drift phase, only switching to "FOR ORDERS" on the 9th of September.
Its only RUMINT without any evidence whatsoever that Minerva Julie had it crew changed right after it arrived to port after its weird drifting?
RU ULU is the code for Russia Ust-Luga just for clarification.
It first arrived in Tallinn first, but didn’t come alongside, and then continued onto Ust-Luga.
It dropped anchor outside of Tallinn for six hours.
At-sea crew changes are pretty standard in the tanker industry, and were broadly common in the merchant industry up until recently due to annoying Covid regulations.
But yes, RUMINT
RUMINT?
rumor intel
TY
They are pretty standard for tankers because of the annoying regulations countries put on tankers calling. It’s cheaper to pay for a boat than the entire pain in the butt of needing to hire a pilot, pay higher berthing fees, etc just to drop crew off.
Also to answer the obvious question, “why couldn’t they do it when they got to Russia” Westerners (and the lack of transport links that are traditionally used for other nationalities to get home) obviously can’t crew change in Russia, so stopping off in Tallinn before you enter the terrorist state obviously makes sense
The Captain MAY have had some inkling, or more specific orders.
Otherwise someone shoreside would have needed to monitor their position and give guidance.
In any case someone shoreside did give orders which were at best a bit weird and would have caused questions.
So another line of questioning would be to look up that line of command. Also, this week delay cost a fair bit of money; crew, fuel, provisions, if nothing else. Someone paid for that.
good luck following the money on international shipping...it's convoluted on purpose
chain of command though...I believe there were records that showed who the designated person ashore was?
as far as I know the whole thing is a dead end except for the time+place "coincidence"...everything paperwork wise seemed normal (unless oliver has got some extra cards in his pocket :p)
GDPR
Maybe if a Minerva ship has had an accident that has a report in recent times you might get some names to research
But on the flip side, often times people just get described as their age, sex and nationality
Ust-Luga? That is very interesting beacuse its 2 previous trips were to Ust-Luga, but then suddenly for this trip it went to the Petersburg Oil Terninal.
I talked about this a while back.
All destination broadcast changes in September:
destination change to 'RUULU' at 03/09/2022 16:04:55
destination change to '' at 04/09/2022 00:03:32
destination change to 'RUULU' at 04/09/2022 00:10:55
destination change to '' at 05/09/2022 00:00:02
destination change to 'RUULU' at 05/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to '' at 06/09/2022 00:00:01
destination change to 'RUULU' at 06/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to '' at 07/09/2022 00:00:04
destination change to 'RUULU' at 07/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to '' at 08/09/2022 00:00:04
destination change to 'RUULU' at 08/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to '' at 09/09/2022 00:00:02
destination change to 'RUULU' at 09/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to 'FOR ORDERS' at 09/09/2022 08:08:38
destination change to '' at 10/09/2022 00:00:03
destination change to 'FOR ORDERS' at 10/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to '' at 11/09/2022 00:00:04
destination change to 'FOR ORDERS' at 11/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to '' at 12/09/2022 00:00:04
destination change to 'FOR ORDERS' at 12/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to '' at 13/09/2022 00:00:04
destination change to 'FOR ORDERS' at 13/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to 'EE TLL' at 13/09/2022 08:06:00
destination change to '' at 23/09/2022 11:31:25
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERS' at 23/09/2022 11:40:55
destination change to '' at 24/09/2022 00:00:06
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERS' at 24/09/2022 00:04:55
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERP' at 24/09/2022 09:04:55
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERS' at 24/09/2022 09:10:55
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERP' at 24/09/2022 14:52:55
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERS' at 24/09/2022 14:58:55
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERP' at 24/09/2022 19:16:55
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERS' at 24/09/2022 19:22:55
destination change to '' at 25/09/2022 00:00:05
destination change to 'TURKEY FOR ORDERS' at 25/09/2022 00:04:55
This is obviously incomplete due to the limited range of the Danish AIS dataset.
If I remember correctly Ust-Luga is also basically owned by Putin’s son in law
@serene grove
Yes, I just mentioned it as the only additional path I could think of.
I BELIEVE the Captain has some dedicated person ashore who he reports to, and receives orders from, or is at least a "hot line for help" in event of emergency.
I would expect the Captain, if not the crew manifest, to be held in the public domain.
The Insurance Company would require the shoreside support person, and that name may be in the public domain.
And the ships Agents would have to have some knowledge of such sailing orders.
At a minimum those persons may have some knowledge of Minerva's orders and how they were dispersed. A one time set "hover over these coordinates for 7 days" or if they were updated daily.
Someone in that chain knows something, more likely a few know something.
How to get them to talk I don't know.
There is a guy who runs a blog called gCaptain, John Konrad. He was a professional Captain and has many links into the culture. He may have some insight.
https://gcaptain.com/russia-sabotage-ships/
Uhhh, not exactly.
The Designated Person Ashore is a role required by the International Safety Management Code (ISM Code) to provide the crew with an off-ship person responsible for ensuring that the ship is managed and operated safely.
Basically it makes someone on land responsible for writing up SOPs, doing accident/incident/near miss reports and providing the ship with the necessary safety equipment/PPE.
If a person was just a DPA, they'd have no reason to be telling the ship to do anything operations wise, whilst they might have a maritime background, it could be literally anyone.
The role you're thinking of would be Marine Superintendent, which is usually held by a former maritime officer, either deck or engineering. It would be less weird for them to be involved (to a limited extent) in operations.
Sometimes the Marine Superintendent can be double hatted as the DPA.
SaraL
Thanks for clarifying.
I was just trying to find people who may have some info on Minerva's real time movements. There is some Chain Command.
Trying to look through the keyhole.
This may be a helpful tool for someone.
https://twitter.com/wdrinvestigativ/status/1660315684004323328 https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/ndr-wdr/nordstream-andromeda-ukraine-russland-100.html
Exklusiv: Beim #Nordstream-Anschlag prüfen deutsche Ermittler offenbar eine neue Spur. Sie führt nach Recherchen von NDR, WDR, SZ und internationalen Medienpartnern in ukrainische Militärkreise.#Ukraine #Russland @manuelbewarder @FlorianFlade @schmitt_jrg
Andromeda continues to be a strange as hell story
Danish media berlingske.dk has the angle as the top headline right now.
It's paywalled.
All of this still doesn’t answer the most pressing of questions around Andromeda:
- How did they get the large amount of explosives into Germany
- How did thet get it into the water
- How did they avoid detection by the Minerva Julie, German, US, Swedish, Danish and Russian navies all operating in the area
- Why would thry choose the most difficult locations to perform the dives
Can someone explain how the Ukrainian soldier comes into the story? It's not clear from the stuff that isnt paywalled.
"But there is another lead from the "Andromeda" - German security authorities actually see it as explosive, since it is supposed to lead to Ukrainian military circles: When renting the yacht, at least some of the people who will later travel by boat on the Baltic Sea should were, have presented passports. According to the research, one of them was a Romanian passport, issued in the name of "Stefan M.".
Ukrainian citizen?
A person with this name and date of birth is said to actually exist, but according to the findings of the BKA, he was probably in Romania at the time of the explosions. But then who was the man who appeared on the Baltic Sea? After research by WDR, NDR, SZ and media partners, German investigators believe it could be a Ukrainian national: a man in his mid-20s from a town south-east of Kiev. His name is known to the reporting team.
Photos on social networks show a young man, often smiling, sometimes in a military uniform with a helmet - and with eye-catching tattoos. The young Ukrainian is said to have previously served in an infantry unit. Investigators are apparently following other names and clues. It should be the hottest tracks so far.
Only one of the young man's relatives can be reached on the phone: she says he is currently serving in the military. Sometimes he calls. But she says: He didn't leave Ukraine last fall. Official Ukrainian bodies have not yet responded to inquiries."
So the person with the Romanian passport was a Ukrainian soldier? If so, what's the evidence?
From the tagesschau piece.
they [the media] don't know or don't share that. the identity could probably be established by us, if that photo is really from social media.
WARSZAWA/ROSTOCK. En 26-årig ukrainsk soldat med falskt pass och ett brevlådeföretag i Warszawa är två heta spår i den tyska utredningen kring sabotaget av gasledningen Nord Stream. Det kan Expressen avslöja i samarbete med europeiska medier. De ryska fartyg som synts i närheten av gasledningen har avfärdats i den utredningen och fokus ligger på...
more info here
I think what they're suggesting is that the Ukrainian was passing himself off as the Romanian citizen.
supposedly his social media hasn’t been updated since 2017 and he was a member of “Ukrainian Nationalist group”
I have a hard time not seeing this as extremely convenient.
No one seems to be able to explain any of the technical details of how the Andromeda could pull this off
But the evidence left behind:
- explosive residue
- A paper trail to a polish shell company run by a Ukrainian
- A passport that links back to what I am going to assume will be an Azov “nazi”
It sure is a convenient set of evidence that has been found.
It says he followed a 'Ukrainian nationalist group' on social media. That's a bit thin.
You should see the ones I follow on tg...
"The Russian ships observed in the area of the sabotage in the months before the explosions are no longer considered interesting by the German investigators."
SUS
still believes that German intelligence is infiltrated by Russians, and they are totally incompetent
huh, Russian news has REALLY jumped on this article.
Just googling Feeria Lwowa, and almost all results are from Russian news sites only.
I'm still leaning towards the idea that Andromeda was a deliberate false trail. It could also turn into an politically convenient scapegoat.
Same, at least until I see an answer to the many technical questions
that is possible, but i don't think it is likely. i guess it is somehow involved, probably not just as a false trail.
well, most of those can be easily explained, if we think some influential and rich person did it, like some of the leads seem to have shown a few months ago.
i mean, the "azov nazi" or just an infantry soldiers surely won't be the answer. if this was somebody from ukraine organizing this, it was very likely a person which's name we do know.
The person's birthday was mentioned earlier, if I remember rightly
i did not mean the soldier - that was just somebody hired probably (if it is the correct lead), but the person who started / organized it.
I have yet to see a single one explained.
Interestingly, all the contacts I have who “know” have all laughed off Andromeda
Yes, it was the birthday of the alleged Mr Big
can't find it, do you have a link?
Petro Poroshenko?
hm, that is one very low on my list...
but i mean, if we have a date of birth, that would be very interesting.
Yes
The Russian reaction is interesting
what? source?
First time the Andromeda was mentioned, Russia ignored it completely and focused on Hersh.
Now they are all jumping on it.
Russia is usually good at attempting to muddy the waters when things are closing in.
Even the Russian understand how unbelievable Hersh is.
This has been discussed extensively here. If you want to read up on the discussion and the sources, I recommend searching this channel for things like "birthday".
This statement goes against the proof we have from DK navy, how are they so sure of this?
"The Russian ships observed in the area of the sabotage in the months before the explosions are no longer considered interesting by the German investigators.
According to sources, the Russian ships have been able to be excluded from the investigation – their positions have been mapped and the conclusion must be that they have not been in such a place that they could have carried out the deed."
ah, found it, so it is not that we know the birthday of mr.big, but it is just the coincidence that the 26th september is pp's birthday. that is not really a lead...
The articles mentioned that this had been discussed in intelligence circles. That is all we know.
Well, Russias second riches man have also the birthday the 26th September, that is basically the same lead, lol.
Personally, I don’t actually think that the SS-750 et al. were necessarily directly involved. I have a suspicion that they were sent to the site to further muddy the waters.
Ships that are clearly capable of doing the sabotage, sailed very close to, but not directly over the site. This would “show” the west that it was Russia without there being a smoking gun.
But that is only RUMINT from an "anonymous sources". That is as trustworthy as Hersh, even if its from New York Times.
Several sources have mentioned the presence of a Russian submarine prior to the blasts.
Denmark’s lack of any real ability to detect submerged contacts has been a hot button issue in Danish defense politics for years.
Sweden is very secretive about their hydrophone arrays and if evidence was picked up with these that could explain their desire to keep their investigation separate from Denmark and Germany.
The Ufa which was not yet in service and crewed by a highly skilled acceptance crew just so happens to be unaccoutned for for 7 days just prior to the explosions just as the Minerva Julie loitered above the sabotage sites.
Also coincidentally at the exact same time as the Andromeda was supposed to be at the site
It sounds as if the Russians have fobbed them off with some sort of explanation for what the ships were doing.
What if the explosives were never on the Andromeda, but the divers were.
Explosives were deployed by the Ufa, but divers from the Andromeda were used to work on them.
The Ufa lacks a real way of retrieving divers at 80m. This would place explosive residue on the Andromeda while avoiding the problems of getting the explosivea into Germany and onto/off the Andromeda
Russia denied that the ships were ever there, saying that they were in the other end of the Baltic
that's possible. but i think you - and most other people - overestimate the technical difficulties if indeed a billionaire from ukraine or russia or the region is behind it. it is no problem from them to get the explosives to germany, and access to explosives would also not be a problem.
it is a problem for me, for you and most people to get professional explosives for pipelines, pipeline divers, good faked passports, ... - for all those people formerly and currently involved with state parties, miltaries, militias, and often also the gas and oil business, those things are not really a problem. they have those capabilities.
and i mean, anyway the only "problematic" border would be ukraine/poland, if the explosives came from ukraine. after that the chances to get into a deep control with unloading or x-ray is very unlikely.
in a good semi, it is close to zero to be checked.
If this amount of explosives entered Germany undetected, Nord Stream would become a non-story.
It would be the largest counter-terrorism scandal in decades.
what? how should they be detected? that is not a huge volume?
i mean, if i would try to smuggle them from ukraine to germany, i would give myself clearly a two digit percentage to succeed. i see no scandal there if it happened.
most semis are never checked in depth.
and anyway, "entered germany" would not be remarkable at all, there are open borders. only the eu-border would be more interesting.
There are a lot of steps involved in acquiring and smuggling this amount of explosives.
No one is acquiring hundreds of kilos of military grade explosives in Europe without several intelligence agencies being on top of them
at the same time no one is skimming hundreds of kilos of demolitions grade explosives off the top without a similar thing happening
if this lead is correct, i expect industrial grade explosives meant for exactly for what they were used. and those are indeed available to companies in the gas business. and well, with some corruption some could disappear. and smuggling is not a real problem at all.
In which case they would already know exactly who was behind it as they are tightly controlled and chemically marked.
There is a reason that in the last decade terrorist attacks in Europe have mainly been commited with knives and vehicles.
afaik industrial explosives are not individually chemically marked? do you have a source for that? maybe some specialized ones are, for regular ones, i know that they are not.
it is not the reason that it is very difficult to acquire or make explosives, no. i mean, i studied that a while ago, and i made some myself (officially, in a university lab). if i wanted to make a large amount of explosives, i could do that. i have the knowledge and lab practice, and i know how buying raw products works. and i am not special with that, there are tens or hundreds of thousands of people in germany with that knowledge.
and if you don't care to survive, like most terrorists don't - well, it is much easier and you could cut some corners.
we are pretty lucky that most terrorists are idiots.
a halfway smart terrorist would be a big problem. and we saw that e.g. with breivik or oklahoma.
also most terrorists don't have good funding.
All plastic explosives are tagged. But there was some 600 tons of untagged Semtex that went to Ghadaffi in the 80s and a few tons later showed up in the hands of IRA and ETA in the 90s.
But afaik blasting explosives as ANFO, gelatine dosnt need taggend as they already emitt easy detectable molecules.
but only tagged for detectors, not tagged to identify an individal serial number or charge?
no dna or sophisticated chemical tagging?
There is a significant difference between “homemade” explosives like ANFO and military grade explosives.
It has been hinted several times by the investigators that military grade explosives were used.
yeah, but i replied to your terrorist comment. the reason that terrorists use knives and cars is not that explosives are like rocket science. beside that ammonium nitrate based explosives are used pretty much industrially.
yeah, but "military grade" is the same as the shaped charges meant for the gas pipeline industry.
Luckily for Russia, many state level actors have access to Soviet explosives making tagging in this case not perticularly useful
Sommerloch news somehow.
Only chemical tagging so dogs can detect it and it shows better up on X-ray.
It has long been talking about the posibilty about doping it with some diffrent metal mixtures depending on month and year there were made in, but I dont think it never became for that.
yeah, that is also my knowledge. at least until a few years ago, explosives were not individually tagged. you can with some luck "guess" which company made it, but that is most often all.
Already?!
Clima Crisis 😉
interesting bit from one of the articles:
"We have a really good picture of how and what happened on site and how it was done," says Mats Ljungqvist.
Which is interesting because Sweden is running their own investigstion
and I haven’t seen much that suggests they are also deeply involved in the Danish/German Andromeda investigation
However we are not going to get any attribution on WHO did it from the Swedish investigation as the scope of reach is:
"if Swedish interest or Swedish security is threatened, for example if Swedish territory was used to carry out the sabotage."
If the answer is: No, they wont say anything on why may have done it. So I think we are going to get disappointed by the Swedes, as usual.
I always was sure that the divers must have been military trained after all we talked here.
Basically the OPCW report-issue that they were not allowed to do any attribution, only to investigate if there had been chemical weapons used in syria or not.
The guy’s tattoos are gothic rune tattoos
Specifically ones that are often used by neo-nazis?
even more likely industrial divers, working in that area before, just doing their regular job there.
"norwegian divers" lol
why norway?
you just need to follow the natural logic, US and Norway colluded to both profit from selling fossil fuel så they wanted to sabotage the pipes 😉
Hersh weird tangent.
No but the Norwegian oil industry are used to have deep divers and saturation divers. There is a really good report on that and they just basically experimented on the divers as the effect of thoes kind of pressures on the human bodies was unknown.
Really intresting book about the deep and saturation divers. But if you read that, you understand that even diving at 70m is hard.
https://lescompagnonsdusaga.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/northseadivers.pdf
ye def have more of the expertise on that in the region, just lacks all other logical connections
Well if you read Hersh between the lines it was Norwegian divers as they have alot of experience of that, and that they would earn money on selling even more gas to the EU (not that he talks about that as motive but that is basically the rest of that narrative why norway would be involved)
But Norwegian gas exports to the EU last year only increased 3.3% lol
yeah Norway is absolutely maxed, there isnt more to sell
would need new discoveries and the time to build production to accomplish much beyond whats already done to squeeze out a litle more
and they are trying to limit further development in fossil in general so not really going all in on fossil profiting compared to most of the big fossil producers
No one knows. But from the political aspect it doesn't make sense to sabotage with non military civilists.
hm, i can't really follow. with what we know so far, i don't even exclude, that the main motivation was not political. we even don't know that.
also, actually i think, if you could chose people, the best divers for this are professional pipeline maintenance or building offshore divers.
Obligatory reference to Bellingcat article on how (not) to identify far-right symbols…
also for norway it is actually pretty irrelevant how russian gas would get to europe. and there are other ways if it would be actually about that.
beside what you said, and that ns was anyway dead at that point in time already.
yeah, theres certainly good reasons why people dislike the pipelines
but they were already not delivering gas, so what upside is it to risk destroying it from the European side
"US did it to sell Gas to EU and increase the Schism between Germany and the NATO/EU, so Germany can send tanks to Ukraine" is the argument why US/UK would do it
with extreme goodwill there is a tiny bit of theory you could arrive there, if you just choose to ignore all the open information 😉
that sounds all just like bullshit. if i go by interests, there is russia - far above everbody else, and then none-state actors.
for russia there is indeed much to say, also that only 3 of the pipes were destroyed, and suspiciously just one of ns2 was left intact, and well, according to eu-regulations gasprom can only use 50% of the capacity and ns2 gas has to be sold much more expensive than ns1 gas, the old contract would have been done with that. but that also only makes sense.
on the other hand russia also had an interest to be out of the contracts by force majeure. which is btw. also true for germany, and if you look just at state actors and a motivation, i would put germany at the second place.
Yeah, and that the Gas contracts with US were made in the spring, so US would not gain in the increased gas price after the bombings.
besides potential damage by getting caught red handed seems to me like much bigger than the potential upside in a non producing pipeline
It is bullshit, but that is basically the pro-russian narrative.
if we think of halfway sane state actors, at that point in time, i think only russia (and germany) had a high interest in destroying ns.
What would Germany gain?
would be very un-German way I think, also their problem with it staying whole would be what? that Russia suddenly decides to ship gas again?
force majeure and ending the contract with russia by that, without having any legal obligations anymore. germany had contracts with russia that it has to pay for a base level of gas if it takes it or not.
(also silencing all the idiots which wanted to turn it on again.)
oh, germany is not even really on my list of suspects :D it is just if you look only at motivation and interests. who profits from that?
However the force majeure would only gain Gazprom mostly, as they would not had to pay liability for non-delivery of gas.
it clearly has spared germany from probably decades long legal struggles.
well yea, but if they wanted out by force they could just wait - a non issue if its not in use anyway
yeah, but they tried to blame the inability to deliver gas on the west and western sanctions, thus also all the shit with the turbine etc.
one pipe is still okay. one of ns2. russia could have still sold as much gas as before to germany technically, just for a much higher price, as for ns2 the eu regulation demands to have prices close to the market price.
If NS wasnt bombed, Gazprom risked to pay out up to 10-15% of the whole Russian international currency reserve..
THAT would hurt the Russian economy for years.
yeah, it were huge legal risks as well for germany as also for russia. while germany would have had another way out, by getting international sanctions.
yeah, major upside to the Russian side even if it wasnt producing if you know it was doomed anyway
and this happened after quite a few months, by the time Russia would have to be very aware Europe would not easily restore operation anytime soon, if ever - at least when it comes to fossil
This is Russias curency resrves, think that 50% is under sanctions and locked out for them in western countries.
So if they had to pay libabilty over multi year contracts (speculation on how much the libability clause works but if its 5 years contract and lets say 11B/y) and they loose 60B of 300B, that would make Putin very sad.
looks like energy prices are starting to notice more renewable production too
negative system prices today
I wish we had a smart charger, because now I always have to manually set our car to charge at the right times 😦
from what I recall when it was cheap gas it would drop during the night - now it looks like its in the middle of day when solar / wind / hydro is at high capacity
Yup, I've noticed that.
but yea not going to be a fossil rush back to Russia anytime soon I think with how it looks so letting NS stay operational seems like it really would only negatively affect Russia in current situation
i mean, whoever did it, left - by failure or intentionally one of the 2 pipes of ns2 intact. which is exactly as much as gazprom is allowed to use for their own gas, and which is bound to a newer eu-regulation, which allows gas only to be sold close to market prices.
NS1 also has a quite diverse ownership
It's 51% Russian, 49% various German, Dutch and French utility companies.
NS2 by contrast is 100% Gazprom
Just as a total aside, I remember reading/watching a documentary on Russian spying in Europe, perhaps it was even a Dutch one on the OPCW shenanigans and whatnot
But my understanding is there's a specific Russian passport office which issues basically all the spy passports (in addition to the passports to Depardieu, Seagal and their related moronic ilk)
Is there any significance to passport office 8012?
please can anybody fact check the latest “whistle blower story” posted by kimdotcom at his twttr account? https://twitter.com/kimdotcom?s=21&t=TlPYLdKAF7Z-LwSrv7tnGA
The ASDS has been out of service since 2008.
They went back to the SDV whilst a new design is being developed.
As for fact checking the rest of it, it's all conjecture. Submarines don't operate on the surface and with the U.S. Navy's nuclear fleet they are stay submerged for months, it's unprovable whether they were there or not.
I'm gonna guess I'm not the only person having trouble seeing that tweet on my main acct lmao
(he doesn't like it when people fact check his tweets)
I will say that U.S. Navy submarines, at least publicly, only end up in the Baltic Sea very rarely.
It's been a couple years since they did.
Like, it's exceptionally rare.
They prefer to dock in Faslane, or Norway (or the Netherlands super occasionally)
Also...
"radar data"
"radar evidence"
I'd expect someone who is somehow the guy you want for the super sensitive naval submarine capability development project, but doesn't to know what radar is, and that ADS-B isn't radar.
Also for example...
At this juncture, the Poseidon had completed the first part of its mission, confirming the detonation of the explosives. It then flew over land near Miastko and rendezvoused with a US Air Force Boeing KC-135R Stratotanker for in-air refueling at 1:20 am UTC on September 26. The…
414
105
This looping around isn't just random, and it's entirely explainable.
The plane is just going around and around the PL 1 corridor.
Which are the general duty regions for AWACS aircraft over Poland, of which a P-8 sniffing around activity in Kaliningrad would be orbiting.
Essentially, it's all nonsense, easily disgarded.
it drives me nuts but ADS-B is often referred to as "secondary radar" even though it's technically incorrect (should be "secondary surveillance")
iirc originally the point was to do altitude correction without using GPS...so basically you use ADS-B for vertical positioning, combine that with omnidirectional rangefinding from your primary radar, and you get the 3D position
so it was thought of as a secondary signal that increases the accuracy of your primary radar
(even though the altitude data is reported by the aircraft as fed by its barometer, not observed by radar)
Suggesting a submarine is convenient in a conspiracy
Because ultimately, there's no way of proving it.
Even if you want to go counting US/NATO submarines in their homeport, there's always going to be a couple out doing something.
It proves nothing in any major way.
oh yeah I'm not arguing with that, my point is that if someone is calling ADS-B "radar" it's not necessarily because they don't know what they're talking about, just some portions of aviation culture call it that
Sure sure.
reminded me of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvAueVn6Fzo
In 1984, a deadly new Soviet Nuclear Ballistic Missile Submarine leaves Murmansk and heads out into the North Atlantic. The entire Soviet Navy is looking for her, with orders to sink the brand new vessel. Fearing a rogue Captain is about to launch nuclear weapons against the United States, the President deploys the US Navy into the Atlantic as w...
(I love how after a month or two the release date is now just shown as "1mo ago")
"For a man born in the Soviet Union, her captain has a very distinct Scottish accent"
yeah its a bit more covert now when more time have passed - but I could easily see this just as easily could have been basis for a conspiracy exactly for that reason - that theres so much uncertainty and lack of proof tied to subs
thankfully nobody went all trump arrest images with this one
It's obviously why using submarines is what you would use if you didn't want to be caught.
Looks to be the picture that the reports are pixelating out.
There's nothing to fact check.
been trying to find the other ones
found another account that could belong to him. Also stopped being active in 2017. Basically it just reposted stuff from a group call “Uber Alles”
I've summarised the latest Andromeda developments here ... https://medium.com/@brian-whit/nord-stream-sabotage-mystery-yachts-ukrainian-connections-cb04ebae3853
“In the same year, the company also changed owners. The new owner is a 32-year-old woman from the city of Kerch on the occupied Crimean peninsula. In the Polish company documents, she has used her Ukrainian passport — but our review of Russian databases shows that the woman changed her name several years ago and now also has Russian citizenship. She works for a Russian authority in the city. On a Ukrainian war criminals website, she is listed as a traitor because of her collaboration with the occupying power
So “Ukrainian”
If this was the “Ukrainian company owners” that the reporting 2 months back was about, if they knew the identities, reporting them as “Ukrainian owners” is kinda disingenuous.
Also, she's listed on, I assume, Myrotvorets.
Obviously they are Ukrainian by nationality, but they certainly aren’t on Ukraine’s side in the conflict.
So this is the picture they are saying is him.
FWIW
It strikes me as no coincidence that some spurious report splashes at about the same time as the counter offensive is about to launch. Ukraine "news" is all over the place with speculation and this "report" just adds to the noise.
Psyops likely, just adding to the fog of war.
Hey @strange bane Im deleting these pics and that VK link
Fair enough
If a legitimate news org reports on this, please feel free to link to that report
But otherwise please don't link to people's personal accounts
It’s the picture from the reporting
WARSZAWA/ROSTOCK. En 26-årig ukrainsk soldat med falskt pass och ett brevlådeföretag i Warszawa är två heta spår i den tyska utredningen kring sabotaget av gasledningen Nord Stream. Det kan Expressen avslöja i samarbete med europeiska medier. De ryska fartyg som synts i närheten av gasledningen har avfärdats i den utredningen och fokus ligger på...
Well, they pixelated the picture in their reporting. I found discussions on Twitter about the picture that led me to the VK.
Ah ok
Thanks for clarifying
Yeah please don't add the VK link or the depixelated pic
Cool cool.
TASS in Russian, translated:
"The head of intelligence of Germany said that not a single special service knows who blew up the Nord Stream
According to Bruno Kahl, the investigation is being carried out "in different directions", the work of forensic specialists is complicated by the fact that the place of sabotage is on the seabed
BERLIN, 22 May. /TASS/. The head of the Federal Intelligence Service (BND) of Germany, Bruno Kahl, claims that not a single intelligence service can at the moment unequivocally name those responsible for undermining the Nord Stream. He announced this on Monday, speaking at the Federal Academy of Security Policy.
"No country, no special service in the world is now able to attribute this to anyone in particular," he said. "Maybe this will change, there are noticeable successes in the investigation." Kahl recalled that the place of sabotage is on the seabed, which significantly complicates the work of forensics.
According to him, the investigation is being carried out "in different directions." "I do not rule out that success will follow, which will make one of the options more likely, and others less," the head of the BND added."
Bruno Kahl is a moron
The head of Germany's foreign intelligence service was in Ukraine when Russia invaded and had to be taken home overland in a gruelling two-day journey by special forces when the country's airspace was closed, Focus magazine reported.
LOL You convinced me!
Also you can identify the two people in this picture by searching the Polish business records
I don't want to name them, but through the business records of the woman with a name starting with N, you can identify a connection to a second company called BB "Aero" Limited
Whose customers are apparently biochemicist Giles E. Hardingham
BBC Radio Lancashire presenter Leanne Bayes
and "ambitious male executive"
Likewise...
52.2375214, 21.0314754
BB Aero is also based out a virtual front office, this time in Krakow
All very suspect, a web of virtual front offices (which provide a fake address to 100s of companies), one of the directors living in Kerch, having taken up Russian passport and working for the Russian occupation authorities.
This should surely be geolocatable.
maybe a little better quality
Is there some reason why "the woman with a name starting with N" can't be named? It's easy enough to find in the public records.
Oh I’m just being careful
We have rules against doxxing and against conducting research "in public" here in the server out of a concern that during the research process, you may mis-identify the person that you're researching. This happens all the time as part of the research process, but it's one thing to mis-identify someone in your research notes that no one else will see, and do it in a public setting like this which could have real-life repercussions for that person(s).
If they’ve been named in an article does that change it?
Specifically Gazeta.ru names them.
Yes, if their name has been reported in a reputable news agency, then you can link to it and mention the person's name.
Imagine that the NYT publishes and article saying that someone named "Rick Johnson" has been arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist. Linking to the article is fine, and saying, "Some guy named Rick Johnson got arrested!" is OK.
What we do not want people to do here is look for every "Rick Johnson" on Facebook and post their Facebook profiles here, or their White Pages info, etc. Because chances are that most or all of those people are not going to be the Rick Johnson in the article.
In other words, finding and posting personal info on people you think are the same Rick Johnson as the one in the article is what we don't want people to do here.
По крайней мере двое украинцев могут быть причастны к взрывам на газопроводах «Северный поток» и «Северный поток - 2», пишет газета Süddeutsche Zeitung. По результатам расследования удалось выяснить, что германские следователи еще несколько месяцев назад наткнулись на польское турагентство Feeria Lwowa, которое принадлежит двум украинкам. Именно...
This is the article.
The "N" woman is named in public documents relating to her company's registration.
I've done a short write-up about BB Aero and its fake customers. It's also worth noting that the company claims to do charitable work for "orphans and veterans”. https://medium.com/@brian-whit/nord-stream-investigation-another-strange-travel-firm-comes-to-light-bed1b61d9d40
A second mysterious travel firm has emerged in the Nord Stream sabotage affair.
When the operation to bomb Nordstream goes successfully.
Nice write up though 🙂
I've added a bit to the BB Aero story. The firm's website is remarkably similar to Feeria Lwawa's now-deleted website. Both firms boast of the same fake customers, though Feeria gives them Polish names
That has money laundry vibes
They used a Gmail account instead a mail attached to the webpage.
Is there any connection to a Western European business in these
Hmm, I dont think the new Nord Stream "development" worked as well as Russia had hoped for, nor Kahl's statement.
`"On May 25, the ambassadors of Germany, Denmark and Sweden were summoned to the Russian Foreign Ministry, who were strongly protested in connection with the complete lack of results of the national investigations allegedly carried out by the authorities of these countries of sabotage at Nord Stream in September 2022, their inability to ensure transparency investigative actions," the department said.
They stressed that Moscow stated the lack of interest of Germany, Denmark and Sweden in establishing the true circumstances of this sabotage. “On the contrary, by their actions they are clearly dragging out time and trying to hide the traces of the true culprits of the crime, which, as we think, are well-known countries. At the same time, it is no coincidence that “leaks” of implausible versions are dumped in the media with a desire to confuse the situation,” the Foreign Ministry said. . They also indicated that Moscow will continue to press the authorities of these countries to conduct an "objective comprehensive investigation of sabotage" with the obligatory involvement of Russia.
Moscow considers unacceptable the attempts of the authorities of Germany, Denmark and Sweden to evade interaction with the Russian side on the issue of the investigation. The three states continue to ignore the notes of the Russian embassies, as well as calls from the Russian government to organize an open investigation.
On Monday, the head of the Federal Intelligence Service (BND) of Germany, Bruno Kahl, said that not a single intelligence service can at the moment unequivocally name those responsible for undermining the Nord Stream. `
I've been looking at the captures of the Feeria Lwowa website by Wayback. Interestingly, the last capture before the site disappeared was on Sept 29 last year. An attempted capture on June 5 last year returned a 503 error.
another one from german media pushing the andromeda-lead: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/nord-stream-anschlaege-hinweise-auf-ukrainische-taeter-verdichten-sich-a-b176fd6b-1258-47dc-99bb-6e9db544908e
archived: https://archive.ph/SAyyE
Oktogen is much lighter than TNT, could be transported by a relatively small boat, and could have been taken to the bottom of the Baltic Sea by experienced combat divers. The often-put-up thesis that the assassins could only have brought the explosives to the site of the attack on a larger ship and possibly a mini-submarine because of its weight is no longer applicable.
Such a moronic statement, when they just mentioned 500kg charges.
Octogen has a relatvie effectiveness of 1.7, so it would be 294kg charges instead of 500kg
Hardly a “small charge”
also good luck getting Octogen on the black market without Mossad showing up.
perhaps they are expanding more into fiction markets 😉
I think that the naming of "Octogen" is a trap of see who is the leak.
That is a good point
Afaik its alot harder to manufacture, therefore fewer producers, not that much better nor economical worth than RDX (1.7 vs 1.6 RE factor). You can littarly make RDX in your garage from 2 chemicals, one that you can buy in any camping store.
Have I imagine that the German investegators said they had found traces of hexamine?
Just a reminder that Seymour Hersh said the explosive was C4
Interesting paragraph from Wikipedia. Apparently HMX (octogen) is used to punch holes in steel pipes.
eh you can use pretty much whatever high explosive you want to make shaped charges, that doesn't really set it apart
New interview with Seymour Hersh in Neue Zürcher Zeitung. The weirdest yet.
NZZ has drifted right politically in recent years, so they might be motivated to make Hersh look more reasonable than he actually did. But his behaviour in this interview is still obviously deranged.
What’s the truth to the Seymour Hersh and Abu Ghraib angle?
At this point it is more sad than anything. He obviously isn’t all there anymore and is being taken advantage of.
The fact he mentions that he's very much paying people to edit and "fact-check" his stories pretty much explains it
Wow. Is he doing it due to cognitive decline?
No, just that he has people that are either scamming him or doing whatever because they get paid for it, and just making the story for the sake of profiting
And he just doesn't care what gets put out. That's just great.
so essentially the same as the US Democrat lady
as long as its not preventing them, money and people around them who like money keeps them there
I don't think these situations are really that comparable.
perhaps not, but more in a sense that people reach an expiry date where they can be exploited if they have too wide reach or power - so should perhaps be some upper limit regulations to correct for it
so many twists and turns in this saga, eh?
I was reading through the latest comments and one thing I am not sure of, whether @stark palm or others accept or not the validity of the claim that German intelligence agencies analyzed the movements of Russian ships near the blast sites and concluded they could not have "done it"? That seems a very important consideration to me anyway.
all we have for that is a journalist saying it
and that contradicts what someone posted earlier:
The claim was reported by @elfin cradle
#1072947857654554624 message
but not sure where from
You could have asked me directly 😛
Here you go:
"De ryska fartyg som observerats i området för sabotaget månaderna före explosionerna anses inte längre intressanta av de tyska utredarna.
Enligt källor har de ryska fartygen kunnat uteslutas från utredningen – dess positioner finns kartlagda och slutsatsen ska vara att de inte har funnits på sådan plats att de kan ha utfört dådet."
https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/misstankta-sparen-fran-sabotaget-mot-nord-stream/
WARSZAWA/ROSTOCK. En 26-årig ukrainsk soldat med falskt pass och ett brevlådeföretag i Warszawa är två heta spår i den tyska utredningen kring sabotaget av gasledningen Nord Stream. Det kan Expressen avslöja i samarbete med europeiska medier. De ryska fartyg som synts i närheten av gasledningen har avfärdats i den utredningen och fokus ligger på...
That's funny, I just found it a minute ago 😉
WARSZAWA/ROSTOCK. En 26-årig ukrainsk soldat med falskt pass och ett brevlådeföretag i Warszawa är två heta spår i den tyska utredningen kring sabotaget av gasledningen Nord Stream. Det kan Expressen avslöja i samarbete med europeiska medier. De ryska fartyg som synts i närheten av gasledningen har avfärdats i den utredningen och fokus ligger på...
Has anyone contacted Matthias Carlsson?
I dont think so. Wanna make me do it?
I think I have seen a similar qoute in a German article that the DE investigators disregarded the RU ships. Will try to find it. Will let you know.
Thanks, I asked him on Twitter, will update if I get a response
Nice! 😄
It was also mentioned in last week's Spiegel article: "Bis heute halten sich zahlreiche Spekulationen über mögliche Täter, die bis hin zu einer Bezichtigung amerikanischer Nachrichtendienste in Zusammenarbeit mit norwegischen Behörden reichen. Auch von einer sogenannten »False Flag«-Operation durch Russland ist immer wieder die Rede. Unter mit dem Vorgang vertrauten Personen gilt dies als äußerst unwahrscheinlich. Hinter den Kulissen hieß es sogar schon früh, Moskau habe kein wirkliches Motiv für die Tat."
not quite so specific though
https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/ndr-wdr/nordstream-andromeda-ukraine-russland-102.html
In the course of the Nord Stream investigation, the Federal Criminal Police Office searched an apartment in Germany and interviewed a woman. The witness is apparently the former partner of a Ukrainian suspect.
Is this the first time an article mentioned the actual charge that German investigators are investigating?
StGB § 88 Verfassungsfeindliche Sabotage
What puny punishment:
"Whole or in part are put out of action or withdrawn from the intended purposes, and thereby intentionally support efforts against the existence or the security of the Federal Republic of Germany or against constitutional principles, shall be punished with imprisonment for up to five years or with a fine."
Exactly, that's one of the reasons I thought it was noteworthy.
that would just be the criminal side of it, there would also be damages and compensation and stuff
I don't mind the 5 year sentence limit tbh, considering that most of the situations where this law would apply probably involve environmental or other rights activists
grayzone found a boot somewhere: https://twitter.com/TheGrayzoneNews/status/1665618556216659968
The Grayzone joined an independent expedition to the sites of the Nord Stream pipeline blasts
There, we uncovered a clue missed by official Swedish investigators: a boot closely resembling the kind used by US Navy divers
By @JeffreyBrodsky5
https://t.co/erzMo0yDGv
1177
464
That's just what they do
A deep fake Putin announcing mass mobilisation in Russia may be one part of what seems to be a hacking attack coinciding with Ukrainian counter-offensives in the east & south today. TVs in Crimea were reportedly bro…
Just in case anyone missed it . . .https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/06/baltops-2023-exercise-kicks-off-in-the-baltic-sea/
russia also just started an unannounced naval exercise in the baltic:
https://twitter.com/AlexKokcharov/status/1665640543555145728
https://www.svoboda.org/a/rossiya-i-nato-odnovremenno-provodyat-voennye-ucheniya-v-baltiyskom-more/32445005.html
#Russia today began a previously unannounced naval exercise in the #BalticSea, a day after @NATO began its annual #BALTOPS exercise.
Russia's drill involves 40 vessels, 25 aircraft and 3,500 servicemen.
1/2
"Another enhancement to BALTOPS23 is the collaboration of sixteen chaplains representing three different faith/life stance traditions from eight participating nations."
there must be a story behind that particular 'enhancement' for it to warrant a mention ?
Certainly problematic if true. Really wild. But at this point, maybe Europe will choose to ignore it.
Also crazy how that one line in early German reporting which everyone ignored has turned into THE story now.
Putting this together with the old Spiegel reporting, I guess we can assume the original plan was to attack from a Swedish port.
easier to understand where that story comes from, but still lacks a credible explanation on how they would pull it off
A bit wild that Wapo sat on this leak for 2 months and published it today of all days, but also looks like they did a lot of legwork on investigative research with talking with Euro leaders and such.
Also what are the ramifications of this if we are to believe this group was reporting directly to Gen. Zaluzhnyi, and it was supposed to happen right after BALTOPS - what conceivable motivation for that besides laying the blame on NATO?
I never believe in any news that uses "anonymously intelligence officals", it can just be disgruntled intelligence people that just want to sabotage for the state for some reason. Its just " Get out of Jail card" where you can claim anything but show no real source or proof.
And isn't it curious that this news about Nordstream always show up in US news when Ukraine have great sucess on the battlefield or just started a new offensive?
Yeah maybe I'm getting too paranoid, but is that to bury it, sow seeds of disbeilief re: Kakhovka, or just a coincidence?
Absolutely. We rag on Seymour Hersh but that "an anonymous source inside" has become de rigeur, I feel like in the Trump years but maybe earlier. Often led to nothing
Saying WaPo is dumping this to tamper Ukrainian success or sow disbelief with the dam is insane, sorry
For me, my brain goes back to the Minerva Julie hanging around the area for such a prolonged period - right when the Andromeda is supposed to have been active above where the cluster of leaks subsequently appeared.
Is it possible the Russian's could also have received similar intelligence from an informant? And if they had, could a tanker awaiting orders, have served as a deniable lookout for them?
I just dont the pieces fit together with all the other activitities around there that they pulled off not being noticed, carrying all the gear they need AND the dive while also apparently the countries around there being aware of the risk
The German reporting from last year claims the CIAs source for briefing Euro intelligence agencies came from overhearing russian chatter, not a Ukrainain source as is now claimed. So, not inconceivable... but if they were suspecting sabotage, why not send a real military ship? Or call the Germans. No need to be sneaky about it.
Well, there's one simple reason for using a civilian ship deniably - don't reveal that you know from a source, possibly within western intelligence - what's about to go down.
To be clear, I have no idea - I'm spit balling some ideas. The coincidence of the MJ's appearance over the site is difficult for me to get past, but in time, it may become clear that it simply was a coincidence.
Yeah... I thought it was compelling too, but it seems no major outlets (or the sources in the investigations or intelligence talking to outlets) want to touch it.
Zaluzhnyi and not Budanov, though?
According to this yeah: "The European intelligence made clear that the would-be attackers were not rogue operatives. All those involved reported directly to Gen. Valerii Zaluzhnyi, the country’s highest-ranking military officer, who was put in charge so that Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, wouldn’t know about the operation, the intelligence report said."
The new WP states that the CIA received info about a planned Ukrainian attack on NS from a European intel agency, from a Ukrainian source the CIA hadn’t yet deemed reliable.
Months ago the story was that the CIA got the info from intercepted Russian communications
A very severe lack of any other changes that can be publicly stated is the most likely reason that sort of filler gets published
Oh my god, what humongous amount of warcrimes are they committing that "putting a cross on a parked tank" rises to the level of "interesting enough to publish"?
Did the danish military spend millions of DK on developing a special cross holder or something?
You can't put a price on a tank blessed by an almighty. Isn't it normal anyway for Chaplains to be present with deployments etc? Also for exercises too?
Praise the lord and pass the hand grenade!!!
Linked below is a interview with a retired US Navy Captain discussing the Ukraine War with an emphasis on the Black Sea. About 80% of the way through they discuss Nord Stream briefly. No new info but a way of evaluating who done it.
The interview is interesting in its own right as well.
GUEST: Jerry Hendrix - retired United States Navy captain, historian and author
The land war in Ukraine has occupied most attention among media and analysts since the full-scale war began in February 2022. But what happens in the Black Sea is perhaps where we should focus more. The battle for Snake Island, and the sinking of the Mosk...
i know this is probably disproven by now but i did some napkin math and like
how do people believe the andromeda
300kgs*3=900kgs
5 divers you can assume 85kgs p/person (425kgs)
assume one tank per dive per diver (180 kgs)
1500kgs already
the bc50 can carry 1800kgs
you have another 300kgs to carry all the rest of your gear, including stuff like food, literal lead weights
plus youd need give or take 4 weeks to say back and forth from rostock to bornholm
Quote from an American source, link below...I find this source to be quite good.
Note Kirby's comment near the bottom of the bottom of the quote.
[Quote]In an exclusive story, The Washington Post on Tuesday reported that "three months before saboteurs bombed the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, the Biden administration learned from a close ally that the Ukrainian military had planned a covert attack on the undersea network, using a small team of divers who reported directly to the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces."
The newspaper wrote that a European intelligence service collected the information and shared it with the CIA in June 2022. The details "provide some of the most specific evidence to date linking the government of Ukraine to the eventual attack in the Baltic Sea, which U.S. and Western officials have called a brazen and dangerous act of sabotage on Europe’s energy infrastructure," the Post reported.
The European intelligence report was shared on the chat platform Discord, allegedly by Air National Guard member Jack Teixeira. The Post said it obtained a copy from one of Teixeira’s online friends.
When asked about the story during a briefing Tuesday, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby declined to “engage in a discussion about intelligence matters from the podium specifically with regard to that disclosure or any of the other,” he said. “And in this case, certainly not going to speak to one that The Washington Post even said was not corroborated by U.S. intelligence agencies.” [/quote]
My commentary on the latest developments ... the Ukrainian plan, etc https://medium.com/@brian-whit/nord-stream-sabotage-revelations-make-embarrassing-news-for-ukraines-allies-cbb6a0f890d7
Brian
I don't have time or gumption at the moment for a long dissertation so to cut to the chase..... my feelings on this Andromeda matter have hardened over time. As a very occasional recreational Diver and as a live aboard on a sailboat I find the Andromeda story ludicrous.
I get that some people say this or that is possible, and they are correct. What I see now is that peopl3 have a very hard time putting all the pieces together, integrating the actions in their mind, to come up with a good understanding of what it would have been like in the moment, or week on this case.
In short Andromeda is BS, IMHO.
If you desire I can answer in more detail. But it takes the skill set of Joseph Conrad to make you viscerally understand, to feel the heave. That I do not have.
Interesting.
Good summary and commentary Brian.
I feel like this needs further examination/inquiry:
● The Ukrainian plan was to carry out the attack in June last year, “on the heels” of BALTOPS, a major Nato exercise held annually in the Baltic. For reasons that still unexplained it appears to have been put on hold but revived three months later.
Not exactly sure what “on the heels” of BALTOPS means, but using BALTOPS as cover could risk implicating Nato in the attack -- which would be pretty stupid. The CIA received the intelligence info in June, which could be before, during or after BALTOPS, but presumably the sabotage operation would have already been put on hold by then.
Yeah, I can't think of another reading of that than a way to put the "blame" on Nato and pull them further into the conflict, no?
Washington Post says the intelligence info came from a "close" European ally who is not named in order to protect the source. The word "close" suggests to me that it's talking about the UK. Anyone agree?
In the context of this particular theory, the risk of detection of anything placed around the pipelines prior to August would have been high; there was a planned annual maintenance period from early July to mid July. The annual maintenance should have included an external visual inspection of both NS-1 pipelines by ROV. Such a visual survey, performed competently, would have identifed anything placed on or near the pipeline. During this maintenance period gas delivery is severely restricted; not that gas delivery needs to be turned down for an external inspection but obviously there are maintenance activities at the onshore compression facilities and in previous years the rov inspection was performed around the same time. This chart shows the gas delivered through NS-1 and you can see where delivery drops off significantly in both 2021 and 2022 for this maintenance.
The chart also clearly shows when the gas delivery was reduced to 40% of capacity prior to maintenance shut down, later to 20% of capacity and to zero in first week of September. We know that one compressor/turbine had been taken offline sometime earlier in the year and transported to Canada for maintenance; but looking at the profile my guess is that there really were some issues with compression at the Russian landfall and it wasn't just bluffing by Gazprom to justify reducing the delivery rate. Some additional info : https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/gazprom-off-line-nord-stream-compressor-station-now-deemed-hazardous-2022-09-05/
Russian gas giant Gazprom said on Monday it had received a formal warning from Russian regulators that the idled Portovaya compressor station, which is supposed to push gas towards Germany through the Nord Steam 1 pipeline, no longer complied with safety requirements.
How have the German intelligence come to the conclusion, the Ru vessels are not involved? Kinda curious with that given some of the Ru infiltration they suffered.
I can't say I'd exclude wilful negligence if a fault was developing with companies potentially becoming insolvent
Agree but detection doesn’t matter if the explosions were meant to be immediate or near immediate, as is the case with the Andromeda theory
the point that was raised in the discussion above (aro/Brian) was that the original intelligence report supposedly received by cia from a european agency said that the operation was planned for June and that "for reasons that still unexplained it appears to have been put on hold but revived three months later". I'm pointing out why it made sense to postpone and not to place any explosives on the pipeline in June (or July).
But if the explosion is immediate - or within 24 hrs from planting, what does detection matter?
it doesn't but i think you have missed the point - maybe read through the earlier conversation you had with Brian ? ie "For reasons that still unexplained it appears to have been put on hold but revived three months later." I just explained why it would have been put on hold ? BALTOPS in June and survey in July I suggest would mean that the operation to place explosives would be delayed until after both to avoid detection. It's worth noting that if the Andromeda was involved, there was a period of almost two weeks between it being on site and the explosions on the 26th.
I wonder if its possible to find out if they did a visual inspection (the press release doesn't say anything of external inspection, nor what is included in the annual maintainence). And who did the inspection, and if it would be possible to get it somehow.
Agreed - but the press releases are just 'motherhood statements' that are identical each year and issued firstly before the maintenance period and later on the day they are completed; the associated pdf releases just state that ". . . Nord Stream AG will temporarily shut down both lines of its gas pipeline system for routine maintenance works inclusive testing of mechanical elements and automation systems for ensuring reliable, safe, and efficient pipeline operations" which says nothing of any value. There is no publicly available information (that I can find) on the work performed for 2022 - for obvious reasons I think.
Wall Street Journal says investigators have tracked the Andromeda's movements ... including a trip to Poland.
"The Journal cited people familiar with the Andromeda’s voyage as indicating the sabotage crew had finished half their job, laying deep-sea explosives on Nord Stream 1, before they set their Bavaria 50 Cruiser on a course away from their target, toward Poland.
"Andromeda, which had days before been rented from a German company based close to where the pipelines land, sailed back north in what investigators believe was an effort to complete its task and plant mines on Nord Stream 2, the newspaper said."
German investigators are examining evidence suggesting a sabotage team used Poland as an operating base to damage the Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea in September, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday.
Link to WSJ article: https://www.wsj.com/articles/nord-stream-sabotage-probe-turns-to-clues-inside-poland-4ed20422?page=1
It looks like the Andromeda only carried enough explosive to attack NS1, then sailed into Polish waters to pick up more explosive for NS2.
This series of events though means the Andromeda placed exposives on NS1 prior to Christiansø
which means it did it during the time when the MJ was directly over the pipes and the US and German navy were conducting the exercise a few miles away.
☝️
Its really bad by the German investigators if they are first now doing investigations in poland, months after the articles started to turn up..
new dispatch from sey hersch: they got the explosives air dropped somehow
Wallstreet article un-paywalled: https://archive.ph/Zd0ha
It would be so funny if the Danes and the Swedes found TNT or RDX on the samples from the pipes.
I think nobody actually uses TNT anymore? RDX is like what you wanna be thinking about
especially since it comes in a bunch of pipe cutting forms
TNT is common in mixtures for underwater charges, like naval mines.
And we know it wasnt a cutting charge. At least not at the site where people have been diving with ROVs.
my understanding is that the first people who got there cut out the damaged segments and took them home
