#πŸš€ v0.13.2 - 20th September 2024

1 messages Β· Page 1 of 1 (latest)

full vortex
#

🧡

#

cc @dark abyss <@&946480760016207902>

#

just noticed with @dark abyss that we've got a weird tui regression in v0.13.1 where we accidentally seem to output loads of empty lines

dark abyss
#

we can probably go right ahead to v0.2.0 which also has some perf improvements

full vortex
#

although if we're doing a quick urgent release, i think a rollback to the one that definitely works would potentially be safer?

#

i'm towards the end of my day here, so can't run anything today, but could tomorrow?

dark abyss
#

yeah we can save v0.2.0+ for later

full vortex
#

@native vapor @dark abyss would either of you want to run it? if not, i can pick it up first thing tomorrow

#

i really want to avoid releasing next week, given we're off to san diego the week after

dark abyss
#

I can do it tomorrow, today's a bit busy for me

full vortex
#

that sgtm πŸ™‚

#

✨ v0.13.2 - 20th September 2024

full vortex
#

just gimme a ping if things get out of control for timing, i should have a spot of time tomorrow morning to get it done if you want me to

dark abyss
full vortex
#

dependabot also does this insanity for buildkit, it has no idea what the most recent version is somehow, and keeps trying to upgrade us from master to the latest release on a release branch (which is likely a downgrade, since only some commits get cherry-picked over to it)

full vortex
acoustic tree
#

The Pr is good, I'll just remove the commented code, add a release note and we're good

acoustic tree
full vortex
#

why does it need to be merged for the release? it runs every night right?

#

it's not in the release, so doesn't need to follow the same timeline (same applies to all our ci)

#

@formal crag was reviewing that one, so I would let him have another glance given there's not a rush for the release

full vortex
#

v0.13.2 should appear as user notifications

formal crag
dark abyss
#

I'm around, can kick off the release in a bit!

full vortex
#

i think it should be good to go whenever πŸ™‚

#

i might reconsider the way we bump dependencies for the engine 😒

#

cause this was a bit annoying

dark abyss
#

weird, did they break something in grpc?

full vortex
#

we get this weird internal error received 4294967270-bytes data exceeding the limit 65535 bytes from a user, and i've not seen it before 😦 so yeah, downgrading in the meantime feels like a safe bet

dark abyss
#

oldmanyellsatgithub why cant i rerun a failed job when another job is still running

#

what's up with all these failing [sdk]-dev jobs? is this just spot instances being spotty?

full vortex
dark abyss
#

someday i hope for a rerun to land on an instance that doesn't immediately detonate Prayge

#

ok to be fair a few of these are something else - random network issues fetching modules:

    github.com/containerd/console: github.com/containerd/console@v1.0.3: Get "https://proxy.golang.org/github.com/containerd/console/@v/v1.0.3.zip": stream error: stream ID 19; PROTOCOL_ERROR
#

feels like this happens more often than it should

native vapor
#

"Persistent" in that it pops up at least a few times a week ephemerally, as opposed to "happened for a day once and went away forever"

#

but also you'd expect to see way more networking errors all over the place if it was something low-level, not just go module downloading

#

got a googlewhack from it πŸ˜„

dark abyss
#

maybe it's something specific to QUIC/HTTP2/whatever fancy protocol Google is using everywhere

#

ok, green (enough, macos publish still errors, assuming that's not fixable atm) - tagging following RELEASING.md πŸ‘Ό !

native vapor
dark abyss
#

pushed v0.13.2 tag

dark abyss
#

everything's shipped! time to bump Daggerverse and friends, cc @cold tangle @lapis oxide @nova mulch @native vapor @fast mantle

cold tangle
#

bumping daggerverse and the playground now

dark abyss
fast mantle
#

done βœ