#8042
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
traces for failing pipelines:
It seems to be mostly this error @winged plaza @timid maple :
failed to collect IDs: failed to collect IDs for field "Python": expected *ModuleObject, got <nil>
will dive in, yup
we have consensus on everything
i think there's a few points about.daggerfrom folks in https://github.com/dagger/dagger/issues/8123
it seems there's a few people with concerns around it
that said - since it's not in module urls, we can easily change it later
so not a blocker
Yeah that's not a blocker. It's easy to revert (doesn't break any imports) and we're going to use it as bikeshedding for https://github.com/dagger/dagger/issues/8123, which is a decision that will affect everyone.
So merging this will actually help the bikeshedding discussion in 8123
yup nice nice
I have a few things to wrap up before going away but let me know if you need help resolving a merge conflict.
working on fixing ci now
mostly I'm stuck on that weird "failed to collect IDs" error
@fierce sleet just noticed the README has gone - i'd like to keep it, it's got valuable info for new contributors, where should we put it?
Btw, we still have a bug in the find up logic where if a module in a subdir of the repo fails to load (e.g., syntax error in module code), it’ll continue the find up and runs a "parent" module if it finds one. Nothing to do with dependencies, just parent dir with a dagger.json. So this change will bring those errors back. Justin, do you have bandwidth to try and solve it in the next few days? Doesn’t have to block this PR.
yeaaaa, i can find some spare bandwidth
i mean, i already got so distracted from dag.Self on autogenerated sync methods
what's one more distraction
I know the feeling!
It's in .dagger like the rest
oh bleh
you're right, git didn't notice it as moved
Maybe because of too many edits?
found it
looks like a sorta legitimate bug, will open an issue/pr for that as well
thank you!
aight 🎉 just gonna head off and go to some lunch and will get back to it asap 😄
merged 
@slim nest i opened a pr with just a test in it for this: https://github.com/dagger/dagger/pull/8132
i think it's potentially something to do with the secret scanning in objects we introduced?
Pushed an extra commit with the fix! I'll approve it once CI is done. It feels like an awkward "self-approved PR" so will wait to merge unless it's blocking anyone actively
