#Private daggerverse
grand violet
In a private company that can just be a group of git repos. Like a group in GitLab.
acoustic frost
I think @stray pulsar means a privately hosted Daggerverse. I'd love that also 🙂
stray pulsar
Yeah, that is the plan b, but the daggerverse it really appealing, it would make eyes shine
In my case, the company has several team, stablished tools and so one... I cannot just decide which tools I gonna use on the projects I work on.
I see dagger been the main tool for pipelines here, but I need to convince others, saying that, every card I can put in my hand will help me in this task.
grand violet
I think <@247836339624476674> means a privately hosted _Daggerverse_. I'd love ...
Yeah I know, but the main thing that the daggerverse solves is the discovery of modules from repos all over the web. But when it's a company you can define a single place to add the modules so it facilitates that discovery.
Having said that, I do understand the appeal of having Daggerverse's UI 🙂, and it's possible we allow self-hosting in the future, but it's unlikely to happen anytime soon. Cool side-project though, if anyone's looking for one 🙂
acoustic frost
Having said that, I do understand the appeal of having Daggerverse's UI 🙂, and ...
Is the current Daggerverse source open?
grand violet
No, it's not.
The CLI is open source and uses a certain amount of this kind of introspection that you can see.
The usual way any SDK uses codegen also works for building an html page, which is much trivial to do.
acoustic frost
hmm. Thanks for the explanation! That seems like a bit more work than I have time to do 🙂 I'll wait for y'all to opensource and distribute daggerverse.
grand violet
Of course, just leaving it out there! My point is that it's technically within reach for users to create whatever GUI they want for modules. Whether it's for discovering or calling functions.
stray pulsar
I'm overloaded as well, but I will have a look on this project later
neat musk