Entropy as a utility to prevent collateral damage

[modest willow]

Is there a philosophical question embedded in this? Or this is a straightforward point about market economics?

I haven't had my coffee yet this morning, so apologies if there's a metaphor here I'm missing! ☕ 😴

[high jungle]

That which I had proceduralized is the way to scale, and meaningfully measure the world of our necessities to protect them from being competed upon by large corps that seek to disturb a market.

The truth is that in the world of business, the plane of competetition between businesses is due to a lack of solidarity in the awareness of how to measure the market abroad since pricing seems to be largely subjective.

So the key to me is to create a capstone value upon products of what I would call necessary utilities, the goods that everyone needs to survive. And if these goods are controlled in markup and markdown then this can stabilize inflation and send a gravitational ripple to the job market without even doing anything other than prevent these goods from fluctuating in price.

Alas we can now see that these necessary utilities are the heart and soul of people by right participation.

And that's ethical, good and meaningful.

[high jungle]

Now to make a flower of a metaphor, the means of control over the price of these necessary utilities are parametrically stabilized in the first and the last, as to say the highs and the lows.
(Jesus Christ reference).

This is the optimal grip of organic breath control.

Our means of measure is
through the airs of awareness rather than to say currency is like a liquid or a solid. That's not good because liquids and solids are the soul and currency is not soul it's spirit.

[modest willow]

I can't make heads or tails of any of this, to be honest. But maybe someone else can. 👍

[high jungle]

Which part of the subject is difficult to grasp?

For me, I am not confused, but for you, you are showing confusion to me.
This puts me in an awkward position.

If you would like to know on intention, I have intuitions of measure, since that which is intuitive is to measure.

And then I have produced a logic of this developing intuition in a way that felt most clear and comfortable for me.

How people would engage is beyond me, but I just sought to share what I thought to be valuable within my own application of philosophy into a subject of participation in the world.

[modest willow]

Well, the first confusing this is what it has to do with philosophy. It seems like you're mostly talking about an alternative to market pricing, or speculating about a possible alternative theory of economics. It's hard to see how that's related to philosophy, particularly the type of philosophy relevant to Vervaeke's work. I'm not doubting that it's interesting or that economics is important, I just don't know why you posted it in the #1099789273298898944 area, particularly when there are lots of unmoderated spaces on the Discord which might have been more suitable.

The second thing which is confusing (which is probably more subjective) is simply that I can't parse your writing style. You move from extremely detailed examples (but it's not clear to me what they are supposed to illustrate) to metaphors or spiritual topics (i.e., moving from a discussion of home prices to the human soul, breath, etc). It's just very hard to follow (for me, anyway). I would say I only understand maybe 1 out of every 10 sentences. But like I said, maybe it's subjective and other people can see the pattern of your thinking better than I can?

In any case, I'm more concerned about staying on topic.