#!process friend forgot to say/talk about
vital kernel
i never mentioned LPs by name during my intv and i was chill
ruby panther
you're not supposed to mention LPs by name anyway?
lament sun
no like
vital kernel
my interviewere sussed it out from what i was saying
lament sun
no
vital kernel
i feel like the LPs are broad enough as to where any answer could match them
strong trout
how
ruby panther
and most decent behavioral answers show LPs anyway
lament sun
idk thats what hes telling me
strong trout
what story could not portray LPs
i feel like the LPs cover everything involving workplace environment expectations what not
lament sun
¯_(ツ)_/¯
for his tech tho he said he needed like 4 hints
and when he solved it the interviewer kept rubbing his face and was confused on his solution
is this recoverable for r2
strong trout
i needed like 2 hints for my r2 idk
i did v well on behavioral though
still waiting however
wanton tendon
still waiting however
when did you finish the interview?
lament sun
he just answered STAR he said
strong trout
when did you finish the interview?
fri
strong trout
he just answered STAR he said
i mean star in ur behavioral should ideally demonstrate any of the LPs
strong trout
same! lmk if you hear back anything
dm
glad acorn
he might be fried
the LPs are so general you could cover it with a story on a class assignment
and hints wise if its a hard maybe its feasible
if it was some easy shit fried
lament sun
and hints wise if its a hard maybe its feasible
course schedule ðŸ˜
arctic citrus
better than my friend who fucked up first unique character in string
how do u fuck up this q'n
it's literally easier than 2sum
glad acorn
fucked up the more optimal approach with no hashmap
arctic citrus
lool
glad acorn
lowkey that approach might actually be easier than the hashmap
gotta take an L once in a while i guess
strong trout
better than my friend who fucked up first unique character in string
hell nah
isn't this just a 'seen' set