#Adobe (Seattle) vs C1 (McLean)
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
yeah i woudl say so
shit
i think you have to be super social in order to secure one
if you think you can manage that, you can take adobe
but c1 is a great place to be ng
How is C1 job security
good for 1 1/2 yrs
lots of leeway for ng
there's prob a diff but c1 is a decent feeder i think
not worth the risk in low RO
adobe won't carry for ng recruiting
Real low, for a good reason it’s a dying company
you might be able to push either to fall
Does adobe push to fall?
i think c1 might
Adobe has low ro right
ye
bro go c1
the RO rates are so drastically different
no he's not
this cycle is fucking cooked
this stupid shit doesn't fkn matter
job is bottom line
I dont think so
im prev aws, and i got procs at stripe, adobe, palantir, and google
That is true though
it's decent
but those procs are all notoriously hard (not sure about adobe)
and ng bar is incredibly high
even if you somehow land procs, it's not guaranteed ur going to pass
Yeah ng bar is much higher lol
i mean i see what ur saying
True but it’s nice to not have to lock in
the upside is large
And get ro
but risk is also massive
but why not just wait 2 yrs
c1 is basically guaranteed job for 1.5 years
before pip actually ight be on the table
and u can get more + better procs and a lot more time to prep
it will be better
it's been dogshit for 5 yrs
it will be better
ok so if that's not guaranteed
even tho there's an established pattern
of dogshit years before good ones
then why are we trying to tell this guy to go for a higher risk option
that's more likely less guaranteed
im aws
aws > adobe
and i got 4 procs
4/150
what does entry level networking yield
I was in this predicament last year take c1 Adobe ro rate is low and the ng market is really tough
Adobes name brand is prob better but not by much
Yea this guy is spitting