#NG JS vs 5R vs (maybe) HRT
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
hrt above js is crazy work
aint nobody wanna code in ocaml
Proverbs 18:2
just look at firm perf
JS revenue > citsec + HRT
that has more to do with team than firm
HRT internal tools vs JS equities desk dev?
the other point i wanted to make
was that HRT had some issues a couple years back
people on blind now are also complaining
about shitty management
and being fired
i mean it's all very out there
i remember 2023-2024 HRT barely hired anyone bc of firm downsizing or smth
why does this matter though
you're still solving low level problems
using ocaml
are you concerned about getting hired elsewhere..?
because ur basically locked in to js
if so, exit opps are very good at js despite languages and internal tooling
why is cpp the north star here 😭
because almost everyone uses cpp
everyone as in other trading firms..?
yes
i can think of at least one other example of a top firm that doesn't use cpp that much
u cant join somewhere as an experienced engineer where they expect u to have years of cpp knowledge
and youve never used the language professionally
just wont happen
but also
cool
and i can think of 10x
the firms
that do use cpp
a lot
where do you go after js
what is ur point
meh
u clearly dont understand how the industry works lol
if you say so..
also more money
wait wdym
why would u not
if ur in nyc theres like nowhere else to go
not necessarily true that youll earn the same
^^
ive heard some eye popping numbers
for optiver
delta one
like u would not believe
optiver 😂
plenty of ppl leave js bc of pay
yea
u have senior swes at optiver earning multiple m's
that probs doesnt happen ever
at js
mostly traders but im sure some swes too
funny you bring that up bc i was on a very similar team at optiver lol
idt it was that much more
im hearing its like that now
an insider source told me they want a different pay structure altogether
because that team makes so much money for the firm
that its unfair for everyone else to eat off that
but uh
i cant verify that
at all
so maybe its a huge overexaggeration
idk
well im just citing one case where one might want to leave js
for better pay
js i hear is super communistic with pay
i do concede that like if you are a top performer or have strong conviction that you will be
it probably makes less sense to go
but i think for the majority of people it does not make sense to make decisions with that assumption
this was not about hrt
i think wanting to work in cpp
is also important too tho
ocaml is slop
and a few years of that
will set u back
if u want to go somewhere else
state your case
ngl ifl gunning for these only makes sense if ur goal in life is to retire at like 30 or smth
yea i agree
i prioritize my health, wellbeing, etc, over the marginal 500k or whatever
why do u need 210.2337678276k
i mean this is a pointless argument if u go for quant ur greedy like full stop
idk. i just cant wrap my head around it
sure
it looks so unnatural
but even if you are greedy as a pig what do you do with that much money lmao
not intern
but ft
i would rather do citsec low latency yea
u can negotiate them up to js
i dont understand this point if u dont care ab money u can go work for like github or msft or wtv and chill
why would u ever go to js if u care that much ab wlb
i dont think so
it's not but im just pointing out how ridiculous it is to be arguing about earning like an extra half million after you earn 700k or whatever at the cost of your health, wlb, etc. if you seriously set your value function such that it's worth it to sacrifice your wellbeing for these things, i seriously question your decision making process
because jane obviously clears like citsec post trade compliance team or wtv
im making the assumption that if ur able to get js, then ur good enough to get a good team at other firms
because jane offers for swe are standard across the board i thought
u could make this argument for like any income tbh
but the reality is a higher tc always unlocks a new level
there's a scene in marginal call where this guy explains how he spends 2m tc and the breakdown actually makes sense
didn't he spend ~200k on hookers lmfao
nah i think like 70
ah, much more reasonable
i mean that was like the only extra thing ig
the rest was like food, clothes, mortgage
ngl im fine
with never owning
a home
ever
too much work
apartments are awesome
if some shit breaks thats not rly my problem
somebody else will get a guy to fix it
and worry about paying for that
the extra money would just sit in a bank
as in more materialistic?
what is the advantage of owning a home
unless you plan on having a family
seems inferior
this is true but the best option for single person is prolly buying a condo/apartment/townhouse
buying a single-family home would be mad goofy if ur just by urself 💀
fr we in quant for that sweet wlb 🔥
ocaml is a far better language than cpp
There was a StackOverflow question recently that led me to want to write a new post about Ranges. Specifically, I wanted to write about some situations in which Ranges do more work than it seems like they should have to. And then what we can do to avoid doing that extra work. I’ll offer solutions — one sane one, which you can already use tod...
consteval auto for2(info init, info range, info body) -> void
{
inject_tokens(^^{
{
auto&& __r0 = \tokens(range);
using __R0 = std::remove_cvref_t<decltype(__r0)>;
inject_tokens_impl<__R0, 0>::apply(Direction::forward, \(init), \(body));
}
});
}```
i think C++ suffers from lack of direction
C++ taken strictly as a language is so much less deserving of praise than many other languages
the main reason to use C++ is because of network effects
OCaml on the other hand is at least a bit more elegant even down to the theory