#!process meta reject (looking for
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I will try to write everything that happened here in the thread.
Timeline:
reachout 01/21
oa completed: 01/23
Screening scheduled: 01/23
Screening: 02/21
Took exactly a month to prepare for everything
PE right?
PE Basics:
First interview I had was PE Basics, and it was very straighforward, I had two interviewers and they were very chill and pleasant to talk to.
I was asked to describe everything that happens when typing www.cutecats.com in the web browser.
I started with URL parsing and DNS lookup, then they asked me about DNS architecture and how it worked and I mentioned the muti-level architecture that DNS servers have and how if link is not found browser, OS or router cache how then it needs to reach the root DNS server then .com server .. etc.
Then I talked about the individual layers and how the request is packed, going over everything from application layer to Data Link Layer.
Then I talked about the local area network NAT and how routing works, also mentioned ARP and how IPv6 doesn't even use NAT.
then they asked me more of a distributed systems questions and fail-over mechanisms. I talked about how there's multiple layers that the request has to pass till reaching the endpoint server (multiple proxies), and mentioned firewall, load balancer, caching layer, and finally web server/application server.
for failover mechanisms I said that we needed multiple servers (said same for proxy servers as well) so we don't depend on a single node and explained how that would work.
Then they asked me how the data would be distributed, I provided an example of a bad way of distributing data among servers using one directory server and mentioned it that this was an approach we could take or we could have a much better option in using consistent hashing and explained how it works also mentioned RAID 6 and how we could preserve data in each node if failure happens.
Overall I think this went really well, the interviewers were very nice and made me feel like I did extremely well on the interview.
yes
Maybe there was an issue in the coding section? Based on what you said, it doesn’t seem too bad how you answered
PE Coding:
Very standard LC interview.
I got asked easiest question that was Valid Parentheses and I wrote the solution using stack and explained how and why it works. Then she asked me if this is how I would have wrote code in working environment and I was caught off-guard and said yes, then she proceeded to say what if instead of brackets/parenthesis/braces we had 'a' and 'b' or something like that so then I used a map and rewrote the solution. Thought It went well.
For the second question she asked me Dinosaur CSV question, which I knew the solution of and wrote the solution straight away but I didn't do an optimization that is I should have dropped the dinosaurs in csv2 file that didn't meet criteria of csv1 right away. She noticed and asked me about it. At first, I didn't notice but finally I said what I would have done differently verbally (didn't have time to modify the code, and she looked satisfied). I also mentioned that we could independently parse the two files and rather than one after the other (i.e. different threads) but I am not sure if it was a mistake. at some point she asked me something and I just nodded my head since I didn't understand what she said (multiple times) and I am still not sure if it was a mistake but overall I felt happy with my performance.
there was, but didn't think it would make them reject me as I felt it ws very minor
This lady was Indian and had pretty strong accent, very stale didn't smile or anything through the whole interview but didn't give me any negative signs either tbh
Some interviewers are just weirdos and reject for the sake of rejecting
Had a same experience with Bloomberg (same question too lol)
Dw bro you’ll get something better u just got unlucky
the coding part was so easy I didn't think there was even a slightest chance I would get rejected lol
I felt like it was just a bit of miscommunication
Dw bro their loss
U seem like u know ur stuff too from the first part
I didn’t know PE was this much theory
who interviewed you for PE basics?
yeah I went over other people's experiences and they had to answer all sorts of stuff: OS, Networking, Distributed Systems are the main topics
that's why I took a month to prepare
I think it’s because of the coding part, they expect for the valid parentheses without the stack
Ur basics sound good if anything was to reject you it’s definitely the coding part
Because some interviewers expect optimal from the get go
alex and alvaro
Sorry bout that bro I’m also bout to interview with em same role in 3 weeks
What did u prep with for the basics
@lone plume are you done with your screening?
yeah I think that's where I messed up, but I read that they prioritize pe basics over coding portion and since I solved both I though I did well enough
Thanks for the feedback.
I had same experience Today with bloomberg but with a Chinese woman interviewer😭😭😭
good luck!
My interviewer didn’t even know python dictionaries preserve their insertion order now
And she works with python everyday
Makes me wanna punch my laptop 😂😂😂
what was asked in your PE basics round?
I genuinely think like the monent u get those interviewers ur fate is sealed
Like ur getting rejected whether u do good or bad
Yup
Was this the onsite?
I got rejected after first onsite
i haven't done it yet, its in 3 weeks
It gets worse with each round passed
Bloomberg is awful
I used shit ton of resources tbf, but something I would really recommend is this guy on youtube,
https://www.youtube.com/@johnkubiatowicz3737
I also read Understanding Linux Kernel 3rd edition (make sure you read time scheduling and memory management separately as they are handled differently now) , read Systems Performance: Enterprise and the Cloud, and used sadservers for trhoubleshooting stuff.
they have no method to their insanity
They reject for no reason
All my techs were great, my interviewers literally said this is great. Still got rejected
How linux works?
+1
Did u solve a lot of those sad servers stuff?
Sorry to hear that bro literally a shitty company idk who they think they are lmao
I asked for feedback and my recruiter sent data structure basics
I was like dawg u gotta send that to ur interviewers first 😭
all easy questions that's it, I was planning to solve more but I didn't make it to VO so no point now.
I forgot to mention, for Networking I used material that I had saved from my previous Networking lectures.
Thanks for the information bro, really unfortunate that you got rejected 😦
Have u applied to their Business Engineer position?
Try asking your rec if you could be referred to that position?
I asked my recruiter to refer me
Did they?
I just emailed them an hour ago so no response.
I have 0 processes right now and I'm graduating in May. Hiring needs to pick up the pace, or else I'm cooked 💀
i hope u get that process bro shits tuff out here
Zon will save u bro
someone let their zon recruiter know to save me from unemployment. I can offer X and Meta recruiter emails 🙏
i have 3 zon recruiters who ghosted me. i can give you their email, not guaranteeing any response tho 💀
I'll take whatever I can get lol
I got couple of dm's asking about my race, I want to clarify here that I am a white intl student
after talking with some people I think what got me rejected was that I dove straight into solving the dinosaurs csv problem and didn't do much explaining beforehand (I was explaining while coding). They focus lot more on your ability to communicate solution rather than coding, so they might have assumed that I had the solution memorized + slight optimizations I missed initially didn't help either.
Yeah it’s more dependent on ur interviewers race
Indian/chinese international interview->reject
Sorry to hear that
what's PE lmfoa
Following
i mean if interviewer tells you to do this w multiple types of parenthesis then he just don't want you to pass, but single type can be done