#Electricians in the early 1900s had a
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I think it is time you should start talking on this
@forest prism You can share it here.
You raised a valid point.
AI is simply not good enough yet. Once you get beyond simple REST API work it seems to simply be incapable of doing rigorous logic and debugging work, even with CoT reasoning. If you're competent I think AI is a great tool, especially for processing large volumes of data, and the increased productivity will surely decrease the number of jobs available, but I'm doubtful it's the end of the SE gravy train.
I dont see why you brought up the story of electricians
They were able to successfully unionize
Because their employers needed them
If your reasoning for unionizing is to protect coding from becoming automated
Then there is no leverage for the union to negotiate with
In fact, the act of trying to unionize would probably accelerate efforts to automate away tech jobs
Today, an electrician might not look skilled to you, because it is common but back in the past they where like how coder of today are.
I am not sure, What kind of AI you are exposed to, But this is really concerning:
https://levelup.gitconnected.com/sam-altman-might-be-a-super-villain-b98c4692a52
I didnt disregard their work lol
Read my following messages
Im saying the analogy isnt apt, since electricians had more leverage
This is an overly dramatic article made by an unknown
Idk why you linked it
Also i cant even read the whole thing
This was not for you
Okay
I know, but im asking why did you choose to link such a seemingly low quality article
Is this your only response?
I don't know, may be your standards are different, just read it few hours ago, the length at which it covers things that are going unnoticed is insane
Ok ill give it a lookover
Yes. People have opinions, they are free to share. You shared one, I accepted
Gotcha
This article is paywalled
Nope, just use option, continue using google or apple whatever
You can read it, no need to subscribe.
idk its just needless fearmongering, if AI is going to replace jobs first it's going to be copywriters and marketing. idk if you've ever tried to debug stuff even with top of the line models it's pretty difficult, especially with novel issues, since LLMs are trained with data, if there's no data they're susceptible to hallucinations and such.
i mean the first couple lines of the article are basically likening it to the atomic bomb i mean come on
Lmao this is the impression i got
Its just some random dev yapping
bro wtf
- is this article actually this short
1.a. its like a 30 sec read and the only thing that it actually says of substance is "omg ai is an atomic bomb" - take some time to actually read the responses people are responding to you with. it looks like you arent 🤣
- did you write this article and are just trying to promo it?
the fucking 1 comment reply here is Getting to me
like if you wanted to get some Organic Engagement on your post just make one of those subway surfer videos and use some talking head generator to surface onto a platform that you can ragebait harder on