#Any Asian interviewer?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
wait why would this matter 💀
You'll get to know that tomorrow 💀
uhhhh...well if it means anything the only asian interviewer i have is the second name in my last interview. so 50/50 chance they're shadow asdfasdf
Yeah second name is shadow
Good luck bro
I have an Asian, Harvard grad interviewer💀
How do you guys find your interviewer with just the first name?
Mine is named like xyz L on my portal. So, just the first name is visible
wait why does this matter
all 3 of mine are asian
some people have 4 interviews some have 3
one of mine has his full name and the other only have one letter
@fossil pond same. I have one tech tomorrow and two on Wed. Good luck. Can I dm?
I think he means 1 behav and 3 tech
Yeah mine is 1 behav 2 tech
Didn't realize
i also just have 2 techs
good luck
ok but u are cracked
what is it based on?
asian brown male
how many tagged have u done so far?
when is urs?
like 40+ tagged focusing mostly on meds now
dec 2 💀 that was the earliest they let me schedule
lmao
I asked if I were to reshedule what would be the earliest they could give me and he said Dec 14 lmao
I said nvm I will take it tomorrow
I feel so underprepared ong
done like 20 tagged
fr
when is ur interview
good luck 🙏🏼
For meta final, do they explain questions or do they paste it?
bro ru may 24 grad?
tmr
same
how many tagged have u practiced?
golden number seems to be 75-90
You can ask for explanation which they give by giving you an example. I did that, just gotta ask if they don’t initiate
good luck bro
Yeah I am
gl brother
gl
I am ngmi I cant solve any meta tagged question
in 20 mins
too stupid
and too sleep deprived to think
fuck rest I gotta do atleast 30 more questions tn
I lwk might crash out during the interview
should I Just call it a day and rest and do a couple questions tomorrow morning and let jessu take the wheel
Well then they will just paste questions without tc's.
If I ask, will they provide sample tc`s?
Yes. Probably only one tc
and interviewer will explain it for you
GL
for you omar
for you
although i just noticed now that i had one 1-2 bugs in my second question but it seems like interviewer didn't notice
we can't run the code anyway
ur probably fine
If you just run through the test case and it works I don’t think they care for much more
I’ll see you in Menlo
my app is tied to nyc lkajfklasdjf but we'll see i have no idea anymore if they'l l actually honor it
yea me too 😭
indeed
fuck.
see you in meta cloud
so far....tagged my guy
craacking faang surprisingly has like 90% of the tagged covered
and he does go over the potential follow ups he hasn't missed
jesus you're chillin
honestly i'd like....focus 70% on efforts reviewing the 100 and 30% on new ones
but regardless i'll see you at menlo or nyc hlsdjjf
I agree with rizzware. I've gotten all tagged (or their variations) so far
@fossil pond goodluck!
team,
3/4 done
solved both optimally but lowkey can't tell if interviewer understood my answer to the last follow-up ngllllll
i hope so
cuz he asked like twice what i meant alsdjfklsadjfklsdfand
its okay can't do anything about it now
it’s def not that deep if you solved both optimally
will take your word 
@fossil pond can I dm? I just did my first meta tech
ok but what if my solution is not that clean
and how do I even know it is optimal, like I think I did it? but what if I didn't lmaoo
Was it tagged? If so you can prob look at the editorial
yea both were tagged
one was a variation
it looks kinda same but idk
guess no point worrying about it, maybe if I ace my other two I still have a chance
AFAIK slightly buggy code and unclean code is ok (if the interviewer understands it)
idek if the interviewer understood it tbh cuz I was silent for stretches
like 20 seconds nothing
I should have asked if she is following along
Nah 20 seconds isn’t big
Yee always do this
this is what happens when I am rusty, this is my first technical since like 2022 lmao
Dw you got 2 more techs
also I did not explain my thought process clearly for second problem
but tbf there is not much thought process
it is a straight forward question
If this was a shadow round, your feedback won’t really matter
u just gotta implement it
this wasnt shadow
chat if I do 60/100 on one interview and 90/100 on other two itnerviews can Meta still hire me
I will work for half salary
Yeah this is interviewer dependent, normally ask if they’re ok with the potential approach and then start coding
yea she did say sure start coding
Yee then you’re fine
Tbh 15 mins per q isn’t enough time, so I’m sure they don’t mind
jus ask here :>
were u asked to code ur follow ups or just explain the solution?
kindaaaaa only if the change to satisfy the followup was extremely minimal
like instead of min heap how would you refactor to use max heap
jus a matter of applying negatives to the elements that we'll push then ya kno
I won't say it's bad tbh
ok how do u guys know u got the working solution at the end
it looks right to me but I cant be sure
it works yea
but what if I think it works but it does not
it was only one test case
and I did not check for if input is none
uhh
so cooked
They don't run your code. Chill man
As long as your dry run worked perfectly, you're good to go
4/4 optimal too 🐐
🐐
lmao this was me for the bloomberg interviewer but they said lgtm and passed me, the code was never run so thats why i think
yeah im gonna hope that all they care about is if dry-run of the simple cases they provide is enuf
Oh I thought ur also supposed to come up w some of ur own cases or edge cases right
depends on interviewer
i asked each interviewer and they said nah no need for me to come up w more
guess i drew 3 lucky ones
same
^
Why is the thread called this😭
Tbf my Asian interviewer today was cold
Same 
Lmao my interview was at 1pm yesterday
Meta is not hiring me
But still 2 more to go
@woeful bear How’d it go?
Were you able to at least give a suboptimal solution @woeful bear ?
oh I gave the optimal solution at the end. But idk if it is correct. I mean in my head I think it works but maybe the interviewer did not. I did dry run on test cases and it worked but idk if she liked it or not cuz she was just so cold throughout the interview. Also there was bad communications from my side. And she did not ask any follow ups, which from what I have seen everyone else got follow ups but I did not. Prolly cuz she gave up on me lmao
idts but we'll see
I think first one is a leaning no hire, so the other two better be strong hire for me to have a shot
Was it tagged questions?
what ques have u been doing
they asked me an untagged
are asian interviewers more tough from your experiences so far? i have all asian lol
They don't easily show their emotions, and that makes it difficult to judge how you performed
ah, the poker face
did you atleast get tagged qs? and did you feel like they might atleast tell you if you're going off track
how'd it go for you? mine seem to be from UCLA but i could be wrong
Mine isn’t for a while
@solar palm Got a lot of time to prep and dread getting untagged hard
same 💀
but i have just one more week to go lol
Let us know how it goes then
Good luck
will do!
The Indian interviewer I got seemed fine
It’s the East Asians that r concerning
i have east asians
My second one is an East Asian bruh
so i should expect it be like talking to myself then
i'm praying for no untagged atp
🤞
Oh my asian interviewer was chill (at least it seems like it 💀)
2nd interview fucked me harder
the second q was non tagged and I thought I was doing it right but did not dry run at the end and did not finish the code
I chatGPT the question and my solution was on the right track but chat's code is so much simpler
I complicated it for no reason
done with my onsites for meta. so not getting the offer
first non tagged, second tagged hard
meta did not want me fr two hards in three interviews lmao
4/6 were tagged, 2 non tagged
Damn dude. You might be the unluckiest so far interviewing at meta
If you were able to at least give a suboptimal solution for the questions, I wouldn't consider it a reject straightaway
I got solutions working
for all
but bad code and bad comms
and no follow up times
onto the next one
I don't think they care about that