#mathworks process confusion
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
so
- did oa
- did some recruiter call (like 15 min chat about experience, the position)
- got rejected
- is this how mathworks just works? i def BOMBED the OA like 1/4 test cases on coding; and then questionable performance on remainder questions.
so my confusion is: why didnt mathworks just autoreject me after OA? and why did they call in the first place????
like. or did i just reek in the recruiter call so much that i wasnt able to make up for the failed oa?
They like your resume? Then probably headcount hits or something
possible, and i think thats the best faith assumption
im just paranoid because there was a q that was like
"what did you like/not like about your previous employer"
and i feel for my response like i was just not articulate / not on my A game bc i was like lowkey sleep deprived
because i said something like "lots of tech debt bad and politics are bad"--and i dont really know a better answer because i really liked my prev company; and when respond to whether i would consdier going back full time i said "they dont have headcount"
like ig what im looking for is "would there have been a way to like give myself an edge by being. nicer. or being more personable or saying something diff"
aND LIKE AT THE END OF THE CALL IM LIKE "... so what are the next steps" (recruiter didnt volunteer the information) and then its like "iF the committee says u pass go in"
they prob pass on your info to someone else - very likely the reviewing person saw your resume, OA and phone call notes for the first time all at once, alongside all the other candidates. i wouldn't stress too much about your phone call answers being the determining factor bc there are so many other things at play too!
toast senpai 🥺
(thank u )
nah mathworks just sucks like that