#Canadian looking for summer swe internships, can't get interviews at all

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

astral heart
#

Bump

undone glacier
#

Just write Expected: May 2025

#

Try to use XYZ when you can in your experience bullet points like your last bullet point in 2nd most recent internship

#

Project bulletpoints seem too wordy

#

Try to describe what the project does in less words/emphasize more on the skills you learned/used

#

Idt you need to say /4.0 since GPA is known to be /4.0

#

What’s “software construction”? Maybe try to use a more familiar class term

#

Maybe bold the dates

#

Why do you have those terms underlined?

#

I’m guessing the projects are underlined because they have links? Might not be obvious at first imo

#

Curious why you have Canadian citizen on there?

chilly skiff
#

is it not usually a question like 'are u legally entitled to work in canada' ?

#

I would take it off

undone glacier
#

I’d only put it on for those jobs tbh

astral heart
astral heart
simple tundra
#

Take this with a grain of salt but I got a quick resume review from a recruiter a few weeks ago and she specifically pointed out that resumes should have boldings on the tech stack and metrics / quantifiable impact

astral heart
astral heart
undone glacier
undone glacier
undone glacier
astral heart
#

Ok I implemented all of the suggestions above ❤️

astral heart
#

Bump

undone glacier
#

Bold expected: too

#

I feel GPA: 3.8 (Dean’s Honors List) would look better but that’s just my personal preference

#

Maybe for the last project you can say you achieved 3rd place in a bullet point (and bold it if you prefer) instead of beside the project tech? But both prob work

#

Otherwise seems much better now

undone glacier
#

Eh I don’t have anything bolded and I get responses

astral heart
astral heart
#

After suggestions:

undone glacier
undone glacier
brazen parcel
#

what kind of client specific challenge?

#

authenticated CRUD on db by lambda funcs?

rapid beacon
astral heart
# brazen parcel seems almost good but the first point of your first work exp is generic tho. idk

yeah idk what to put atm since it's still a little bit early. basically clients like profs and researchers ask for a software solution and we make it (for example, the invasive plant identification that i'm doing rn), but i haven't gotten to the aws portion of the app yet so that's why i just listed the services i'll use. once i implement the services i'll swap it for a more accurate description. do you think that's okay?