#New Grad, not hearing back
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
moved expr to the top just now, before it was education --> experience --> projects --> skills, but nothing worked so I decided to change it idk
Bro got amazon and apple on resume and ghosted. We are so doomed
nah tbf my GPA is dogshit
Should be Education -> Skills -> Experience -> Projects
Education on top if you're a student
Couple of weird things that may be tripping up ATS
- get rid of the team name after company name
- who graduates in march? put may or spring
I haven't applied with this resume yet, the previous one was Education --> Experience --> Skills --> Projects. An engineer reccomended I change it to this format cuz he says he doesn't give af ab school if I have experience
I am on quarter system, so I finish March
Your bullet points are janky and reek of GPT but it shouldn't matter since your resume says "Apple" and "Amazon"
; your resume is good. you not getting any callbacks is giving me chills
i see i see
idk if that applies to students.... usually the first filter is grad date but it's not hard to find the education section I guess
just nitpicking here
Actually I think most of these aren't chatGPT, I am just ass at english 💀
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL 💀
What's bad about the bulletpoints
it's fine it gets the point across
"engineered an efficient system" and "innovatively designed" sounds like something GPT would say
Nah I read on some blog that adding adjectives makes me sound smarter
no it makes it sounds like bullshit 🤣
better to have metrics
How do I make up metrics
And agree no need to go overboard on big adjectives, focus on your impact
don't have to make up, try to guesstimate your impact if you don't have exact metrics
Mhmm doesn't really apply to these projects tho
And get rid of the team name in front of company name... you might be fucking yourself with that
Yeah like how much did your apple thing improve stability by, etc...
when a bot filters by "Apple" and you have "Apple - bla bla bla bla bla"
I mean for amazon there was no visualizer and now there is, technically that is like 100% improvment
idk how smart the systems are but it may get tripped up
great 100% it is then
oh I see
Ok I will try adding in some metrics
But it just sounds very bullshit to me in my head but thats probably because ik its cap
And don't bold random shit it's kinda annoying to read
A recruiter told me she liked it cuz they look for keywords
yeah come up with a number and iterate until it makes sense
"proof of concept" is not a keyword
So shit like "improved readability by X%"
you can bold tech/frameworks
for example this bulletpoint right - Migrated frontend from Angular to React and implemented server authentication, improving system performance
and security
before there was no authentication at all, and because of that u actually couldn't make API calls. So if I said "improving system performance
and security by 100%" does that make sense? I feel like spamming 100% makes it sound like cap
what was the reason for migration in the first place?
OK I see
Because Angular package dependencies broke CSS
Modernized the frontend and engineered server authentication by migrating codebase from Angular to React and implemented SSL and OAuth components using Typescript to enable access to API service
idk something like this
those are two different things so you could separate
- Modernized frontend components and extended compatibility with CSS libraries by fascilitating codebase migration (100+ components) from Angular to React
- Enabled interoperability with API service by engineering server authentication using SSL/OAuth in Typescript
for example
you fill the details
I see
thanks
this is a mouthful huh
Enabled interoperability by authenticating the API Gateway using Amazon authentication which required creating new domains in Route53 and implementing CORS in the frontend, CDK, and Lambda.
Is it above 3.3?
no lol
This is too much just focus on the authentication piece and for the rest just say "AWS"
this doesnt read well or make sense