#stonks
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
Biased towards the rich
Typo
When I sold before hours on Thursday it was already sharply declining
From a peak of like 500
15% unexplained decline was enough for me to sell
And I feel that my sale may have led to a very significant drop in price
Sold but came back up, everyone was saying hold for the same reason you’re saying it now
I’m still buying back in
There’s 2 reasons why ppl are buying
To make a profit
To stick it to the institutions
If you fall under the 2nd be willing to lose all your money and risk only enough you’re willing to take
This type of stuff will continue to happen as the institutions aren’t trying to go down without a fight
The weird thing was that it happened literally hours before robinhood made the announcement
And typically institutions can move the price
Which leads me to believe that some institutions may have had insider information
Just a conspiracy theory
But a possible explanation
I’m just saying if your plan is to hold til the end don’t invest more than you’re willing to lose
Or else you’ll end up selling
It doesn’t matter if you bought back in, selling to begin with allowed funds to cover their shorts
That’s why short float dropped from 140 to 113%
There’s nothing wrong with selling but it’s super hypocritical to tell ppl to hold now when you sold in the past, especially since you’re saying your sale significantly impacted the market and potential for this whole squeeze
im buying back in for that reason
i have no idea how much impact my sale had (said it half jokingly)
it honestly was a panic sale
and the whole hold mentality really came to me after the robinhood thing
it only gave me more motivation to buy back in
its been a day and three quarters since my sale
mentality completely changed after the whole robinhood thing
im buying back in and very much encouraging it
buy and hold!
CNBC's Jim Cramer on Friday complimented the retail traders who helped spark the massive run up in GameStop shares, but advised they take their profits now. Subscribe to CNBC PRO for access to investor and analyst insights: https://cnb.cx/2Vtntx6
CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Friday complimented the retail traders who helped spark the massive run-up in...
Such a loser
I think gme will go to 500 by the end of next week
Even more
Anyone else trying to pump up dogecoin even more?
There’s gonna be some drastic changes in the system
The markets will become more democratized
The little guy will become the king
Citadel will die
This will become the new normal
The owners of the market will start to shift
And we, CS majors, are gonna be the ones to start it
We’re gonna build new systems and create new types of funds that actually help people
We’re gonna build a democratized trading platform
What stocks will we long next?
We have the right ideas
Need to get our voices in front of millions of ppl
We could have a serious influence
Guess we could share our ideas in servers with hundreds of thousands of ppl and wsb
Honest question should I post this on wsb an doxx myself?
The concerns are security related
But I could really start the beginning of a new thing
I miss the old WSB the straight to the go WSB
@gusty totem has entered the community.
did wsb triple in suscribers
i had to unsuscribe
is it even class warfrae
ppl trying to frame it as a revolution lol
hedge funds making money off of gme too you know
ppl are gonna be absolutely fuarked after this
yesterday i saw a tiktok where this dude was teaching people how to sell naked puts on robinhood
Wow, @winged locust just joined! Who brought the cake?!
They aren’t really harming anyone but themselves though. Other than the firms that had short positions they had to cover like Melvin, hedge funds are basically exclusively winning off of this.
💎 👐 💎 👐 💎 👐
this
this
@unreal quest stop 🧻 👐 xd
glad ur back in tho :D
I mean many probably are
volume was way lower thursday/friday then it was earlier in the week
Have no fear, @regal ore is here!
Tweeting for the first time in 6 years to say what the fuck
54359
576389

One share??????
One fucking share??????
That’s ant stuff
Who do they fucking think we are
They’ve lost nearly all our trust
And we all know how poorly they’re doing financially
Robinhood literally doesn’t have the cash to cover orders
Hence the emergency funding
But it will be gone in no time
We cannot trust a company that can’t even maintain proper reserves.
They need to be prepared for things like this
Robinhood never had the volume of a real broker. They were never in a position to handle things like this, so they can’t be trusted
Fidelity and vanguard have been around for decades and are too big to fail. Something like this will not affect them. They’re also major holders of gme
Fidelity has trillions under management
Robinhood needed a credit loan for $500 million
Probably at a very high interest rate
When we build this app, we can partner with fidelity to facilitate trades, and the value provided will be the ui (realistically, they’re users are boomers and they can’t really make such a drastic change)
fidelity has an app already.
It’s dogshit
It’s pretty much just the website
just use that app if that's your plan. otherwise you're just adding expense
It’s very unintuitive
And hard for new users
That’s the biggest benefit Robinhood provides
But when I signed up for etrade, they threw all the information at me. It was complicated, but at least they’re not hiding anything. Robinhood is dumbing things down and hiding a lot of stuff
there's a huge cost tradeoff of having fees/no fees for trades, especially if you're doing your own clearing. Also, they're not exactly dumbing things down. They offer limited kinds of trades and minimal extra information so that it can be intuitive (though less informed)
sure after many years of not being free and having huge industry connections
Commission free trading is a very new thing
Everyone has gone commission free in the past few years
the reason flow is sent to hft for a lot of brokers now is to help cover clearing costs with no broker fees
exactly
They just weren’t able to figure out how to do it before this
basically because robinhood offered it and they wanted to stay competetive with customers
If they’re doing their own clearing, then they’re more trustworthy. They have all the internal information and communication gaps shouldn’t be a problem
If robinhood and their clearing house had a communication gap, that’s a huge problem
clearing isn't free though. and you have to cover cost differences between trades .
if I agree to buy for X
and someone else agrees to sell for Y and we're the "closest" prices for whatever algo they use
Fidelity makes money by earning interest in their aum I think
How do they offer it for free?
What’s the catch
they have to cover the cost difference so that I can actually pay X and they can get Y
They have 3 trillion aum
At a very conservative 1% return, that’s 30 billion
The cost to cover the trades isn’t anywhere near that
they have way more funds and when trading less volume with lower volatility things, you can easily break even or profit on average
With that much aum this won’t break them
robinhood had highest volume of gme and is a smaller startup
Clearing trades probably costs hundreds of millions of dollars. Robinhood doesn’t have that
not a huge established firm
That’s nothing to fidelity
sure, that's the difference between a new(er) startup and a well-established large business
your app will be much smaller than robinhood if you make it (until it "catches on" if that ever even happens)
The extra $500m probably in clearing fees was enough to break robinhood. Fidelity wouldn’t even have to tap into their reserves to handle that
That’s why I’d be partnering with fidelity
Or vanguard
Since they can be trusted
you still have to pay clearing fees though
you need the capital to do that whether or not you self clear
trust isn't really the problem here
to trade with no limit on volume and no fees even in volatile markets, you need huge backing capital and minimal other costs due to efficient and effective infrastructure
fidelity did raise their margin costs on various kinds of trades, so it's not like they did nothing to limit sells and buys of options
wallstreet bets bought a fkn billboard
The value add would probably be selling them the UI
what the fuck
they just were secure enough with a smaller volume of trades through them and more capital that they didn't need to halt entirely
Which they could acquire
A better UI would drastically increase their customer base
And they’d have more money that they’d be earning interest off of
To handle this
Robinhood could never afford be a major player
Unless they reached trillions aum
they could over time
likely
but sure not in a sudden huge burst above what they can handle
none of your ideas address ways you would/could become a major player either, though you mention doing exactly that and changing the market. Just now you've seemingly switched to hoping to be acquired by fidelity, or work for them to help them improve their product?
Your definition of trusted seems to amount to "has tons of money". The little player will need to make more restrictions in order to stay afloat in volatile markets. They'll seeming only be "trustworthy" if they have no restrictions. This is only possible when they have tons of money and risk their own capital in crazy volume+volatility conditions no matter what.
58 <<< 178, I think u misunderstood that post
No it’s quite low
In comparison to other days
It’s definitely a red flag
I mean yeah it’s much higher than it normally is
But it shows that people are backing away from it
That big of a drop in a single day definitely says something
Volume was high (in comparison) on the days price went up
Bro u really don’t read huh, “on even less volume than Wednesday”
2 paragraphs above the highlighted sentence
You said “they didn't say it was low in compairson, 58 itself is being considered low”
And literally in the pic they compare the volumes
#stonks message
Is the message with the pic
By comparing Thursday’s to Wednesday’s
the highlighted text in the pic says it's too low to cover short positions
which is what ^ was saying
it's not too low to cover them
sure. I was was just trying to clarify since y'all were literally arguing about different things
The short ratio is even higher now
Isn’t it like 250 now
It’s still insanely high
It can’t stay that high
I have a hard time believing him on a judgement when he misinterpreted one of the original premises of the pic
Based on all the sentiments on wsb it’s gonna continue to go up
That’s a wrong number that’s total % float I believe
It’s still over 100 tho
Will the short interest go down?
It can’t stay this high
And when it happens will it continue to skyrocket
Wsb says it will keep going up
wsb says lots of things over their history lol
Everyone is saying hold
They’ve been right over the past 9 months
The sentiment is buy and hold
Right now
No ones backing out
not every time. folks post their losses there pretty often
Short squeeze hasn’t even happened yet
If everyone’s buying and holding it can only go up
they are indeed saying buy and hold right now, sure
It’s a mob mentality
It’s implied because they did the comparison 2 paragraphs before that’s just reading comprehension at that point lol
Plus deepfuckingvalue not selling will encourage everyone to hold
He’s literally the one who started this
Without him this wouldn’t have happened
Hundreds of thousands of people on there are buying and selling
That’s what all the comments are reflecting
Here’s the other thing
These funds continued to load up on shorts
Even as the price was exploding
Should we do puts?
Or will it keep going up
Do u think it will crash back down to like $10?
Still could make a huge amount of money on puts
Personally I don’t want to do puts
Cuz it’s against my values
We only want it to go up
Based on recent data they’re not exiting
Shorts
dw we'll see plenty of losses in the coming months 
When
From it going up or down
If the mob mentality sticks the number of losses won’t be high
all people who bought above a price it's not going to meet again are at a loss.
The price can't literally go up forever. no matter what the max price is, eventually it'll peak.
Also, all people who short(ed) it at a price below whatever it ends up at by their expiry if they haven't closed out their position while it was below that price.
like it's possible it'll go back up if more people keep buying, but there's a finite amount, and you can only buy what people sell. If you get in at a really high price, and it doesn't go higher because people stop wanting to buy as much at that price or literally can't buy at that price, then the price goes down and you have losses
Will it go back down to pennies
but it'll go much lower than hundred(s) of dollars
Wsb doesn’t care care about its intrinsic value
sure, but they're not gonna buy forever
every fad ends eventually
this has a finite lifespan
The trend is gonna continue
for some time sure
People will continue to drive up shorter stocks
The idea of meme stocks isn’t dying
but not forever for gme
Now crypto is exploding
They’ll find another stock
There’s other small cap crypto’s
of course it isn't dying, but firms probably won't publish their short positions anymore, and will probs be more conservative about them
Aren’t they required by law to publish them
If it’s public they have to share this information with the Sec
Since they’re a public company
As a buyer of the stock you have a right to know this information
It’s just hard to find
they won't publish a huge report saying why the stock is overvalued due to its funadamentals
is what I mean by not publish
It was dfv who exposed this
He saw this in the filings
yeah but this was a common thing. doing that will be less common in the future most likely
They wouldn’t have done this had he not brought it up
Why do u hate it?
Look what it allowed us to do
Over the past few days
The content right now helped me
Well yeah it quadrupled in size
People who didn't care about stonks before mostly won't care about stonks after
The top posts tho
Like dfv
That’s what people will listen to
The fact that it quadrupled says something
The negative posts get 0 upvotes
The more positive posts the more ppl will buy in
Dfv posting this encouraged ppl to buy
The entire sub is buy and hold
I'm sure the wsb OGs love that random people are pumping the stock now.
guys lets start a pump and dump scheme
A bunch of useful idiots who are definitely going to lose their shirts.
bunch of GENIUS cs majors from TOP universities tell you which are the BEST tech stocks to buy in 2021
tbh blockbuster was a good one to get in on lol
fully liquidated teeny prices up 740% on either thursday or wednesday
it started being pumped along with GME but with fewer people
I fully bought into it
I made $80 on the dogecoin pump and dump 😎
Gme?
I hat would happen if someone tried to place a very large order?
Like millions
On blockbuster
they couldn't get it all filled
So u need the mob mentality to pump a stock then?
they wouldn't get most of their shares and the price would balloon to match
but no one would buy at the new price since you have all the shares
not exactly what I said
What would it take to pump it?
Blockbuster
To turn it into another gme
Why did ppl want gme then?
What traction did it have
It was still a small market cap
Like 200m
At the time
Could this be done to very small stocks?
Would we be able to pump a penny stock
Or does no one want them
Is that happening with gme?
there was no misleading info
Ppl advertising to buy
it was jsut memes and posting positions
And then selling
or like "GME is gonna make a huge comeback with electronic game sales and be the next huge company"
Would it only be illegal if someone with inside info did it?
yes that's insider trading
Then how did dfv pump it up then?
if they trade based on secrets they know
Everyone was calling him an idiot
What did he convince ppl of?
Well how did he convince ppl to buy it
he didn't directly
When everyone was calling him an idiot
he posted his positions and why he bought in
ya that's up to them
and also it was funny to read
but market value reflects what happens, so if a bunch of people buy into something liquid it'll affect the price
Well no one bought into it until he came along
no one bought into it until a year after he firrst came along
dfv had a large position since 2019
What was their reasoning?
Cohen was a large shareholder
Right
When they acquired him
So he wasn’t an insider
But what convinced them to buy gme over any other random company? How would a company with such a small market cap even get on their radar
How did they discover GameStop
When all of the info was buried in Sec filings
they kept getting reminded of it by dfv, and a few people bought in with each post. with the shorts, the value went up a little, then more people bought in, this drove value up, etc. etc.
it was momentum after a point
higher value made more people wanna buy in
but random chance and people just gambling hoping dfv was right at first
melvin had the opposite thought, thinking gamestop was way over-valued and will soon go bankrupt
that's why they shorted
they could be entirely right, but in the short term, people that bought in early last week or around then made huge profits on the pump
Would it have happened without Cohen and burry?
Did dfv have any influence on them?
I think that was just an analogous situation, not any direct cause of this
there's not necessarily any way to know without them saying that explicitly. idk if that happened
random buyers there at first that saw dfv's position from his posts
So without dfv this wouldn’t have happened
a lot laughed. maybe a few bought in
probably not, unless someone else did something similar
gamestop's company value is not intrinsic to what happened
that was a lot more due to bandwagoning and social presure
Well did Cohen buying in have a significant impact on the price
Since it was a pretty large order
the sheer volume of buys is probably the main thing responsible for the price
idk how big his order was, but there were a lot of little buys that started the price increase
others bought in as it went up
noting the short interest and posting it also probably got some people to buy
Was the volume significantly lower?
Before dfv
dfv himself didn't add a giant volume as far as I'm aware (but I'm not the most well informed)
he just had a largish position
initially
It was seven digits a few weeks ago
Now it’s 8 or 9
So yeah volume increased significantly
what's total number of GME shares?
Do calls have any direct impact
yeah
70m
any sort of trade has an impact
He bought 50000 contracts
50000 shares
Through contracts and normal purchases
Is 50k/70m enough time have a significant impact?
That’s .07% of the total company
so had contracts on only a small amount of the total shares. his contracts alone didn't drive up the price
He owns 50k shares
people buying in after seeing his position did
50k shares is a small total amount though
like big compared to any average person
but small compared to total number of shares
it didn't over the course of the year he had them
move the share price much
the price change was when people finally bought in
combined with the short position
This summer the prices were at the minima
he had a lot of value as the price started to climb
but the number of shares he had contracts on likely didn't change the price themselves since he just had them and held them for so long
yeah
and after
they just got a much bigger short position recently
AND
a lot more people bought in
those two together are roughly speaking "why" the price started skyrocketing
The price was near 50 around 2014
And 15 in 2019
It hit $5 in summer 2020
So it was clearly on a decline
yeah
Was that the funds shorting it?
and eventually it'll probs be a penny stock
that's the fact that it has very low value as a business
shorting it basically increases the price
if anything
they make money whent he price goes down
but don't "cause" the price to go down
Why was it declining
game stop is brick and mortar retailer
and games are more and more often online
bought on marketplace for consoles and on steam or amazon
etc
probably have been shorting it for a long while
perhaps not in quite as large positions
but probs no way to know exactly when they started
it definitely happens
140 is outrageous
it's not that unsual for a heavily shorted stock
Over 100?
it can easily go to 200+
yeah the actual share of stock doesn't know it's been shorted, so the same share can keep getting borrowed and sold at margin
Well did the shorts fule this situation?
Was it cuz it was fundamentally undervalued
Or cuz hedge funds were shorting
file?
*fuel
hedge funds shorted it because they thought it was fundamentally overvalued
dfv bought in because he though it was undervalued and that it would go up
We can agree that it was undervalued at $5
and for the meme since he like gme
no if they'll be out of business soon. probably yes if they bounce back and get a better online market share
They have no debt and their sales were quite respectable
if they go out of business the share price will drop to basically 0
they're closing lots of stores and have been for a while
yeah, that's why I said basically
Their revenue has been in the billions
like fractions of a cent
yeah they're still in business and making money
what's their profit?
(revenue - costs of operations (e.g. employes, website maintenance, store rent, etc.))
They lost $18M on $1B in revenue
It’s been +/- $30M
In recent quarters
Either lost or made that much
Actually they’ve had much larger losses
anyway short is basically just the bet that revenue, and with it also share price, will go down in the future.
During the summer they lost over $100M
Despite profits in the billions
Something is going on here
Why can’t they make a profit on $6B in revenue
They’ve been in the business for decades
stores and employees and other operations cost too much
you have to keep paying rent for your stores
And even amazon is making money
and your employees if they're working
that doesn't stop unless you close stores and fire folks
Would u say a company is worth anything if it’s making a lot of revenue but operating at a loss?
Is it salvageable in that case?
amazon has record number of people buying stuff online
$6B in revenue is not a trivial sum
covid has been PERFECT for them
no, but they have tons of stores to pay rent at, and employees to pay wages/salaries, and website hosting costs, and more
With that type of user base they could possibly afford to raise prices
if they get a much better online platform and shift to thatr, and it's successful, then yes they can bounce back
if not, then they'll probs go out of business
Do u believe it was undervalued at $5?
over time
idk tbh
I can speak to general trends and how finance and markets and stuff work in general, but I don't know about particular values if they're actually good or bad
so businesses can use debt in previous years as a tax write off for future years when they profit
If they profit
so like
-100M one year
and
+100M next year
is net zero and they have no taxes
gamestop could do something similar if they became profitable again
The shorts were a bad decision from the start
There’s no way it was overvalued at $5
was it shorted when it was $5?
That was an awful decision on Melvins part
may well have been shorted later than that
They definitely shorted around that time
What makes you think so?
I'm not sure how one would tell that other than speculation
Shorts can definitely cause a stock to be undervalued based on the volume of shorts
if the price is really low, it's not a greta idea to short since there's no cap to losses and you can only profit at most what you put in minus the borrowing fees
Basically what’s happening now w gme but reverse
Based on price dynamics
The fact that it was continuing to go down
And what I’ve read on wsb
It’s only implied tho
prices are fundamentals mixed with faith. they can assume what they want. I think the price could also have just happened to go down. There's no way to know for sure
current price is all faith in what other people are doing
There are ways to guess the price
ya ofc. that's how firms/ or even retail traders trading make money is by modelling and successfully predicting
And be right a good percentage of the time
But it’s not something the average person can do
but to say becasue the price went down there must have been a huge short position is misleading
The fundamentals are quite convoluted
Like dfv used public info
Anyone could have done this
It wouldn’t have been easy to
But yeah knowing the power of wsb this can definitely happen again
anyone can do most trading
We just need to find more companies that are fundamentally undervalued
Anyone can become rich trading
Most ppl don’t know how
the advantage of a large firm is the infrastructure making it easier to model and apply models against historical bases. It's largely with public information or information that's for sale tho
only if they all do something
Combined that’s billions of dollars worth of purchasing power
I don't think his goal is to lead a mob.
He’s in a position where his opinions matter
And can move the price of a stock
Maybe not
But it is something he can do
and I think it'll be short lived, especially if people start losing money
which, when the price comes back down for GME, a lot of people will
It went up 400%
After he sent the tweet
Doge went up 1400% in a single day
Yeah
But significantly higher than it was before
It’s now at $.02
It was at a fraction of a cent
Thursday
The price went up 400% after he sent the tweet
Also signal
He tweeted out use signal
And the price of an unrelated company went up
Like 10000%
That was definitely him
He can move markets
If he tweets out any stock name it will move the price significantly
That’s the power of the mob mentality
When you have so many people looking up to one thing
Whether it be elon or wsb
the price of an australian GME (not gamestop) went up because people were just jumping on the GME hype train
same with the nottingham Robinhood being negatively reviewed.
mob is powerful, but like it's literally all just short-lived fads and side-effects, no lasting change
The thing is they’ve built up a community of 4 million people
That’s very powerful
Do retail traders even have significant impacts on stocks?
yeah but less powerful than funds that can just NLP wsb in addition to everythign else they look at
Has robinhood fueled stocks
Or is it institutions
Why?
It can pick up the general sentiment
I’m sure hedge funds do it
They’ll scan Elon’s tweets and place orders in milliseconds
I’m sure they’ll buy whenever Elon tweets something
trying vs succeeding is different. some places can still use it to find signal, if they do enough trades, even 51% accuracy is great for their profits
I'm conflating the two. Sometimes I'm shitty with words
Well don’t they try to pick up the news within seconds
Milliseconds
Before retail buys
So they can get the best price
that's hft quants
Okay there’s quant and traditional hedge funds
actual human traders cannot execute trades nearly that quickly
Traditional hedge funds are dead right
Yeah they control like 90% of the market
Right
So they can pretty much move the price to whatever they want
The market is worth trillions
Hedge funds are worth billions
that's different
no individual fund is
able to move the market that much without making huge arbitrage opportunities
Hedge funds compete with each other
They even compete within the fund
So Blackrock can move markets
But it’s probably not in a single account
Do most funds do that
It’s much easier to get a large return on a small account
blackrock has lots of investments in lots of places. for example they have the largest shares of goldman and several other firms if I recall right
Can a single institution move a stock?
That’s not a penny stock
Like can they move Apple
if they did hugely, they open up a huge arbitrage opportunity for others to take advantage of
usually this is a bad idea, so they try to avoid it even if they have funds to do it
Can’t hft pick it up
Who can access dark pools?
How are they even legal
It’s hiding information
From the public
Are it’s competitors easily able to pick up on strategies
With their technology
Is the reason these funds win cuz of their technology
The markets are a zero sum game
When someone wins someone has to lose
There’s gotta be losing hedge funds
scale and infrastructure are big parts of its.
People investing based on emotion or hunches are less precise and wrong more often than math
Sometimes they’re right
and being able to apply that at scale with good testing is a net win usually
sometimes they are
for basically any stock, if a lot of people buy relative to available trading volume, the price will go up
if everyone sells shares at once and lots of people have shares, then price will go down
Well are there any single institutions that can move a 2 trillion stock
Do they ever coordinate with each other
most of blackrock e.g. is peoples 401ks
Different hedge funds
Don’t different hedge funds hide from each other
Well for for every hedge fund that wins one must lose
not exactly, but sort of. Two people can both "win" off an individual trade if they look at it as part of their whole portfolio
The number of shares doesn’t
Unless the company issues new ones
So it grows by ppl raising the price?
Of the shares
Where does the extra money come from?
actual company value
buyers and sellers
when they agree on a price they bid, that's the "value" at that moment of a share
yeah
the price on the ticker is basically like average of last few moments' bids
Well there will be buyers and sellers who set drastically different prices
At the same time
right and they won't be able to buy/sell, or they will and the clearing house/broker can profit depending on the direction of the difference in bids
oof
@unreal quest there's a lot of great info out there and you seem really excited to learn about this. Might be worth reading up some books, or checking out some actual resources to get a better idea for how the overall market works and trading strategy than just reading wsb and asking Qs here.
And they’re doing this on purpose
I heard it was cuz the dtcc raised the collateral
From 2 to 100
And clearing houses didn’t have the cash
Why did dtcc raise the collateral requirement then?
Was it necessary
For them to do this?
Are they responsible for this whole shitshow
And could it have been avoided
my current understanding is that given the volume on robinhood at the time and general volatility, it was unavoidable for rh to halt and it was basically due to regulations in place, and avoiding losing all their money
Does robinhood use apex anyways?
don't they normally raise collatoral requirement in volatile markets?
Apex and dtcc are two different clearing houses
whether or not they use apex, they need to settle trades and have collatoral on hand
even if they use their own clearing house
for the clearing house to stay afloat, it needs to either have the cash on hand, or pass on the risk
That’s why fidelity was able to keep it up
They have their own clearing house
And they have the money to handle this
they raised margins on all their options too
just didn't lead to a trading halt
they had a smaller volume traded through them though than robinhood
robinhood had the bulk of wsb
and new folks that joined in on the hype
but also yes, fidelity are more established and have more capital on hand likely
Even if they did see the same volume robinhood saw it wouldn’t be a problem for them
Since they would have had the cash to cover it
we can't guarantee that's true
Are we sure there was no collusion here
it could be, but I don't think we can say that with certainty
no I'm not sure 100%
I’m still not convinced that robinhood didn’t collude with citadel
There are so many holes here
but it is believable that it was solely reasonable decisions that led to it
Something just doesn’t seem right
It likely played a part
Will the investigation be able to determine whether it occurred
Or could they hide it easily
We'll see I guess. tbh I think they're in the clear for the class actions due to their clearing costs and also that it was in their terms of service
but maybe we'll learn there was collusion
can't know for sure yet
If there was collusion then there’s definitely gonna be penalities
Even if the clearing costs were a reason
I’m sure both played a role
The way that ceo spoke was just so off
If it was truly cuz of clearing costs he would have just said it and be done with it
maybe. could have also been stress running around all day trying to get hundreds of millions of dollars of loans to cover costs, and not sure how to most clearly explain what was going on
a lot fell on his shoulders to try to keep things running as smoothly as possible despite unprecedented trading at/above capacity and available costs.
The fact that hundreds of millions of dollars was enough to shut it down is a red flag
A broker needs billions in rainy day funds
To cover things like this
no no
thye needed hundreds of millions more
not just to have that amount at all
and a broker can only function at the scale it has
An extra $100M expense shouldn’t be a problem for robinhood
Fidelity could cover that without blinking an eye
That’s why new brokers are a terrible idea
fidelity has been around for a long time
and when it started it was the only one with no fees
which is what attracted a big user base in combination with tons of ads
but it also has the fewest analysis tools and special kinds of trades offered
so it all comes with a trade off
What types of special trades
usability vs overall utility
To set a margin rate that low means they needed the cash to pay for trades
That cash had to come from somewhere
you can set up lots of complicated logic for automating kinds of trades and correlated things with some other brokers
Doesn’t that mean that robinhood needed the cash
not nearly as much with robinhood
To cover the loans
no not in general use
only in this rare instance with WAY more flow than usual
mostly on things that are WAY more volatile than usual trades
the combination of both is part of what made this so hard for them to continue allowing buys
Well I guess this was a valuable lesson to the market as a whole
We can’t just make limited trades a new normal
this isn't the first time a short squeeze has happened, but it's the first time a tiny broker has had most of the volume of trade run through it
if anything it should tell retail investors to be more careful about what broker they're using if they're just jumping on a hype train that's concentrated in a single small broker
If fidelity can improve their UI they’ll be the new normal
Robinhood is fine for $1000 accounts
People were making so much money on this that they couldn’t handle it
there's a psychological switching cost for a lot of users to actually move once they're all set up on robinhood.
fidelity already offers a lot more features and good things than robinhood
the UI is partially hard because there's so much there in comparison. But, it could definitely improve a lot
If you think you're up for the job, you could always apply to fidelity
I’m an entrepreneur mainly
That’s why I’m seriously now considering trying to sell software to fidelity
Many of us came up with the idea that we need a new platform
I think you'll have a tough time with that unless you have a seriously polished product. there's a LOT of back end in any app like that and it needs to fully integrate for them
Yeah it’s gonna take some time.
And many conversations with them
But I think we can at least get started now
Now I have the cash to put up for this as a result of my winning trades
Is the idea you'd be like consulting with them building the product then?
because they do have an app that I'm sure they already employ folks to work on
so like
it's probably not in their interest to just start consulting on a completely different app
as opposed to hiring IC or employees to just work on improving the existing app
They really just need more visualizations they have like none
Most of their customers are boomers
Who don’t mind the terrible visualization
So it’s probably not even on their mind
But making a drastic shift is pretty hard for such a company
Which is why acquisitions make sense
In certain cases
And this is a very recent trend
Everyone used robinhood before this
Now there’s gonna be a huge switch
To fidelity
acquisitions require you to already have something that's worth their purchase.
I think by the time this is ready, most people will be back on robinhood
like until you've built it and have agreements with fidelity there's no product.
but by the time it's worth using, a lot of people will be back on robinhood. This product, unless it is fidelity will have the same issues as robinhood but more since it's smaller
Fidelity and Webull getting a lot of new customers
if you actually want to make a new UI for fideltity, your best bet is just working for them. They're already growing their userbase because of this
i have a feeling fidelity's stack is the biggest monolithic cluster fuck ever
Do u guys think robinhood is ever coming back?
some of the menus in their sign up pages don't even scale properly, i have a 1440p monitor and it's just like, it literally stays the same size
and there's a ton of white space
Their interview process told you right away they don’t focus that much on tech 🤣
almost definitely I'd bet
lmao yeah but you'd think they'd at least try to modernize their UI from fucking 1998
that wouldn't surprise me
The integration can be done in about a year
Maybe even less
I have the cash to hire the developers now
i interviewed for them and tried to ask the guy like "oh what kinda microservices do you guys use" and he just dodged the question
mans is ballin 👀
This is biggest issue they pay like 65k in not so low cost areas
Fidelity?
Yeah
I can pay tech salaries
I will pay a competitive salary
Then it gets acquired and everyone gets a nice chunk of the pie
if it gets acquired Their salaries might tell you how much they value this atm
Why doesn’t fidelity focus on tech?
But even anything they said a week ago isn’t relevant anymore
Now that they’re gonna see a drastic uptick in the number of users
I will try to get a call with them
To discuss this
their core user base still won't be this new influx of users from robinhood
And see if there’s any interest
it's boomers who have their life savings invested in their IRA accounts
it's not how they make most of their money probably. also hot take tech salaries are super inflated imo,and they just aren't contributing to that as much as big N
like i have a feeling, even if fidelty comes out and updates their UI (which i doubt cus they'd probably have to rewrite their whole ass monolithic stack), they would probably leave the legacy UI in for their boomer users
If most ppl are leaving robinhood, where will they go now?
Yeah they can have both
i mean there's more than just fidelity
i'm just saying they won't suddenly replace
or make up 50% of fidelity's userbase now
there's plenty of boomers who have been trading on it way way way before the iphone even existed
Webull getting a fair share imo from exodus as well
they make up a huge percentage
They’re probably gonna see millions of new users
plus most retail investors have a lot less money than boomer 401k and investment accoutns that have compounded for years
this is potential but not a guarantee. it's still a risk for them if they sink money into it
could be great for them and you and they both win big
so go for it if you want
but like it's not a guarantee for them so it's very possible they say no
Yeah I’ll see what they say
I just wanna get a feel first
Before making any assumptions
also, it'll help to understand their current features and what's done if you had a strong foundation in the market''s inner workings and maybe some general trading strategies
it's worth reading a book or watching a course or something
or a few
lmk if you want some recs on either video series or some books
just jumped on the hype train and won
yeah and congrats for that
yeah would appreciate it
any recommendations?
Can I dm you some?
Yeah thanks
If Elon tweets buy GameStop the price will surge
We’re gonna start our own market
I seriously believe that democratized finance is the future
I might be able to get to 1b
With puts
Yeah
Just need to 5x my investment
I mentioned it here
Far up in the chat possibly
Sure someone could explain
theres too much to read lmao
He has almost 200m
His kids' kids are set for life lol
More than that now
wait does that shit not get taxed
I won’t get taxed
how dat work
tax evasion 
And I’m reaching out to charities to see what I can do
It’s not tax evasion
It’s done all the time
What other plays?
200m, how much did u start with holy
Business losses are legitimate tax deductions
Shares? Mid 200s?
Yeah
So what're you up to now
210
I bought gme $300 calls yesterday
When it was in the 200s
Now it’s 325
If it stays above $325 it’s a win
Nice! I would have to sell shares to buy any calls at its current price, or deposit more but it wouldn't necessarily be there in time
$100 calls
Nah GME is built different
At like 10 cents or whatever
Gme isn’t hard to predict
Other than the robinhood shitshow
Had the robinhood shitshow not happened it could continue to rocket
Everyone is saying hold on
Mob mentality
It hit a low of like $120 on Thursday
Now it’s back above $300
$132 at 11:30am on Friday
I sold before hours that day
After the price had declined from like $500 to $430
A 15% loss was enough to make me want to sell
Really thought we weren’t going to go beyond $500
And now I feel really bad about what I did
mans went from 200k -> 200m what a legend
Dfv is a bigger legend
He did like the same thing
But he risked everything he had
haven't you been trading for like a week
Yeah
Had he sold is $12 calls on Friday
And bought $100 calls
He may have been a billionaire
he got diamond hands
He didn’t blink an eye when it hit its low point
i wish i had the funds for calls lmao
Friday was a Golden time to buy
lol $100 calls a week ago for 10c
When $100 calls were worth pennies
im weak
10-20 cents
thats what like 100 bucks for a option
Something like that
Options prices take into account volatility
Now they’re obviously much higher
When the price was still in the double digits
for historical options prices look at this site
Optionistics
1/22
Sold them on the 28th
They were gonna expire anyways
It’s next day
It was an ah trade
We’re gonna keep wsb up
We won’t let it die
How are things going for you?
Will u be allowed to trade when u start work?
Or do they have restrictions
Where r u working btw?
oh, not citadel
idk, its just that im feeling incredible anger towards citadel
They own almost a percent of it
The whole worlds view of hedge funds
Bought and sold ah
Yeah
I bought some more yesterday
Tho
Cuz I still have a lot of faith in gme
The short interest is still well over 100
I still don’t have direct access to the money. I can partially control the trades but the account is still my parents
The goal is to get it to $1000
And this will require the collective effort of wsb
@unborn whale has just slid into the community.
DTCC is the clearing house for equities, apex and others are just like a front end
theres literally a formula that they use to calculate it
How come they need two layers of clearing houses?
What’s the point of apex then
What do they do
FREEZE! @marsh star has entered the room.


