#Serena's predicament
1 messages Ā· Page 1 of 1 (latest)
haha i like the thread name!
But if you feel like you've been making gradual progress and it's been a year already, why doesn't the business already know enough about its userbase?
Your knowledge of the user should be growing with every hypothesis you test.
Each design you create and pit against your audience IS research.
very true and we do learn a bit each time but i feel like it's not enough
there's still a lot i don't know and itching to learn
For sure. But it's more important to focus on what you did learn if those learnings have helped focus your time toward meaningful progress to further answer questions that you have, to dig deeper.
All the knowing your user bits will develop as a consequence to that
Again, simply doing surface level research and asking questions in times of uncertainty in reality leads to not great answers
Like you already have a basis by which to continue testing
That's not something to be taken for granted
And if you do in fact see some stickiness in certain things you're working through, then that's worth exploring further
maybe im not patient enough? isn't it a shame that i've been here for a year doing a bunch of designs/features and i still don't fully understand the user?
it is shameful i say!
I've been working startups for a long, long time
and that's why i'm having this problem š
And there is always more to know about the people you serve but more importantly the things that they're trying to get done
And 80% of that learning comes from experiments. Trying stuff and seeing what works. Some of it is real bad.
That's reality
And I currently work at a 250 person startup
true but what about efficiency? you don't think taking just a bit of time to do research will save money and time in the long run? like i'll be able to design more productively and we'll have faster progress
it takes a toll on the engineering team too build and experiment everything
oh interesting! do you guys prioritize understanding the user at your startup? or is it still very much like what we're talking about right now
We understand our users through a lot of different channels. Sales, CX, CS. It's not that common for Design to be engaging with clients directly. That's more a function of Product.
Along with data platforms
But
You are a single designer
You do what needs to be done
Doing research as a sole designer with such a small sample size
How accurate of a picture do you think you'll have of your user?
Compared to the work that you're testing
it'll be more accurate than it is now and that's what im striving for
so you think the PM should know the user better than the product designer?
yes
im so confused
i thought product designers are the most user centric ones
like we're called ux designers for a reason right?
"user experience"!!
ehhh. i dont think user centricity is a.. uh, thing.
its more like
what metrics matter the most to whom
lol prototype i remember our previous convo
š
like with your software for CEO's, is the CEO using it? or is the company the CEO runs using it?
There is no such thing as being "most user-centric"
Everyone on the team is user centric from their own PoV
usability as a metric matters the most to the designer
Yes
but isn't part of usability knowing the user
potentially
but whats the delta from knowing if just human beings can use it?
and what do you gain by having a smaller delta
but is it so wrong for design to want to talk to clients so that they can better emphasize with them?
we need empathy!!
if you ask Brian " what is your favorite color?" do you know Brian? Do you know who he is as a person? his life goals? what makes him anxious?
No. You know what his favorite color is.
Usability is only an aspect of the user and that is only a small piece of the pie a designer might have.
right now i just feel like my designs don't have as much empathy as it could
you guys are right about the usability thing but i want to go back to empathy
i cant believe pms should know the user more than the designer
Ok I'll bite. Describe what you mean when you say your designs don't have as much empathy.
like i cant step into the shoes of the user to know what they want from the design (or from the feature im designing)
i don't have the context
for example, what piece of info do they value more than the other? knowing that will let me better design with that content hierarchy in mind
sorry I was eating
I can feel that, I guess I wonder why you think that talking to a user will help you understand what piece of information is the most valuable if you can't already infer that from what they're trying to accomplish
no worries!! you guys don't have to reply asap š
like lets say you do get to talk to 4-5 users
how else can i know prototype?
you have to infer from goals
enlighten me!
lol
im sure talking to them will let me understand their context and understand their mindset and all of that
Like, if I'm trying to download an image on Google Drive, I can probably map out what information is the most important to me accomplishing that task
its the qualitative research part
without knowing anything about who is going to be using it
i think thats a bit different
yeah I can understand that, but consider how many people might be using your system and how small of a sample size you're going to be working with.
in terms of research
isnt having a small sample size better than not having any sample size at all?
a sample size of 5 is effectively a sample size of zero when it comes to behavioral data
you cant trust it, its as good as making a best guess
or potentially way worse
depending on how informed your decision makers are
like if I wanted to understand what people do first when they get into a car to drive somewhere
how many people do you think I would need to talk to, to be able to see trends in behavior
but those products are very different
I agree with this statement
what im designing for is very niche for a specific user
just talking to some of them will be eye-opening
the problem right now is that i dont know anything about them. how can i design for someone i dont know?
but the blade cuts the other way too
it doesnt have to be research
if waht you're making is very tailored and personal
but i just want to know the user more
I think niche and focused even more important to lean on PMs
and you might as well just design waht you believe is the optimal experience
and force your users to adopt that workflow
and im not sure if you guys saw the convo leading up to this thread but thats my problem right now
i dont want to be this robot designer designing with no empathy
Just as an example, do you think Apple designs with empathy?
the problem is we dont have a pm too
Itās not wrong but have to be ārealisticā and balance things out
because most designers are large companies like Apple don't get to talk directly with users either
it isnt their... responsibility
to own that information
or to own "empathy"
wha!!
Yep
I have never used the word "empathy" at work 
oh man im just so lost
Yeah, I donāt know if many if any company that works as youāre hoping or describing.
none of the big ones do
I also think you might be using empathy as a magic bullet that solves everything - even the most empathetic person isnāt actually the user you might approach it but what actually matters is to get something out and test it with the actual user or market if they wanted it
Maybe a mid sized company of like 12 designers?
but these companies employ researchers who do gather data
But big corp the users are even more guarded
and PM's who own product knowledge
ok guys let me ask you this
and marketing people who do customer research etc.
I get to talk to my users on a weekly basis but Iām pretty sure that is⦠special case never had this ever before
strategy people who talk to customers for product fit / market fit
arent there designers who own research because the company isnt at the stage where they have researchers
I think you can own the research activity, as in
act as the researcher
but the knowledge isnt owned by design
Hmm I donāt know if a product designer could really do both
Agreed with research activities
I mean you can whether you do it well is a different statement
Like if youāre a company spending time doing both you need a researcher
hey, i do plenty of bad things. sometimes they look like research.
Design does not own research
who owns research if theres no researcher?
the PM
Like at least not the level I should be doing, I guess
ahhh
they do research anyways
if there is no pm, the ceo
Yes or whoever is managing the product
Never thought of who owns research 
competitive analysis, market fit, strategy, etc. is all owned by the PM (or should be)
because they're the one who defines what it needs to do
in order to be successful
design just figures out how it does it
I think schools really teach it differently than what goes down 
so your question about information hierarchy is relevant. tahts part of "how it does it"
why are we called ux designers!! š š¢ šµāš«
@thorny ermine Iām serious like⦠idk maybe Iām just too held up on the word āownā
remember when we had the convo about how UX isnt really a thing š
Lol didnāt Prototype share that article
I mean, it is because people call us UX designers but
There was a super lengthy argument
the real world is muddy.
If you like doing research and want to focus on it, I think itās good to become a researcher
and everyone company, every team is different
Because we're accountable for the output of the experience...er, design
Titles = accountability
What users experience
yes, I'd say that is probably the real relevant point. if something experience-related isnt getting done, the designer is the one who usually has to figure it out.
or get on someone else
to do it
MAKE A 404 EXPERIENCE, WE FORGOT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN OUR S3 BUCKET GOES DOWN
"What does the loading animation look like?"
"Engineering thinks this screen will take 45 seocnds to load. waht do?"
obviously share cat gifs
Dinosaur jumping game
PM =
ask the designer to tell us waht the optimal experience is
me = let me learn after effects real fast
me = smart animate pls work
I'm sorry this was uh, not the answers you were hoping for
lol im just trying to digest this
were all designers here right?
like hearing all of this makes me feel like designers are being condescended?
Since empathy was brought up here's a nice article on the topic that i like: https://xd.adobe.com/ideas/perspectives/leadership-insights/why-i-dont-believe-in-empathic-design-don-norman/
I currently manage a design team for a 45B pharma tech company, but previously I led a design for jaguar land rover, and ui.com and helped a friend start up thje biggest esports org in the US, and every company i've ever worked for has been
approximately this
for better or worse
I think you should check out the naval gazing video
oh yeah thats a good one
might I gently suggest the other side where perhaps designers are not more important than anyone else in the org
No. 
ANDY PLS
ANDY
SMART ANIMATE ALL DAY
Why are you here
fr not even a designer
Prolly
Why not
drinking bubble tea and eating herring
@quasi wharf
i never thought designers were more important but just hearing this makes us seem less valuable? š
he is uncultured. doesnt know what bubble tea is
bad mentors getting derailed 
design is valuable, its part of the trio
^lol
Get help.
lol to ben*
its just design doesnt lead the trio
this is from airbnb or something
i dont remember
but it explains the product trio
oh, lol
yeah that makes sense, maybe ben gave it to me
er. not our ben
spotify ben
You use smart animate, I donāt wanna hear itā¦
In most places, design is tactical, not strategic.
perhaps we need to learn the other roles and the type of value they deliver alongside design
because this conversation is not condescending towards designers in any way
most of us are designers
i remember that doc prototype! and i read it š
oh, lol
You wouldnāt think that if youāve used a product that didnāt have a designer involved
Iām just thinking about the last hackathon we had where devs worked on projects and then presented them to the company
most everyone here will not know what svn is
and they are blessed for not knowing what it is
We should rename it āthis is why we have designersā day
Iām a senior ux designer at a big tech company
why would you share that
I had to design a version control system for altran
and the devs were like
MAKE IT LIKE SVN
and i was like no
god no
developers...
DevUI as a term exists for a reason
baguette
And it isn't ever spoken positively
Wait are yāall getting derailed what is this screenshot
svn
Yea we derailed
Through our experience using things and learning from previous projects, every designer builds up a library of patterns that we can apply to different situations
And we learn fundamental ways of thinking about interaction design
"product sense"
its clearly the worst of all the version control systems
its like git, if you hate yourself
On a whole I think everyone who wrote something here are designers professionally minus bigbrainer. But bigbrainer also designer 
product thinking is a thing!
Hmmmmmmm
WAO IM DEFINITELY A DESIGNER OKAY
Okay Iām sorry
and andy who is 11
and andy who is 11
Oh, well thatās very sad
Iām 12 now okay
Iāve been with my wife for almost 10 years, and I still donāt always get her
Jesus 11 was so last year
I know her better than anyone
Iām not 22 
serena probably already left tbh
Jordan and Brian both lead product design functions of their respective companies. I'm a product design manager now :(((((
she's probably thinking we have no credibility at this point
The idea that we could fully understand a user⦠itās just not possible
Iām a babeh designer compared to prototype, Brian and Jordan
Itās already the worst that happens is one more person thinks Iām dumb
and users are constantly evolving
research one month will vary from the next month
Well itās probably because we get distracted too easily
I think if you werent in your current role, you'd be managing a team too rn
its just taht your current company is bigger than ours š
way bigger
just a little bit

CEO of our hearts and minds
Dunno what u mean my focus levels are unmatched
no she could make an llc
new plan. we form a company, hire andy. workhorse him to death
Wtf
why andy
you think he could pass our rigorous interview process?
"what is your design process"
You think you could live up to my interview process standards?
we can just take turns bringing him to father / son work day
mother / daughterw/e its called
andy- i dunno just throw stuff on figma
parent/child
Iām down @ebon rock
wtf
But I donāt have to do anything right
you have to not swear
You canāt explain excellence
tru tru you are the most excellent of the excellenters
Nice
lol sorry guys was ordering boba! im still here š
@gray roost is boba still accessible in TX as it is in SF
O m g
Did I tell you????? I am walking distance from boba
Walking!

RANCH 99
if you have more q's ask while we are here
we get easily distracted
and specifically ping Brian and Prototype
boba focused
aw thanks guys! i always have questions haha
but ping brian and prototype
pls
awesomeness is what it is
and hey y'all, this has been a great read
I want to go back on brian's point on this. if this is the case, how do we designers get sales, cx, and cs's insights on the user? a problem in my startup is that these teams don't know how to give us user feedback or share problems/insights which makes sense since they aren't product people
Go ask them and teach them what youāre looking for
not to be blunt but...ask?
lol i want to but they are constantly busy with clients and us product people are told not to bother them...
theres a real disconnect with them and the product/tech team
People will always make time for people if they want to. Are you someone people want to make time for?
that's a potentially bigger issue to deal with, but you really can't schedule 30 minutes with a few different people so you can find out more of what they know about the people you're designing for?
I would gently nudge you to ask yourself that question and see how you can convince people to make time for you.
Nobody is owed a meeting or time other than the person paying the paycheck.
Who told you you canāt
ceo "don't bother sales, they are busy selling" "cs and cx are constantly swamped"
Just find a way to not bother them š Iām sure youāll find a way
appealing to ego often works
its not wrong for me to do so right? or should i be leaving the nonexistent pm to do that š
dont want to be stepping on people's toes after all...
If the PM doesnāt exist you then have to step up
Thereās no hard set roles and etc esp in startups š
Just make a plan show how itās not going to impact sales share the plan and off you go
yesss thats what ive been trying to do
You most likely to save time need to have questions in mind first
and if there's a pm, i shouldn't be doing this?
You should still do it imho
Does it help you learn about the customer?
How come you wouldnāt š
Maybe Iām not fully understanding your question
right thats what i think! but what i kinda got from this convo is that i need to step back and not want to always think about users?
lol
I donāt think thatās what ppl said
But rather you canāt see it as only the ux designers job
And it doesnāt always have to be behind research before you do something
and that you can get a lot of that info in different ways rather than talking directly to users
Personally I think youāre shutting things down when someone says no at work too easily
maybe but i dont want to be that pushy/overbearng person? the person whos always fighting for things? stepping on people's toes?
Thereās hills to die on sometimes
When you feel like you need to
And thatās where tact comes in
Thereās ways to do it without offending people
ā¹ļø
this may not be related as much, but let me ask you this - how do you feel about a ceo just throwing a scrappy balsamiq wireframe at you and telling you to make it pretty?
Iāll be frank sometimes that happens
I think we talked about that last time too
But I would look at the thing see if thereās glaring issues
If yes bring it up
yes we did but it ties back to this convo in a way cause his reasoning is that i dont know the user so all i should focus on is the UI and not the holistic UX
this is partly why im so adamant about knowing the user more
it seems condescending to a designer to do that
i dont know man
i just cringe so much
but someone there does know the user, or at least more than you do. book them for 30 minutes and have a list or questions ready to go. or ask if you can buy them a coffee. chat them up at lunch. ping them on slack.
I think you might be focusing too much on āwhat a UX designer should do and shouldnāt doā
āA ux designer shouldnāt only do UI itās degradingā
is it wrong to feel that way? ^
Itās not but what are you going to do about those feelings and resolve it
i know what you mean chris, but i dont feel empowered to do so. it will always seem like bothering people
and sometimes the job is just to design a button because you need a button
I do think thatās atm an internal problem
If that makes sense
You have to ask for the help
If you donāt sometimes they donāt know
yeah, I'd tend to agree. if you don't feel like you can approach a coworker to ask about anything that's really odd.
You might be taking things too much at face value
i do talk about it all the time. early in the convo i mentioned that i keep getting push back
For example ceo said donāt bother them I donāt think that doesnāt mean donāt talk to them at all
Just make sure time wise itās not too much meeting time etc etc
it may be an internal thing but i guess thats why im talking with you guys to see whats right and normal
if this is how a 30-person startup just is then maybe its time for me to leave
I don't think the company size/stage itself is the issue
I just can't imagine that a company really says "no, don't talk to anyone and just do this", or as Kenny said maybe you're taking that too much at face value. there's back and forth about lots of things every day in most jobs, bothering someone is different than learning what you need to do your job.
Imo hereās the question
Are you still learning?
And have you learned from this exp how to solve the challenge
as a designer? no
there are all these skills i want to learn/brush up on and im not given the chance to do so
i cant be doing UI forever
thats not a product designer
i need to work on UX
research
analyze data
everything a full fledge product designer does
Something to consider might be that as a designer you get different responsibilities at different levels as well. Sometimes what they need at that moment is better UI to help show and test the product where it's currently at and that's your role at this particular moment (UI isn't lesser than UX, it is a part of it to some extent). Wether you control direction or execution changes as you go up the ladder and have different priorities and are able to delegate
You need to push for some of those (if that makes sense)
And what Allyson said
Why not fix the product user test thr product and learn there too
I think you have the most context of when is a good time to push or a good time to provide what's needed. It's a product that has to eventually go live so they can't spend time prepping and planning instead of doing sometimes
better to get feedback on something tangible vs something that sounds good on paper bc of some interviews
Sometimes itās about seeing what the business wants and strategically planning UX in the future if theyāre not receptive to it at first
But I do see your concern where you have an idea of what things could really help this process, but if you don't have buy in from higher up or the resources (time, ppl, etc) then it might be best to make the most of what you got and test what you want to know
i totally get doing what the business needs, and ive done that for over a year. now im being reflective of my career growth and i obviously want to grow as a designer
and not be a robot forever
Would you consider a product designer at Google someone that is a full-fledged designer?
I'm going to give it to you straight because this is a lot of roundabout conversation.
Product designers at Google, Amazon, many large corporations never do research. Ever.
They don't talk to customers.
Are you saying that these designers are not full-fledged designers?
putting research aside
Take some time to ask yourself how and why you've gotten to this specific definition of full-fledged designer
they still do more than just UI
At the end of the day if you are dissatisfied with where you're at, start looking
You have a job now to keep you afloat, look for companies that you think more closely align with what you want to do next
Ask pointed questions
And if they are satisfactory
Try to land it
If the looking isnāt successful then you go back and learn more until you can be
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
If you want to have greater control over things that happen during discovery, find a place that allows for it
I feel really bothered that you consider UI just this small thing.
it takes decades of practice to hone visual skills
But @thorny ermine the ketchup bottle

@quasi wharf a big part of UX is UI as well
Ux wirh just research and no UI to reflect the research is ⦠well idk if u ask me
Itās still nothing
As a junior, a lot of companies start out by wanting a lot of āexecutionā
I think @daring imp mentioned that once in a LinkedIn post
guys i know ui is not small! but i dont want to ONLY be doing that. you know what i mean?
I totally know what you mean but only You
this is what ive come to understand a product designer to be: https://youtu.be/gEYq6GFAFCs?t=258o
My job as a UX designer can be very versatile and ambiguous so I tried to break down my responsibilities and day-to-day tasks in a more concrete way. Below are links to design bootcamps I'd recommend and links to tech gears I use on the job.
āļø Connect with me
IG: https://instagram.com/chunbuns
Blog: https://chunbuns.com
Shop my fave ...
Can make that happen
If you want to use more data in your design go forth and do so š
at 4:23 sec if the link doesnt take you there
Find ways to do it in the constraints theyāve given you
we are not tracking data and ive constantly asked to do this
Thereās no data at all or thereās no specific data you want
no data at all
no ones tracking anything
in this video, im not doing even 50% of the responsibilities mentioned
im not doing interactions cause well you guys already know the answer to do that
im not doing content, copy - that is given from the ceo "since he knows the user more" -_-
im not using data to inform design decisions
and she mentions conducting usability tests
nope not doing that either
and we already talked about research
First of all I would say the video is an example all orgs are different
Right. Most of these things you're describing require a great deal of investment from the business
am i understanding the problem space? nope not doing that either cause everything is guessing!
Ux is dealing with a lot of uncertainty and often it begins by guessing
Instacart has over 2k employees globally
yeah i'd also point out that she says "includes user testing with a researcher"
and its one of the activities in her "20% data" bucket
yes with a researcher, and if there isnt i should own it but im not empowered to do so
It sounds like you've brought up your concerns and someone higher up is saying "no" for one reason or another. Could be a variety of things we've mentioned, but if you're seeing that gap and it can't be fixed then maybe it is better to look elsewhere for what you want to be doing. But every company and role is different, when you're interviewing you can have a better idea of what you want to go for
ehhh, I dunno. Your definition of research is
gonna be different than what a researchers definition is
of course i know the researcher does it best
look i dont want to be a pro researcher
i just want to learn the skill
just all of these skills
and allyson yes im realizing this
usability testing, sure. I dont think anyone has an actual problem with usability testing, but even a researcher would understand that it's not the highest priority activity
especially for someone who is the only designer
as a researcher here once put it, heuristics > usability testing
Serena I think thereās some questions you have to ask yourself too:
If your ceo said go research
-what is the research
- what are you actually looking for
-why have you chosen to validate that specific way
If you havenāt thought about these yet it might be hard to convince the ceo too
The answer cannot be āI want to do user researchā ā> āwhat specifically do you want to knowā is most likely what theyāre going to say
i have made specific research plans
my big takeaway from this video is that BBQ in San Francisco makes me sad
So do you know why those plans work or maybe donāt work and why business isnāt focusing on it atm
he has told me to design a feature but thats too feature-oriented and imo we need to understand the problem first before finding a solution and not just build a feature for the sake of building a feature and because his instincts say so - so i took the initiative to write a whole doc specifying what the problem is, what context we have (and need to get from research), what the user needs are (which are also assumptions and need to be validated with research), what the user, business, product goals are, what our constraints are, what our other assumptions are (which again we should validate with research), what use cases to think about (again we also should validate), and asking questions on what success looks like when we dont even have baseline data lol. then i made a research plan with what research methods we can use to get the insights we need (one of them was user interviews so i listed out all the questions, the whole methodology and everything i can think of! you guys get the point! )
yes these are probably run on sentences lol
outcome of that was it got brushed off, he made a p0 wireframe and told me to make it pretty
so there's kind of two options here....
- research research validate research validate etc.
- make a best guess at the thing to make based on what you know and get it in the hands of users and see if it works
It sounds like maybe you also didnāt speak his language
An entire document couldāve scared him
chris not sure if you read the earlier convo but dont you think its more efficient to take the time to understand the user so that you can design more productively and get more progress vs just spending eng time building a bunch of things, guessing, and making slow progress?
Sometimes itās easier to build an mvp test
Test and find out first
Honest answer
Mvp doesnāt have to be full wireframes
Thereās many ways to test a market hypothesis
And it doesnāt have to be overly complicated full blown research
it wasnt complicated i promise
just from your summary it sounds like a lot, even if it wasn't to you. or at least it might have to the CEO.
if I can make a recommendation:
https://www.amazon.com/User-Experience-Team-One-Research/dp/1933820187
it didnt happen in all one setting
kenny was asking if i asked myself these questions to make a case for research
really good read, and every chapter has a "if you can only do one thing, do this" recommendation. and that may be the way you need to go (at least to start).
I think maybe heās expecting you to go learn and find out what the problem is
His direction was āI would like this featureā

perhaps i should try to go to instacart lol
you guys keep reasoning thats how a startup is so yea
im done with being a feature oriented team
it sucks
there i said it
But thatās what PD is like 
but the thing is you really never get to do everything. in my role I do a lot of user testing and interviews, but even so there's lots of times where I just have to make a best guess and go for it.
I mean like 
sometimes it works great and sometimes it doesnt
(and I work for a multibillion dollar company)
i want to be in a product oriented team
This article is certain to upset many people. Iām sorry for that, but the degree of ongoing noise and confusion surrounding the role of product at tech companies is only getting worse.Ā Moreover, I see the issues and problematic behaviors getting institutionalized in conference talks, training programs and so-called certification programs for pr...
chris i want to do user tesitng and interviews like you!
lol i sound whiny now
do you guys feel me though?
im not crazy right?
The bigger the company the more likely there are dedicated ppl for some of the things you'd want to do. Smaller the company maybe tighter timelines and resources so gotta choose what works at that moment to get something out. It's good you're figuring out what you want to be doing so when you interview you can ask about their day to day and what kind of projects they work on etc
You can do that like legit nobody is stopping you
You get your work done and you do research to complete your work just make sure you get your work done
No youāre not crazy thereās nothing wrong with what you want but you have to execute what you want with business tact
So you make your ceo happy
And also you are happy
totally understand, but also worth noting that about 90% of the time I design things before I ever get to talk to users. I'm talking to people in my org that know what we're trying to do, work out some ideas, and we try stuff to see if it works.
to be clear, if you're not happy with what you're doing then totally look for something else. but it also sounds like you could have a lot more success working within the constraints that you've got, even if they're not ideal or you don't like them.
I don't think you're crazy btw lol I'm just typing on my phone and not great with words sometimes but I think there's an "ideal" where you have all the time and resources you could want, and then there's a "we need to ship and actually deliver and present and make progress". And it sounds like you're putting pressure on yourself to learn, make all the right decisions, etc when it's an iterative process
Agreed with Chris though like for real if you wanna go elsewhere do that bc you know your day to day best
I just realized too I think a big underlying assumption you could be making atm is just that your ceo doesnāt know and you donāt agree with the direction
But just wanna make sure you hear it's ok that things aren't going perfectly and you don't have to rush through what you're learning. Sounds like this challenge you're having now is even something to learn from
I would also say that going to a place where you have seniors and mentorship would be awesome
Having the pressure of solo designer, delivering, pleasing CEO, and wanting to learn a variety of things is a lot
yes i really want to be in a design team with designers to learn from
Which on I totally get but at the same thereās different ways to prioritize tasks and just because the feature isnāt what you wanted doesnāt mean itās not product oriented team (if that makes sense)
Kano model might be something you want to look at
Then make sure for your next job thatās a requirement
That thereās other more senior designers or a design manager
its too lonely here and feel like the team doesnt understand designers
its hard to advocate for designers when im the only one
kenny ill be honest that that was always what i was looking for but its more competitive getting a job at a bigger company here in the bay
Iām at a start up and atm I made sure that thereās a design team lead
And 5-6 other designers in the org
I get what you mean but also pls make sure youāre not switching places too often
It doesnāt⦠look good if itās a pattern
i did the self-learning journey to product design (transitioned from being an architect) so i was competing with students with internship experience already
I understand i career switched after working 4 years in a different career as well
Youāre not ābehindā because you came from Architecture
If it helps a bit, you having experience is already really helpful vs probably when you were first searching as someone with no exp
thanks guys, it does š¢
Maybe try to make the best of what you can in this position while sprucing up your stuff? Doesn't seem like there's a big rush to leave that place atm other than you feeling unsatisfied with what you currently deliver, but that's still good practice and something to put on the resume šš¼
yea ive been debating that allyson
partly why i had this whole convo with you guys for advice
and you're not behind anyone, we're all on own path. I switched into UX after a decade plus in marketing and web design, so if you're behind I'm screwed š