Design critique

[thick thistle]

I am creating this poster but i still feel that something is lacking but i cant figure it out. My best guess is Depth
so i need some feedback to understand what does this design lacks

i asked my few friends which one looks better and they said the 1st one but personally i like the second one

[blazing acorn]

Hi @thick thistle
-I may be super old, but the font is way too bright on the background/ there is a lack of contrast- everything is very bright except for the photo. I would suggest darkening the font to balance the light background (and bring depth)

-On the second one, I wouldn't place the bright address over the person, it's very hard to read

-The pink you're using is too bright/ too vibrant, I would use a slightly more muted pink to balance the palette more.

[thick thistle]

this one is most recent version

[wintry elbow]

I got an idea. Since you have a nature walk in the activities, what if you apply double exposure effect to show the location? Example

btw, the footer text is hard to read

I like the original arrangement of the activities wrapping the silhouette

it feels more coherent

using glassmorphism without an associated meaning/visual metaphor can come off as “too trendy”

[thick thistle]

noice ideaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[wintry elbow]

Also that fatface/didone typeface gives high-end boutique vibe to me, not very zen in my humble opinion

[thick thistle]

i see, will surely work on that

Thanks a lot for your feedback