#Any ideas how I can perfection this logo?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

blissful cliff
#

good potential strong identity colours but I believe it needs more cohesion with the type style. at my first glance they look a little off, work on ur proportion, especially with the V extending and the O feeling cluttered and much larger in comparison to the other two letter. simplify a bit what are you trying to convey, whats the star and im assuming liquid in the V for, pick one and utilise it to add onto the already strong branding colours.

rough cloak
#

Make the content inside the white Circle which is red into a circle which is red

cobalt jay
#

No logo is "perfect".

The main thing I see is that there are too many elements in there that makes it unnecessarily complex.

  • O - Don't have a "Captain America Shield" version. A pure circle and have the star as the negative space for the hole in the O.

  • V - Keep the V the same size as the O. Have it be connected, in the white color. No need to make it more complexed. Keep it connected.

  • Y - Loose the V at the top and make the Y the same size as the other letters. It is lacking the balance because the Y seems so tiny compared to the other letters.

blissful cliff
cobalt jay
blissful cliff
#

Yeah it definitely is a skill because I feel it enables you to break down your own work, Saleem any chance you could give some feedback to my motion design project I just posted it!

cobalt jay
proper orbit
#

I like the colours, specifically the 'off-black', it goes quite well with pure red.

With that being said, I think you're don't too much. And things quite fit. Each letter seems like a slightly different style.

O - Curvy (naturally), with a star? a curving star at that. Which is weird, considering the extremely straight V and Y.

V - My favourite letter out of three personally, but it has that water-y/blood-y section, which doesn't appear in the other twos. The other two have symbols of sorts, but liquid?

Y - It's really "compact", the other letters have a lot of white space, but there's little-to-none here because of the mini V inside the Y. And it's weird, because unlike the other two red bits, it doesn't match it's letter in stroke-width.

And overall... the red is like "too obvious"-ly supposed to provide some meaning, but I simply can't for the life of me figure out what it could be. It's as if you're trying to do something experts do, but more like checking a box, and not really understand how/why they did it on their specific design... Not saying that's what you did, but that's the vibe I get. Basically, in short: "you're trying too much" lmao.

As for suggestions, I'd just try to simplify it more, like - and although It's hard for me to imagine - I think if you removed: inner circle, red star, mini red v, it'd look better. And then, I'd experiment with decreasing the 'O' to the size of the Y, and keeping it the same - the 'V' will be the highlight of the show.

I'd also experiment with... an "off-red" (a shade of red that isn't quite #F00, make it slightly lighter - use the same difference in luminosity between #000 and the current background, and it to the #f00).

#

Ah, I basically ended up just combining what Hariho and Saleem said, welp, I guess it's still useful to hear more of same feedback - gives it more importance

patent fox
proper orbit
#

(you also took away my favourite parts: the red, the V)

#

I think the lower case y looks better though ig mb

patent fox
#

I will take a look how it looks without the innercircle of the O

patent fox
#

Now after trying it. I have to say it actually looks better without the inner circle

image.png
proper orbit
#

Oh wow, when you take people's advice, things improve