#which one is better ?
35 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Tysm :>
Sonics are better
shoo!
hazard and decay better sustained damage than sonics...
Fenrir is a brawler
but yes. BSGS better than both options
Decay/hazard
or
Corona/glory
👀❓️
corona and glory are horrid
🗿👍
Sonics deal sonic damage, which is much better for brawlers
And at that level sonics are better
grey damage*
which is a huge advantage ofc but i'd still reccomend rads due to fenrirs average speed (unless you go into scout mode which makes you super vulnerable) so rads can fire effectively sooner.
plus, sonics only have their full damage potential unlocked at 100m which is pretty rare in a real fighting scenario.
sonics can come in clutch sometimes, espacially in BR when you can spawn directly onto a beacon which is being/will be contested
🥲
pilot is currently bugged. dw about it
you do need to work on some robot/weapon levels ASAP tho
Not gon bother
?
With you giving false advice
i'm sorry if you disagree. but this is my opinion.
take it up with ruken if you think I dont deserve the RA role. I'd be happy to oblige 
You can’t be removed from the role for this, nor was i gonna tell anybody, too minor
😅
i did clearly state the pros of the sonic build so if the OP decides that it fits their style better they can go for it. but i just like the insanely higher sustained damage the hazards have
Rather use sonics in my hangar
hazards or sonics
idk what you would think but i would put 2 hazards and a devastator
Horrible.
Either sonics or hazards.