#Alliance size reduction and rework
30 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I got the DMs showing I made the cut… I’m not just complaining.
I just understand what’s better for the overall health of the game the purpose of the balance change is to help new players or up and coming players. Along with providing a more competitive environment. Yes the big spenders will probably stick together, maybe not. One of the biggest spenders in my kingdom, is not with the “big alliance”. And either way it would make way for new people that might be more interested in spending if they felt like they had more of an impact.
This wouldn’t solve any of your problems but would ensure you’d struggle to ever take any seat from the top team.
Elaborate?
Only way to clear sops is to bomb rally them. 20/30 keeps is not enough to set a proper bomb whilst reining other sops etc.
Couldn’t the person just bubble game the SOP that would stop a bomb rally and then you would have to wait another 5 minutes before you could attack
No because of the dozens and dozens of full march solos being yeeted at the sop. Setting bomb rallies is highly tactical too. Offset rallies/dragon rallies etc. plus the depression that permanent bubble gaming would generate would kill the game.
Bomb rallies are the most important and most fun aspects of the game
Not to discount the OP but seems he would benefit from a few merges down his belt before assessing the state of SoP and competition in game.
Also, sop gameplay is highly team based with very close and detailed communication across the team. It seems that’s what he wants is to remove the team play and base it around the individual
Which would be awful in my opinion
Right. This is absolutely a team game. Numbers and coordinated strategy can overcome strength and stats in a single player. It’s one of the most compelling aspects of the game IMO.
Forming a team to take down a high spending ego maniac is one of the joys of early kingdoms.
And team play becomes even more important as kingdoms merge.
Some people haven’t spent their every Saturday and Sunday on battle voice channel (along 100+ teammates) listening to tactic ops commands in between pump up songs playlists….and you can tell.
As the owner of the worst stats in mutny, I say: a team is only as strong as its weakest member. This makes me the strongest member of mutny
And because mutny are the top team in the game, this means I have the best keep in the world. Can’t beat this logic
Thanks for insight from everyone. I guess it’s time to just join the winning side and see how it goes.
Or work with others to put together a team to beat them.
That’s definitely more fun.
Ego chasing for vengeance, imo, might actually be why half the people still play years into this money pit 😂
No no you def have more options than just bending the knee to current power in the kingdom. Thats where the long game comes in. Thats where you cultivate a culture of opposing a certain group and as merges / sycs occur you seek diplomatic partnerships to grow the opposition alliance.
I guess this thread can be closed 🤣
Argh i wanted to see the original post because I still learn a lot from people's responses
Oh well
Would like to see a change in this as well. Should have a section integrated into the allegiance to see people online and then have a active. Its annoying seeing whos active but cant tell if they are online or not. This is one of the few games that doesnt have this feature
Thought was universally agreed this was a bad post 😂
what my idea?
Are you the OP?
OP? lol it was a yes or no question
If you have a suggestion, start a new post with it.
Don’t post an idea on another person’s thread especially one whose idea was so universally panned that they deleted it.