#can someone help me with my haymaker deck
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Can you post the list here first?
OK, so, I know that you said you'd prefer being through DM but, I think my read is you're trying to do too much
You have it as both a hare apparent deck and as a general rabbit deck.
Even with Baylen's mana generation I also think some of the more expensive spells are optimistic.
What are your problems with the deck currently?
want it optimized
and there are just not many good rabits that makes tokens like hare apparent
Is your main plan to win by going wide?
yeah before i gave all the focus on baylen but failed
also i have a friend groupe who is good at helping but when it comes to decks they just say i need to make it better but never say how
i see you kept my feel of the deck
The considering section are just cards I've cut from your deck
I think the most expensive card I've added that isn't a land is [[metallic mimic]]
why remove long ear tho
Byrke is a card I was mixed on
I'm trying to figure out how much he's "win more" in this deck
He's adding counters to your creatures but is that good when you're casting him later in the game if it's just when he enters.
Metallic Mimic, in contrast, means all your creatures that are rabbits enter with a counter.
But long ear also doubles counters
Yeah, that's why I was saying I was feeling mixed on it.
If you really want him in though, I can add it back
[[growing ranks]] doesn't do enough since most of your tokens are 1/1s
But finneas gives everyone counters also tokens
Cathars crusade that bad ?
So he's helping you establish a board presence
Cathar's crusade means you have a lot of cards/tokens with a different number of counters on them.
True
And, either people scoop to it and you reanimating a full graveyard or they make you play it out
I also worry about it costing more than Baylen. It's good for rebuilding I guess
So if you think about it as something you do after your board has been wiped
In the end you know more then me
But thrumming stone and cathar's crusade can do something like:
Hare apparent->1 counter (2 hares, #1/2)
Hare apparent 2-> 2 counters (1 hare, #3)
Hare apparent 3-> 3 counters (1 hare, #4)
Hare apparent 4-> 4 counters
Then you have 1 HA with 10 counters; 1 HA and 1 token with 9 counters; 1 HA and 2 tokens with 7 counters; 1 HA and 3 tokens with 4 counters
Yeah but isn't it better then having none
As I said, I can see leaving it in, it's my own preference
There's also [[starlight spectacular]]
Enchantment
Parade! — At the beginning of combat on your turn, choose creatures you control one at a time until each creature you control has been chosen. Each of those creatures gets +1/+1 until end of turn for each creature chosen before it. (Places everyone! The first creature in line gets +0/+0.)
Which is only triggered on the start of combat rather than a static counter
Yeah it really seems goofy
OK, so, based on the feedback, it sounds like we put byrke back in and cathar's crusade and then find 4 cuts
I need to go have lunch
Take a look at the current list I made and see if there's anything you're interested in cutting
Or aren't convinced on.
is season of gathering worth keeping ?
Sorry, I'm back
I think it is
It does a lot of things for you that your deck seems to want to do
But would silvan library be better?