#(11-3-23) How do you feel about the Naga/Rakshasa/Kindred/Umbra change? Be respectful.
120 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I'm pretty excited about it. More snakes for snake typal. And more respect for various cultures. Also, I like that the Umbra change, like the Naga/snake one, feels more consistent
All genuinely positive changes - Kindred being my favourite. Typal just felt...too "game keywordy" (if that makes sense)
All seem sensible enough
I hate all of it to different degrees. I don't like making naga snake not even snake humans it just feels wrong
Also wait they also changed rakshasa?
Nooooo my cat demons
not any of the card names, just making them no longer cats
But they are cat demons
😭
tough cookies
Not prior to Gygax they weren't
Honestly I hate the tribal change because it feels so idiotic to me but Kindred is probably my favorite alternative due to a certain other IP
We are in a post Gygax world though
We are in a world influenced by Gygax
Rakshasa are shapeshifting demons from Hindu mythology, they are nothing like they are depicted in D&D and Hinduism is still a major religion. D&D made a mockery of a part of that part of the religion and this is a tiny step reverting that.
It feels idiotic because the entire basis really comes off as "tribal = indigenous Americans = barbaric" which is not even close to accurate.
It's used for the tribes of Israel, it's used for my ancestors long ago with Germany and Ireland not only my ancestors that were already here. Tribal being removed comes off as virtue signaling more than actually being concerned about if it is really a problem to me.
As Carson pointed out in another channel, the tribal v typal v kindred thing is a much more nuanced conversation.
The first nations people in the US have indicated for a long time they do not like the use of the word tribal. I think that particular decision is quite americentric but I respect that it makes it more approachable for those peoples in North America.
I would say it isn't fair to call it a mockery they took influences from creatures all over the world to make an interesting game that was meant to offer a lot of seeing your own culture... But also was made by a bunch of people not extremely familiar with said cultures in a different time.
They took no influence from the Hindu myths, they just took the name and appended it to something they created
Turning cultures you don't understand in to entertainment is not cool, the fact that it was done 40 years ago does not make it any more okay,
and we have an actual south Asian person in Shivam saying this is a good thing. so is it relevant that a self-described German and Irish descendant isn’t a fan
Yes but it's also far more nuanced than a lot of people realize. Even Indian is more complicated with in my area it still being used in some context namely marketing material. There is a lot of context and person specific nuance.
Someone that is German, Irish, and of Native American descent.
I am told by people from NA that the word tribal has come to be harmful to the peoples of that region, that's all I need to say we should drop it from the game where those peoples may be hurt. You can still use the word Tribe to refer to the groups that are comfortable with or embrace that identity in other contexts
I think it’s unnecessary.
I do question how my German and Irish ancestry somehow discounts my feelings over the word tribal when my ancestors on all sides were in tribes if I stick to my matrilineal line I am very quickly back to strong Native American roots and displacement. It is no more or less relevant than my German side from my father or my Irish side from both of them. To discount the opinions of people whose ancestors were in tribes because they were the "wrong tribes" does come off as quite offensive personally.
I’m a descent of native Americans, and “tribe” doesn’t bother me in the slightest. I think it’s nice to have my ancestors represented through use of the word tribe.
You saying "I am fine with Tribe to describe me" does not take away even slightly from other people saying that it does bother them. Its good that you are happy with the word, but others are not.
“Tribe” isn’t offensive, it’s just a name for a kind of civilization.
The issue is that the only person who was actually offended by this was someone speaking on behalf of native Americans. To my knowledge, she had not asked anyone about it, she just assumed they would be offended by it.
She garnered enough attention on Twitter to inform Wizards of it. All of this started with a singular person.
I am gonna need you to prove that, as the slightest search turns up hundreds of pages and thousands of people talking about the word tribe being problematic in contexts nothing to do with WotC
I have seen plenty of First Nations people who take issue with the usage of the word.
I can't speak on that topic with firsthand knowledge or experience, as I've never taken the steps to look into my mom's claim that we're of indigenous descent, but what I can speak on is that as a trans person, there are plenty of spaces where within our communities, trans people disagree on whether one word or another is problematic or not. And both sides typically have their good reasons for those views.
I was mainly referring to Rakshasa and Naga
Okay fair, I'm sure you see the misunderstanding considering the context of where I brought up my ancestry 😅
The tribal discussion is more nuanced as has been stated so I will stay out of that and let people who do identify with being “tribal” speak first
I still find it really weird that they didn't make naga snake spirits or snake people or something... Just snakes
Ye. The most I can do is draw a sympathetic parallel to arguments from within communities I am a member of
Tribal is mostly offensive when used to mean savage and stuff. This is why nobody really disagrees with the tribes of Israel and stuff. There is implications with how some people use it.
Realistically it changes my life 0%. So..yeah.
Hadn't actually heard the news till seeing this discussion
I will say it does kinda give me a bit of reminder about the discussions over is oriental offensive with Oriental Adventures.
Oriental in regards to Oriental rugs isn't considered offensive and calling people Oriental is considered offensive... But beyond that most people aren't sure where the line is that it becomes a problem.
I see benefit and 0 downside to the tribal change
It doesn't matter your actual associations with the word; better to avoid the whole thing. Is anyone hurt by losing it?
If some people find the usage of the word harmful, and other people don't... Is there anyone who removing that language is harmful to?
In terms of Rakshasa, it makes sense to me that the term was taken from that culture and then entirely misused. I think it's interesting that they opted for a look and type change over a name change.
I mean yes. Some people are legitimately bothered over words being changed on the basis of being less offensive to them that they don't personally find offensive because it comes from others acting like they know better than them about what will bother them and stuff.
There isn't any one word for Native Americans that doesn't bother a segment to a degree. There are some terms that are more widely accepted than others. Generally everyone tries to give the benefit of the doubt though that people are acting in good faith over such things though.
Just feels weird to be bothered by other people... Trying not to bother people?
"We made a change so as to not potentially offend a group of people "
"Well that offends Me"
""Are you actually In the aforementioned group of people"
"Well....no."
"Alright then. Carrying on...."
I just...find it equal parts fascinating and sad how angry some people get about some one else changing something inconsequential to make a third party less unhappy.
And I think the complete lack of reaction around Umbra really sells it.
Cos it's not minor change people don't like, it's WoTC taking steps to appeal to a part of the customer base they aren't in.
because we’ve already had groups of humanoid snakes that only get that typing [[!sakura tribe elder]] [[!seshiro the anointed]]
Could we get a link/ref in the header about the actual changes, I'm not sure about what is changed, though I doubt it'll change much my playing experience.
Thanks carson!
am I the only one who thinks the Naga change was purely mechanical? I think it's a case of "we can no longer find any gameplay reason to keep these cards apart, collapse the smaller creature type"
naga are also an important thing in multiple Asian religions
The naga thing seems prolly more of a functional change that they felt still aligned with this set of changes
I am and it bothers me a bit mostly due to the fact it feels more like the result of virtue signaling and people getting bothered on my behalf, as well as people completely ignoring that it is a word that applies to many people's not just indigenous populations
Nah totem armor bothers me very slightly because they basically already weren't giving us any new ones through standard ever again and it also just wasn't something that really made sense to begin with to me plus Umbral was on almost all of them so it's very whatever.
It seems like a pretty basic change tho. Like, one of these terms is steeped in complex history and modern controversy, and the other isn't. I'm still not seeing the harm in swapping.
That isn't a reason we can't. We got monkeys that are goblins.
That I agree with. I take more issue with the people that insisted it's offensive towards Native Americans wholesale and stuff like that when it's very nuanced than WotC making the change.
It's very mechanically relevant.
Okay, that's what I was starting to figure. The change isn't your issue, just the discussion around the term?
It feels like its people being bothered on their own behalf
More or less. I don't like people trying to speak on the behalf of entire groups as a general rule versus on their personal experiences as a member of a group particularly when it's people that aren't in the demographic doing so.
on another note, I wonder if the Rakshasa change will also apply to future D&D products
Probably
I still kinda hope they find a new name and keep a cat/tiger demon in there somewhere
The tribal issue is a complicated topic, but I believe wotc folks when they say their cultural consultants (?) told them to change it for sensitivity reasons
I've seen quite a mix with white people insisting it's offensive to indigenous people not based on actually discussing it with a large number which would get the fact it's complicated but rather because the Twitter hype caused by one person on Twitter.
I know that plenty of Native American nations actively embrace the term “tribe,” but I also know that it does bother some folks and some groups (to whom it may have been applied in the past)
Exactly, like I have no problem acknowledging it does bother some people. But to insist the word is offensive is different than some groups find it offensive because one treats it as an inherently bad thing while the other acknowledges it's nuanced.
But no-one here is saying its offensive to everyone.
We are saying it is offensive to those people whom it bothers, and that is more than enough reason to not use it
Enough people that wotc trusts spoke up about it that was worth changing for them
I agree in regards to the current discussion here.
So why are you arguing about it? If you accept that it is offensive to some people, and that that is good enough reason to not use the term, and no-one here is expressing any other opinion, then what is the problem you have that is worth bringing up to this group of people here?
Some people enjoy arguing for the sake of arguing. 🤷
People have said it's offensive to push people to say typal instead during discussions before which is where it bothers me because it treats tribal like it's a bad word to be avoided. Meanwhile I've not seen anyone that is personally bothered by it here instead it has been people saying others said it bothers them but multiple people myself included saying we aren't bothered by it.
Well this thread went about how I expected. At least people were polite to each other.
Oh it's still going to pop up at least once a week, someone randomly airdropping an entirely unsolicited opinion on the matter simply to stir up the masses.
Tbh hound to dog typing is all this is at the end of the day. What matters at the end of it all, is the bonds we make and experience though this game
My 2 cents at least
I give people the benefit of the doubt that it's less to stir up a mess and more that it bothers them and they want to vent online.
Like naga to snakes is one I'm a lil bothered with because snakes just got a lot of cards now but also just snake seems weird... But ultimately it's not like we haven't had beast for years which shouldn't be one
Overall it's mostly whatever... Because it's not like the playerbase is going to embrace the change overnight
At FNM there were a lot of brief discussions about the changes basically amounting to people being confused about why, "it was probably a PR thing", discussing snake impact
I dunno why they changed nagas to snakes as there is a distinguishable difference between the two. I understand that nagas can be in entirely snake form but that’s not often how they depicted. Just seems like a weird change for almost no reason.
The rest I don’t really have an opinion on.
guess they couldn't mechanically support keeping Naga separate from Snake anymore, so gameplay issues forced Naga to be subsumed
While I agree they aren't portrayed an accurate way, I don't use the word Hinduism or describe it as a religion. Since the people who follow Sanathana Dharma don't define it as a religion or like the term. Since there is no core values, commandments, or central themes tying it all together I understand their points on the misrepresentation.
It's as if they took every Native American belief structure, lumped then altogether, and declared it a unified religion.
This is something I think is simply not known by many people due to very little education/media attention/lack of presence in their region. I've learned more about it in the past day just by watching the reactions from people than I ever would have from regular exposure/education.
Yeah, the only thing worse than little to no education on it was the colonialism cliff notes which misrepresented it in every shape and form. Which even on a college level has often ignored the direct sources.
At least these days there's more attention for the colonialism issues which helps with said education.
We just you know, continuing to learn, adjust, and course correct. Generation A is gonna have hopefully a better understanding and more accurate representation of these things. That's all we can really do.
That's all there is to it. It's a slow process and sometimes it's hard to get 'racist' (using the term liberally here) habits out of people because it was the norm for so long. To that end I hope people don't immediately jump on folks making small mistakes or using the wrong word, especially since there's also the multilingual issue with it.
The way WOTC goes about it also reminds me a bit about how Sid Meier's Civilization went. In 4, you had "The Native Americans" led by Sitting Bull, which had Totem Poles and Dog Soldiers. Obviously a terrible representation. For 5, they actually worked together with representatives of the people they ended up representing in game (The Pueblo didn't want to be included) and in 6 they went so far as to get the people to do the music parts as well - though even that one wasn't without controversy. It's a gradual change that not everyone will like.
something I saw online: had Wizards stuck to the source material and not the D&D thing, [[Tombstalker]] might have gotten that KTK reprint instead of just getting kicked off the card file because it's not a Cat
?
There are non-cat demons on tarkir though
there are, but that was forced onto them by Standard playtesters. Tombstalker was taken off much earlier (while building the Limited environment) solely due to not being a Cat
The consequences of the fact the D&D Rakshasa was an amalgamation inspired by an episode of a TV show
Originally it's inspiration in D&D was a combination of the association of tigers and sorcery for early art and the depiction from Kolchak: Night Stalker for the actual creature. It didn't call them cats or anything. The closest was saying they often take humanoid forms with beastial traits primarily of tigers and apes.... But the art used a tiger like appearance and that's what stuck.
Sadly a downgrade for [[ophiomancer]]. Overall I'm rather indifferent about these changes though, nothing really important.
at least it wasn't a naga
Sidisi decks in shambles
.)