This could add some more nuance to the game and maybe encourage a more debuff focused deck. This could also improve a struggling archetype in ppt! I used to enjoy playing ppt but as more and more cards that favor mono and rainbow got released I've been forced to adapt to be able to be able to get rewards in league. I'd honestly just love more ppt love!
#Negative Scores on Cards
16 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
No. Please just no.
Shinigami would become extremely prevalent again, as well as debuff decks in general.
Imagine Shinigami + Lock.. Make your opponent only able to play 1 card that scores negative.
Reducing my hold nuke to 0 is demoralizing enough. Don't need hydrogen peroxide rubbed in the wound on top of that
Even with Shini out of the picture I'd argue Negative PPT decks are already more than reliable. Especially when mixed with lock and/or positive PPT for yourself
When was the last time PPT lock was prevalent in league I feel like I haven't seen it for weeks now
Hasn't been used that often in league for a bit but doesn't change the fact that it's still quite strong.
People just hopped off the PPT lock train and onto the Tennin Python train is all
i uh, run a tourney that heavily encourages that and is currently meta
so yeah thats good for you
I think this is a complex topic because right now is more important to use the stategic value of such limit imposed by 0, i think that the game should run in the opposite direction, by using more the cards with low power , maybe i'm wrong but negative numbers are gonna remove a strategic mechanic of the game.
I prefer 0 being the smallest value because of the self debuff strategies, but those strategies barely exist nowadays t-t.
I like to use hibiscus on a card with zero power or stack debuffs on a hangedman.
I wish Avid would create more self-debuff cards.
Being able to go negative would kill PPT decks, mainly the ones that run Infinity/Eirene/Christmas
Stack up PPT all you want but a debuff deck will just rip your cards to ribbons and you're losing more power than you're gaining