#Vickers Contract supporting CW's most toxic tanks.

69 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

ionic goblet
#

You have purposely made the challenges to make your most toxic tanks the most played. Tanks like the mk1/xm800, atgm tanks like ignis, t55, auto guns of all kinds.
Although Era 3 isn't nearly as bad, this contract shows just how bad you have made Era 2 into. You have completely lost site of balanced gameplay and continue to support those toxic game ruining tanks. I'm not sure why you are doing this while saying "You are listening"and care about player experience.
Then with your upcoming changes you aren't doing anything to fix these issue. If anything it will make alot of those tanks more toxic. I love this game and its sad to play and feel how cheap the gameplay is now. I hope you can understand and actually care about player experience and stop supporting your most toxic tanks.

Also just to add these tanks in thier own aren't that much of a problem however when you support this many being played at once. It really makes the gameplay feel cheap and meaningless. Atleast to me.

light sapphire
#

Think the contract shoulda included heavies....

warm elk
#

The Vickers mk.3 is definitely not a heavy.

light sapphire
ionic goblet
#

I just want the game to be more diverse and situations like this just really show how far WOT console has fallen.

ionic goblet
#

Simply stated mediums and heavies would have made for a better experience. I also dont understand the TD and artillery challenge. Yes ww2 can complete the contract but, its a CW tank and should cater to CW players. Even vets and High skill players understand mostly atgm and auto cannons has not made CW and Era 2 specifically a better experience. So why keep pushing it. 😑

ionic goblet
#

The fact you say that in response. The only reason Im saying anything is because I feel like this game is better and I feel like it could be great. If you can't enjoy something but still see its imperfections your not a true fan.

#

Don't ever just follow or like a game at 100%. Never a good thing. Everything can continue to improve and evolve. 🙂

#

Wasnt even a big complaint either. Even made sure to say its not normally this bad lol.

#

Sir, I never called you a sheep specifically and you seem to have a personal issue. I dont want to get involved in that way. Its just an opinion that everyone is allowed to have. If you have problems there are other places for that.

#

Sir, plz stop trying to make issues here. I expressed an opinion. Thats it. If you have this much of a problem with that, a social space for opinions is not for you. Otherwise you can just disagree and not make it anything more. Plz and TY.

#

Also to try and help you being a sheep is an expression to not just follow. Wasn't a personal attack of you personally.

#

I altered the previous comment to hopefully help you not be offended. @smoky night

#

Remember everyone is raised differently. So whats offensive to you isnt offensive to everyone.

#

No need to threaten people. Just say something.

hushed bolt
#

The proposed changes would go a long way to provide better balance to the classes in CW. Small fast vehicles that can deal damage are so popular because they currently have built in advantages. The changes would help level the playing field.

ionic goblet
light sapphire
slim rune
#

I genuinely don't think the restrictions are too much of an issue with tank variety. Era 2 is largely mediums and lights at the best of times, and the Wiesel and XM800T are always going to be abundant regardless of the contract rotation.
Switching it to medium/heavies would be nonsensical, especially as we've just had such a contract (Chisel) and gotten a new one (Hardcase).

Mediums/TDs could potentially work for the CW-only sections, but the severe reduction in choice would probably annoy more players than a slight increase in light counts. There's only so many TDs, and do you really want more ELCs in Era 2?

As for the upcoming changes, it looks like camo is going to be less effective, which is one of the main issues currently with these small tanks. Hard to claim that they aren't listening when that actively solves their primary complaint.

ionic goblet
#

Also you cant tell me the 250 penns wasn't specifically designed with the autocannons in mind. Plz think as a whole before making light of valid criticism.

#

Many dont agree with all the upcoming changes either. So you'll turn it into a whos more right situation. Thats never healthy for a game.

slim rune
ionic goblet
slim rune
#

As for 250 penetrations, that's for multiple battles. Not in a single battle.
Such a criteria existed before the uptick in autocannon armed lights too.

ionic goblet
#

If its the upcoming changes like I said not everyone agrees and time will tell how much the changes will help. No point in saying how good or bad they are u til they happen yes? 🙂

slim rune
ionic goblet
slim rune
ionic goblet
#

I simply have a concern and even made clear its not a game issue as awhole just badly set up. Atleast to me who has noticed the increase of certain tanks for this contract.

fallow pollen
#

I don't actually mind the contract. Theres definitely been a small spike in wiesels but otherwise I haven't seen it much

#

Think you've might've just had a bad streak man.

ionic goblet
fallow pollen
#

And I was playing gen 2 for a decent chunk of yesterday

slim rune
ionic goblet
ionic goblet
fallow pollen
#

That is the most oddly enlightened thing I've heard someone say in this server

#

Its a spy.

ionic goblet
#

Just the contract influenced an increase I felt was not well thought out. Thats all.

slim rune
#

It's actually the least worse of the available options. As mentioned, we've just had a Medium/Heavy contract, and you absolutely do not want more TDs in matchmaking.

ionic goblet
slim rune
ionic goblet
#

However I have been told having a diffrent opinon on this discord will always warrant the same people ensuring you are aware how wrong you are. So I guess thats true. 🙂

ionic goblet
slim rune
ionic goblet
#

Again to be clear this is in regards to the CW specific contract.

#

Not all contracts should be handled this way.

slim rune
#

That would be three consecutive Medium/Heavy contracts, including the current Hardcase.

That's not exactly desirable

ionic goblet
#

I have seen a suggestion to seprate contracts for ww2 and CW. I actually like that idea if it would help.

#

Honestly this whole problem is only a thing because WOT didn't care about overall game balance or contracts when designing and releasing certain tanks. Its a problem of thier own making.

slim rune
#

Most tanks aren't balanced around having 7 of them per team.

Any tank becomes a problem in those environments.

hushed bolt
#

7 even 10 Vickers MBTs wouldn't be a problem.

I would say MOST vehicles are not a problem with 7 per side. Just some.

gaunt bone
ionic goblet
light sapphire
ionic goblet
heavy wraith
gaunt bone
heavy wraith
#

The fact that so many people play them says it all

gaunt bone
gaunt bone
heavy wraith
light sapphire
#

Too many of any given tank can be annoying or toxic especially given on certain maps, I just wanna see more variety not just lights in era2 and 3 and having copy paste tech trees isn't helping much with that either.