#Remove Ardennes from CW
76 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I have a better idea - absolutely remove all small maps from WWII that should never have been in Cold War. And best of all - remove all maps from WWII from CW mode.
No Ww2 maps have 0 reason to be removed from CW. Dont sabotage one mode because you prioritize WW2.
There is a huge argument for removing WWII maps drawn in CW mode - they are simply too small for the capabilities of Cold War vehicles. Himelsdorf - that's a joke.
Other small maps not for CW tanks.
Redshire
Fishermanâs Bay
Heilbronn
Vineyards
Erlenberg
Raseiniai
Great Wall.
But simple all 2 WW.
Lots of people including me love most of those maps. Removing the maps will ruin CW and make the playerbase worse.
Smaller maps are fine. Not every map needs to be big.
What a crazy suggestion when CW is already repatative.
Oh incase you didnt notice Era 1 and Era 2 has ww2 tanks in it.
So mabey you can argue era 3 only but still less maps is bad.
People need to stop asking for removal and ask for improvement. Removing stuff almost always ruins games.
Fisherman bay is fine. Redshire is fine. Vineyards is fine. Lot of small maps but if your idea is all then maps then itâs just less maps for CW and less variety.
I definitely preferred the Cold War with only four starting maps, prepared especially for this mode. There is also a 5th fantastic training map with burning oil wells. And it definitely looks the best for the Cold War. And probably in the whole game... The 3rd era should be played exclusively on these 5 special maps. The 1st era can contain maps from the 2nd world war because there are many vehicles from tier 9 and 10 of the 2nd world war. However, the 2nd era should have only the largest maps from the 2nd world war plus these 5 for the 3rd era. I do not think that the more maps the better for players. And I do not think that fewer of them but better quality will cause monotony in the game.
Well I can tell you haven't played many games. Destiny tried that. Players hated it. Many examples of if there are too few maps you dont keep players. Game is boring with little to work towards.
WOT was not a stupid and fast shooter similar to many others. Until WOT significantly stood out from other online games, the player base grew quickly at the beginning and then remained at a constant level for years. It was WG's controversial decisions and drastic changes that discouraged long-time experienced players. Despite the merger of platforms, the number of players is constantly decreasing. Today's players come and go quite quickly because the game does not offer many challenges, apart from the increasing number of unbalanced maps and the constant introduction of premium vehicles. Those that are definitely too strong are expensive. And if there is a large group of complainers, they are changed a lot, which WG still pays off. These cheaper premium vehicles do not stand out in any way from the best. They only lose old premium vehicles and those from the technology tree. I completely do not understand the point of offering old and weak premium vehicles in very expensive packages? Players are still decreasing... despite the fact that the once unique and demanding game has become easy, fast and colorful... Oh yes, and Ardennes is probably the worst map in the history of WOT right now... Same for WWII as for CW. Especially with the current spawn points...
Tunnel/ bobsley maps in today's WOT are completely pointless.
Well, your opinion is noted. For cheap premiums. The EE and 490 are definitely top performers. If not the top performers. The game is dieing for sure but the maps are not the cause. Lots of other reasons. Many like the balance of small big and each has its own challenges. No map is good for every tank. Again removing content will not save this game it will kill it faster.
Many of my friends were excited with the new ww2 map additions to CW. So thats already 12 people satisfied with that decision.
The problem of the falling popularity of WoT is not the number of maps, whether they are too big or too small, but their quality, balance and size inappropriate for CW. The problem, and the biggest one, is simply monotonous gameplay, without such great importance on how many maps, but the lack of activities such as those available on the PC version. The lack of a larger number of events as there was, for example, during Christmas. The lack of demanding challenges such as long haul. The lack of 7 vs 7 battles, etc. The lack of clan battles for provinces, assaults, etc. This is the source of boredom in this game and the reason for the departure of loyal players over the years. I played many online games and often after a few months I played on several maps. See Counter Strike for example. Several iconic maps for a dozen or so years.
Its not the maps at all. Besides a set few. Your the 1st to complain this much about maps that I have seen.
You can even name ligit reasons why this game is dieing but then you talk maps and most people I know will disagree with you.
Even in this thread to remove Ardennes more people disagree.
All the previously mentioned elements, their absence or major changes had an impact on the slow decline of this game and the departure of the best players' community. These reasons have existed either since the beginning of the console WOT (lack of clan functionality and clan events) or have arisen in recent years as a result of bad decisions. On the other hand, the lack of new maps adapted exclusively for the CW mode and the addition of maps from 2Ww, especially the very small ones, additionally discourage players from CW and the entire WOT game. And this process cannot be stopped. The game is falling faster and faster and only at the WISH OR RATHER the demand of WG itself. The lack of prospects for any improvement does not encourage spending money. Even profitable crates, which big players bought hundreds of, were destroyed... because having several hundred premium vehicles - collected for many years, they received a refund in gold, which they spent in the game and did not withdraw at an ATM... In addition, there is the technical condition of the game. No quick break for reported problems. No. last example with bots on 2 QW that shoot at undetected players... The problem has been there for months... Op premium tank tier 10 (1st in the history of the WOT tier 10 game with a bonus to earnings was destroyed after 2 months...) T249 WG "fixed" it in about 2 months. and they can't use bots for half a year.
Those players I know agree that the lack of maps for CW kills this mode, just as the lack of diverse events kills the WOT game itself. Maybe you know new players, and they usually change games the fastest... because new, more interesting ones come out.
Ah got to assume everyone that disagrees are lesser players. So common. Well your just as arogant as the rest so no point of continuing.
You don't have a Nick from the game on discord so I can't say how long you've been playing, what your level is, at least on your current account, so I don't know how much you know about the WOT game from a longer perspective. But I conclude that either you're not a good observer, or you can't draw conclusions from observations, or you simply have your own vision that is at odds with reality. And the reality is that there are more and more bots in battles, in every mode at every level of 2WW and the CW era. Whether you see it or not, it's like this and it's getting stronger. And on top of that, the bots on 2WW are broken... We really don't have anything to discuss any longer.
See again you have to degrade the other party to seem more correct. No point in continuing.
I refuse to argue with arogance.
yep no poin to discuss...
Lack of clan functionality and events.. my 450 player strong clan is proof that clans can do fine if effort is put in to them.
Events.. thereâs a whole server dedicated to tournaments and playing competitively, itâs where all the best players STILL PLAY!
Why are you bringing up her stats?
Shall we talk about your 11k WN8 by stat padding in tier 4? No wonder you know all about OP bots đ Over 2500 battles in the M8A1, yeah⊠I wouldnât be trying to stat shame anyone if I were you.
Youâve also only had 1600 battles in CW and this post is about removing a map from CW.
What a load of nonsense
Your just yapping about everything not do with the threads subject.
Ardennes is terrible and turns into an early base cap 90% of the time I play it
Constant base caps under 5 minutes with the majority of the lobby doing absolutely nothing
Fishermanâs bay is miserable
Ok
Stats paddingng... on random games made with WG MM?
You mad or what?
You use words whose meaning you don't understand...

Clone Battles are just training rooms and meetings there are organized by players themselves and there is nothing more to it. It has nothing to do with clan bits or the fortress from WOT PC. This event and functionality should be provided by WG. But they are too lazy and it seems a shame to give them some gold. But you can see that with such an approach of the players themselves, if you are doing so well, WG does not have to change anything. This is pathetic. Only one group gathered 45p players in clans who did nothing to make clan battles a part of the WOT CONSOLE game, and not just a private initiative... Seriously, there is nothing to brag about here...
Irrelevant to the threads subject
For me it is important that someone uses such arguments in my direction. As for the topic, only maps designed for CW mode should be available on the 3rd era. Removing only one map ARDENES (which is the worst map in WOT CONSOLE from 2WW) will not solve the problem of the remaining 2WW maps that are inappropriate for CW mode.
The 1600 battles that I supposedly have on CW are mostly on the first 4 maps. I was right not to research vehicles there because that is not how this mode was supposed to look. But if the majority likes it... then the majority can't be wrong, right? Most players on CW play like lemmings in a trance, driving without an idea and dying quickly. This is how senseless battles on CW currently look on maps from 2WW.
There are wargaming sponsored events.. you can win prizes like tanks, gold, premium time, camo..
Not to mention all the independent tournaments that are driven by passionate players who want to create a competitive environment for tankers to enjoy, you can even win cash prizes in some of them.
If youâre going to take the post off topic, and if youâre going to stat shame someone by sharing their wot stars link (which by the way is against this discords rules) then at least be well informed and not rocking out in tier 4 yourself.
I donât expect removing one map will solve all problems. I mean your literally agreeing with me about the removal of Ardennes and choose to go on rampage with your opinions that again have no relevance to the threads subject. Go and make a thread with your opinions and donât drag em in here.
Does a link to a publicly available player statistics page violate Discord's rules? At what point? No one should be ashamed of their statistics. It's just a small determinant of whether someone can lead a discussion in a given topic or not. For me, what is organized outside the game doesn't matter. That's why clan membership itself is pointless. Such CLAN WARS functionality should be implemented in the game. You'll probably agree with me here? Only such a systemic organization makes it possible for all clan members to participate in it. when others have, for example, blocked vehicles after their matches. In the training room, you can organize many events, e.g. playing tag or hide-and-seek XD But this topic is not about that. This is a petition to remove one map from the CW mode.
Creating separate threads with petitions to remove more inappropriate maps for CW mode would only dilute the problem of using maps from 2WW in CW mode. You can also collect the worst and smallest maps and WG with one ticket could do it. Otherwise it will take a few years...
^this is why I didn't continue with him.
Then clearly you canât lead a discussion then if your saying that cause of your 1600 battles in CW.
I believe HELA, when she says I have 1600 battles on CW. I didn't count it đ
I dont known where XD
I remember how great it was to play when the CW mode appeared and "only" four maps didn't interfere with the great fun. Supposedly 4 maps... But what maps they are, they are simply beautiful maps and then the additional one from the training mode with burning oil wells.. Oh and I also have other accounts, on one of them over another 10k, ~6000 battles on CW... But ok everyone can have their own opinion.
I dont like 2WW small maps on CW. Its my and only my opinion.
Now i dont like CW chaos... and dont play. Dont pay. Simple. Nev players era.
This was only a temporary testing run for a period of time to look at servers performances
Yes, I know about the temporary withdrawal of large maps from CW. Before the withdrawal, 4 large ones also drew more often maps from 2WW. I suspect that the problem on the servers is the millions of projectiles fired from all those rotary guns traveling over a kilometer, which the server has to register and was not designed for.
Just remove standard battle from all CW versions of WW2 maps. They are too small and early caps actually ruin games.
Remove Ardennes from CW and WW2 entirely. Worst map in game.
Everyone who has an different opinion is in your eyes straight arrogant. Here you are again calling others arrogant. Omg
To implement a clan wars mode maybe as an weekend event every 2 months would be great. đ
No, people who use assumptions of being lesser and stats to invalidate someones argument are arogant. Stated it outload and people agreed.
Was not a problem until that point.
Know all the facts before you make false call outs.
This is why your blocked you say alot of false things.
This guy made a lot of arguments and you just replied with you are arrogant.
And now you start wit me again đ
Just saying.. already unfollowed this tread.
đ
Actually we went back and forth until he made lesser assumptions but Im sure you just didn't feel like mentioning that.
Again false comments.
You did not respond to one argument he made. Itâs like speaking with a wall
Incorrect I agrred with everything except removal of all ww2 maps from CW. Gave examples and my clan loving the new ww2 maps. Never degraded his opinion. Just didnt agree. Thats ok. Not everything needs to be Im 100% and your 100% correct. We are going to stay on those extremes. That doesnt make either side lesser. Until the other party starts saying otherwise.
Learn these are suggestions and opinions. Not Im right and only right.
I actually dont see many saying why thet hate adrennes. I get its small. However it has city and hills. Several choke points but, many places for fast tanks to flank.
I think if u scroll up it appears your starting? You came into this thread and specifically responded to that person. No relevance to the threads subject.
Sorry king I called them out in similar way in the past. We took it to DMs and solved it. Should stop.
Can you explain what you dont like about the map or is it just the size?
Because I agree with nickBezSensu in most points. I donât want to say the same things again.
The capping can be solved like one guy said by doing white cap and TD only.
Agreeing is fine, dont bring up unrelated assumptions and stat shamming and its not a problem. You didnt but he did.
This guy has a good suggestion IMO. Not removal but adjustments.
A good middle ground.
The position of the bases & spawn points promote people to go the opposite to the flag causing early caps. Size is an issue like majority of the maps. So the map is more liable to fast caps. The amount of tree coverage and various hills lacks visibility on the enemy. Promoting more camping. Lot of people also in silly spots like K0.
Ah, I can understand some of that. The removal of cap and having just Team Deathmatch would help yes? They can also adjust the map some. So on bad spots they could add a big rock. The smaller maps a good for brawling so Im curious how that can be improved if people do have an issue. Before we jump to removal. If there is no way then remove.
Province is one I cant defend. That map is awful