#SOVIET TT (EXTENDED.) + FIXED T-80 TT.
114 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)

Least now we got a great community here to judge the TT. Lol.
I like it, hopefully some of these if not all of them can be added in the future
If you noticed I made a Object 477 branch. ๐๐
At this point why not
Object 225.
Are there no T72's or am I just blind?
Same ere
I think he excluded those since they are passed where tanks would branch off from
I didn't include those. I included more tanks.
These 2 may be too new to be in the game, as the year when they entered production is what counts towards the year 2000 cap as far as I know.
Otherwise, I can tell that a lot of effort went into this, and it respects all rules for natural progression set by previous lines as far as I can see.
I'm not a big fan of the USSR or Russia, but upvote because it's a well made tt.
Last I heard the cap was 1999
1999 is just the newest that can be added.
If it was 1999, then I would've said something about the t84 too. But no, that one is ok.
I think a completion of the czech/romanian line into era 3 should be given priority instead of adding even more lines tho. Imagine a ww2 line without a tier 10 tank, same thing as a cw line with no era 3 tank. It's a shame that they've left it unfinished and ignored the fact that it's unfinished for so long. I don't care if they use only romanian tanks or mix in some more nations for era 3. Just give it something in era 3. It could be just the tr85m1 alone and that would suffice. Or if they want to add that as a premium or they just have something against it and don't want to add it (altough there's no reason for it not to be in the game), something else, anything, even if it's not romanian, as logic-lacking as that would be.
And yes, I'd be saying this for another line that doesn't lead to era 3 too if there was one.
They're adding new lines when there's one only halfway done that could be completed. I've come up with 2 different ways that it could be completed before.
I don't think anything is too new for detente really since the leclerc T4 was revealed to the public in 2016 despite the base tank maybe being older
Bad argument. It's not about when the public got wind of it, but when the first unit was built.
We don't really know when it was built tho, we only know the French have been experimenting with main armaments since the 1990's which doesn't tell alot
Other than the range is between 1990 and 2016
Maybe the standards will get more blurry years in the future when they run out of things to add, but they don't need to break the rules they've set now to add more russian tanks when russian tanks are the most numerous already, they still have many they can add without breaking the rules, and there's still an unfinished line and important nations like Italy, Sweden and Japan not in the cw tt's.
The only real difference is its armament, we know that was tested in the 90's, therefore the Leclerc t4 must've been built in the 90's for them to test it back then.
Hmm
I am looking online
A prototype was built in 1996, however to avoid being scrapped, the prototypes turret was restored and mounted onto a an older leclerc hull in the 2010's and nicknamed terminateur, in the 2010's.
Considering the designation was only given after the prototype turret was restored and mounted on an older leclerc hull, one could say that they broke the 2000 limit rule, however if you stretch the interpretation, you can also say that both parts are older and thus its OK.
You don't have such an interpetration here for these ones.
Anyways, the priority shouldn't be to add all the newest russian tanks right now, but to finish the romanian line and add something in era 3 already, and then to introduce important nations into the roster that have been ignored until now, like Italy, Sweden (into the tt, they do have a premium), and Japan, and maybe they could add some more, like maybe Brazil.
I think independents have been very ignored imho
All of these but Italy could be independents.
The only nation there is isreal, even though so many more independents exist
Is Italy really independents?
BUT Italy.
Except Italy
Japan, Sweden and Brazil could be.
Any nation that was part of the non aligned movement before 2000 classes as an independent
So Yugoslavia, Egypt, India, ect
Italy wasn't part of the non aligned movement
Yugoslavia already has a premium and it's in the eastern tt.
But you still didn't understand what I said. I didn't say Italy was non aligned. I said that Sweden and Brazil were not aligned, and maybe you could make a point for Japan, since South Korea was put into independents with the k1.
Read again. This is a reading comprehension issue on your part, thinking I said Italy is not aligned.๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Guess my reading was wrong
Apologies
Anyways, before they add new lines, they should get something for the romanian line in era 3. A line should have a prize tank in top tier/era as is tradition.
Np.
Ye true
If it was up to me to make such decisions, I'd first have the romanian line conpleted with this suggestion I made exactly as I made it:
#1275958994699157524 message
Then I'd add Japan and Sweden to independents. (There are good suggestions for that on this server too)
Then I'd add Yugoslavia to eastern and Italy to western (Raininghavoc's suggestions would come in handy there)
Then I'd add french lights (saw a good suggestion months ago)
Then I'd find a way to add Brazil to independents. I think they have enough for a line.
And that's it for as far as I'd have a plan.
Isn't Yugoslavia, a founding member of the non aligned movement?
Makes zero sense to put it on eastern alliance considering how vehemently opposed Yugoslavia is to the Soviet union
The have the m636 as a eastern premium, so it is set that they would be eastern.
Weird, their so opposed to the soviet union historically I'd think that they make more sense being western alliance than east if I had to pick between the two, but oh well
Well, the decision was already made when they added that premium. Just like they made South Korea and Sweden independents with their premiums.
Maybe got added to that because communism, just like China.
Actually I think that's the code!
Official NATO members: western alliance
Communist countries: eastern alliance
Non-NATO and non-communist countries:
Independents
Tbh people aren't worried about 3 tanks when they can get 8 more instead
And honestly the independent tt needs way more added and should be a much bigger priority then 3 tanks
Nah, you're trying to rage bait me. I already gave my reasons why, and my suggestion has 9 new tanks, not 3.
You're only saying that because you hate me personally and want to be nuisance to me.
Just admit it already. Your problem isn't with the idea of having the romanian line be complete like the others.
You were in favour of it before that drama when I made this older suggestion for it:
Your problem is with ME.
Admit it.
No I'm still in favour of it being completed but making it a top priority is not the right way of doing it
Also they won't do anymore then 3 more for era 3 so it's pointless to say people would be in favor of 9 when we know only 3 will be added until they decide to move on
Uh huh. Again, it's not just 3 tanks, I suggested 9. Your argument falls. And shouldn't it be a no brainer that finishing something that you left half done is more important than starting something new?
And again they will only use 3
Also if they were gonna finish it it would already be done
Just because they add a few more doesn't mean a new line will be finished later. They're taking time and resources to make less tanks, so it will be finished faster and therefore the pace of releasing tanks won't be slowed. Wouldn't you like to have this in one season and another new one in the next instead of nothing in one and a new one in the next?
They CAN finish it. I already proved it twice!
So doesn't mean they will
Also again people won't be really excited over that line being finished as they would be for an entire new line
But it means they should, and that's why I'm so vocal, to bring light to the issue that of them ignoring it.
That's just your opinion.
It's fact
Opinion*
Fact
No, opinion. Now would you stop bothering me?
It's obviously a fact, why would people get excited for 3 new tanks when they can have 8 new tanks in a full line
@spare geyser Refer to this. They could have both those "3 tanks", and the other 8.
But they won't and clearly aren't bothered by it
And that's my whole point and why I'm here: they should be.
No your only here about that cause it's your nation's tanks, if it was any other nation you wouldn't care
Cope. Just say it out loud. You just hate me, and that's why you even bother to have this "disscussion". You want to annoy me. And I already said: I'd be ok with it even if they didn't use romanian tanks to finish it and I'd have a problem with any line having no era 3, so no!
Lies
Just stop bothering me already, you bully. My first suggestion literally had half foreign tanks and I only made a second after seeing that one with only romanian tanks gets more support after Raininghavoc made a suggestion like that, and I wanted to make a better one because I could.
You haven't had an issue with the Chinese lights not going to era 3
That connects back to the main line.
So
Therefore you do get to era 3.
It can though
The same logic applies in ww2, there are lines that brach to 2 or even 3 lines but still go to tier 10, what's so different here
If you start the chinese line, there is a way to get into top tier from it, but not from this one. By "incomplete" I don't mean that tank x or y isn't in there, but that a final prize tank in top tier isn't there. That's what makes a line complete.
It's a dead end, whereas any other line you take isn't a dead end and you get to the goal of top tier/era.
So connect it with the Chinese line then would that make you happy
And how would you do that? (Without breaking multiple rules of natural progression.)
I'm so tired of this already. It's clear that you just want to make me look bad, but I'm forced to keep defending myself as I'm being attacked.
The same way any other line connects back to a main line
Also your not being attacked lmfao stop playing victim
Jesus christ I'm closing this post.
You'd have to connect it to the heavies, which are 2 spots above. Also, that isn't the main line of the romanian tt.
Whatever you say
They come from different beginning tanks.
You've been way off topic this entire time anyway
Projection. And you just hate me and that's the only reason why you're here.
Yeah that's why I listen to Csickphantom.
Notice how it's called Soviet tt extended not romanian

You started this argument, so can we end it? I've told you to stop bothering me 2 times by now.
You start this mate
My disscussion was with someone else, not with you. You came here and claimed that my problem doesn't matter.
It doesnt cause it's a different line
You started this by going off topic
I wasn't talking to you.
Doesn't matter
@dense bramble ๐
Being off topic is a problem
Crazydevil already stated you went off topic. This is called "SOVIET TT (EXTENDED.) + T-80 TT FIXED." Not Romanian/Czech TT.
When other posts go off topic, such as when the is4m post became about the fv4005, no one seems to care, but when I do it, it's a problem. You just hate me, that's it.
No
Nobody hates you bruh. That's you making that up.
He's playing victim which is wrong
Maybe not you, but Crazy and Squirrel do for a fact.
