#List of Tanks that needs serious pen buff on all ammo types.
144 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Even if you give them all a e4 pen drop off penalty they still be most underplayed tanks
Falloff changes would help them more imo. Adding 10mm of pen isn't going to do much when it loses 50mm of that at range
They'd at least be able to pen stuff past 300m
All that it accomplishes is now they can pen thicker armor up close which is only going to hurt a lot of the same armored tanks you listed
premium spam penning armor is not a new thing
pc have premium spam blitz wot have premium spam it's natural of the game you have to deal with getting rt bt
That wasn't about premium spam, that was about the premium still being highly limited
im not talking to you
Yeah ik
I dont think you get what I'm saying. Adding that pen to their premium just won't help anywhere except for close range under about 175-200m
i don't know why you would use them all for sniping in 400mm away
just saying
That's not sniping at all.
iron mace exists if you are going to complain about drop off pen
It's a 25% decrease it's not worth running over the more valuable perks
maybe add the 150cm for the Kranvagn
man wants to give the kran 272 standard pen, are you high?
One message removed from a suspended account.
I'm sorry what?
I don't think the Kran's turret can get much thicker without it being considered a fortification and the German tanks everyone would just whinge about
You missed the is7 at 303 and the leman russ at 304 hell the nemesis only gets 310 on all its ap rounds.
the concept is a t9 and 310 at t9 is fine much higher than the cobra t54 the double tap and a bunch of other t9s with sub 300 pen that need a pen buff the sharpshooter and e50 only gets 270 premium to name a few the arachnid is at 280 id say around 310 is fine for t9s and around 320 premium for t10s is about where most tanks should be as for standard rounds about 260 is fair for most tanks the leman russ only gets 232 standard which is a joke and forces premium spam overall not a bad start but needs more to be complete
I think the problem is not the pen is how much they loose pen at range. If they was losing less pen at range it would feel better cause most of those tanks have absolutely no trouble under 100m
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
it's apcr it's supposed to have good pen. apcr are bad at penning angle armor and how is 272 op? are you new to the game?
the is7 is fine, 310 heat is not good even in tier 9 heat is worse than apcr in terms of armor pentation a lot of heavies have more than 310 heat
Their pen is low but isn't bad, but paired with high drop off it becomes obnoxious
High drop off would make sense on a brawling TD like the E4 to incentivise it to get close before firing it's gun, you could literally give the Waffentrager's drop off to the E4 and it would still have more pen at max range than the Pz7 does at 100m
310 heat is still better than the 280 heat the arachnid gets and if you cant make 310 pen work thats a you issue 310 is fine for t9 regardless of if its heat or apcr.
The is7 and the leman russ can both make do spamming gold as you generally dont need more than 300 pen to make do but i dont want to spam gold all the time if your hypothetical buff to a kranvagn gets 272 apcr and 330 heat because you like that tank other tanks should also get buffs equal to it all of the tanks you listed are "fine" as is but if your going to argue 303 pen with 50m drop off is good your wrong its playable but nowhere near "fine"
these tanks want buffs to be on an equal footing to each other giving one tank a penetration buff because you like it but denying that same buff to another tank with a worse gun makes no sense the is7 has a worse gun than an e100s 12.8cm but you want to give the e100s 12.8cm a buff theres no sense of fairness here is there?
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
i agree and the arachnid is too good it's don't need a buff
Yet the e100 and maus do when they have the same alpha but more pen and probably accuracy
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
None of the tanks "need" a buff but you cant deny one tank and buff all of its competitors when it has a worse gun to begin with
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Slightly more pen, but they lose pen quicker over distance
You don't see the point im making the gun is fine as is all of them are. so if your going to buff one gun you need to buff them all so they still compete at the same level
ive been playing console for 8 years and wot as a whole for 13 years, the kran absolutely does not need 272 standard pen, if you cant perform with its current pen you may need to rethink whatever strategy your using while playing it.
this clown thinks the kravn have good pen
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
yes aim with weakspots on a gun that have worse accuracy than the foch 155
One message removed from a suspended account.
Look what I found! The pen % of all of these tanks except the Is7
And waddya know? They're all at the bottom of the list for tier 10 heavies
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
that doesnt really prove much, considering the machine is down there and its pen is fine.
They loose more pen but both the is7 and the 12.8cm all finish up at the same pen over 500m 263mm meaning they perform equally at 500m outside other stats you buff the penetration on the 12.8cm by 10m does that raise the 500m drop off to 273 while the is7 is still stuck at 263 if so they no longer directly compete and if you add iron mace into the mix the higher the drop off the more useful the perk so is7 would get 276ish while the maus would be at 280+ i dont know the exact figure and cant be bothered working it out when the points obvious
ok and? this is 6.0 the tank has worse dispersion than a t57 good luck hitting weakspots 100% time
it also has like 2-3 times the turret armor of a T57
Is7 has mobility to offset its drop off, none of the German heavies do
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
man keeps complaining about the things that keep the tank balanced
One message removed from a suspended account.
Go head defend weak tanks
so 252/300 pen can pen everything?
Yet the Type 5 gets to RBRT everything else for free 
i hate to break it to you but if a type 5 is killing you, its less your tanks fault and more on you.
Then the leman russ or any other tank that got skipped over with a similar issue and it still doesn't solve the problem of the bad standard rounds so even if you were to leave the premium pen alone 250 standard when the ops proposes a buff to 272 on the kranvagn which has virtually identical pen to the is7 and even better mobility is mental the hypocrisy of the whole idea of only buff these tanks when others have similar or worse guns is ridiculous
Yeah the tank with less than 3k DPM getting killed by a type 5 with its obnoxious DPM is a skill issue, sure
obnoxious dpm? what are you smoking
everything can rbrt a type 5 🥱
250 to 303 is fine to this guy but 252 to 300 is bad
heat is worse than apcr end of story
True but low ap is still bad
apcr 252 is worse than 250 ap in armor penetration
2% normalisation isn't that much of a big deal the extra shell velocity from apcr makes up for it
false having 2% normalization increase the enemy effective armor while angle by 9%
just go to tanks.gg
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
have you heard about normalizion and pen rng?
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
it's have 0 normalization that's means it's have hard time penning angle armor
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
because it's matter
please play this game for once
So by that logic apcr only gets 2% normalisation which as you just established actually matters and has a big impact on armour... So if a tank has say 303 apcr when every other tank in the game is getting 320+ apcr according to your proposed buffs it would be at a disadvantage over all the other tanks right?
Fyi I hate heat as a round its too inconsistent to rely on so im all for kranvagn getting a pen buff my point remains if your going to buff one you need to buff them all
One message removed from a suspended account.
is7 is good it's don't need a buff and the 2 shot autoloader don't need a pen buff to
you think 254/300 is find for a bad autoloader
One message removed from a suspended account.
tell that to everyone who play this game
One message removed from a suspended account.
they will not agree with you everytime
One message removed from a suspended account.
cope
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
The cope is so strong i use it to power the whole city
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
i can aim 300mm of pen can't pen every weakspots or everything
One message removed from a suspended account.
good luck penning a hull down e4
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
200m cupola angle
Is7 is meh these days its been power crept by the introduction of more and more broken op premiums which out pen it and out armour it my point wasn't just about the arachnid or the is7 its about all of the tanks that you left out i said it was a good start but the e50 sharpshooter etc etc all which you left out need buffs 270 apcr premium you may like the is7 but theres a reason its almost bottom of the list on moe
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
I made a mistake i didnt filter my screenshot
if you think the e4 e3 is a 100% autopen you don't know what you are talking about and don't say the avre armor is a autopen with 300heat
Its middle of pack
One message removed from a suspended account.
No but its a very good indicator of how its performing
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
then why the e5 have lower moe than the is7? is the e5 bad? by your logic
Show me a clip you pen it 4 time in the Kran
The requirements to mark show what the best are doing with a tank its not the full picture but we dont have access to all the data you would need to make a good assessment wotstars only gives so much
One message removed from a suspended account.
Then your argument is meaningless
One message removed from a suspended account.
People always looks at the stats on paper and think they know everything about the tank they talking about
The e5 has a big easy to hit weak spot pen isn't everything and i never said it was my point remains your hypocrisy shows when you buff every tank but leave out others on what basically amounts to a quality of life buff for most heavys
One message removed from a suspended account.
The is7 don't need to be over buff the fv4005 have low pen are you going to tell me it's needs 400 pen?
And im not saying it should be but if all the guns it is comparable to get a buff then so should it otherwise it will be power crept a little something called balance...
do we need to buff everything
guys we should buff the avre pen since fv215 183 is getting a buff 😲
just shut up wg bot not every Russian tanks needs a buff
you have nothing better to say muted
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Reason: Bad word usage
Whatever grandpa keep posting outdated memes