Should i switch from arch to ubuntu/debian?

[steady creek]

Is it worth doing? Why or why not

[steady creek]

Or Fedora maybe

[silent tiger]

if you are content with your package avaliability then just stay on arch frankly its usuaully kind of better once you are used to the management of its packages although fedora tends to have newer packages in certian ways than arch

but fedora also requires you to restart your computer to apply updates every time like windows

[steady creek]

What about debian?

[zenith bone]

if you want maximum stability, minimum maintenance and a reliable linux distro where you dont need the latest features, use Debian

[silent tiger]

although stability isn't always something to be strived for especially if you are using new hardware like the radeon rx 9000 series basically newer computers in general benefit from a unstable distro, to be fair though unstable is kind of a misnomer,most of the time you can get relatively tested unstable distros via things like solus linux

[jolly badger]

short answer: yes

[jolly badger]

only if you use the gui software updater. which you can set to apply updates at runtime anyways.

[steady creek]

will fedora work fine with nvidia GPU?

[silent tiger]

without secure boot yes with secure boot you need to sign the drivers for nvidia