#deriving the determinant and inverse of a generic 2x2 matrix
79 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hey @vital cedar, Thanks for sharing your math problem with us. While you wait for a Helper to help you, we want to share some vital information with you.
Please take a moment to read the helpee guidelines. This will make sure that your post follows the helpee rules of our community.
Please don't ping <@&775784618955505685>, <@&1283689826742440016>, <@&819616364188139550>, or <@&624327278137966593> for help because their job is to take care of the server's administrative tasks, not to answer queries directly. However, if you have a problem with how a Helper is acting, you can ping a Helper Moderator.
It's always very useful if you can show us the work you've done so far. This makes it easier for our Helpers to find mistakes and help you get to the right answer.
seems simple but how did they solve the system of equations for x, u, v and y
also what is the importance of the determinant
other than telling us if theres a possible inverse for a matrix
Each term of the matrix has a factor 1/(ad-bc) which is 1/determinant of the original matrix
isnt 1/(ad-bc) times the original matrix with a and d switched and c and b minused
Yes
That's the inverse
what does the determinant refer to visually?
determinants can be visualized as the factor by which the unit area is scaled when a linear transformation takes place
ok but then am i correct in assuming there is a factor which represents the shaw of it
like how far it turns into a parallelogram
thanks for this though it really helped my understanding of the topic
@vital cedar
Hello bonaparte5472, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.
@quiet kayak @glacial bay @torpid harness The user still needs help with this help request.
I mean you could see the basis from columns and find out the angles ig
alright so its not a set expression or
Use a system of equations
Let A be a 2x2 matrix
A^(-1) is the matrix that satisifies
A*A^(-1) = I_2
Where I_2 is the identity matrix of order 2
So you have
$$A = \begin{pmatrix}
a & b \
c & d
\end{pmatrix}\
A^{-1}=\begin{pmatrix}
a' & b' \
c' & d'\end{pmatrix}\
\text{Such that:}\
A \cdot A^{-1} = I_2$$
._kamikaze._
We now multiple the two matrices
$$A\cdot A^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix}
aa' +bc' & ab' + bd'\
ca' + dc' & cb'+dd'\end{pmatrix}\
= \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0\
0 & 1
\end{pmatrix}
._kamikaze._
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Now we solve the system
$$\begin{cases}
aa' + bc' = 1\
ab' + bd' = 0\
ca' + dc' = 0\
cb' + dd' = 1
\end{cases}$$
._kamikaze._
We are looking for a', c', b' and d'
$$
\begin{cases}
aa' + bc' = 1\
ca' + dc' = 0
\end{cases}
\ and \
\begin{cases}
ab' + bd' = 0\
cb' + dd' = 1
\end{cases}
$$
._kamikaze._
We will work with elimination
$$
\begin{cases}
caa' + cbc' = c\
aca' + adc' = 0
\end{cases}
$$
we multiply first line by c and second one by a
._kamikaze._
$$caa' + cbc' - caa' -adc' = c$$
._kamikaze._
._kamikaze._
._kamikaze._
thus $c' = \dfrac{c}{cb-ad}$
._kamikaze._
We do this for all 4 variables
To find the following inverse matrix
$$\begin{pmatrix}
\dfrac{d}{ad-bc} & \dfrac{-b}{ad-bc}\
\dfrac{-c}{ad-bc} & \dfrac{a}{ad-bc}
\end{pmatrix}
$$
._kamikaze._
We notice that the repeating ad-bc is the det(A)
$$\begin{pmatrix}
\dfrac{d}{\det(A)} & \dfrac{-b}{\det(A)}\
\dfrac{-c}{\det(A)} & \dfrac{a}{\det(A)}
\end{pmatrix}
$$
And we can now factor it out
to find
$$A^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{\det(A)}\begin{pmatrix}
d & -b\
-c} & a
\end{pmatrix}$$
._kamikaze._
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
._kamikaze._
#bot-cmd-latex to spam LaTeX, also observe they already got help.
How am I spamming?
I don't see how helping twice is a bad thing considering the thread is still open
You did not work with the student, you just left them a bunch of LaTeX entries to read on their own, and have to sift through them and the actual sentences.
As for the channel still being open... they just never closed in. But again, reading the channel would clearly tell you they got help and were satisfied with the help given.
Also per the rules, one helper per channel unless the channel has been ghosted by the original helper (and OP is clearly still present.)
Ok
I found it helpful how they explained how they solved it