#Why is my proof incorrect? - Lin alg

41 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)

ebon coral
wispy mirageBOT
#
๐Ÿ‘‹ Welcome to your Help Thread!

Hey @ebon coral, Thanks for sharing your math problem with us. While you wait for a Helper to help you, we want to share some vital information with you.

โ€‹

โ— Please take a moment to read the helpee guidelines. This will make sure that your post follows the helpee rules of our community.

โ€‹

โ— Please don't ping <@&775784618955505685>, <@&1283689826742440016>, <@&819616364188139550>, or <@&624327278137966593> for help because their job is to take care of the server's administrative tasks, not to answer queries directly. However, if you have a problem with how a Helper is acting, you can ping a Helper Moderator.

โ€‹

โ— It's always very useful if you can show us the work you've done so far. This makes it easier for our Helpers to find mistakes and help you get to the right answer.

wispy mirageBOT
ebon coral
#

I was told it was incorrect but I dont quite understand why

#

I'm not a mathematician so my rigor might be a little off (notation etc)

#

also dont mind pinging me when anyone resopnds

unborn flare
#

Each line is also just off, you also never showed phi was linear

lofty bane
#

what does c + lambda*epsilon mean, what does small number greater than 0 mean? who ever said K = real numbers?

ebon coral
lofty bane
#

your task is to show phi is a linear surjection

ebon coral
#

Would you two say that my proof lacks rigor or that the logic to my solution is just totally wrong?
In other words, could tiny changes like more grounded definitions etc save this?

unborn flare
#

You've also said W is finite

unborn flare
#

If w is a vector in W, can you find a linear map that sends v to that specific w

lofty bane
#

let f,g in Hom (V,W), does it follow that phi (f+g) = phi (f) + phi (g)?@ebon coral

unborn flare
ebon coral
ebon coral
unborn flare
#

Epsilon isn't a thing period

lofty bane
#

ok I suppose you have proved linearity elsewhere

now let w in W be arbitrary. Find a suitable linear map f : V to W such that f(v) = w. If w = 0, you can take f = 0.

ebon coral
unborn flare
#

You're not

ebon coral
#

what if I say there exsits an epsilon > 0 , would that make it valid

unborn flare
#

Epsilon in analysis is just an arbitrary positive number

#

It'd make it better, but you've not assumed anything about the field

lofty bane
unborn flare
#

So you don't know > exists

ebon coral
#

So is my method hopeless? (I have a proper solution to this problem btw using bassisses, I just wanted to know where I want wrong and if it was salvagable)

lofty bane
#

it is hopeless

lofty bane
#

stick to the definition of surjectivity

hallow fulcrum
wispy mirageBOT
#

@ebon coral

:HelpIcon:| Help Reminder

Hello .kobe., this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.

ebon coral
#

+close

wispy mirageBOT
# ebon coral +close
Please thank your Helpers before closing!

Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.

wispy mirageBOT
# wispy mirage

Thank you for your feedback! aL has been awarded 1 helper_points. They now have 968 helper_points. They have 3 helper_points daily left for today.

wispy mirageBOT
# wispy mirage

Thank you for your feedback! Omega has been awarded 1 helper_points. They now have 898 helper_points. They have 3 helper_points daily left for today.