#Euclidean Geometry (∆)
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hey @tardy karma, Thanks for sharing your math problem with us. While you wait for a Helper to help you, we want to share some vital information with you.
● Please take a moment to read the helpee guidelines. This will make sure that your post follows the helpee rules of our community.
● Please don't ping <@&775784618955505685>, <@&1283689826742440016>, <@&819616364188139550>, or <@&624327278137966593> for help because their job is to take care of the server's administrative tasks, not to answer queries directly. However, if you have a problem with how a Helper is acting, you can ping a Helper Moderator.
● It's always very useful if you can show us the work you've done so far. This makes it easier for our Helpers to find mistakes and help you get to the right answer.
What have you tried?
I uhh
Constructed to Bisect AB in Q and drew QR J AB to meet BD in
QR perpendicular to AB to meet BD inR
Wait, I need to see the original text.
I spotted what might be a mistake.
To clarify, I meant take a photo or a screenshot of the original problem.
Right, that's what I thought the typo was, except I thought you meant that BP = 4 AP, because for BP = 4 AB, you would need P to be on the extension of AB, not on AB.
Now, onto actually solving the problem. We're given a bunch of length ratios, and then asked to prove that two line segments are perpendicular.
So what theorems do we have handy that relate lengths to right angles?
If one side of a triangle is produced, (i) the exterior angle is equal to the
sum of the interior non-adjacent angles; (ii) the sum of the three angles of a
triangle is two right angles.
COROLLARY 1. If two angles of one triangle are respectively equal to two
angles of another triangle, the third angles are equal and the triangles are
equiangular.
COROLLARY 2. If one side of a triangle is produced, the exterior angle is
greater than either of the interior non-adjacent angles.
Ig it would make the problem lengthier
Ok how do you plan to solve the problem
Well, if we draw out the diagram and call the intersection of BD and CP Q, then we wish merely to prove that one of the - wait.
No, I thought I might've spotted an easier method involving quadrilaterals.
Or, wait.
Wait I see somthn
To clarify, my idea is to prove that one of the triangles containing point Q is right by proving its lengths satisfy the Pythagorean theorem.
AB = 2 BC, .'. BC = BQ. In the ∆ABD, Q is the mid-
point of AB and QR =¼ AD. .'. R is the mid-point of BD and QR
= ½AD (
I drew it
Where are you getting BC = BQ?
I constructed
This
No, BC = BR.
...because you just said R is the midpoint of AB.
So AB = 2 BC ==> BC = AB/2, and AR = BR = AB/2 by the definition of midpoint.
Hence BC = BR.
If BC = BQ, that makes triangle BQC isosceles, with B as the vertex, therefore <BCQ = <BQC, which makes it impossible for <BQC to be right, which is what we're trying to prove it is.
Okay, you misspoke.
The point you're calling F is the point I'm calling Q.
And the point you've labeled as Q is the point you told me was R.
I see. QR is by construction the perpendicular bisector of AB.
Therefore triangle BCP is congruent to triangle QBR.
AB = 2 BC, .'. BC = BQ. In the triangle ABD, Q is the mid-
point of AB and QR = ½ AD. .'. R is the mid-point of BD and QR
=½ AD (
Okay, I'm sorry, but you're really leaving out a lot of important details.
Like...!?
It makes no sense to write one thing and then write "therefore".
Wdym
AB = 2 BC, therefore BC = BQ makes no sense.
Bro BQ=½AB
But you didn't say that.
I did
What you need to say is AB = 2 BC is given, therefore BC = AB/2. Q is the midpoint of AB by construction, therefore BQ = AB/2 by the definition of a midpoint. Therefore, BC = BQ (by transitivity of equality).
Exactly
Yes, that's exactly what you should've said and didn't.
Bro I'm on ma phone how can I type so much 😭
I mean, it's called patience, and you can't do math without it.
You have to cross your t's and dot your i's or else your proof is just wrong.
Don't apologize to me, sloppy thinking is a habit that hurts you.
Okie 👍
Now, QR = AD/2, prove that.
Similar ∆s
Prove BQR = BAD.
Okay, look.
BAD = 90 degrees because ABCD is a rectangle.
BQR = 90 degrees by construction because QR is by construction perpendicular to AB.
So...!?
Therefore BAD = BQR.
That is waht I'm saying
No, it's what you're not saying.
Bruh
I am impatient 😭
Oh I solved the problem
And I'm gonna tell you how with patient this time so wait ...
Oh wait! Triangle DCB is similar to triangle CBP.
Which I think can then be leveraged into proving that triangle BFC is similar to triangle PBC.
Got it!
Why do you inqire so much 😭
Bud I'm on ma phone and it's LateX
And I couldn't do it here cuz my text was too long
Well, pdfs are kind of sketchy last I heard.
In any case, I figured it out.
Look, just explain each step, one at a time, in plain words.
ur picture looks likeAB=4BP,your topic is the opposite!According to your picture.
AssumeBP=x,soAB=4x,BC=2x=AD
It can be seen from the rectangle.
CP=5^(1/2)x ,BD=2(5)^1/2
BD/CP=BA/CB=BP/DA Triangles are similar.so AngleABD=AngleBCP becauseAngleBCP+BPC=90 AnglePBD+BPC=90,AngleBFP=180-90=90 BD is perpendicular to CP
Refer to my pdf once
Anyways I solved the problem