#Why is Arg(z) considered discontinuous at -1?
128 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Why is Arg(z) considered discontinuous at π?
Why is Arg(z) considered discontinuous at -1?
what is gamma 1,2
ts thing
can u define it
are you familiar with how the prinicpal argument is defined for -pi to pi
below the x axis its negitive above its positive
I just learned it a few days ago so kinda?
Well, the principal value arg(z) can have values in (-π, π] by convention. You can also use the convention [0, 2π), or any other semi-closed interval of length 2π, really.
And since rotating by a full circle doesn't change the complex number, we have Arg(z) = arg(z) + 2πn.
but i thnkg the question he gave uses the prinicpal argument
u have to stick to it
also the theta in principal argument is as
-pi <theta<= pi
Oh, right. Sometimes upper and lowercase are swapped.
I'm more used to lowercase functions meaning principal value and uppercase ones being multivalued.
in high school they just use principal argument really, i dont think they even teach the other convneitons
Oh, you learn complex numbers in high school? Cool!
everyone here does
Hm, interesting. Depends on the country, I guess.
true
Are pi and -pi different angles?
see the argument in ur question can never reach -pi sicne its out of its domain but teh defination of principal argument
Oh
it can only approach
Oh okay
but they both approach it yes
Oh and what happens if you were to take sqrt(z) which has Arg(z) in it
And take limit as z->-1
if u take sqrt(z)
So the point it approaches is not in the range?
Okay
say it agian i did not get what u mean its is not in the range
Like it’s not part of the possible outputs of Arg(z)
well if u take sqrt of z then make z approach -1 its arg(sqrt(z)) will approach pi/2
notice i siad arg(sqrt(z)) not arg(z)
Oh
So if you take the limit as z->-1 of Arg(z) it approaches -pi which is not within (-pi,pi]?
limit does not exist
LHL = -pi , RHL = pi , and arg(-1) = pi
its discontinius
so it approaches -pi
but not quite gets there
So if you approach from above or below the real axis the limits are different?
yes if u use the prinicplal argument convention
Would it help if I showed the graph of the principal value? As in, in the form z = arg(x + iy).
if u want it to be continoius u can use least positive argument convention
limit does not exist how ever the argumetn has a value
pi
lorddarpinger asked smth btw
then we convert it into teh principal range i.e make theta b/w -pi and pi
Okay
if u have 3pi u subtract 2pi to get into teh range
Is arg(z) continuous?
Oh you can convert any angle to be within the (-pi,pi]
yes u do that in tirg too right
nooo
No?
Oh then how to get the angle
Ye
Oh
u gotta make sure abt argument's sign and all
Here you go. Ignore the almost-vertical part, that's just an artifact.
You can see that arg(x + iy) is discontinuous on the ray {x ≤ 0, y = 0}.
Well, suppose z = a + bi. Then if r = |z| = √(a^2 + b^2), then θ = arg(z) satisfies:
cos(θ) = a/r
sin(θ) = b/r
Usually you'd do it like this:
- Look at the signs of a and b. Those correspond to the signs of cos(θ) and sin(θ), so you know which quarter the argument lies in.
- Solve tan(θ) = b/a in the respective quarter.
Of course, you need to mind two things:
- If a = b = 0, then the argument is undefined.
- If a = 0, then tan(θ) is undefined, so you just look at the sign of b and deduce whether the argument is π/2 or -π/2.
You can rephrase this question the following way: what direction does a vector with length equal to zero point to?
No direction?
Yup.
Oh so it’s undefined cause there is no direction
Yeah.
Is there formula for Arg(z) that works for all points within the principle range
Or do some a and b values result in the formula not working like a=0
Not really. Depending on where the complex number lies, it could be arctan(b/a), arctan(b/a) - π, arctan(b/a) + π, -π/2, π/2 or undefined.
Oh okay
Usually it's calculated using the algorithm I described above, with some slight variations, maybe.
So like determine which quadrant then get the angle and if no angle look at b
Well, I mean, the angle either lies in a quarter, on a ray or nowhere.
What do you mean by ray or nowhere
Well, rays lie between quadrants, after all.
And if z = 0, then the argument is just undefined.
Oh okay makes sense
So do the 2 steps to get the argument?
And if one or both are 0 perform the other 2 steps
Yeah. Though, if at least one of a and b is zero, then it's pretty easy to see what the argument is, anyway.
You're welcome!
@tacit osprey
Hello bruh_sophie0521, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.
+close
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.
LordDarpinger Thank you for helping our users, however our Mathematics Team cares about the health of its members, so you can no longer receive
since you surpassed your daily limit, but don't worry, it will be reset tomorrow.