#Pi Powering

18 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

cyan holly
#

61 is NOT = 2 * 31
31 * 2 = 62

fringe brook
fringe brook
#

vvv
Again we truncate Pi to its 9th irrational digit/place/position

3.141592653^4 { time or space } = 97.40 90 90 96 0

This 4 can be as a time powering, or as a spatial powering?

If we call it a time powering, 97.40 90 90 96 0 minus the previous XYZ { space value } 31.00 62 7 66 62 = 66.40281434 { Cosmic Pi Time? Cosmic Pi Space? }

However, if we that 4th powering a space/spatial power, I do the folowing; 97.409090960 / 4 = 24.35 22 7 2 74 and in this way I say that Im re-normalizing the truncated Pi resultant { 97.40 90 90 96 }, as a spatial/space value 24.35 22 7 2 74. I dunno.

In this manner 24 is obviously less/smaller than XYZ{ aka 3D} so how can a re-normalizing of a 4th power be as space/spatial be less than 31.00 62 7 66.. or rather, what I mean to say, how is can this lesser value be of significance in any way???

fringe brook
#

vvv
31.00 62 7 66 62... minus 24.35 22 7 2 7 4.. = 6.654 00 39 22...

Pi truncated to 9th irrational position/place, and then to the 2nd power 3.14 15 92 65 3**^**2 = 9.86 96 04 39 7... and divide that by our above, immediate resultant { if not insignificant } value 6.654 00 39 22... = 1.48 41 42 28 4...

Ok so why take the truncated Pi value to a 2nd power? For exploratory reasons, relating to this who procedure of what does it mean when I say Im re-normalizing truncated Pi^4th power etc?

Or do any of these numbers, set off any inspirational alert bells to myself, or others?

What rational scientist over years since that of Maxwell, or even prior to Maxwell, would follow along these Pi associated pathways of consideration?

I watched vid today with physics theorist name Schuller, and he seems to mention to be looking for connection between Gravity as background metric used in conjunction with Maxwells conclusions.

Im tired, so, maybe just more of Ribot beating the bushes hoping some *meta-space geometric pattern is the connection --tho pattern *is not an **occupied space **in of itself-- to our physical reality of observed time, that Mxawells conclusions are.

low wing
#

What pi do you like ? I prefer pumpkin pi

fringe brook
# low wing What pi do you like ? I prefer pumpkin pi

I like the one to 9th irrational digit, I guess I was not clear on that issue.
Why the 9th? Because it includes 66 and Cosmic Pi Time is 66.4.

3.1^3 = 29.791

3.141^3 = 30.98 87 32 22 1....

3.141^3 = 31.00 61 98 11 07 21 679....

3.1415926^3 = 31.00 62 7 50 93 56 96 69 642776....

3.14159265^3 = 31.00 62 7 65 74 01 0302860934625

3.141592653^3 { XYZ/3D space } = 31.00 62 7 66 62 83 67 42352563829077

Other reasons to use and stop at 9th irrational digit? Im my space and time horn torus we find the triangular based bifrustum polyhedron --with four internal nucli of realith not shown--- as one static version of the Minimal Pulse of Universe, the graviton-darkEon.

And within the graviton-darkEon, we find that the 9th nodal event is not directly/immediately nuclear to either end triangle, nor the mid girth triangle ,ergo, 9th nodal event it is the random agent that is nuclea/internal-to-reality, of the graviton-darkEon { triangular bifrustrum } aka Minimal Pulse of Universe.

9 surface vertexial nodal events of graviton-darkEon ---9^2, minus 9 = 81, divided by 2 = 36 lines-of-relationship { LoR }--

4 internal vertexial nodal events of the graviton-darkEon -- = 6 LoR,s

9 + 4 = 13, ergo, 13^2 = 169, minus 13 = 156, divided by 2 = 7 lines-of-relationship for Minimal Pulse of Universe { graviton-darkEon } = Total = 78 lines-of-relationship.

For LoR's I like to think of Quantum Field Vibrations, ---occupied space filling-- however, that does not appear to include the vibrational nature of the 13 vertexial nodal events themselves.

A question for me to ponder, as well as many others.

low wing
#

Hmm

fringe brook
#

Oops, corrected the above, to correct position for the 78 LoR's is the total lines of relationship for 13 vertexial nodal events. 4 vertexial nodal events = 6 LoR's ergo the tetrahedron.

low wing
#

So, what I'm wondering

#

Nevermind

velvet aurora
#

Maybe you aren’t advanced enough for this discussion post yet

cyan holly
#

they didn't teach me anything about the 13 vertexial nodal events in school 💔

low wing
#

It's somehow connected to that website, but I didn't find much about the definitions there either

#

Maybe I looked at the wrong articles

fringe brook
#

oops found another error. Corrected 76 LoR, to 78 LoR for the 13p nodal/vertexial events. Interesting developments today, in that I have dont recall ever noticing the following regarding teta{4}hedra in the graviton-darkEon aka the Minimal Pulse of Universe.