#Help solving using algbera please

58 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

ionic saffronBOT
#
  1. Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  2. Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
  3. Do not ping other members randomly for help.
  4. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  5. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  6. If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:

+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:

radiant shore
#

Try writing the parabola in the vertex form. That will allow you to express b and c in terms of a.
After that recall when a quadratic equation has two roots.

distant isle
radiant shore
distant isle
#

thats what I did and I then solved using the discriminant formula

#

but idk it doesnt work

radiant shore
#

Well, first of all, what expressions for b and c did you get?

distant isle
radiant shore
#

Now, what about the discriminant?

distant isle
#

yea i got 324a^2 +56a -324a^2 > 0

#

which makes no sense but i might be bugging

radiant shore
distant isle
#

yea but 56a>0 isnt helpful no?

radiant shore
#

Oh, it is.

#

You can simplify the inequality a bit more, too.

#

Well, you get a > 0, right?

distant isle
#

ye

#

how is that helpful in any way

#

oh wait

#

yh idk

radiant shore
#

Well, we want a + b + c, right?

radiant shore
distant isle
#

yea but you dont know what a is

#

a is just more then 0

radiant shore
#

We know a condition on a, though.

#

So, what will a + b + c be?

distant isle
#

we know b is negative

#

but idk c

radiant shore
#

No, no. I mean a + b + c in terms of just a.

#

We expressed b and c, after all.

distant isle
#

yea i know so based upon that those are the only conclusions which can be made no?

#

because a is a constance not an integer

radiant shore
#

Well, a can change, of course.

#

a + b + c won't have an exact value, but we can put a condition on it.

#

After all, you're asked what its value could be, not what it is.

#

So, what is a + b + c in terms of just a?

distant isle
#

how do you put conditions on c , thats what I dont get

radiant shore
distant isle
#

yea but we have it as a condition not as a variable were we can just plug them in

#

the only condition i know of is that b<0

radiant shore
#

We have a condition a > 0 and b and c expressed in terms of a.

#

That already puts a condition on a + b + c.

#

What is a + b + c?

#

Recall that b = -18a, c = 81a - 14.

distant isle
#

thats were I have been stuck on

radiant shore
#

Substitute b = -18a and c = 81a - 14 into a + b + c. What do you get?

distant isle
#

bruh

#

mb

#

64a-14 = a + b + c

#

so D is correct

#

thank you so much

radiant shore
#

You're welcome!

distant isle
#

.close

round marshBOT
#

Unable to parse the channel name