#Interesting question

15 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

terse grove
#

Pls help i cant solve

opal brambleBOT
#
  1. Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  2. Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
  3. Do not ping other members randomly for help.
  4. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  5. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  6. If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:

+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:

terse grove
#

It means which n positive integer
n! | 1^n +2^n … n^n is correct

forest edge
#

First observation I have is that when n is prime, we can take mod n on both sides, n! mod n = 0, and by fermat's little theorem a^n = a mod n, giving is n(n+1)/2, which is 0 mod n, as long as n is not 2.

If n+1 is prime, n! = n mod n+1, and by fermat's little theorem a^n = 1 mod n+1, giving us n. So the I'd guess that it works for prime n and prime-1 n, but obviously not sure

#

Just tried some values, that is not right, seems like for almost all values its false, now imma switch to counting the number of powers of 2.

#

The exponent of 2 in the prime factorization of n! is O(n)

#

If n is odd, then 1^n + 2^n ... n^n mod 2 is 1+0+1...+0+1, there is exactly one more 1 than 0, so if n is odd, the sum is odd. This means that n! cannot divide 1^n + ... n^n for any odd n

#

Sorry, that was wrong, what matters is the total number of 1's not the amount relative to 0, the total number of 1's is ceil(n/2) so if that is odd, then n! cannot divide the sum

#

For every prime, there should be a similar argument

#

Actually no, you want to take mod 2^k for all k

#

This will give you a bound on the exponent of 2 in the prime factorization of 1^n + 2^n ... n^n

#

Then you lower bound the exponent of 2^k in the prime factorization n!, and that will be asymptomaticly larger than the first bound

#

This would show that it can't be true for all but finitely many n

#

1 and 3 are likely the only values