#limits
192 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Hey
hey mate
Is the answer 2
Is the red line f(x)
i need this one
the red line is f(x) correct
Ok
Ohh now it makes sense
i found it 1/0
Alr
It approaches either of the infinites
No actually, f(x)>x in a neighborhood containing -1
f(x)-x ≥ 0 basically
+∞
Wait it’s -∞ my bad
Cuz minus 1 in the numerator
Yeah
You can’t directly substitute here
-(1/0)
Ok, how would you interpret 1/0 in a limit sense?
cant i apply the lim?
Wait, how about this
Let’s define ε(x) as f(x)-x, alr?
sure
Now, evaluate both the left hand side and right hand side limits
they the same right
That’s not the correct form of the answer unfortunately
You have to show that
But yes, the lhs and rhs limits are the same
oh shit
u da best
i got it
basically i could write it like
lim= x * (1/f(x)-x)
and for x→-1+
and for x→-1-
right?
Yes
Watch where you're putting parenthesses
any idea
Well, you see where f(x)>x
Clearly when x is in the neighborhood (-infinity, 1), f(x)>x
f(lnx) is it -inf?
x→0+
What
Yes
.
lim x->0+ lnx is -∞
Fucked with my phone keyboard
It wouldn’t be -1/0 though
yea i got it
#helper-nominations
Was studying
yea so
Also please refer to my bio
i got the answer i needed
Thank me when you close the post
Yep
Erm what
Ahhh yeah basically yes
so finally its
Is f(x) still the red curve?
What
Send a picture of the graph again please
Ok there’s a horizontal asymptote, you’re correct
You should really be saying $f\qty(\lim_{x\to -\infty}x)$, but that's alright (just a little bit of notational clearup)
Kocher
Or something of the sort
Notationally yes
Technically infinity is not a measureable number, so we can't really say this
but
we dont care about that
do we?
cuz when x→2 the red hits it
Rn you’re good though
But you should get in the practice of using conventional notation
the y=-3 matters
whats that
Teropic
It’s literally the same thing, but it’s more notationally correct
Ravi ≥ ^• ∧ •^ ≤
It’s simple enough
LaTeX isn’t python lol
yea ik
if you use it regularly it takes a few weeks to get used to
lmao
Yep
but not worth the time or effort right now
bet
just use pen and paper
True
gl
tysm
do +close if you are done
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.
Thank you for your feedback! Ravi ≥ ^• ∧ •^ ≤ has been awarded 1
. They now have 1
. They have 3
daily left for today.
Thank you for your feedback! Kocher has been awarded 1
. They now have 1236
. They have 3
daily left for today.
Thank you for your feedback! Dr. Bored the weed dealing sigma has been awarded 1
. They now have 3
. They have 3
daily left for today.
Thank you for your feedback! therealcoffey has been awarded 1
. They now have 52
. They have 3
daily left for today.
@bitter torrent why skull
1236 is crazy 😭😭😭
Hello, I can solve your problem at a budget
Against rules!!
@supple island close the post what are you waiting for
+close
You are not authorised to close this help request!
+close