#INDUCTION
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
,rccw
Show that the statement is true for $n=1$, then true for $n=k+1$, with $k\in\bN$. Then conclude using the inductive hypothesis.
Kocher
You can just use the fact that $6^{k+1}-1=6^{k+1}-6+5$.
Kocher
So you can use the inductive hypothesis cleverly.
what im completeyly lost
You need to find a way to use the fact that $6^k-1$ is divisible by 5, per your inductive hypothesis.
Kocher
If you can find a clever way to group the terms such that this hypothesis appears, you'll be virtually done with the proof.
Technically, both ways will give the answer, since:
||a^(n + 1) - b^(n + 1) = a(a^n - b^n) + (a - b)b^n = b(a^n - b^n) + (a - b)a^n||
idk what youse are on abt if u look at my example i sent could you compare to q im doing now and tell me whats the next thing i have to write
Yeah, but depending on the context, the formula may not be able to be used.
Anyways.
,rccw
You've done exactly that in your previous examples. You've found a way to use the fact that (something) is divisible by (something).
I know.
Now you just have to find a way to include (6^k-1) in your statement, which will convienienty have a multiple of 5.
Positive 35, yeah.
why positive
Kocher sorry for interrupting but he has done some mistakes here
Why did you write -1 in the power in the 2nd step
And how did you take out 6² in the last step
-36+35=-1.
oh ye my bad
taht - 1 isint ment to be apart of the power
and the 6^2 i took out bc thats what i did in my exampkle
So do it again and use what kocher said
Hm, why? It can be used for the induction step for all of these exercises.
Sure, but it's kind of a cheat code.
Well, I guess. It's easy to derive, though.
i ahve this q aswell
but im confused
on how to get the -3.4^k + 1
part
@stuck gazelle @fluid spoke @polar tide
I don't understand what you did in
?
I'd represent 7 = 3 + 4.
what does that mean
Ah, wait! Sorry, I misread.
Ah, I see now.
Yeah, looks good.
Well, we had 4*4^k + 1, but the bracket term contains 7*4^k + 7. That's 3*4^k + 6 more than what we had, so we subtract it.
is the bracket not( 7^k + 4^k + 1 )
The first term is 7(7^k + 4^k + 1) = 7*7^k + 7*4^k + 7.
You can +close if you don't have anymore questions
+close
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.
Thank you for your feedback! Kocher has been awarded 1
. They now have 1206
. They have 2
daily left for today.