#further maths argand diagram
189 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Do you need to know what the modulus is tho?
Think of complex numbers as Ae^it
Like where A is the length or magnitude of those lines
ye they use modulus argument form in the ms
but it makes no sense
Then what do you think the A for z_1 , Z_2 are related by
since the argument isnt pi/4
But the angle between them is right?
ye
Okay so let me draw a picture for you if it helps to make u understand better
Gimme a moment
ok
whats e
$\frac{z_1}{z_2} = \frac{|z_1| e^{i\theta_1}}{|z_2| e^{i\theta_2}}$
[redacted]
no
we have not learnt this
like
You're familiar with trig identities?
ye
this was the ms
Tell me what this turns out to be
Yes
cos(k)cos(l) + i^2sin(k)sin(l) + cos(l)isin(k) + cos(k)isin(l)
oops
pressed enter
wait
Yeah take your time
that?
Yes group the terms
ohhh
Yep
Good job
Now we should try to compute what's 1/cos(k)+isin(k)
Now we should try to compute what's $\frac{1}{cos(k)+isin(k)}$
[redacted]
uh
It's the same with simplifying a+ib
ohh
1/a+ib
so
Yep go ahead
how do i write in like that
So here's a hint
no i mean how do i write so it prints an image
ill just do it normally
Go ahead
rightt
so its just cosk-isink
Now back to your problem
Write OP and OQ in those coordinate forms
Let me know if you didn't understand this
yeah idk
so k is pi/4?
No
But can you see why Z_1 is OP(cos(theta_1)+isin(theta_1))
And Z_2 is OQ(cos(theta_2)+isin(theta_2))
ye thats the modulus argument form
but u dont know the 2 thetas
You don't need to
Just simplify the expressions and let me know
The upshot is knowing theta_2-theta_1 is enough
Which is pi/4
If you're getting stuck in simplifying $\frac{OQ(cos(\theta_2)+isin(\theta_2))}{OP(cos(\theta_1)+isin(\theta_1))}$ then use the previously obtained relations we computed
[redacted]
2(cosxcosy - sinxsiny + i(-cosxsiny + sinxcosy)/(cos^2y+sin^2y)
so
2(cos(x-y) + isin(x-y))
That means you messed up a sign somewhere
It's not
You just need to find why
I showed you the two identities
That we computed
It's just a 2 liner after that
and
x-y = pi/4
because
x is the arguemnt for z2
and y is the argument for z1
and then
its just
2(cospi/4 + isinpi/4)
Yep
So a comment i would like to make is
You did not need to do this
Instead
Use what we obtained
so od i just memorise that
modulus(cos(a-b) +isin(a-b)) would be the 2
divided
ive seen questions like this before
$$\frac{OQ(cos(\theta_2)+isin(\theta_2))}{OP(cos(\theta_1)+isin(\theta_1))}$$
$$=(OQ(cos(\theta_2)+isin(\theta_2)))*\frac{1}{OP(cos(\theta_1)+isin(\theta_1))}$$
[redacted]
Now what was 1/cosk+i sink
cos^2k + sin^2k
o
Here
Now what was (cos(a)+isin(a)) (cos(b)+isin(b))
Cosk-isink
Here
Hence in just a single line you simplify the fraction (thanks to our previous computations) as 2(cos(pi/4)+isin(pi/4))
The upshot is these identities that we obtained
Can be used in many places
You don't always have to fall back to trig identities
That's it, just a comment
yo are u able to help with a mechanics q?
run +close and it'll give you an option to rep
+close
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.
Thank you for your feedback! [redacted] has been awarded 1
. They now have 6
. They have 2
daily left for today.