#Flying Hexagon --in label only--

5 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

lament oasis
#

someone get this kid a gr textbook

lament oasis
#

you could just paste the image into discord?

neat quiver
#

... you could... download the image in your browser. Or take a screenshot.

faint oasis
# neat quiver ... you could... download the image in your browser. Or take a screenshot.

Ok I may have figured out how to it. I see the image of flying hexagon in this message. Your downloading of image was way to go, my tho it wasnt in my downloads. So not sure where it inloaded to, I just expanded image and clicked copy image. thanks.

To be clear, perspective in those days, and today --to whatever degree--- was Euclidean { primary static equanimity }, and,

as I got more I read Fullers conceptual axis spinning of these fundamental 4-fold, 4-fold and 5-fold, great equatorial circles was the first step to 2ndary way conceptualize motion. Fuller thought of spin as the initial primary motion as the 5th dimension, or first powering via spin as motion ergo time.

Of course he states the other, and additional, five primary motions in Synergetics.

Not sure if I mentioned, this 4-fold jittbug of Fullers will transform into 7 or more exotic shapes ---without disconnecting struts to the vertexial tubes at the intersections-- and we can also turn it inside-out { another fundamental motion }, without disconnecting

faint oasis
#

.
Here is another semi-related{?} geo-numerical thingie. Also read about it in Synergetics, and it and link below explains it better than I can. I realized today why sea navigators chose the pentagon in stead of a triangle or square to make sure they were not sailing 180 degrees in the wrong direction.

Triangle and square both have symmetry, and the pentagon has symmetry of five, and that allows for and odd set, that the odd { 3 } triangle will not do for checking navigators math. At least that is my guess. Here is the link. It goes to Robert Grays Synergetics that put on the net back in early or mid-90's{?}

If print is too small, then there is zoom in clicable at bottom of page. It is a color plate/page in Synertics 1 and 2 by Bucy Fuller. I thought about it today because of conservation about prime numbers in another server.

Oh yeah. The way that the flying hexagon relates is that between prime number 3p and 5p there is non-prime 4. Between 5p and 7p there is non-prime number 6. In the photo I posted a message or two earlier above, we see the hexagon has the tail wing as the 7th set of triangle geometry. 6 + 1 = 7th triangle.

4 + 1 = 5th triangle set as pentagon -- not a square-- that allows for sea navigators to not go 180 degrees in the incorrect direction.
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01z.html