#Help
264 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
+close
No eligible helpers were found in this thread. You can still close this post if you don't require helper any longer.
That diagram looks... arbitrary.
I mean this
This is what I meant to do
But I guess it doesn’t work like this?
...that's still arbitrary.
I don’t know what you mean
What do you mean arbitrary
Why do you think it's a square?
"Roots"?
Yes roots
...there aren't any "roots".
We use the roots of unity technique to solve it
And four roots don't make a square, they make a quartic.
That’s what was taught in the exercise
tf is correct?💀
This is what they want me to do
But I’m trying to solve using trig and geometry
I just don’t know how
Because I ain’t doing allat
Yes
The first vector we can say has magnitude 1 and angle pi/2, moving in the pure positive y direction.
Yes
Then the second vector has magnitude 1 and angle (pi/2 - 2pi/9).
Can you extrapolate the third and fourth vectors from this pattern?
There's a very easy way to illustrate this is that it's 2pi/9 4 times, which you can imagine 4 consecutive sides of nonagon 
I don’t understand the second bit
😭
The ant turns right by 2pi/9.
That is, turns clockwise.
Which, in polar coordinates, is a negative angle.
Wait this makes more sense
To me
I don't think it does.
I haven’t done polar yet so I don’t understand the negative angle thing
For one thing, the interior angle of a regular nonagon has measure 7pi/9.
Wait I don’t even understand why this is pi over 2
Have you taken trigonometry?
Yes
Do you know the unit circle definition of trigonometric functions?
my bad
I’m meant to. But um remind me
Magnitude is 1
And like angles sin theta cos theta?
Or smth
The the radius is 1
Okay, so. We begin by drawing the unit circle, which is the circle in the Cartesian plane with radius 1 centered at the origin.
Ok
Then we draw the angle in what's called standard position.
Sure
Standard position is when one ray of the angle coincides with the positive x-axis, the vertex coincides with the origin, and the angle is measured counterclockwise.
Wait lemme try draw this
Like this
?
Exactly like that.
Then the second ray of the angle intersects the circumference of the unit circle at a point, right?
So if the angle has measure theta, that point is defined to be (cos(theta), sin(theta)).
Ok I see
In any case, the important point of that lecture was the point about the standard position of an angle.
Because what's a standard position angle of measure pi/2?
The like y axis?
The entire y axis?
That was my idea.
So as you said it’s a vector magnitude 1 as that’s what the ant has walked through and angle (pi/2-2pi/9) because it’s turning negatively away from the y axis?
It's turning to the right, which is clockwise, which is the negative direction of an angle in standard position.
One thing your lesson is right about is that complex numbers are a convenient way to represent vectors.
I see. So ok back to the treating it as vectors…. The first vector is mag 1 and pi/2
Angle
That is the ant walking forward 1 unit?
As you said
Right.
Why would the second one have the same magnitude
I understand that the angle of it would be pi/2-2pi/9
Because the problem says so.
The ant keeps walking "forward" one unit at every step, where "forward" is the direction it happens to be facing.
Ah I see… so then the pattern is it walks forward 1 unit you do pi/2-2pi/9 it walks forward another 1 unit and you do ((pi/2-2pi/9)-2pi/9)
?
Now the part I don’t get is how to put that into an answer in the form that’s wanted
Well, that's not "the answer", that's just the description of the situation.
Well I’m not sure how to what I said to form it into what they want
They want you to find the distance of the ant from its initial position.
I could draw 3 triangle. And maybe work out the sintheta
And add them up?
No, that's not necessary.
See, that's the beauty of expressing the legs of the ant's journey as vectors.
Because then we can just sum the vectors.
And then the ant's distance from its starting position is just the magnitude of the sum.
This is perhaps where the thing about expressing vectors as complex numbers can help the most.
Because you recall how to represent a complex number in polar form, right?
z = r(costheta + isintheta) where r is magnitude and theta argument
Of the complex number z
I mean, I was looking for z = r e^(i theta).
Oh I also know this
That would be step one of the answer to my next question, which is how do you convert polar form into rectangular form.
Hmmm I’m not sure what you mean by rectangular form
z = a + bi
Ahh
I’d use this
Sub in theta
Right.
And r
So then we want to add our four vectors together.
...where'd you get that?
4 from the 4 times walking one unit
And the angles from -2pi/9 each time
And I just made the negative ones positive
Oh
That is, <x_1, y_1> + <x_2, y_2> = <x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2>.
That's why complex numbers work well as vector representations.
I think I’ve sort of got myself confused. Not really sure how this works
I understand the other questions in this topic but it’s because they sort of told you the methods to do
Like number 5 for example I was able to work through easily
Okay, just take it from the top.
The legs of the ant's journey are vectors.
The total journey is the sum of those vectors.
Ok I’ll try again from the top
The sum of two vectors is the vector whose components are the sum of the corresponding components of the vectors being added.
Surely there’s none with Pi/2 if the ant moves forward 1 unit the magnitude is 1 and it has turned from 2pi 2pi/9 to the right so wouldn’t the first vector be the cos component of that add the sin one
That is, <x_1, y_1> + <x_2, y_2> = <x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2>
...a vector isn't "add" anything.
A vector is two components.
The components are separate.
Sorry just how my teacher explained it 😭
That's why complex numbers are a good representation.
Because the real part and the imaginary part are separate.
And when you add complex numbers, you add real to real and imaginary to imaginary.
Just like when you add vectors, you add x-component to x-component and y-component to y-component.
Yeah I’m struggling to see what the components are
I think that’s the issue
I know the magnitude is 1
A vector is an arrow pointing from the origin to a point on the Cartesian plane.
The vector is therefore defined by the point to which it... points.
So why isn’t the first vector just 1
That’s the magnitude
And it comes from the origin
Because vectors have direction.
Could you go through what the components for the first journey would be
And maybe the second. And I might figure it out from there
I think I’m just fundamentally misunderstanding what you’re saying
So leg 1 has magnitude 1 and angle pi/2.
We need to define both the magnitude and the direction because that's what makes a vector.
Yup
We can equivalently describe this vector by its components, its vertical and horizontal displacement.
Yup I understand that
Which is equivalent to the coordinates of the point to which it points if its base is on the origin.
Yup
...are you familiar with the complex plane?
...no.
No.
The imaginary axis?
Yes.
...yes, and the complex plane is... y'know... the plane. Defined by both of those axes.
Yup ok I understand
...and the complex plane is equivalent to the Cartesian plane.
Or at least analogous.
Yup
...if you don't need me to explain this stuff to you, what do you need explained? Because everything you seem to not be getting is just quite a simple logical consequence of everything you're casually accepting.
I think I just sort of like an explanation of the formation of the horizontal and vertical vectors
So say start with the first journey of the ant
And simply just say what the horizontal and vertical components would be
And I was hoping I’ll just sort of figure it out from there from everything you’ve said
I don’t understand how to form those I think this is the most confusing part of it for me
You have the vector in polar form.
The components are just the vector in rectangular form.
You know how to convert it.
Right.
Ok thank you i think I finally got it.
I think I understood this whole time but I think my brain was just conflicted because I’ve never seen such a context
Maybe it’s the fault of my teaching
I don’t know
But thanks a lot
Yeah, that'd be my assumption. You seem to have been taught a very rote, procedural method of calculation instead of a formal conceptual understanding.
Yeah my teacher goes “don’t bother understanding this just do the method”
Lmao
That's literally not even teaching math.
He literally scrunched up a piece of paper with the backbones of calculus
And threw it in the bin
And said just do the techniques
Without proof, math isn't math, it's just random nonsense.
No need to understand
So I don’t think I’m used to like actually thinking in examples like this which go out of the comfort zone of what I’ve been taught
When I go to university I should probably relearn everything from scratch
That's kind of a problem all over.
And the worst part… is I’m the top scorer of my class 98 average. So I think this shows that teaching styles needs and overhaul. Because the entire course is computational and requires no further understanding apart from the odd question here or there like this one which will never be asked
It's really depressing too, because the beauty of math is how structured and interconnected it is.
If you have any suggestions to fix my deficiencies in maths I’d be glad to take them and do it over summer before uni
I mean, my biggest suggestion is just to seek out proofs.
I wish I had that one teacher who explained everything is such a way like this
But the course I do is high school level so by design teachers won’t teach like this
If there's anything you don't understand, anything you have the slightest doubt about, or even anything that you just kinda wonder why it's like that, look for the proof.
Ok thanks a lot
There is literally a proof that 1 + 1 = 2.
Wow
So would you say to key to improving in maths is understand the bare bone fundamentals
Like I said, it's to understand the proofs, and more generally to develop a precise and logical state of mind.
If I had to describe math in so many words, I'd call it the process of discovering what we already knew.
OK cool thanks a lot
Because every true statement in math is an inevitable logical consequence of our axioms.
The reason we don't know every true statement in math is because we just don't know how the axioms combine to render those consequences.
First I’ll get good at exams sit them. After I’ll try to become a real mathematician
I mean, a strong theoretical understanding will certainly help you in exams.
I don’t really have the time unfortunately
1 month
I can only rely on how I’m being taught + intuition
That's understandable, but if you understand the techniques you're being taught instead of just memorizing them, you'll be able to adapt them on the fly for circumstances you weren't expecting.
I can sort of do this for the regular math course I do but not the extra math course. It’s much newer and more complex pun intended (as it involves complex numbers)
In any case thanks for helping me see math in a different light
No problem. I'm glad this perspective agrees with you, and I'm sad it wasn't taught to you by the people whose job it was.
Well I suppose the school doesn’t see it as practical because we would never get anywhere if we stopped at everything to make sure everything understands it. I suppose the class is made for the average person in the class. And goes at that pace. Me and this other guy finish the work long before the rest but we aren’t really given more challenges ahead of that… it’s like we are forgotten within a class
...if school can't afford to make sure students understand the material, then... it's just fundamentally failing at its job, right?
Yes and that’s why I believe the school system sucks. But then again I suppose it gets complicated because then you may have to split classes by “ability” or I suppose performance. And then it becomes a complex system
So to be fair to them I’m not sure how they’d get it to work to be fair to everyone
Being the learners who are slower to learn and the faster ones
I mean, the issue is just that they're not even teaching the subject they're claiming to.
They're just dropping random alleged facts on your head with no context. That's not how you teach anything.
Yeah true… hopefully I’m not completely stunted for university because I’m really passionate about doing math
At uni
I just wanted to say thank you for your help I really appreciate it
I had all the pieces but for some reason couldn’t put them together effectively at the time. I appreciate it. I’m going to close the post now but wanted to let you know I really appreciated you helping
your vote is the biggest thank for him, so do +close if you're done and vote for him
+close
You have already executed this command; please press "Close Post" to close your help query.
I can’t vote : (
every US citizen above 21 has right to vote 😭
Nvm lol
@fleet glacier
Hello monsieur.charcuter, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.
+close
You have already executed this command; please press "Close Post" to close your help query.