#Calc curve sketching
167 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
can someone please explain how i can sketch it
can you show what your progress is
it doesn't appear to be decreasing between 3 and 7
is it possible can you show me a quick sketch on how it should look?
that would be overhelping
please this is urgent for my tutor ðŸ˜
but it's convex up when x > 5, and decreasing from 5 to 7
what would look like that
im not to sure
what functions can you think of with f'' > 0
parabala?
correct
so whens its (3,5) its a parabola?
uh, except f''(5) has to be 0
so how would that work
i'd try to draw it starting to become more and more linear near 5, i guess
if its possible can i see a quick sketch of it
.
please this is really urgent im willing to pay bc i need to hand this in my tutor in 10 minutes ðŸ˜
is my first graph correct on the left side?
f'(3) should be 0, remember
f'' < 0 for x < 5 should make you think of a downwards-parabola looking thing
wat, why'd you move f(3)
f'' < 0 for x < 5
that's the opposite of what you've drawn
so its wrong? i though f'(3) should be 0
f(3) can be not 0, even when f'(3) = 0
yeah it's not clear but we can infer that you are to draw f
yes
ok so what was wrong with it??
and then this
flat?
well, a downward parabola has a point of flatness
i think you've tried to draw f'(5) = 0
that's not correct, f'(5) should be less than 0 since 5 is between 3 and 7
instead, f''(5) should be 0
you can interpret that as "not curving there"
kinda linear at that point
please can u help me sketch it
i am trying
er, kinda
this was closer
the biggest problem is that it's not decreasing from 3 to 7
if you're not very clear on this topic
then maybe it's good if your tutor knows that
yes
but can i just see what it looks like
please this is really urgent like i said ðŸ˜
well, ask them
i cant this is hw due soon
ill tell them when i hand it in
please man i just really need to see a sketch of it
im desperate please can u just help me 😠😠ðŸ˜
i'm trying
i don't think giving you the answer would help
you should understand why your answer is not right
yes but i feel seeing the graph would make more sense to me ðŸ˜
which is for various reasons depending on which iteration we are talking about
i appreciate your help but can i see what the graph looks like so i can understand better of what youre trying to explain?
up until x = 3
down until x = 7
up after
and then the curving is:
say, slope decreasing until x = 5 after which it starts increasing
yep
isnt that what i did first?|
here you can see there's a spot around x = 5.5 in which it is going up
which it is not supposed to
the when does it stop
it stops going down at x = 7
that's what f' < 0 for 3 < x < 7 and f' > 0 for x > 7 means
no
the value of the function is supposed, as you move from x = 3 to x = 7, to go only downwards, only decrease, from f(3) to f(7)
you are again drawing f'(5) = 0
which is not one of the requirements
?
yeah this is basically right
ohh but what happened to the downward parabola
i think the graph is fine
the downward parabola is akin to the part of the graph x < 5
and the upward parabola is akin to x > 5
the places where f'' is supposed to be negative or positive
ohhh ok tysm for the help i think i get it now ðŸ˜
wait if f''(x)>0 when x>5
does that mean its decreasing?
when f'' > 0, it can be either increasing or decreasing
or flat
f'' is about how the slope is changing, not about the slope
it's like how f' > 0 can allow f to be positive or 0 or negative
hey can u read through my answer and see if its correct?
sorry if my handwriting is atrocious im trying to finish really fast
@torpid quest
it's correct
so niko is partially correct
your graphs are not right, they're backwards, idk why it even asks you to sketch any graphs at all
he is right about it being a poi but not about a ciritcal point
your words are sufficient from my perspective
yeah
f'' > 0 is like a normal parabola and f'' < 0 is like an upside down parabola
you've drawn it downwards when f'' is +
so it starts off decrreasing?
well, as you point out
we can't tell whether f is decreasing or increasing or whatever
since all we have is the f'' information
you can note that f could be increasing all the way, but still look like part of an upside down parabola in one and part of a right side up one in another
you've drawn the same thing twice and neither is right
so how should i change it
well, make it so that f'' < 0 for x > 2 and f'' > 0 for x < 2?
.
i don't know what the confusion you're having is