#Check work
81 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I am a little confused:
- What is the ζ(s) doing in the sum?
- What variable are you integrating with respect to? The only variables I see are (k, s, n), both k and n are those of the sum, and if it was s, then the entire sum is independent and can be pulled out, especially since the ζ is independent of the sum
- For the anti derivative at the bottom, n≠-1, not 1
- Lastly, we usually do not really calculate and use decimal values, we keep things such as ζ(3) (Apèry's constant) or η(3) as they are, since they're considered more-or-less a closed form, using numbers to represent things gets messy, as you can see
From what I understand, you meant ζ(k)? And an empty integral? Just multiplying the difference between Φ and ψ with the value of the sum?
I’m using the Dirichlet Eta Function and Riemann Zeta Function relation on top I wanted to get the divisible number for the bottom and then just replace K with 1-13 and add everything up the use integration to get the answer
You have defined zeta inside the sum itself, without having any k in it
$\int_{\psi}^{\phi}\sum_{k=1}^{13}\frac{2\left(\zeta(s)=\sum_{n\ge1}\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n^3}\right)}{\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{k-1}{6}\pi\right)\cdot\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{k}{6}\pi\right)}$
Leonhard Paul Euler
Yes
Well, there are a few problems
Firstly, the definition of zeta is wrong
This is eta
Secondly, as I mentioned initially, what is the integral with respect to?
What are you integrating
Thirdly, there is no "k" in the numerator
That’s mostly because my friend told me it was the zeta function so I just wrote down the problem he wanted me to solve
I’m pretty sure it is I just didn’t question it
You cannot do that
At k=1, the zeta function is divergent
And the denominator is a product of two sin functions, the most it can be is 1
So this sum diverges
Man, I definitely need some tutoring
I feel like a total dumbass right now
No worries, I like analysis, I can help
Worry not
I think it could be eta(k)?
Since the definition you wrote next to the zeta is that of eta
But still am unsure what the integral is supposed to be doing
My friend told me it was supposed to integrate the whole answer for the summation which sounded kind of weird
Again, I’m just rusty but he thinks I can do all of his work for him
It sounds like nonsense to be honest
Let me rewrite the question
In the way it would make some sense
$\int_{\psi}^{\phi}\dd x\sum_{k=1}^{13}\frac{2\eta(k)}{\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{k-1}{6}\pi\right)\cdot\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{k}{6}\pi\right)}$
Leonhard Paul Euler
So I would only be solving for the summation?
I highly suggest you double check the question with your friends
Then, I can help you solve it
Yeah I took calculus courses in college about five years ago and my friend is taking them now so he thinks I can do anything even though I forgot a big majority of it
I’ll try and solve it now
So he just sent some random nonsense expecting it to mean something?
I didn’t know it was random nonsense at the time, it looked pretty structured based on the notes I took a while back
Nowadays, I just do death metal vocals and work at an aquarium science lab and I haven’t looked back at calculus in an extremely long time but I’m thinking about getting back into it
Any advice?
I highly recommend you start with the basics
Even if as low level as trigonometry
There are thousands of courses and YouTube playlists and books on calculus
Even Coursera has some stuff
the only stuff I know right now is sin, cos, tan, how integration works in the rules for it, and a couple of series and that’s about it
Then you should really get refreshed
I myself am refreshing on some courses
Calculus included
It is good to refresh every once in a while
What kind of math are you mainly practicing right now
Now I am revising complex analysis
Did differential equations, calculus, proofs, number theory, real analysis, etc...
Going over everything
Do you have a job that revolves around this stuff?
I have multiple jobs, one of which is a researcher
And one of my areas of research is math
Oh, the only math my job requires is basic geometry for tank sizes and gallon estimates
That’s not my job, all I do is build what was already planned
@main onyx would you say that math skills equate to intelligence? Or is it just something that anyone can do if they study long enough?
Of course some sort of intelligence is required, from the point of, take someone that has brain issues, of course they cannot do complex math, but for the average person, I say with a good enough teacher, and enough time, they can do some advanced math pretty well
Hmm what are some online teachers you would recommend?