#Sequence test

44 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

nocturne lion
#

If $(x_n)$ is a sequence of positive real nunbers such that $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{x_{n+1}}{x_n} = L > 1$ how to show $x_n$ diverges?

tulip spadeBOT
white summitBOT
#
  1. Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  2. Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
  3. Do not ping other members randomly for help.
  4. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  5. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  6. If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:

+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:

nocturne lion
#

Assume $x_n$ converges to $a$, then $$x_{n+1} = \frac{x_{n+1}}{x_n} * x_n$$ and taking limit both sides we get $$a = La \implies L=1$$ which is a contradiction

tulip spadeBOT
nocturne lion
#

Is this right

tender topaz
nocturne lion
tender topaz
#

Here it's in the limit, so it's not equal to that, but it still behaves like that.

nocturne lion
agile locust
#

but a=0 is also a possibility

#

@nocturne lion

#

If we assume for a contradiction x_n converges to 0 then for all k > N we have x_{n+1}/x_n > 1

#

where N is large enough

#

then

#

$$\frac{|x_k|}{|x_N|} = \frac{|x_k|}{|x_{k-1}|}\ldots\frac{|x_{N+1}|}{|x_N|} > 1$$

tulip spadeBOT
agile locust
#

but then $$|x_k| > |x_N| > 0$$

tulip spadeBOT
agile locust
#

contradicting the assumption that x_k converges to 0

#

this is the same argument we can use to prove the d'Alembert test for divergence of series

violet wadi
#

Set $k=\frac{L+1}2>1.$ There exists $N$ such that $x_{n+1}>k\ x_n$ for $n\ge N$, hence $x_{n+m}>k^m\ x_n.$ As $k^m$ can be made arbitrary large, $(x_n)$ tends to $+\cal1$.

tulip spadeBOT
#

mimshell

nocturne lion
nocturne lion
agile locust
# nocturne lion why is this?

because by assumption the ratio converges to L > 1, so eventually the ratios must be larger than 1+\delta for some delta > 0

tulip spadeBOT
nocturne lion
tulip spadeBOT
agile locust
#

how do you go from this

#

to this

#

even for n=1

nocturne lion
#

n > N

nocturne lion
nocturne lion
#

@agile locust so, do you consider that what I did is correct?

abstract havenBOT
#

@nocturne lion

<:HelpIcon:1304095958283321385>| Help Reminder

Hello halex6825, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.

abstract havenBOT
#

@agile locust @violet wadi @tender topaz The user still needs help with this help request.

nocturne lion
#

+close

abstract havenBOT
# nocturne lion +close
Please thank your Helpers before closing!

Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.

abstract havenBOT
# abstract haven

Thank you for your feedback! aL has been awarded 1 helper_points. They now have 867 helper_points. They have 3 helper_points daily left for today.