#rational number proof
34 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
(b) No. let a = 0 and b = sqrt(3) then ab = 0, which is rational.
yes
Assuming a,b could be 0, then no
Otherwise for non-zero rational & irrational values, yes
~~tex {C}
Yes. Let $a = \sqrt{\sqrt{2}}$, then $a ^ {2} = \sqrt{2}$, $a ^ {4} = 2$
anonymous190
~tex {a}
If a is rational and b is irrational: suppose ${a+b} \in Q$, then $a+b = \frac{c}{d}$ where $c \in Z$ and $d \in Z$. Suppose $a = \frac{a_1}{a_2}$, where $a_1 \in Z$ and $a_2 \in Z$. Then $b = \frac{a_{2}c - da_1}{da_2} \in Q$.
anonymous190
Indeed. Don't forget your conclusion, what does your work show, what's the final answer?
And do you have a counterexample of a+b being rational while a and b are both irrational?
How to draw to conclusion?
@shrewd spade
Hello anonymous190, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.
What do you mean?
You showed that b must be rational, when a+b and a are rational.
So.. the answer is obvious.
@undone flume @spiral plaza @clear otter The user still needs help with this help request.
?
Well you just shown b in Q, but that wasn't the question, you assumed b is irrational. So what I means with not forgetting to write a conclusion is saying
"this is a contradiction, we assumed b was irrational so it can't be in Q, so a+b with a rational and b irrational cannot satisfy a+b in Q. So a sum of a irrational number and a rational number must be irrational."
Ofcourse I'm using a bit many words but you can't just end a proof with "b in Q" if you need to make a contradiction to actually finish your proof
And the question (a) asks for the sum of a,b both irrational too.
Can you think of a counter-example such that a,b is irrational but a+b is rational, or can you proof this is impossible?
Isn’t this proof by contrapositive?
Look at your proof here. You start with "if b is irrational" and you finish with "b in Q" which means b is rational
So this is a proof by contradiction. You make a assumption, then proof that you get a contradiction, so the assumption must be wrong
What’s the difference between proof by contradiction and contrapositive?
I'd say intuitively it's pretty close. Contraposition is more strictly in logic, so really formulating a P⇒Q and then proving not Q ⇒ not P
I'd use the word contradiction when just writing out proofs in language, so when you say "we assume" and then disprove that assumption later, whereas with contrapositive I'd really start proving implications between logical statements
but quite possible some pedantic logicist can see this chat and angrily explain the exact difference between the 2 😃
SPiVaK!!
+close
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.
Thank you for your feedback! Jehare has been awarded 1
. They now have 4
. They have 3
daily left for today.