#the eqs (1) x^2 + ax + b = 0 and (2) x^2 + cx + d = 0 have exactly one common root
11 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
The calculation itself seems fine (some brackets are needed, though), but I think you also need to somehow use the fact that not only p^2 + ap + b = p^2 + cp + d, but they are also both equal to 0.
Apart from that, I have another idea.
Suppose f(x) = x^2 + ax + b and g(x) = x^2 + cx + d.
Let's take f(x)g(x). It's a polynomial with exactly one root of multiplicity 2, so itself and its derivative have a common factor. So, maybe that can be done somehow?
try vieta formula?
@neat schooner
Hello pimadorr_36566, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.
consider the roots of the first equation to be t and w, and the roots of the seconds equation to be t and z. (t is the common root)
Then you have t + w = -a, tw = b and t + z = -c, tz = d
Just solve for the second equations other root (in this case z) in terms of the coefficients.
(t + w) - (t + z) = (-a) - (-c)
=> w - z = c - a .... (i)
Now we just gotta represent w in terms of a,b,c or d
tw = b and tz = d
=> t = b/w and t = d/z
=> b/w = d/z => w = bz/d
Sub it in (i)
=> bz/d - z = c - a
=> z(b/d - 1) = c - a
=> z[(b - d)/d] = c - a
=> z = (c - a)d / (b - d)
Option A
I dont know why yall are complicating it so much tho, derivatives in a basic quadratic equation problem ??
Oh, good idea!
Well, just a possible alternative approach.
thank you! now it seems like this problem was really simple i don't know why i was unable to solve it 