#Irreducible polynomials
46 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
tautau
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:

usually one asks whether this polynomial is irreducible over Z_p
what do you mean by "irreducible over Q(X)"?
@violet fox
rational numbers
yeah i know but i dont kno how
assume f is reducible over Q, what does that mean?
yeah there would be a epresentation of f= gq
such that?
degree of both are smaller than degree of f
correct, now what if you took the same product of polynomials modulo p?
degree smaller than p
conclusion?
contradiction becuase f hast degree p
contradiction with what?
that deg g + deg q = p
why is that a problem?
because deg f = deg g + deg q if f was reducible
yes, if we assume for a contradiction f was reducible over Q, then it would follow f is also reducible over Z_p
now show that x^p - x + 1 is irreducible over Z_p and you're done
this is a known exercise
so if i now take that polynomial mod p then it would be constant 1 because of langrange theorem
huh
polynomial modulo p means the coefficients are calculated mod p, that's all
oh true
and how do i then show it is irreducible over Z_p
sorry my brain seems blocked
no rush, we can continue some other time
maybe because over Z_p it has no zero
well its also primitive
there are many paths to victory
well the polynomial has no roots of it would be reducible i could maybe show that eather g or q has a root and that would contradict
no roots just shows there are no linear factors
but that doesn't imply irreducible
Show by induction that if g(x) is a monic irreducible factor of f(x), then g(x+n) is also a factor where n in N
f(x) = x^p - x + 1 in this case
okay thanks i will try
@violet fox
Hello eliashkp, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.